/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/05/23/#ubuntu-bugs.txt

[Relic]Hello :)02:57
ruiboonhi. i am currently triaging a firefox bug. the issue is that certain websites do not display correctly. I suspect that it is due to addons (there was no issue with the version in the live cd). however, the problem still persist when using a new profile. what info should i ask from the submitter?03:06
\shruiboon: addons provided via ubuntu, or third party? if so, ask the submitter to remove all his addons which are not coming from ubuntu03:20
ruiboon\sh: erm.. does'nt using a new profile start it with the default set of ubuntu addons?03:25
ruiboon\sh: the submitter mentioned that he has remove/disabled the addons, but to no avail03:25
\shruiboon: the only extension is the ubuntu firefox modifications afais...so this needs to be the only extension enabled by default03:27
\shruiboon: btw..which bug?03:28
ruiboon\sh: bug 23393403:28
ubottuLaunchpad bug 233934 in firefox-3.0 "Firefox doesn't display correctly this page" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/23393403:28
\shhmmm..the very same output as on my screen03:30
\shand I really don't have anything installed with firefox only the ubuntu stuff03:31
\shnow let's have a look on konqui03:32
ruiboon\sh: do you mean that you got the same output as the screenshot?03:33
ruiboon\sh: mine dont. looks alright to me03:33
\shruiboon: I get the same output as the screenshot03:34
\shruiboon: konqueror (kde4) does give me the correct output03:34
\shbut !03:34
\shkonqui doesn't show some ads like this escuela de Frankfurt03:34
\shdo you see them with your ff?03:34
ruiboon\sh: nope03:36
ruiboon\sh: dont even see the phrase in the source03:36
\shit's a picture03:37
\sh <tr>03:37
\sh          <td><a href="/especial/escueladefrankfurt/"><img src="/media/promos/promo_especial_frankfurt.gif" width="320" height="225" border="0" alt="Especial sobre la Escuela de Frankfurt para todos los públicos"></a></td>03:37
\sh        </tr>03:37
\shcheck for this line in your source03:37
\shif you have adblock running or something like this, disable it, and reload the page...03:38
ruiboonnope. it is not there03:38
ruiboonadblock not running03:38
\shit looks like it's a bug in the html code03:38
\shit has to03:38
\shkonqui has adblocking by default and blocks all "/media/" crap03:39
\shbut firefox not....03:39
\shnow03:39
\shlet's test my theory ;)03:40
ruiboonthat strange03:40
ruiboonwould you like to do a diff on the html source?03:40
\shnope03:40
\shthe adblocking doesn't help like this...03:41
\shyes...will make a diff03:41
ruiboonhere's mine http://paste.ubuntu.com/13988/03:44
\shok..03:46
\shfrom line 197  downto 21003:46
\shthis is the media stuff...the content is changing...03:47
\shkonqui blocks this part03:47
\shbut give me a sec...testing with windows03:47
\shruiboon: http://paste.ubuntu.com/13989/ <- ff3 source output03:48
\shruiboon: http://paste.ubuntu.com/13990/ <-- konqui output03:49
\shff2 on windows -> perfect03:50
\shbut I can't test ff3 on windows....grmpf03:51
ruiboon\sh: thanks for helping me in this. but i'm afraid i have to go off. got school :)03:53
ruiboon\sh: thanks again.03:54
\shruiboon: /me needs to get back to bed and get up in one hour again ;)03:54
\shcu later03:54
=== Igorot is now known as Knightlust
=== asac_ is now known as asac
warp10saivann: pong07:39
=== gnomefre1k is now known as gnomeffreak
=== gnomeffreak is now known as gnomefreak
ruiboonhi. i'm currently dealing with a bluetooth bug and require some help. Submitter has a problem with scanning/binding bluetooth devices from 2 python applications, but has no problem with pairing/sending files. So which package should be this bug filed against? and what other info is needed?09:07
=== emgent_ is now known as emgent
IulianG'morning10:11
thekornhi Iulian10:12
IulianHeya thekorn10:12
pedro_morning Iulian10:14
