/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/05/27/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

gnomefreakepiphany needs to be rebuilt on new xulrunner in intrepid05:24
=== asac_ is now known as asac
asachi08:01
asacfta_: what was the problem sebner referred to yesterday?08:10
[reed]asac / fta_: ping08:39
fta_asac, try http://-kol.deviantart.com/08:39
[reed]so, do you or do you not disable the EULA on Ubuntu?08:40
fta_it seems it works for everything but linux browsers08:40
[reed]I thought I saw a patch that added the override pref08:40
fta_[reed], we did08:40
[reed]where's the patch?08:40
[reed]I can't find it08:40
fta_not a patch, it's in firefox.js08:40
fta_debian/firefox.js08:41
fta_installed as /etc/firefox-3.0/pref/firefox.js08:42
[reed]hmm08:42
[reed]k08:42
=== fta_ is now known as fta
armin76fta: is it legal to disable the EULA?08:52
ftaask asac, we discussed it here08:53
* armin76 blames asac08:53
ftaasac, xul rc1 is not installable in hardy because of missing yelp (the break)08:54
[reed]armin76: it's not09:21
asacfta: did someone let xul into hardy?09:35
asacarmin76: its legal09:35
asac(i am not a lawyer)09:35
ftano, proposed or ppa are not installable09:35
asacfta: yes, did someone let it into proposed09:35
asac?09:35
asaci uploaded yelp to proposed too09:36
ftai can't see it09:36
ftafta@cube:~ $ apt-cache madison yelp09:36
fta      yelp | 2.22.1-0ubuntu2 | http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages09:36
fta      yelp | 2.22.1-0ubuntu2 | http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Sources09:36
asacok so its just ppa09:36
asacyeah09:36
asacthats why i ask if someone let xul into proposed09:37
ftafta@ix:~ $ apt-cache madison yelp09:37
fta      yelp | 2.22.1-0ubuntu3 | http://archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages09:37
fta      yelp | 2.22.1-0ubuntu3 | http://archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Sources09:37
asacit required approval09:37
asacif that happened the guy forgot to approve yelp09:37
asacthe idea was to let all in today09:37
ftaok then.09:37
asacok, nothing is in proposed yet09:38
asacfine09:38
asaclet me check the lang pack09:39
asacs09:39
asachopefully they are fine so we can finall whip them trough09:39
armin76oh well, the hppa failure said it all: ../../../dist/include/xpcom/nsVoidArray.h: In member function 'void nsAutoVoidArray::ResetToAutoBuffer()':09:43
armin76../../../dist/include/xpcom/nsVoidArray.h:193: error: cast from 'char*' to 'nsVoidArray::Impl*' increases required alignment of target type09:43
armin76alignment stuff09:43
asacfta: uploaded devhelp and yelp to ppa10:51
asacfta: for langpack updates -> deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-langpack/ubuntu hardy main10:51
gnomefreakyelp xul and ff3 all went through intrepid over weekend i got them yesterday. epiphany is the only broken one atm that i can see11:34
* gnomefreak waiting on jdongs ack for flash-10 for hardy and gutsy11:35
gnomefreakbtw ff3 xul RC1 the font shrunk from b511:38
gnomefreakmuch harder to see now11:38
asacgnomefreak: ephy should be updated too11:40
gnomefreakasac: it was removed so i will try to install and see11:40
gnomefreakasac: nope not yet11:42
gnomefreakalthough this kind of bothers me11:42
gnomefreakepiphany-gecko: Depends: xulrunner-1.9 (>= 1.9~b4) but it is not going to be installed11:42
asaclooking11:42
asacok failed to build11:42
gnomefreakah ok11:42
asacgcc11:42
asacgnomefreak: look at mozillateam ppa11:42
asacfor hardy11:42
asacthere the bits should be avail11:43
asacok i think it was a broken build-depend thing11:44
asaci retried the build now11:44
gnomefreakxul is only thing that failed that is related11:44
gnomefreakfrom what i can see11:44
gnomefreaki only see hardy epiphany uploaded to mt ppa11:45
asacyes11:46
asacintrepid doesnt have it11:46
gnomefreakstill not building intrepid yet?11:46
asaci retried the build now11:46
gnomefreakdamn11:46
asaclets see11:46
asachttps://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid/+source/epiphany-browser/2.22.1.1-0ubuntu211:47
