[00:07] gn8 folks [00:26] wow, it is apparently not possible to get those Peace cigarettes outside of Japan [00:27] oh, persia isn't even here :P [00:36] nxvl: Nice photos! === elkbuntu is now known as elky === elky is now known as elkbuntu === RAOF_ is now known as RAOF [01:59] Laney: thnx [02:05] hey nxvl :) [02:06] * ScottK is home. [02:06] heya ScottK :) [02:06] Heya emgent. [02:10] anyone know the key combo to make a window more opaque in compiz? [02:32] hello! [02:32] I'm trying POD > man, and I keep getting manpage-has-bad-whatis-entry. [02:33] Heya gang [02:33] What-is should be in the form executable \- short description [02:34] hmm [02:39] retry :) [02:39] thanks [02:49] Hm. Given a netboot usb stick, is it possible to get it to grab intrepid rather than hardy? === santiago-php is now known as santiago-ve [04:04] Hi all, I want an help regarding debian source package management. [04:04] I did an apt-get source package and made few changes to the package [04:05] and also built the binary .debs using dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -uc [04:05] some 3 or 4 weeks back. [04:06] then I forgot to make the changlelog entries, but now I want to make those entries but unfortunately I dont remember where all the changes I made [04:06] I also want to create patches of these changes now [04:06] I am not getting how to do this, can some help? [04:07] please [04:07] madrazr: You're probably looking for the debdiff command; 'debdiff oldpackage.dsc newpackage.dsc' will give you a diff containing all the changes you made. [04:07] RAOF: newpackage.dsc will be created? [04:08] because I dont think created source debian packages [04:08] madrazr: No; newpackage.dsc is the dsc file for your changed package. [04:08] RAOF: ok wait will check out [04:14] RAOF: there are no 2 .dsc files [04:15] madrazr: You still have your modified source package, right? You can debuild -S to get an updated .dsc for the modified package, and grab the original, Ubuntu source with apt-get source. [04:16] ok will try now [04:17] RAOF: aren't there any alternatives? [04:17] I just want the patch file nothing else [04:17] meaning diff files [04:17] It depends on what you've actually done; there almost certainly are alternatives. [04:18] But debdiff will just be easier, and will get you all the changes you made. [04:18] I will explain, I did apt-get source parted [04:18] made some 3-4 changes [04:19] I dont remember all the 4, I only remember 2 [04:19] then I created .deb files [04:19] only binaries [04:19] now I want the diff files [04:20] of what all changes I created [04:20] Debdiff will do that for you. [04:20] Oh. Do you still have your source changes around? [04:21] yes [04:21] Then debdiff. (If you didn't, what you ask would be impossible). [04:22] You'll need a copy of the unmodified source (apt-get source will provide this) and of your changed source (which you have). Debdiff then basically automates the process of finding the diff. [04:23] say now I will have 2 directories partedMod with my modified source and parted with original source [04:23] by just running debdiff partedMod/parted.dsc parted/parted.dsc [04:23] will I get the diff files? [04:24] Yes; assuming partedMod/parted.dsc has been generated from your modified source package. [04:24] I am not able to generate that [04:24] Why not? [04:24] because of some problem here [04:25] debuild is not getting installed [04:25] now [04:25] infact some problem with synaptic [04:25] I will try sometime later [04:25] You can manually diff -Nur oldsourcedir newsourcedir if you want. That should also get you a diff. [04:26] oh ok sooper I will try this then [06:22] Hello! I'm having a problem with uscan reporting a newer version: current is 3.2 and it thinks 3.2RC6 is new. Anyone knows how to fix this? Thanks. === asac_ is now known as asac === elkbuntu is now known as elky [09:11] siretart: +25 @ your mail! [09:51] Hobbsee: I sent two mails [09:52] siretart: er, the one about the bugsquad missing the point. [09:52] aah, right [09:52] TBH, I don't see the point in the bugsquad having a seperate mailing list. I think they should discuss on ubuntu-motu or even ubuntu-devel [09:54] yeah, true [09:59] Beyond OSI approval, does Ubuntu have any standard guidance about licensing? For example, could