ruiboonhi. i'm currently dealing with a bluetooth bug and require some help. Submitter has a problem with scanning/binding bluetooth devices from 2 python applications, but has no problem with pairing/sending files. So which package should be this bug filed against(the 2 python apps/pybluez/bluez-lib)? and what other info is needed? Thanks10:21
IulianHey pedro10:32
ralphHi, where can I find the guidelines for when each of the different severities should be used in Launchpad for Ubuntu, e.g. Low.  Presumably, it's detailed somewhere for consistency.10:50
pedro_ralph: you're referring to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance ?10:51
pedro_brb10:51
ralphThe BugSquad/FAQ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad/FAQ seems to give poor advice.  On 8.04, `dpkg -l firefox' doesn't display the version because it's too long for the column width.  I've always found    dpkg-query -W firefox    to be the easy way to get the complete version.10:54
ralphShould I just edit the page?10:54
james_wralph: that sounds sensible to me, though it doesn't make it quite as clear when a package isn't installed10:57
thekornralph, i suggest adding this as an new optional item on this list10:58
james_w"dpkg -l firefox | cat" is another way.10:58
ralphjames_w / thekorn:  OK, will do.10:58
gnomefreakdpkg-query -W firefox doesnt give version either11:00
ralphIt gives the single line of output        firefox3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu3       here.11:01
gnomefreakdpkg -l gives more output than dpkg-query11:01
gnomefreakgnomefreak@Development:~$ dpkg-query -W firefox11:01
gnomefreakfirefox11:01
gnomefreakgnomefreak@Development:~$11:01
ralphYes, but the wiki page is just saying "get the version", not whether it has been purged, etc.11:01
gnomefreakoh damn i know why i thinkg11:01
ralphgnomefreak: and what does dpkg -l give for firefox on your system?11:01
gnomefreakralph: make sure you add a * to it11:02
gnomefreakseeing as some people wont have firefox installed but will have firefox-3.0 installed instead11:02
gnomefreakfirefox is a dummy package firefox-3.0 is the package11:02
gnomefreakii  firefox-3.0    3.0~b5+nobinon safe and easy web browser from Mozilla11:03
gnomefreakboth give version as long as i use the package i have installed11:03
ralphI don't want a long list of firefox* packages, so I'll change the page to be talking just about the firefox-3.0 package.11:03
=== LucidFox is now known as Sikon_Japanese
ralphgnomefreak: so on your system `dpkg -l firefox' is again no good because firefox isn't installed and `dpkg -l firefox-3.0' is required?11:10
gnomefreakyes11:11
gnomefreakmost people may have firefox installed but i dont and it might confuse people if they dont either11:12
ralphTrue, but the old wiki page also failed for you then so I'll leave it failing but just add dpkg-query since the confusion of having to explain why they're looking up firefox-3.0 is a lot to add.11:13
gnomefreakis it stricly for hardy?11:13
gnomefreakgutsy had firefox-3.0 in it and taht would have to be used as -3.011:14
ralphNo, it's just an example page telling a bug reporter how to get the version that they're using.11:14
ralphIt chose to use `firefox' as the package name.11:14
gnomefreakoh hell apt-cache policy11:14
gnomefreak:)11:14
gnomefreakits more general this way it doesnt have to be installed for it to tell you the version its at11:15
ralphYeah, but if they're reporting a bug maybe we want them to have problems if the package isn't installed instead of them telling us the uninstalled package's version.  :-)11:17
gnomefreaktrue11:19
ralphIf I file a bug report with exact steps to reproduce, a source extract showing the bug's locations, everything bar a patch, can I confirm it?  Otherwise, they sometimes sit there for weeks without attention when they could move onto the next stage.11:19
ralphOr is it bad form to confirm ones own bugs?11:19
ralphOK, have finished the wiki edit if anyone else wants a go:   https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad/FAQ11:20
