| eross | I don't think it's worth 160-300 to trademark much of my stuff | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| eross | more hobby than anything | 00:01 |
| === kiko is now known as kiko-afk | ||
| === salgado is now known as salgado-afk | ||
| === jamesh__ is now known as jamesh | ||
| === boomer` is now known as boomer | ||
| === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn | ||
| asabil_ | thumper: yes thanks, the vala branch seems fine now | 08:22 |
| thumper | great | 08:23 |
| philn | hi | 08:55 |
| philn | gmb: hi! i see you imported the new dump.. seems fine with attachments now | 09:21 |
| gmb | philn: No, I didn't yet (not on demo., anyway) I just altered the attachments on demo so that they'd show up :) | 09:29 |
| jamesh | philn: I noticed a bit of comment spam in the imported bugs | 09:30 |
| jamesh | e.g. https://bugs.demo.launchpad.net/elisa/+bug/194393 | 09:31 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 194393 in file-roller "Archive Manager can't extract to FTP server (dup-of: 150877)" [Low,Invalid] | 09:31 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 150877 in file-roller "Can't extract to non-local directories" [Low,Confirmed] | 09:31 |
| jamesh | ubottu: wrong. | 09:31 |
| ubottu | Factoid wrong. not found | 09:31 |
| philn | jamesh: ha, yes.. there's a bit of spam.. what can we do about that? | 09:32 |
| jamesh | philn: LP administrators can remove spam comments | 09:33 |
| jamesh | the other option is to filter them out of the dump | 09:33 |
| philn | i can add akismet support to my conversion script | 09:33 |
| jamesh | I haven't really looked at how extensive the problem might be, so am not sure which option is best | 09:34 |
| jamesh | it might be better to kill the comments before hand, since we probably don't want to create person records for the spammers in LP | 09:35 |
| philn | i think we have only few comments spam.. something like 4 or 5 at most | 09:35 |
| jamesh | https://bugs.demo.launchpad.net/~zlgdgzl/+bugs?field.searchtext=&orderby=-importance&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INVALID&field.status%3Alist=WONTFIX&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.status%3Alist=FIXRELEASED&assignee_option=any | 09:37 |
| jamesh | &field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_contact=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=&field.status_upstream-empty-marker=1&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.has_patch.used=&field.has_cve.used=&field.tag=&field.tags_combinator=ANY <- all of these bugs seem to have spam | 09:37 |
| jamesh | bah. | 09:37 |
| philn | do ya know tinyurl.com ? ;) | 09:37 |
| philn | hmm ok i'll have a look | 09:38 |
| jamesh | https://bugs.demo.launchpad.net/~zlgdgzl/+bugs?field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=WONTFIX&field.status%3Alist=FIXRELEASED | 09:38 |
| jamesh | short enough? :) | 09:39 |
| philn | i'll just add a usernames blacklist, since this seems related to a single user | 09:39 |
| jamesh | yeah. | 09:39 |
| jamesh | with anonymous access, user accounts are usually either all spam or no spam | 09:40 |
| jamesh | without anonymous access, that is. | 09:40 |
| philn | gmb: dump-08-05-16.xml.gz available at usual location | 09:45 |
| gmb | philn: Thanks. | 09:45 |
| philn | btw, when do you plan to have an export feature in LP? | 09:48 |
| jamesh | philn: we've got an administrative export script, so can provide data in pretty much the same form you've provided us | 09:49 |
| jamesh | getting things hooked up so that project owners can get regular dumps has been a todo item for a while | 09:49 |
| jamesh | but we can definitely provide data on request | 09:49 |
| philn | ah, interesting | 09:50 |
| philn | when do you plan to get the relax-ng schema "stable"? | 09:50 |
| philn | (and public) | 09:51 |
| jamesh | gmb or BjornT might be able to answer that | 09:52 |
| BjornT | philn: i don't know yet. i'm going to talk to people about it next week. it mainly needs a review before it can be released. the released and stable schema will probably be a bit different (but quite similar) than the current one, though. | 09:57 |
| philn | BjornT: ok, thx for the answer | 10:07 |
| gmb | philn: I'll get the dump re-imported on demo.lp.net this afternoon (I need a sysadmin to help me and they're all five hours behind me at least). | 10:08 |
| gmb | In the meantime I'll run it locally. | 10:09 |
| philn | ok.. i think this dump will be good to go live | 10:10 |
| gmb | Cool. | 10:10 |
| gmb | philn: Assuming all's good I think we'll be able to get that done today. | 10:10 |
| philn | awesome | 10:11 |
