[11:15] <xivulon> evand, see http://www.ntfs-3g.org/releases.html
[11:16] <xivulon> upgrade is trongly recommended for ntfs-3g
[11:16] <xivulon> shall I open a FFE bug?
[11:19] <evand> FeatureFreeze has come and gone.  It's just a matter of following the SRU process from here on out, aiui.
[11:19] <evand> xivulon: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
[11:20] <xivulon> SRU is what I meant, do you think that is worth it?
[11:21] <evand> Yes, it sounds important enough, though it's a rather large delta.
[11:21] <evand> (I imagine)
[11:21] <xivulon> that was my line of thought
[11:22] <xivulon> also can we do lupin 0.17 with latest patches as per slangasek request?
[11:22] <xivulon> see hardy.proposed
[11:22] <evand> yes, it's on my list.
[11:22] <xivulon> thx
[11:23] <xivulon> Bugs which may, under realistic circumstances, directly cause a loss of user data
[11:23] <xivulon> Bugs which may, under realistic circumstances, directly cause a loss of user data
[11:23] <xivulon> ops
[11:23] <xivulon> well that is a reason of SRU authorization, which is the case here
[11:25] <evand> indeed
[11:29] <xivulon> there is already a bug #229000
[11:30] <xivulon> can we put that on the SRU track?
[11:41] <evand> SRU track?
[11:49] <xivulon> to get the bug sorted and the pkg upgrade pushed through SRU
[13:23] <CIA-1> partman-base: cjwatson * r91 ubuntu/ (debian/changelog parted_devices.c): Skip /dev/ramzswap* as well as /dev/ccache*.
[13:24] <cjwatson> xivulon: I know I sound like a broken record, but SRUs should generally be backports of identified bug fixes, not upgrades to new upstream versions
[13:24] <cjwatson> "it's hard" is not usually a sufficient excuse to avoid this
[13:25] <CIA-1> partman-base: cjwatson * r92 ubuntu/debian/changelog: releasing version 117ubuntu2
[13:26] <cjwatson> xivulon: I've made the same comment in the bug, but would appreciate you bearing this in mind in future so that we don't need to have arguments about it :-)
[13:27] <cjwatson> I've targetted the bug for hardy and milestoned it for 8.04.1
[14:25] <ub4b> just remastered ubuntu server cd: anna complains about bad md5sum (filename not shown), but when I Check the CD for defects everything is correct (I regenerated md5sum.txt)
[14:30] <cjwatson> md5sum.txt isn't the relevant thing here
[14:30] <cjwatson> the Packages* and Release files need to be in sync
[14:30] <cjwatson> there's remastering documentation on the wiki which you should follow here
[14:38] <xivulon> cjwatson, I see your point and I agree.
[14:38] <xivulon>  I must add it is unlikely that I will be able to find the time to get sufficiently proficient/confident in a filesystem to patch it (unless the delta is very small)
[14:39] <cjwatson> xivulon: strongly advise fishing it out of revision control, if such exists for ntfs-3g
[14:39] <cjwatson> IME it's usually easy to fish out the diff even if you wouldn't have been able to fix the bug by yourself in the first place
[14:39] <cjwatson> you may well be able to find it just from the diff between the previous version in Ubuntu and the new upstream
[14:40] <xivulon> will do, well have to catch a plain to prague shortly, so it will be after that :)
[14:40] <cjwatson> understood :)
[14:41] <cjwatson> but, hey, evening session
[15:24] <ub4b> cjwatson: thx, I rechecked all those files, found some errors, now it works
[15:36] <cjwatson> ub4b: ok, good
[16:54] <soren> cjwatson: ISTR your mentioning that some work would be put into kickseed again at some point. Does that sound right?
[17:38] <CIA-1> casper: cjwatson * r508 casper/ (debian/changelog scripts/casper): Switch default unionfs implementation to aufs.
[17:48] <evand> I'll be sure to stand far back from my laptop the next time I try an Intrepid CD.