gnomefreakyou cant confirm your own bugs from bugsquad rules as for mozilla its a bit harder than to have 2 people say i have this bug still not really confirmable11:20
ralphOK, if bugsquad says no I won't.  What I need is a buddy where he checks over and confirms my bugs that he can reproduce and vica versa.  :-)11:21
gnomefreakif you leave me with a bug number when i get back in from smoke ill see if i can repro it assuming its the same version of the package since im on my devel partition11:22
ralphThere's no particular one at the moment.  bug #229988, #225637, #225564, #208837 are some examples.11:27
ubottuLaunchpad bug 229988 in bsdmainutils "hexdump's -s option can't spot a trailing `b' for blocks with a hex offset" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/22998811:27
ubottuLaunchpad bug 225637 in coreutils "printf(1) %c doesn't work as expected, instead like %.1s." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/22563711:27
ubottuLaunchpad bug 225564 in util-linux "fdisk doesn't write MBR if only Windows NT ID is changed." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/22556411:27
ubottuLaunchpad bug 208837 in vte ""Esc [ 1 8 t" Response doesn't match xterm." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/20883711:27
gnomefreakthose i would need to be booted to hardy11:28
ralphNot if they still exist in devel?  Which they prob. do.11:29
gnomefreaki will try11:29
ralphDon't feel compelled to.  I wasn't trying to get someone here to do it.  Just wanted to know more about the procedure.  :-)11:30
gnomefreakralph: how are you running the hexdump command? it works for me11:34
gnomefreakand same version of bsdmainutils11:35
gnomefreakralph: example: hexdump -s 512 bzr-push.txt -b  give ouput11:35
gnomefreakoutput even11:35
ralphgnomefreak: the `b' should be a suffix to -s's parameter:  hexdump -C -s 0x1b -n 16 /dev/urandom11:36
ralphI'll add some examples to that bug.11:36
gnomefreakralph: thanks11:37
ralphDone.11:41
gnomefreakralph: that one is confirmed11:46
ralphgnomefreak: thanks very much.11:46
ralphpedro_: thanks, that Importance list was exactly what I was after.11:50
pedro_ralph: great, you're welcome11:50
ruiboonhi. when 2 different packages fails in a similar way, what should the bug be filled against? (the 2 packages uses the same library which also uses another lib)12:02
ralphruiboon: file against the library you think may contain the bug, explaining that it's visible using either of those two progarms.12:03
ralphruiboon: if you're not sure which library contains the bug, specify the first, higher-level library.12:03
ruiboonralph: when i look at the source, there dont seems to be a problem. (the lib was trying to bind to a bluetooth device)12:05
ruiboonralph: i will open up the relevant task12:05
ralphruiboon: OK, pick what you think is the most commonly used program and file against that, saying what you've investigated and mentioning the other progarm failing too.12:06
ruiboonralph: on the other hand, i also suspect that it may be a hardware issue. should i ask for the dmesg output?12:06
ralphruiboon: I'd have thought so.  This is an existing bug?  I assumed you were about to raise it.12:08
gnomefreakralph: you have way too much time on your hands with these bugs12:10
gnomefreak;)12:10
ralphgnomefreak: yes, you're right.  I should do something more useful.  :-)  But they're often interesting 10 minute diversions from real life.12:11
gnomefreakralph: as for bug 225637 /usr/bin/printf %c 65 only gives me 6 nothing else12:11
ubottuLaunchpad bug 225637 in coreutils "printf(1) %c doesn't work as expected, instead like %.1s." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/22563712:11
gnomefreaki dont get $12:12
ruiboonralph: yap. Thank (:12:12
gnomefreakquestion is why is it dropping the 512:12
gnomefreakshoot i have to get moving or im gonna be late as hell :(12:13
ralphgnomefreak: the `$' is my PS1 shell prompt being printed immediately after the output.12:14
ralphYour prompt may differ.12:14
