[05:35] bryce: maybe diff the id's and ask upstream why radeonhd has more [05:36] I'm not sure if -ati refuses to load if the id is not listed, like nv does [05:36] but if yes, then it's probably the reason why it fails to load [05:36] ok, that's essentially what I did (I posted a patch to add it to upstream) [05:37] just that or all of them? [05:37] just the one id [05:38] ok [05:39] I think the answer to all the id's in general is "work in progress". I asked Alex at XDC about radeonhd vs. ati and he said he hoped to see the two get merged together, but didn't have a feel on when or how [05:39] there are three id's missing from -ati that -radeonhd has [05:39] comparing the versions hardy has.. [05:39] right, the current situation is a bit silly [05:40] it's all due to that atombios stuff [05:40] yep.. [05:40] the missing id's: 1002793F, 10027941, 10027942 [05:56] bryce: according to radeonhd, 7942 is a RS600 chip [05:57] hah, alex made a proposed patch [05:57] with the three id's that were missing and other stuff [06:10] awesome [06:10] hmm, I wondered about if it was a 600 but wikipedia said otherwise. But alex will know best [06:15] yes, it's confusing that the patch uses both 600 and 690, but I'll trust him :) [07:52] erf, unfortunately alex's patch doesn't apply against 6.8 [07:52] hrm [09:47] tjaalton: I uploaded the xserver git tree. What do you think of the patch in 219424? [09:48] bug 219424 [09:48] Launchpad bug 219424 in ubuntu-ps3-port "xorg-server wrongly tries to load 'vesa' driver instead of 'fbdev' on PS3" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/219424 [09:53] bryce: apparently it works, and doesn't look too scary to me [09:56] ok, I'll check it in tomorrow unless you beat me to it. :-) but bedtime for now. night. [10:01] night [10:01] damn mini-flu, just in time for UDS [11:51] what's the deal with i915tex_dri.so? [11:51] the intel manpage suggests it's new and shiny, but almost never used, and we don't seem to ship it [11:53] libgl1-mesa-dri: /usr/lib/dri/i915tex_dri.so [11:54] so it's shipped, but I don't know which chips use it [11:54] it's only used with option legacy3d off [11:55] and it's merged with i915 in master [11:56] ah, ok [12:56] it sounds like it ought to be a good thing, but the manpage says it's defaulted to off for my chipset (965) [12:58] 965 uses a different dri driver anyway [12:59] ah :) [12:59] oh yes, i965_dri.so. wtg me for not ls'ing that directory ;) [17:38] Hi bryce, tjaalton. Re the patches for PS3. I've just been speaking with cjwatson I'm getting an idea now of how best to proceed. [17:38] Instead of worrying about Hardy could we get [17:38] these fixes into intrepid first so we can try out on a daily CD build [17:38] ? [17:45] munckfish: they are there already, uploaded today [17:46] tjaalton: cool! thx [17:46] tjaalton: I was looking here http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-xorg/debian/xorg.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/ubuntu [17:51] tjaalton: sorry there are 3 fixes I'm referring to I can only see the crash fix in the repos and the current intrepid release shown on LP [17:51] is this what you mean or am I looking in the wrong place? [17:57] munckfish: oh right [17:58] tjaalton: ok np having the crash bug is uploaded is a great start [18:00] tjaalton: when would you or bryce likely have time to review the other two? (for ref I detailed all here: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-x/2008-May/000158.html) [18:04] munckfish: bryce said he'd upload the other patch today, dexconf looks good to me as well [18:04] I'm busy the next couple of days, preparing for fosscamp/uds and some work stuff [18:05] tjaalton: ok thx for the info. [20:58] heya munckfish [20:58] Hi bryce how's it going? [20:59] pretty good... got distracted by the ssl advisory but am working on your patches. [21:00] oh great [21:00] thx v much [21:13] hi bryce, just wanted to remind you on that white screen bug. did'nt see any activity wrg to SRUs and what not [21:14] mario_limonciell: ah sorry, been working through a backlog of requests. Will get to it soon [21:14] thanks :) [21:14] mario_limonciell: this was the compiz patch issue? [21:14] yeah [21:14] bug 160624 i think [21:14] Launchpad bug 160624 in xserver-xorg-input-synaptics "synaptics driver disregards some xorg.conf settings" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/160624 [21:14] ok [21:14] nope um [21:15] bug 160264 maybe [21:15] Launchpad bug 160264 in dell "[nvidia] compiz displays white screen when locked" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/160264 [21:15] yeah that's it [21:16] mario_limonciell: I am finishing up a couple things for munckfish then will get on that, probably later today [21:16] ok [21:31] munckfish: is there a LP# for the dexconf change? [21:31] ah no fraid not [21:31] I discovered the problem [21:32] while trying to see if I could get dexconf to [21:32] ok, well there will need to be a LP# in order to SRU it. [21:32] I'll file one [21:32] set explicit driver [21:32] ok fine fine [21:32] sorry [21:32] I should've done it [21:33] 230091 [21:34] would you mind subscribing to that? [21:35] sure [21:35] LP 230091 [21:35] Launchpad bug 230091 in xorg "ps3 platform not detected correctly by ps3" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/230091 [21:37] Ok subscribed [23:04] thx for uploading those fixes bryce! [23:05] munckfish: sure! make sure to test, and then file sru's as appropriate. I'll get the xorg changes into hardy-proposed next. [23:06] ok sort of don't understand - if you're putting em into hardy proposed [23:06] then why am I doing SRUs? [23:06] or do you mean SRUs if I find anything else? [23:06] in order to go from hardy-proposed to hardy-updates, it requires an SRU to be filed [23:06] ok I see [23:06] so they sit in proposed till I do that [23:07] exactly [23:07] these fixes should be available on the next intrepid live cd build though right? [23:07] right [23:07] perfect [23:07] cheers! [23:07] if that's sufficient for you, we can skip the sru - but let me know [23:16] that's sufficient for me to get to a point where we can test installation [23:16] but the target is 8.04.1 so I guess I'll file SRUs to get them back into hardy [23:16] ok cool [23:17] what sort of window of time should I leave before 8.04.1? A week or longer? [23:17] for filing the SRUs in time I mean [23:18] expect it to take 2+ weeks for the SRU to go through [23:54] ok understood. right I'm off to sleep. See ya. [23:54] cya