using the BSDL prompt a religious debate? [10:04] andrew_sayers: if you mean the BSD license, it's common enough to got included in /usr/share/common-licenses, so feel free to use it [10:05] geser: ok thanks, I'll get back to pondering then :) [10:11] noob here. Question: is this the right place to ask how/when certain packages are updated? [10:11] I'm the release manager for GRAMPS (on SourceForge) [10:12] Ubuntu 8.04 still lists GRAMPS at version 2.2, though we're now at version 3.0.1 [10:12] I'm curious to know how the process works to get one of our newer versions listed [10:13] same questions, but applied to Graphviz [10:14] latest stable release is 2.18, but Ubuntu 8.04 lists Graphviz v2.16 [10:15] hello? [10:20] Anyone actually here? [10:20] Yes? [10:20] you missed my question just above your login [10:20] here it is: [10:21] The answer would be: hardy has been released, and will not be recieving new versions*. [10:21] ok [10:21] I see [10:21] * Some exceptions being: (very unlikely) a bugfix release released as a Stable Release Upgrade. [10:21] so new versions of packages have to wait until 8.10? [10:21] * A backport from Intrepid. This requires the new version be *in* Intrepid. [10:22] how do we make certain this time our new version is in Intrepid, since it didn't seem to have been picked up in 8.04? [10:23] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid/+source/gramps shows that 3.0.1-1 has been published in Intrepid [10:24] thanks -- I see [10:24] but https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid/+source/graphviz seems to indicate it is still 2.16 [10:25] how do we get the 2.18 into Intrepid? [10:27] usually new version come into intrepid from Debian unstable [10:27] but in case of graphviz Ubuntu has some additional changes which needs to be merged [10:28] I expect to see graphviz merged in the next few weeks as currently nearly every developer works on merges [10:28] thank you for the answers === ubottu is now known as ubott2 === ubott2 is now known as ubottu [11:22] * StevenK appears. [11:22] Wooo! [11:22] (In Singapore) [11:22] Angels descend [11:22] * StevenK waves to RAOF [11:22] Howdie. [11:23] So you're not interested in one or two uploads to debian then :) [11:23] Wanna be in Sydney now. [11:23] * persia cheers the infinite efficiency of packet-based networks as applied to air travel [11:23] RAOF: Not really. :-) Beg me tomorrow? [11:23] Anyone else you know on your flights? [11:23] RAOF: TheMuso is sitting next to me. [11:24] RAOF: lifeless is the flight too, apparently. [11:24] is on, even [11:24] And jml? [11:24] Not sure about jml. [11:24] persia: Where are you hiding? [11:25] StevenK: I've been home for about 4 hours. [11:25] persia: Lucky [11:25] StevenK: No. Just northerly [11:25] Heh [11:25] Air travel sucks. We should tunnel through the earth. [11:25] Haha [11:25] Let gravity do the work for us! [11:25] RAOF: it:s only 43 minutes point-to-point that way, but a little warm. [11:26] I'm sure you could use an evacuated tube. [11:26] I mean, we have science, right? [11:26] It should work for us! [11:26] I have another seven-eight hour flight. :-( [11:26] RAOF: Sure. It's still warm. If you use an air-filled tube, it's slow, but even evacuated, there's still friction. We need better maglev first. [11:27] On the other hand, 43 minutes PRA->SYD would make StevenK have to travel more often. [11:27] Why friction? We just drill a _perfectly_ straight hole, right through the centre :) [11:27] And hope that our scheduling is good enough to not cause collisions. [11:28] RAOF: That limits your destinations, and then you get pressure heat from the earth. I believe the best path is cosecant, but I haven't looked at the math for those tunnels in years. [11:28] Actually, you're almost certainly right. [11:29] I also seem to remember there being some limitation with nearness. I think you have to pass over more than about 15 degrees of curvature for it to make sense. It may be that one has to travel to a different continent to reach short-hop destinations, with a transfer. [11:30] Errr. "pass under" [11:30] But at 43 minutes a pop, that's still cost-efficient. [11:30] Air travel can still be used for short-hop destinations. [11:30] Well, time-efficient. I don't really want to consider the