gnomefreakah12:14
gnomefreakralph: 6$ that has to do with ps2?12:15
gnomefreakshouldnt it be $612:15
gnomefreak$ being prompt and 6 being output12:15
ralphNo, it's like    "echo -n foo"   foo is printed, but no newline, so your prompt appears immediately after the "foo".   So "6" is the output and "$" is the prompt ready for entering the next command.  I just hit return for clarity.12:16
ralphI've gotta go soon too.12:17
gnomefreakralph: thats how mine is ok12:17
gnomefreakbe4 back later12:17
=== Sikon_Japanese is now known as LucidFox
madyogiHi guys, As #ubuntu-motu was a wrong channel for this, I'll ask it here maybe... I've searched all the enries to the Ubuntu Forums, and all the bug reports, but I can not find any solution to my Problem concerning Keyboard Layouts. All the bugs are filed as solved, but for me it appears that they are not13:29
madyogiIf I set up german and Ukrainian Layout, then at first everything works fine. After reboot though, the ukrainian Layout is scrapped and instead of normal characters I get unknown characters... It seems to happen always, when 2 or more Layouts are set. I tried it also with "German/German Dvorak" and the Issue was the same13:29
madyogiso every time I reboot the computer, I have to readd the layouts. And after that everything works fine again13:32
geserbddebian: Boo14:49
bddebianBoo 2 :)14:52
bddebianHi geser14:52
hggdhmadyogi: did you open a new bug report on it?15:29
madyogiNo, I thought I'll ask you about i, before filing it as a bug...16:00
madyogihggdh: there is already a bug about brazilian keyboard, that is marked as fixed. And I thought, that I simply couldn't find the workaround.16:04
hggdhmadyogi: what Ubuntu version?16:06
madyogi8.0416:08
madyogihggdh: in 7.10 everything worked fine16:09
hggdhmadyogi: and what was the resolved bug number you saw?16:12
madyogihggdh: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/18976116:12
ubottuLaunchpad bug 189761 in gnome-control-center "Wrong localised keyboard layout" [Medium,Fix released]16:12
HewusHi. What should I do with bug 193012 (and others like it), where there is a once off crash that the user cannot reproduce to backtrace? Mark invalid due to lack of info?16:12
ubottuLaunchpad bug 193012 in nspluginwrapper "npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc()" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/19301216:13
hggdhmadyogi: do you get a US keyborad layout after reboot?16:15
madyogihggdh: actually german. But yes I get it again. Only all the additional ones, that I set up are scrubled16:17
madyogihggdh: sorry for my bad english...16:18
hggdhmadyogi: no problem, I can understand you ;-)16:18
hggdhHewus: SIGSEGV on g_slice_alloc sounds like memory allocatin problems; if there are many of them, similar, mark the newer ones as duplicate16:22
madyogihggdh: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=634083 this thread is also marked as solved, so I didn't really knew what to do16:23
hggdhHewus: on the other hand, if the reporter (as in the example you gave) states it cannot be reproduced, go ahead and close invalid. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#head-25129f9d2dfd1c797d3c766ae3ce093e0356ea26 for a nice answer to give the reporter when closing the bug16:25
hggdhmadyogi: the forum entry is about bug 193012 (the thread author also commented on the bug16:26
ubottuLaunchpad bug 193012 in nspluginwrapper "npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc()" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/19301216:26
hggdhYour symptoms do not completely match this bug (you *are* getting the german layout, so at least the issue on the bug was resolved)16:27
hggdhmadyogi: I think a new bug is warranted here16:27
madyogihggdh: allright, I'll add it then...16:27
hggdhmadyogi: thank you16:28
Hewushggdh: Thanks. I'll go and round up the duplicates then :-)16:28
hggdhHewus: welcome, and thanks for helping out16:30
madyogihggdh: I haven't tried16:49
