[15:26] <tseliot> tjaalton: can you have a look at the nvidia-glx-dev.postrm.in of the lrm, please?
[15:26] <tseliot> maybe it's just my impression but I think there's something wrong with them
[15:28] <tseliot> for example shouldn't be looking for /usr/lib/libGL.so in the 1st diversion instead of /usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.xlibmesa ?
[19:04] <tjaalton> tseliot: no it's correct
[19:05] <tjaalton> hmm
[19:07] <tjaalton> it doesn't seem to remove the diversion of /usr/lib/libGL.so
[19:14] <tjaalton> ah
[19:15] <tjaalton> wrong package
[19:24] <tjaalton> tseliot: it's irrelevant which one dpkg-divert lists, they both give the same result
[20:18] <tseliot> yes, I tried to say 2 things at the same time. I wanted to say that it should remove the diversion made by the -dev package
[20:23] <tseliot> ﻿tjaalton: the other problem which I wanted to report might be specific to my own packages (nvidia-glx.postrm.in) . I have yet to see if the same problem affects the default lrm. I'll let you know if it does.
[21:39] <tjaalton> tseliot: it does remove them all
[21:44] <tseliot> ﻿tjaalton: in my packages (for some reason) /usr/lib32 is removed before the diversions are removed. It might depend on my rules though. The .postrm itself is ok.
[21:48] <tjaalton> ok
[23:56] <pwnguin> are the openGL manpages under an evil license?
[23:59] <jcristau> if by evil you mean not free, then yes, iirc