municipal-works budget. [11:31] Say, an hour from Sydney to Frankfurt, and then an hour from Frankfurt to Prague. Works for me. [11:31] StevenK: I guess. Air-travel is about 1 hour per 10 degrees of curvature, right? [11:31] (assuming no transfer) [11:32] Also, technically, Sydney->Frankfurt might be hard. I think more than about 60 degrees gets under the mantle (but I haven't looked at the math in years) [11:32] Which means Sydney -> Singapore first? [11:33] Without looking at a globe, something like that. Sydney -> Singapore (under) for an hour, Singapore -> Frankfurt (under) for an hour, Frankfurt->Prague (over) for an hour. [11:34] I daresay I don't want to know how much that would cost to build. [11:35] Yep :) [11:36] I suspect that if anyone does it, the first tunnel will be Eastern North America -> Western Europe, which doesn't really help the current use case, but might give an idea of cost. [11:36] Might need an intermediate though, as I think that's about 90 degrees. [11:38] Hey [11:38] * StevenK tries to beat his spam down [11:39] hey Iulian [11:39] Hi jdavies [11:40] hi all! [11:40] Heya pochu [11:41] yo Iulian [11:41] this is insane.. [11:41] hi pochu [11:41] who called me? [i]nsane4oenix [11:42] hey txwikinger [11:48] ¡hola pochu! [11:53] ciao tseliot :-) [12:14] * StevenK waits for boarding. === LucidFox_ is now known as LucidFox [12:22] * Amaranth looks around [12:23] StevenK: Where? [12:24] soren: Singapore [12:24] soren: Another seven-eight hours, and I'll actually be in the right city [12:24] StevenK: Wow, that long? [12:25] StevenK: Are/were you flying Singapore Airlines? [12:26] soren: au is *far* away. [12:30] Hobbsee: au should move closer [12:31] :) [12:31] Amaranth: i wish! [12:31] even persia gets home faster [12:31] heck, even i made it home faster [12:32] Amaranth: I'm equidistant from everywhere though. Travel to/from Australia has an extra hop near here (well, near enough). [12:32] hehe [12:33] btw, no one exports those cigarettes :( [12:33] persia: so you have to send me a crate or something ;) [12:35] * persia pointedly fails to start an import/export business in controlled substances :P [12:58] Hi, I've an issue with pbuilder: "pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy: Depends: libx264-dev which is a virtual package." Can someone help me please? [12:58] yannick: That typically means that you'll need to specify the one you want, of the form: libfoo5-dev | libfoo-dev. [12:59] persia, I don't see which one to pick up. There is no more devel for x264... [13:00] yannick: In this specific case, I wonder which architecture you are using. From what I can tell, that package is not virtual for i386 or amd64, and doesn't even exist for anything else. [13:00] Does your pbuilder have multiverse enabled? [13:01] COMPONENTS="main restricted universe multiverse" and my arch is amd64. And i do not see it as virtual too. [13:04] Hmmm. No idea then. You might try with a local build (expecting a failure for missing dependencies) or sbuild to see if the issue is with pbuilder-satisfydepends or with your package. [13:05] ok, I'll try sbuild... === Czessi_ is now known as Czessi [13:27] heya [13:30] emgent: huhu [13:30] * emgent hugs sebner [13:30] * sebner hugs emgent back =) [13:30] hahah [13:32] emgent: I think they ignore our questions :P === [PUPPETS]Gonzo is now known as ^Gonzo^ [13:35] sebner: nah false. [13:35] sebner: we should wait. [13:37] emgent: bah :P [13:38] sebner: remember, we are a big family. [13:38] :) [13:39] emgent: partyyyyyyyyy!!!!! =) [13:39] gh [14:06] heya devfil :) [14:06] hi emgent! how are you? [14:07] all good :P [14:07] devfil: http://en.emanuele-gentili.