madyogihggdh: oh sorry16:50
madyogihggdh: wrong window16:50
hggdhmadyogi: no problem16:50
leifdk1978hey guys got some q for bug hunting20:35
leifdk1978any one20:55
Arbyleifdk1978: don't wait to ask, just ask your question21:01
Arbyif anyone knows they will answer21:01
Arbyalthough it's quiet tonight21:01
leifdk1978yeah just dont want to be rude or any thing21:01
ArbyUbuntu Developer Summit is on, normal service should be resumed next week21:01
Arbyleifdk1978: just go ahead and ask, as long as you are polite (which you have been) no-one will mind21:02
leifdk1978ok :) well is kind of new to linux and to only working so i am looking for something to help whit while i learn some skills21:02
Arbythis is an open channel, everybody is welcome21:02
leifdk1978thanx21:02
Arbyok, well bug triage is a good way to start21:03
Arbyhave you read the wiki pages on bug work?21:03
leifdk1978yeah i did and it sounds ok easy21:03
leifdk1978have been using computer for many years just for playign but yeah is learning python atm21:04
Arbycool, welcome to ubuntu I'm sure we can find a use for you :)21:04
leifdk1978yeah realy love the feel of linux/ubuntu and just want to help get the os better21:05
Arbythe best thing is probably to look at applications that interest you and start looking at the bugs for those21:05
leifdk1978ohhh yeah21:05
Arbyfocus on one or a few applications, you'll get a better idea of how it works and what to look for21:06
leifdk1978hmmm ok nice :)21:06
leifdk1978and when i got a good skill in python i can help in making packeged21:06
Arbyabsolutely21:07
Arbyor you could even help fixing bugs in pyhton applications21:07
Arby*python even21:07
leifdk1978yeah but problem is that i have 0 skill so it is gona take a while to learn it21:07
Arbynot to worry, it'll come21:08
Arbythere's a big list of untriaged bugs here https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.searchtext=&orderby=-datecreated&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=New&field.importance%3Alist=Undecided&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.has_patch=&field.component%3Alist=1&field.component%3Alist=2&field.has_no_package=21:08
Arbyhelp yourself :)21:08
leifdk1978yeah gona do that thanx21:08
Arbysheesh, sorry for the huge link21:08
jdaviesArby: tinyurl.com is your friend21:08
leifdk1978np mate just a sign of lots to make21:08
Arbyjdavies: indeed it is21:09
ArbyI just have that bookmarked21:09
leifdk1978a good idea21:09
Arbyleifdk1978: pick an application then look it up on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProcedures to find out what sort of information the developers need21:11
yuriylaunchpad needs to have tinyurl built in. all its links are so huge21:11
Arbythen look at a bug and see if it contains the required information21:11
Arbyif it doesn't then politely ask the reporter to provide21:11
hggdhyuriy: ack...21:11
Arbywith instructions if it's a tricky procedure21:12
Arbyleifdk1978: essentially just work through the process on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage21:12
hggdhalso, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses for a list of stock answers. Cut, Paste, and adapt as needed21:13
leifdk1978as long as i am polite i think i am ok21:13
Arbyand if you have any doubts on the right course of action just shout in here21:13
Arbysomeone will help21:13
leifdk1978thanx guys gona be fun21:13
Arbywelcome to the team :)21:14
Arbyand thanks for helping21:14
askandHi, is someone trying to get atis driver version 8.4 into ubuntu 8.04.1?21:17
askandIf there is someone doing that they should propably try to get the latest version, 8.5 instead. Lots of bugfixes21:19
hggdhaskand: perhaps someone on #ubuntu-desktop will know... or wait for UDS to end ;-)21:19
askandhggdh: good idea :)21:20
hggdhaskand: welcome. Glad to have been able to shove the question elsewhere :-D21:21
leifdk1978hmm this is a fun bug21:22
askandhggdh: not only elsewhere..when UDS ends..I'll be back ;-)21:23