* gnomefreak gonna assume its gonna need to be retried in intrepid as well11:47
asaci retried in intrepid11:47
asacin hardy its all fine in ppa11:47
gnomefreakah i see same issue11:47
gnomefreakwell atleast hppa is waiting on geps11:48
gnomefreakdeps11:48
asacanyone can confirm that RC1 doesnt have a yellow location bar when visiting https sites12:18
gnomefreakit doesnt on https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/23513512:27
ubottugnomefreak: Error: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: The read operation timed out12:27
gnomefreakkiss off bug12:28
gnomefreakbot12:28
asachmm12:37
asacis that a regression or a ubuntu problem?12:37
asachmm ... ok i think its now the blue border surrounding the favicon12:38
gnomefreakyes here it is12:39
gnomefreakblue background on favicon (background as in the whole square is blue12:39
asacyes12:41
asaci think that means "secure"12:41
asacbugzilla.freedesktop.org12:41
gnomefreakah ok cool12:43
gnomefreakasac: how did you add releases to bug 160895 like you did?12:43
ubottuLaunchpad bug 160895 in firefox "upgrade to firefox 2.0.0.9" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/16089512:43
gnomefreakasac: i can figure it out to save my life12:44
gnomefreakok asac since i found out can you please target bug 235135 for hardy gutsy feisty and dapper please, you have to be on a devel team to do it12:45
ubottuLaunchpad bug 235135 in flashplugin-nonfree "[MASTER] Please backport flashplugin-nonfree to version 10 beta" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/23513512:45
asacgnomefreak: nominate for release12:49
asacyou need to be ubuntu-core-dev or ubuntu-dev to accept/decline that12:49
asacso most likeyl you can just nominate, but not approve12:49
asacif you need approval on something let me know12:49
gnomefreakasac: i need approval for this from backporters i got built for gutay and hardy backports so far and waiting for jdong to let me know if feisty and dapper are ok to backport it to12:51
asacapproved for hardy-, gutsy-bacports12:52
asacnot sure about feisty/dapper12:52
asacwhats the current version in those?12:52
gnomefreak9.0.48 asac12:53
gnomefreakfor both12:53
gnomefreak9.0.48.0.0ubuntu1~7.04.3 9.0.48.0.0ubuntu11~dapper312:53
gnomefreaknominated both12:54
gnomefreaki can always reject them when jdong says shouldnt12:54
asacn o12:54
asacgnomefreak: if dapper is lower version than hardy12:55
asacthen we cannot upgrade dapper12:55
gnomefreakdapper is going to be lower always until we push it there.12:55
gnomefreakhardy has 9.0.124 IIRC12:56
asacgnomefreak: i think it was intentionally not updated12:57
asacas konqueror doesnt support xembed12:57
gnomefreakah12:57
asacand flash switched to it in recent releases12:57
asacif feisty has 0.48 than -backports is probably not worth it12:57
gnomefreakasac: ok decline them and ill work with hardy and gutsy :)12:58
gnomefreakthan im done i need to find out what backporters need from me and everything is set12:58
asacgnomefreak: could you ask jdong if he plans a backport for xul ffox 3?12:59
gnomefreaki will when i see him12:59
fta2just tried gnash from hardy, it doesn't work at all for anything12:59
asacit doesn't?13:00
gnomefreaki left a few messages for him.13:00
asacfta2: from ~gnash ppa?13:00
asachttps://edge.launchpad.net/~gnash/+archive13:00
asac?13:00
fta2i remember Rob saying it was able to render youtube correctly, i get a black square13:00
asacfta2: which package?13:01
fta2hardy13:01
asactry the one from the PPA13:01
asacfor me hardy works on a bunch of files13:01
asacat least last time i tried13:01
asacwith the PPA version even full screen works ;)13:02
sebnerhihi ff team13:02
fta2hi13:02
sebnerfta2: 69.28.181.43    -kol.deviantart.com13:02
fta2hm13:03
sebnerfta2: did you find something out?13:05
fta2i'm at work right now, so nope13:05
sebnerah kk13:06
asacsebner: whats up?13:06
sebnerasac: a strange issue occurs with linux browsers and with win/mac browsers not ;)13:07
asacthat is?13:08
sebnerasac: -kol.deviantart.com is working on windows/mac but not on linux13:08
sebnerfta2: the "-" is necessary since without it a *other* site is called13:10