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/img_2655.jpg [14:08] emgent: did you have fun in uds intrepid? [14:08] emgent: lol [14:09] sure, UDS rocks! [14:09] I'm happy for you, but stop smoking! [14:11] hahaha, nah [14:15] emgent: stop smoking and became motu! [14:15] s/became/become [14:20] uhm.. launchpad seems slow today.. [15:14] moins (\sh here) [15:20] lo [15:42] how many times will intrepid be synced with debian before the debian import freeze? :) Once, twice? [15:43] many [15:43] heya pochu :) [15:43] emgent! :) [15:44] pochu: thx :) [15:44] hi pochu [15:44] hey hey devfil [15:46] porthose: in theory it should happen more than once a week till DIF [15:48] pochu: I would to ask you about a wxwidgets2.8 bug [15:49] devfil: yup, what was it? [15:50] pochu: bug #196834. I think this isn't a bug. usr/share/doc/wx2.8-examples/examples/unpack_examples.sh if called to do the work. Maybe I should ask if you want unpack examples or no (.postinst file) [15:50] Launchpad bug 196834 in wxwidgets2.8 "wxPython demo is not installing properly" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196834 [15:54] geser: cool thx :) then the new upstream release of my package just uploaded to debian will be imported soon (that make me soooo happy) [15:57] porthose: if there's no Ubuntu specific changes, yes [15:58] devfil: no, I don't think unpack_examples.sh should be called at postinst [15:59] devfil: you can call it in debian/rules after build, if you want [15:59] in the install target, I'd say [15:59] pochu: I think unpacking examples should be at users choice [16:00] in postinst I can ask if want to unpack or not and where script will unpack [16:00] so what would you do, asking a debconf question? [16:00] that's so weird... [16:00] are the examples too big? [16:01] pochu: I think 10 mb [16:01] but I'm not sure [16:02] pochu: however not debconf, a simply script. wxwidgets2.8 source is so big, if I will add debconf... [16:04] if you are going to ask a question, use debconf [16:04] but better not to add it [16:04] where are the examples, in the -doc package? [16:04] pochu: examples package [16:05] Maybe add a README saying how to unpack it [16:05] pochu: I think nobody will read it [16:07] I hate debconf questions, so I won't sponsor that :P [16:07] if you can think of a different solution... [16:09] pochu: I can try with only bash script to ask, I think this is better solution because I don't need to use debconf support [16:09] if you use that, then it's not translatable [16:09] Maybe a simple: Do you want to unpack examples [y]? is the best think [16:09] and it won't work with packagekit (if we ever have that in the archive) [16:13] pochu: it is only a phrase and who developer must know english I think [16:13] I think if you are going to ask a question, it should be with debconf and priority low [16:25] pochu: 1.9 mb (I've readed 10.9 -_-') [16:25] pochu: however alredy exists a README for unpack_examples [16:25] pochu: Some of the files have been compressed in accordance with Debian policy [16:25] regarding documentatio [16:25] n [16:31] pochu: to unpack them I can use dh_extrac... (I don't remember the exactly name of the tag) [16:33] devfil: When do they get compressed? In the orig.tar.gz? [16:33] Lanely: nono, in debian/rules [16:33] Then there's no point compressing and uncompressing [16:34] If it's dh_compress you can pass -X to exclude some files [16:35] Laney: I don't need to exclude files, just unpack them in the same dir [16:40] done, now it's time to build it [17:03] persia, solved: pbuilder was not using multiverse. I still don't know why it doesn't take my config file in account, but adding universe at the command line is working :) thx for your help. === azeem_ is now known as azeem [17:33] Is it possible to merge something from Debian NEW? [17:35] I don't think so [17:43] ryanakca: the first problem is Debian NEW isn't public [17:46] * jdavies WTHs: http://paste.ubuntu.com/14564/ [17:46] bind mount? [17:47] I just used the makechroot script here (http://people.ubuntu.com/~pitti/scripts/) to make a hardy chroot and I got that [17:48] yes, bind mounts [17:48] found the problem [17:49] umount /home, /tmp, /proc/ and /sys from the chroot [17:49] before removing it [17:49] but too late.. [17:50] geser: ah, cheers, that solved it [17:50] * slytherin wonders how hard it is to give command 'sudo pbuilder create' [17:55] geser: hmm, should I take out the bind mount parts of the script for next time? [18:00] jdavies: bindmounts mounts the directories you specify inside the chroot. For example I have iso image mounted locally which I can use as repository inside chroot. [18:01] slytherin: I would like a clean chroot. Nothing in but the base stuff installed [18:03] jdavies: so you don't want bindmount. [18:04] OK, *removes* [18:09] someone can tellme what can i do when a program are provided as tar.gz and are not in format program-version.tar.gz (and the uncompressed file too) [18:09] mind note: in packaging [18:10] jdavies: you might need things like /proc or /sys also inside a clean chroot [18:10] (and the program uses jam as constructor) [18:10] geser: hm, true [18:11] jdavies: and if you want to test some GUI apps from the chroot then /home and /tmp are useful too [18:14] leleobhz: what program is that? [18:15] slytherin: handbrake.fr [18:16] slytherin: i have another problem too... it "Jamfile" downloads all dependencies again [18:16] leleobhz: I think handbrake is already packaged, I might be wrong, Make sure you check revu [18:16] slytherin: really? [18:16] slytherin: revu? [18:17] leleobhz: http://revu.tauware.de [18:18] 'tis already being worked on by someone [18:18] Laney: hmm nice [18:19] Laney: and how can i help the package creation on revu? [18:20] leleobhz: Well one person usually takes care of it, but you can mail the packager and see if he would like your help [18:21] leleobhz: revu is used for review of packages. A package needs to be advocated by 2 MOTUs before it gets accepted. You will need dput to upload top revu and your publick key will need to be in revu keyring [18:22] slytherin: well, i have the conduct code signed on launchpad and all my keys available [18:23] and now joined to revu uploaders user group [18:23] leleobhz: join the revu-uploaders team and ask here for keyring to be synced [18:23] syncing... [18:23] ;) [18:24] slytherin: suposing my package get accepted, ill get their manteiner on ubuntu? [18:24] s/get their/be the/g [18:25] leleobhz: not "officially" like in Debian, but yes [18:25] RainCT: well, i dont care to much this... [18:26] debian is too "dummy"cratic [18:26] RainCT: im care with ubuntu status [18:27] * leleobhz very interested because i mantain some packages but outside ubuntu... so may be a chance to get they in [18:42] question: debian linda exists on ubuntu? [18:42] leleobhz: linda doesn't exist any more [18:43] Laney: so still the process to use only lintian? [18:43] leleobhz: Yeah [18:43] (AFAIK, IANAMOTU ;) [18:43] ? [18:45] I'm not a MOTU [18:45] But I gather that lintian is all that's used [18:45] oh... [18:45] ok [18:46] Right. lintian is the only tool available. The development of linda has stopped totally. [18:46] geser: ok, well, if I have a dsc of what was uploaded to Debian NEW? (I merged some Kubuntu fixes into Debian, and now I'm looking to merge those changes back into Kubuntu) [18:47] talking about linda.... someone know why this error: [18:47] leleobhz@zorg:~/TRABALHO/DEVELOPMENT/COMPILACOES/UBUNTU/pacotes/praat-hardy$ lintian praat_5.0.23-1_i386.changes [18:47] E: praat_5.0.23-1_i386.changes: bad-distribution-in-changes-file hardy [18:47] E: praat_5.0.23-1.tar.gz does not exist, exiting [18:47] leleobhz: Give the -i option to lintian to get more information [18:48] N: You've specified an unknown target distribution for your upload in the [18:48] N: debian/changelog file. [18:48] ryanakca: technically it would then be a sync from somewhere else but if it doesn't hurry, I'd wait till it's in Debian unstable [18:48] Laney: but im using hardy and cowbuilder [18:49] leleobhz: 1st error because you are not using lintian from hardy-backports. Also make sure you have installed debootstrap from hardy-backports. [18:51] geser: nah, there are still some Kubuntu specific changes / configuration options to be merged, but ok. I do wish their archive maintainers would get through their list... some of them are 1 month old or more [18:51] slytherin: debootstrap isnt installed [18:51] leleobhz: 2nd error because either you don't have a .orig.gz file or the directory name is of the form softwarename-upstream_version-debian_revision instead of just softwarename-upstream_version [18:52] slytherin: .orig exists [18:52] geser: How can I add copyright symbol to debian/copyright file? [18:52] the original tar.gz isnt available because the original source is a .zip [18:52] so i need to uncompress it and recompres in debian formal [18:52] t [18:52] * leleobhz have a script to do this [18:53] if I want to install debugging symbols for a program in hardy, do I still just add pitti's repository or is there a better method [18:53] sharms: see if there is already a -dbg package in repository? [18:53] slytherin: ii