Haraldhello! Need some help with a telnet issue21:34
hggdhHarald: if it is an use issue, you would be better off at #ubuntu21:35
hggdhbut if you want to try it here, go ahead21:35
Haraldthe thing is, I already posted it as a bug... as I haven't found any documentation or post on google which covers the issue.21:36
Haraldis it OK if I post a link?21:36
Haraldor will I get kicked?21:36
hggdhtype in 'bug' followed by the bug number21:36
hggdhyou will not be kicker. Probably.21:36
hggdhs/kecker/kicked/21:36
hggdhdarn!21:37
HaraldOK. BUG 22895321:37
ubottuLaunchpad bug 228953 in ubuntu "telnet disconnects" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/22895321:37
HaraldKool bot. Helpfull :)21:38
leifdk1978yeah that is ok cool bot21:39
hggdhHarald: let me have a look at the sniffer21:39
Haraldsure !21:39
leifdk1978do i have to be able to recreate a bug to confirm21:40
hggdhHarald: who is the client and who is the server?21:40
Haraldthe client is me, and the server is a Alcatel switch...21:40
hggdhsorry, I meant is 3268 the server or the client?21:41
Haraldlet me take a look hggdh21:41
Harald3268 is me allright21:42
Haraldsorry 3268 is the alcatel switch...21:43
HaraldI am acknowledging the TELNET packages from the switch. got messed up for a moment21:43
hggdhHarald: no problem21:44
Haraldhggdh, the interesting thing is, that when I went to the site where the switches are, I could telnet with no problems at all. so I suspect it might be related to the small 15-20ms delay I have from my office to the switch21:45
leifdk1978? is it ok only to work on bug reports a couple of hours each day21:45
hggdhHarald: you were using the same laptop local and remote?21:45
Haraldyes.21:45
hggdhleifdk1978: as much, or as few as you want21:45
thekorn_leifdk1978, sure21:46
hggdhand we still tahnk you for your help :-)21:46
leifdk1978ok thanx21:46
leifdk1978just got the perfect bug report21:46
hggdhHarald: that's interesting. Even more interesting is that I very much doubt it is a telnet issue ... :-)21:47
hggdhHarald: so... I would look at MTUs, Nagle, and friends21:47
Haraldhggdh, as posted on the bug report (at the very end) I agree with your deduction :)21:47
thekorn_leifdk1978, out of couriosity: which bug number?21:47
leifdk1978it was one whit a rythmbox there was more info on thing that went wrong and every screen dump you could emangine21:48
Haraldhggdh, I am not able to reproduce this issue while booting with windows. so I am confused. What is Nagle and friends by the way?21:49
hggdhHarald: The Nagle algorithm is also known as "delayed acknowledgement"21:50
Haraldhggdh: OK. I would know my way in windows, but I lack that level of experience in linux. Could you help me diagnose the issue so that I can test it on monday? Some commands would be helpfull21:52
hggdhHarald: start with the simple -- you have a problem remotely, you do not have a problem when connected locally21:55
hggdhso, what is different?21:55
Haralddelay, of course21:55
hggdhis the delay/latency so big as to make a difference? I am not talking about 10-50 ms, but at the 200-500 ms range21:56
HaraldI actually work in Networking at Bertelsmann, so I have closely examined the packet capture with my colleagues but nothing indicates that it is related to delay.21:56
Haraldhggdh no it isn't. The switch is at the other end of an MPLS tunnel, so delay isn' t the issue here.21:57
hggdhHarald: OK, delay is out. What about MTU, and/or routing?21:58
leifdk1978so it is ok to confirm a bug when there is a lot of info on the thing that cuased the crash or just bug21:58
hggdhleifdk1978: what bug?21:59
Haraldhggdh. Isn't MTU defined by the server, in this case the switch?21:59
leifdk1978before i confirm should i be able to recreate or21:59
hggdhHarald: yes, sort of. It is also imposed by other routers, or when tunneling22:00
hggdhleifdk1978: it is always better what you can reproduce the issue22:00
leifdk1978that is a bit hard but yeah is gona try22:00
