[05:35] <tjaalton> bryce: maybe diff the id's and ask upstream why radeonhd has more
[05:36] <tjaalton> I'm not sure if -ati refuses to load if the id is not listed, like nv does
[05:36] <tjaalton> but if yes, then it's probably the reason why it fails to load
[05:36] <bryce> ok, that's essentially what I did (I posted a patch to add it to upstream)
[05:37] <tjaalton> just that or all of them?
[05:37] <bryce> just the one id
[05:38] <tjaalton> ok
[05:39] <bryce> I think the answer to all the id's in general is "work in progress".  I asked Alex at XDC about radeonhd vs. ati and he said he hoped to see the two get merged together, but didn't have a feel on when or how
[05:39] <tjaalton> there are three id's missing from -ati that -radeonhd has
[05:39] <tjaalton> comparing the versions hardy has..
[05:39] <tjaalton> right, the current situation is a bit silly
[05:40] <bryce> it's all due to that atombios stuff
[05:40] <tjaalton> yep..
[05:40] <tjaalton> the missing id's: 1002793F, 10027941, 10027942
[05:56] <tjaalton> bryce: according to radeonhd, 7942 is a RS600 chip
[05:57] <tjaalton> hah, alex made a proposed patch
[05:57] <tjaalton> with the three id's that were missing and other stuff
[06:10] <bryce> awesome
[06:10] <bryce> hmm, I wondered about if it was a 600 but wikipedia said otherwise.  But alex will know best
[06:15] <tjaalton> yes, it's confusing that the patch uses both 600 and 690, but I'll trust him :)
[07:52] <bryce> erf, unfortunately alex's patch doesn't apply against 6.8
[07:52] <bryce> hrm
[09:47] <bryce> tjaalton: I uploaded the xserver git tree.  What do you think of the patch in 219424?
[09:48] <tjaalton> bug 219424
[09:53] <tjaalton> bryce: apparently it works, and doesn't look too scary to me
[09:56] <bryce> ok, I'll check it in tomorrow unless you beat me to it.  :-)  but bedtime for now.  night.
[10:01] <tjaalton> night
[10:01] <tjaalton> damn mini-flu, just in time for UDS
[11:51] <Ng> what's the deal with i915tex_dri.so?
[11:51] <Ng> the intel manpage suggests it's new and shiny, but almost never used, and we don't seem to ship it
[11:53] <tjaalton> libgl1-mesa-dri: /usr/lib/dri/i915tex_dri.so
[11:54] <tjaalton> so it's shipped, but I don't know which chips use it
[11:54] <jcristau> it's only used with option legacy3d off
[11:55] <jcristau> and it's merged with i915 in master
[11:56] <tjaalton> ah, ok
[12:56] <Ng> it sounds like it ought to be a good thing, but the manpage says it's defaulted to off for my chipset (965)
[12:58] <jcristau> 965 uses a different dri driver anyway
[12:59] <Ng> ah :)
[12:59] <Ng> oh yes, i965_dri.so. wtg me for not ls'ing that directory ;)
[17:38] <munckfish> Hi bryce, tjaalton. Re the patches for PS3. I've just been speaking with cjwatson I'm getting an idea now of how best to proceed.
[17:38] <munckfish> Instead of worrying about Hardy could we get 
[17:38] <munckfish> these fixes into intrepid first so we can try out on a daily CD build
[17:38] <munckfish> ?
[17:45] <tjaalton> munckfish: they are there already, uploaded today
[17:46] <munckfish> tjaalton: cool! thx
[17:46] <munckfish> tjaalton: I was looking here http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-xorg/debian/xorg.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/ubuntu
[17:51] <munckfish> tjaalton: sorry there are 3 fixes I'm referring to I can only see the crash fix in the repos and the current intrepid release shown on LP
[17:51] <munckfish> is this what you mean or am I looking in the wrong place?