lintian 1.23.48~hardy1 Debian package checker [18:54] slytherin - I am looking for w3m, don't see it [18:54] sharms: then use pitti's repository [18:54] deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~pitti/ddebs hardy main universe -- Apt gets a 301 moved permanently [18:56] ah nvm its down ddebs.ubuntu.com [19:13] slytherin: Unicode, U+00A9 © [19:14] geser: How do I write that in vim? And is it necessary to have 'copyright' or 'registered' symbols? [19:16] slytherin: ctrl-shift-u + type 00a9 [19:16] Laney: thanks [19:16] slytherin: iirc the copyright symbol is important [19:17] at least in the U.S. copyright law if I remember some discussions correctly [19:17] Laney: Not working :-( [19:17] slytherin: Really? What happens? [19:18] Laney: Nothing, it just adds blank space [19:18] You get the underlined 'u' and can type '00a9'? [19:18] Then hit space after that [19:20] Laney: I got underlines u, I typed 00a9 but hit enter [19:20] Laney: Done, thanks. :-) [19:20] slytherin: That should work too, weird. Maybe it's your font? [19:20] slytherin: Ah :) [19:21] Laney: Space works, enter doesn't. What does it have to do with font? [19:23] slytherin: No, nothing. If it wasn't coming up at all then it might be your font. [19:23] slytherin: But enter and space both work for me, *shrug* [19:27] geser: Please let me know if this debian/copyright is clear enough - http://paste.ubuntu.com/14586/ I will be back in 10-15 minutes. [19:27] slytherin: I add unicode chars usually with: when in Insert mode: ctrl+v u00a9 and get directly a copyright symbol [19:31] slytherin: the mentioning of the licences is good, but I remember seeing copyright for the W3C from some other years too (check with "rgrep Copyright ." in the source dir) [19:35] geser: I saw copyright mentioned as 1994-2002. Should I make it that way? [19:39] slytherin: yes [19:39] geser: Ok. Any other changes? [19:52] slytherin: no [19:55] geser: Done. Uploaded. Thanks for guidance. :-) [19:57] geser: Going to bed. See you later. [20:11] geser: hey [20:14] emgent: Hi [20:16] sebner: fix your internet connection [20:17] emgent: If I would know how -.- [20:23] sebner: try with "halt" :) [21:17] emgent: was he already online? ^^ [21:17] ye [21:17] emgent: uhh, where can I find him? [21:18] #canonical-sysadmin [21:18] ember: but he is afk :\ [21:19] i know. [21:19] since 77 hours xD [21:44] howdy all (sebner included) [21:44] Hi norsetto [21:44] huhu norsetto. Thanks for that :D [21:45] hi geser, just seen bug 234538 [21:45] Launchpad bug 234538 in findlib "[intrepid] Rebuild for ocaml 3.10.1 -> 3.10.2 transition" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/234538 [21:45] hahaha [21:45] emgent: hmm? [21:46] geser: there is a bunch of stuff in bug 234581 which also deals with this transition, for the time being they are all waiting for u-m-s to sponsor your bug ... [21:46] Launchpad bug 234581 in ulex "Cduce Depends On Non-Existant Package `ocaml-nox-3.10.0`" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/234581 [21:47] norsetto: I've uploaded those OCaml rebuild yesterday which don't need ocaml-findlib [21:48] I'll look at the other ones once findlib got rebuild [21:49] geser: ok, if you may want to cover also those of bug 234581 please mark them invalid or reassign them to you. There is also a ftbfs which I'm investigating right now [21:49] Launchpad bug 234581 in ulex "Cduce Depends On Non-Existant Package `ocaml-nox-3.10.0`" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/234581 [21:51] geser: there is something funny going on with the debian archive, seems like packages.gz are not being regenerated? [21:53] norsetto: if you mean the ftbfs from bug #234846, that's normal during a transition if not all packages are rebuild in the right order [21:53] Launchpad bug 234846 in ocamlnet "ocamlnet (2.2.9-2) FTBFS" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/234846 [21:53] see also the current perl 5.10 transition [21:54] geser: I have all packages built locally, it really seems a problem with rpclocal.c [21:54] ah [21:57] norsetto: what problem do you have with the debian archive? ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz was last modified today [21:57] geser: I see several packages are not reported as updated, and they are not autosynced [21:58]