Haraldhggdh, here is another interesting thing: on windows, when I ask for the switche's configuration, it will just blast through in just a second--while on ubuntu it will slowly scroll through, as if I was connected by modem.22:01
hggdhHarald: so you can start off the server at (for example) 1500, and then tunnel through something that will impose a (say) 1380 MTU limit22:01
Haraldhggdh, how do I define the MTU limit on linux?22:02
hggdhHarald: for example, by 'sudo ifconfig ethx mtu nnnn'22:03
leifdk1978is there any way to recreate a bug if i dont have the hardware or fones or other things22:04
Haraldhggdh, great. I will give that a try. Just out of curiosity, ethernet should behave equally on linux as it does on windows. Any ideas if linux is configured differently from windows regarding MTU?22:05
hggdhHarald: both, by default, will use 1500...22:08
hggdhbest option is to sniff the Windows session and the linux one, then look for differences22:08
hggdhleifdk1978: no, if you do not have the necessary hardware... you cannot recreate22:09
leifdk1978what i was thinking soory is newb still22:09
hggdhleifdk1978: no problem. We all started ignorant, and we are all still learning. Asking questions is not a crime. The real crime is not trying to learn22:10
Haraldhggdh, I did this and both look alike, exepting that on linux it will flow slowlier and disconnect after 300-400 lines. I really appreciate your help with this issue. Is this the correct place to return should I have more feedback on the bug?22:10
leifdk1978thanx so can i still confirm is there is enough info to show the developor what went work22:11
leifdk1978wrong22:11
hggdhHarald: I do not think this is the best forum. You can email me at hggdh2 at gmail dot com, or you can go to #ubuntu22:11
hggdhleifdk1978: is all necessary data is in the bug, yes, you can confirm22:11
leifdk1978ahh thanx then i was doing the rigth thing22:12
hggdhHarald: something *is* different. We just do not know what22:12
Haraldhggdh. Will do. Have a nice day everyone and thanks all of you for making ubuntu better every day :)22:12
leifdk1978we do what we can :)22:13
leifdk1978well i ask to get better to bug hunt22:15
leifdk1978what do we do whit programing sugestions22:17
thekorn_leifdk1978, it really depends. It would help if you can give you abug number, so we can guide you through the nessecarry steps22:19
thekorn_s/you abug/us a bug/22:20
thekorn_bug 23441122:25
ubottuLaunchpad bug 234411 in firefox-3.0 "Mozila Firefox 3 Beta 5 we are all so suddenly crashes in Ubuntu Linux 8.4. program." [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/23441122:25
leifdk1978only confirming when i am sure there is enough info  for a programer to do something whit22:26
thekorn_leifdk1978, how to you know if there is enough information for the devs?22:26
thekorn_what's the creteria for you?22:27
leifdk1978kernel dumps info on liberys  what version of ubuntu  hardware and some info on what happend and why22:27
thekorn_leifdk1978, confirmed for bug 234411 might be wrong22:28
ubottuLaunchpad bug 234411 in firefox-3.0 "Mozila Firefox 3 Beta 5 we are all so suddenly crashes in Ubuntu Linux 8.4. program." [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/23441122:28
thekorn_because there is not stacktrace created22:28
thekorn_and not .crashfile attached22:28
leifdk1978ahh ok :(22:28
thekorn_sorry: .crash file22:29
thekorn_leifdk1978, no problem.22:29
leifdk1978is a crash file a hex file or22:29
hggdhleifdk1978: a crash file is a collection of different type of data, including a base64 memory dump22:48
leifdk1978thanx is new so i am just trying to learn22:48
leifdk1978i hate friedays when i get drunk :(22:58
thekorn_:)23:00
leifdk1978:) is doing some tranlation for my native langue23:01
leifdk1978think it is getting late pll are going for bed23:42
=== emgent is now known as emgent`UDS
leifdk1978dum de de dej think i am tired :=)23:49
=== emgent`UDS is now known as emgent

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!