[17:57] <tjaalton> munckfish: oh right
[17:58] <munckfish> tjaalton: ok np having the crash bug is uploaded is a great start
[18:00] <munckfish> tjaalton: when would you or bryce likely have time to review the other two? (for ref I detailed all here: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-x/2008-May/000158.html)
[18:04] <tjaalton> munckfish: bryce said he'd upload the other patch today, dexconf looks good to me as well
[18:04] <tjaalton> I'm busy the next couple of days, preparing for fosscamp/uds and some work stuff
[18:05] <munckfish> tjaalton: ok thx for the info.
[20:58] <bryce> heya munckfish
[20:58] <munckfish> Hi bryce how's it going?
[20:59] <bryce> pretty good...  got distracted by the ssl advisory but am working on your patches.
[21:00] <munckfish> oh great
[21:00] <munckfish> thx v much
[21:13] <mario_limonciell> hi bryce, just wanted to remind you on that white screen bug.  did'nt see any activity wrg to SRUs and what not
[21:14] <bryce> mario_limonciell: ah sorry, been working through a backlog of requests.  Will get to it soon
[21:14] <mario_limonciell> thanks :)  
[21:14] <bryce> mario_limonciell: this was the compiz patch issue?
[21:14] <mario_limonciell> yeah
[21:14] <mario_limonciell> bug 160624 i think
[21:14] <bryce> ok
[21:14] <mario_limonciell> nope um
[21:15] <mario_limonciell> bug 160264 maybe
[21:15] <mario_limonciell> yeah that's it
[21:16] <bryce> mario_limonciell: I am finishing up a couple things for munckfish then will get on that, probably later today
[21:16] <mario_limonciell> ok
[21:31] <bryce> munckfish: is there a LP# for the dexconf change?
[21:31] <munckfish> ah no fraid not
[21:31] <munckfish> I discovered the problem
[21:32] <munckfish> while trying to see if I could get dexconf to
[21:32] <bryce> ok, well there will need to be a LP# in order to SRU it.
[21:32] <bryce> I'll file one
[21:32] <munckfish> set explicit driver
[21:32] <munckfish> ok fine fine
[21:32] <munckfish> sorry
[21:32] <munckfish> I should've done it
[21:33] <bryce> 230091
[21:34] <bryce> would you mind subscribing to that?
[21:35] <munckfish> sure
[21:35] <munckfish> LP 230091
[21:37] <munckfish> Ok subscribed
[23:04] <munckfish> thx for uploading those fixes bryce!
[23:05] <bryce> munckfish: sure!  make sure to test, and then file sru's as appropriate.  I'll get the xorg changes into hardy-proposed next.
[23:06] <munckfish> ok sort of don't understand - if you're putting em into hardy proposed
[23:06] <munckfish> then why am I doing SRUs?
[23:06] <munckfish> or do you mean SRUs if I find anything else?
[23:06] <bryce> in order to go from hardy-proposed to hardy-updates, it requires an SRU to be filed
[23:06] <munckfish> ok I see
[23:06] <munckfish> so they sit in proposed till I do that
[23:07] <bryce> exactly
[23:07] <munckfish> these fixes should be available on the next intrepid live cd build though right?
[23:07] <bryce> right
[23:07] <munckfish> perfect
[23:07] <munckfish> cheers!
[23:07] <bryce> if that's sufficient for you, we can skip the sru - but let me know
[23:16] <munckfish> that's sufficient for me to get to a point where we can test installation
[23:16] <munckfish> but the target is 8.04.1 so I guess I'll file SRUs to get them back into hardy
[23:16] <bryce> ok cool
[23:17] <munckfish> what sort of window of time should I leave before 8.04.1? A week or longer?
[23:17] <munckfish> for filing the SRUs in time I mean
[23:18] <bryce> expect it to take 2+ weeks for the SRU to go through
[23:54] <munckfish> ok understood. right I'm off to sleep. See ya.
[23:54] <bryce> cya