| philn | i had one more question, about privacy.. shouldn't we ask the bug reporters if they mind their trac account being moved over LP? | 10:12 |
| philn | will bug reporters receive a mail from LP about that? asking for LP user creation confirmation or something like that? | 10:14 |
| gmb | philn: If they don't have a Launchpad account already, no. | 10:14 |
| gmb | (And for a lot of them their email address will be @elisa.bugs.invalid anyway) | 10:15 |
| philn | not the majority | 10:15 |
| gmb | Right. | 10:16 |
| gmb | philn: But even those that have valid email addresses will only have dormant accounts created for them (unless the email addresses are already registered in Launchpad, too, like yours is). | 10:17 |
| gmb | But they won't receive any notifications from the import. | 10:17 |
| gmb | It's up to you as far as privacy is concerned. If you'd rather check with your users before we proceed to import the bugs on production that's fine. | 10:18 |
| philn | well i guess it's fine if the accounts are dormant | 10:24 |
| gmb | Okay. | 10:29 |
| === stu1 is now known as stub | ||
| === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch | ||
| === salgado-afk is now known as salgado | ||
| === jamesh_ is now known as jamesh | ||
| === _neversfelde is now known as neversfelde | ||
| === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell | ||
| === EdwinGrub is now known as EdwinGrubbs | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| philn | gmb: little issue it seems: https://bugs.demo.launchpad.net/elisa/+bug/195093 https://code.fluendo.com/elisa/trac/ticket/914 | 15:27 |
| ubottu | philn: Error: This bug is private | 15:27 |
| gmb | philn: Hmm. It's stripped everything except the <pre> block, it seems. | 15:28 |
| gmb | That's odd. | 15:28 |
| philn | yes :( | 15:28 |
| philn | looks like it's on my side | 15:29 |
| gmb | Ah. | 15:29 |
| philn | new dump, same location | 15:47 |
| gmb | philn: Thanks. It looks like the re-import to demo is going to have to be delayed since we've got to reset the database first and that currently takes a long time (it's a big database). If I get chance to do it today I'll let you know. | 15:51 |
| philn | ok, thx.. sorry this is a painful and long test process :/ | 15:54 |
| === kiko-afk is now known as kiko | ||
| gmb | philn: Me too; one of our aims is to make this much smoother for everyone involved - especially you, the user :) | 15:56 |
| kiko | gmb, philn: the future is philn going to demo, uploading his tarball, pushing a button, getting notified when it's ready, reviewing the bugs, and then saying "yes, push to lpnet" or "no, let's fix something first" | 16:00 |
| gmb | kiko: Right. | 16:00 |
| === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn | ||
| === Spads_ is now known as Spads | ||
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
| luisbg_ | why do I keep getting "Transport operation not possible: http does not support mkdir()" ? | 16:30 |
| luisbg_ | I have done bzr launchpad-login | 16:30 |
| luisbg_ | wait | 16:30 |
| luisbg_ | ok, sorry, nevermind | 16:32 |
| jetsaredim | what's the deal with having to re-gen the ssh keys again | 16:52 |
| kiko | jetsaredim, security issue | 16:52 |
| jetsaredim | twice tho? | 16:52 |
| gnomefreak | :( | 17:18 |
| === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch | ||
| gnomefreak | why am i still getting security notices about my ssh key. i got it about an hour ago and i fixed it last night. key is still on LP page atm | 17:19 |
| kiko | jetsaredim, I'm not sure -- mrevell? | 17:20 |
| mrevell | jetsaredim: Hi. | 17:22 |
| mrevell | gnomefreak, jetsaredim: We ran ssh-vulnkey again against each of the SSH keys registered in LP accounts. That should that that some keys which had been registered since my original email had vulnerabilities. | 17:25 |
| mrevell | the good news is that Launchpad will no longer accept vulnerable keys. | 17:25 |
| kiko | mrevell, should or showed? :) | 17:25 |
| mrevell | sorry kiko, yeah, showed :) | 17:26 |
| gnomefreak | mrevell: so mine is safe? | 17:27 |
| gnomefreak | or is it gonna be removed again | 17:27 |
| mrevell | gnomefreak: Did you receive an email from me just now? | 17:27 |
| gnomefreak | mrevell: ~1hour ago | 17:27 |
| gnomefreak | hint its a brand new key with ssh-vulnkey ran on it last night | 17:28 |
| gnomefreak | i think it was 4 lines of not blacklisted IIRC | 17:28 |
| gnomefreak | kiko was here :) | 17:29 |
| kiko | yes | 17:29 |
| kiko | I'm always here after all! | 17:29 |
| mrevell | gnomefreak: when did you upload the key? The test was run around 20.00 UTC last night. | 17:30 |
| mrevell | mthaddon may be able to explain better. | 17:30 |
| gnomefreak | before that i think | 17:30 |
| mthaddon | gnomefreak, is it possible you had multiple keys and we deleted only one of them? | 17:30 |
| gnomefreak | it was around dinner time ETC iirc | 17:30 |
| gnomefreak | mthaddon: no i only uploaded one key last night | 17:31 |
| gnomefreak | because it wouldnt let me upload the old key so i made a new one | 17:31 |
| mthaddon | gnomefreak, can you try re-uploading the same key now and if it allows you to do so, then we've mistakenly deleted your key and can only apologise - if it doesn't, then the key did indeed need to be deleted | 17:32 |
| gnomefreak | mthaddon: its there | 17:32 |
| gnomefreak | was a sec ago | 17:32 |
| gnomefreak | still there, hence why im asking why i got email if key is good :)\ | 17:33 |
| mthaddon | gnomefreak, let me run my script again and see if it flags it as a problem (the same script I ran yesterday) - if so, I'll need to see what was wrong with my script | 17:33 |
| gnomefreak | would be nice if LP kept track of time we change things like that for user interface | 17:33 |
| gnomefreak | reason i didnt keep old key was because after updates autpo regened key it still wasnt secure so i made a new one | 17:35 |
| gnomefreak | autoregen | 17:35 |
| mthaddon | gnomefreak, the same script I ran yesterday is no longer finding your key as vulnerable, so I'm not really sure what happened yesterday... | 17:37 |
| gnomefreak | mthaddon: the email was ~1hour ago thats why im wondering | 17:38 |
| gnomefreak | key uploaded over 12 hours ago | 17:38 |
| mthaddon | gnomefreak, the deletion was done a while back (I'll try and get you an exact time), but the email was only sent out recently | 17:39 |
| gnomefreak | oh ok i thought they were done around same time | 17:40 |
| mthaddon | no, there was a definite lag - I did the deletion as soon as the code landed, but mrevell is in a different timezone, so didn't send out the message til next day his time | 17:40 |
| mthaddon | gnomefreak, does that clear things up a bit ^ | 17:41 |
| === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado | ||
| elho | hi | 17:48 |
| elho | hmm, i assume the topic tries to imply that only blacklisted ssh keys are supposed to not work? | 17:49 |
| kiko | right | 17:49 |
| kiko | is it unclear? | 17:50 |
| elho | well, could've been as a reason all keys are disabled for now or sth... | 17:52 |
| elho | my launchpad only key for mirroring to sourcecontrol.net was indeed bad, i had it removed via the webinterface right away 2 days ago. my other main key is fine (old rsa) and i did create a new key for mirroring and added it. yet i do get permission denied trying to mirror using tla or a manual sftp. | 17:52 |
| statik | i deleted my key, added a new one, and have been able to authenticate just fine from several different machines and operating systems | 17:55 |
| kiko | same here, elho | 17:56 |
| elho | due to the sftp server on sourcecontrol not closing its connection properly, i do not have the mirror running via cron, so it may well have stopped working before... | 17:56 |
| elho | kiko: ah, so its at least not just me ;) | 17:57 |
| kiko | elho, I meant same here wrt what statik said! it's working for me perfect. | 17:58 |
| elho | heh :o | 17:58 |
| statik | elho: there might be a real problem, we just need more info about how to reproduce it | 17:59 |
| statik | cause everything seems to be running smooth | 17:59 |
| elho | i guess you are not using the sourcecontrol gnu arch mirror but some other hosts though? | 18:00 |
| elho | (i assume that the baz mirror is separate) | 18:02 |
| elho | hmm, usernames seem to have changed at some point... | 18:05 |
| elho | the docs still say it would be the archive name, but just my email is what works :o | 18:05 |
| elho | "works" as in log in to sftp. no files or dirs there | 18:07 |
| === matsubara_ is now known as matsubara | ||
| selmanj | How can I recover a launchpad account that I don't know the email address to? | 18:24 |
| selmanj | (is it even possible) ? | 18:24 |
| Laney | Can I delete comments? | 19:46 |
| Laney | (written by me) | 19:47 |
| ffm | Laney: no. | 20:00 |
| Laney | OK | 20:01 |
| nickellery | hey does anybody know if there is something wrong with decrypting launchpad OpenPGP key verification emails? | 20:12 |
| kiko | nope | 20:37 |
| === gnomefre1k is now known as gnomefreak | ||
| === gnomefre1k is now known as gnomefreak | ||
| emgent | heya mdz :) | 23:17 |
| kiko | elho, oh, you are using sourcecontrol.net! somehow that failed to register :) | 23:46 |
| elho | :) | 23:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!