gnomefreakFirefox can't find the server at -kol.deviantart.com.13:10
sebnergnomefreak: yes, but it's working on windows13:11
sebnerthough fta discovered that this isn't valid13:11
gnomefreaksebner: with firefox 3?13:11
sebnergnomefreak: I suppose with all versions13:11
asacsebner: i think i read a bug about that13:12
gnomefreakwhat did you tesst with?13:12
asacsebner: iirc its not legal13:12
gnomefreakasac: not legal than why would windows work?13:12
asacand the linux parser is more precise on what urls are allowed13:12
asacbecause of a bug in windows parser13:12
gnomefreakah that could be why13:12
asacbut thats all theory as i just remember that argument remotely13:13
asacsebner: you have a bug id?13:13
* gnomefreak figured something should be in front of the ~13:13
sebnerasac: no, just a friend told me about that and I thought it's a bug13:13
asacwe definitly have a bug in launchpad13:13
gnomefreakdoes it work if you change the identifier for FF?13:14
fta2gnomefreak, it's a - not a ~13:14
gnomefreakfta2: ah13:14
sebnerasac: interestingly the site ist "-kol" and just "kol" is a *other* site ..13:14
gnomefreaki c+p'ed it looked like a ~13:14
fta2sebner, that's expected.13:14
sebnerfta2: but why does deviantart allows a site what's not valid13:15
fta2good question, i have no idea13:15
gnomefreakif you go to site without the - you will see ~kol on top13:16
sebnerasac: does every broswer parses the URI at his own?13:18
asacsebner: bug 12146713:19
ubottuLaunchpad bug 121467 in firefox "unable to acces to a specific url with any navigator." [Low,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/12146713:19
asacnot sure if thats the bug ;)13:19
asaclooks invalid13:19
asachehe13:19
asachttps://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/121467/comments/1013:20
ubottuLaunchpad bug 121467 in firefox "unable to acces to a specific url with any navigator." [Low,Invalid]13:20
asacthats the comment13:20
sebnermy friend gave me the argument that though it's invalid it'a a feature and many windows user expect it to work also on linux13:20
asacyes its a bug13:21
sebnerasac: a bug on windows? ^^13:21
asacno, a bug in the www :)13:22
sebnerwhy?13:22
asacpeople use invalid hostnames?13:23
asacanyway, we should see if there is an upstream bug in bugzilla.mozilla.org13:23
sebnerfta2: posted me one yester let me search13:24
sebnerasac: maybe https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35518113:24
ubottuMozilla bug 355181 in Networking "net_IsValidHostName() comment says one thing, code does another" [Normal,Resolved: fixed]13:24
gnomefreaksays its fixed13:24
gnomefreakif fixed it should be in b5 and/or RC13:26
asacsebner: looks right13:26
asacconnected bug13:26
sebnerasac: but I still don't understand why it's working on windows. isn't every browser checking the URI on his own?13:27
asacsebner: platform specific code13:31
asac$ find netwerk/base/ | grep nsURL13:31
asacnetwerk/base/src/nsURLHelper.h13:31
asacnetwerk/base/src/nsURLParsers.h13:31
asacnetwerk/base/src/nsURLHelperWin.cpp13:31
asacnetwerk/base/src/nsURLParsers.cpp13:31
asacnetwerk/base/src/nsURLHelper.cpp13:31
asacnetwerk/base/src/nsURLHelperOS2.cpp13:31
asacnetwerk/base/src/nsURLHelperOSX.cpp13:31
asacnetwerk/base/src/nsURLHelperUnix.cpp13:31
asacso nsURLHelper is probably an abstract implementation13:31
asacand Win overwrites that13:32
asacwhile Unix doesnt13:32
asac:)13:32
sebnerasac: k, and we have no interest in implement that?13:33
asacwell, upstream will apply that13:35
asacerr is already fixed13:36
sebnerasac: that means?13:37
gnomefreakas i said if they fixed it it would be seen in b5 rc1 but isnt. bug should be reopened IMHO13:38
gnomefreaksince they planned a fix13:38
sebnerI understand13:38
sebnerbut IIRC it wasn't working for me also with b513:38
asacnope13:39
asacapparently its in, but still not fixed13:39
sebnerasac: hm?13:39
sebnerah ok13:39
gnomefreaksebner: the fix never landed in our builds but should have per bug report13:39
asacdo you have a URL that has a dash at the end of hostnames?13:39
asace.g. kol-.xyz.net13:39
asac?13:39
sebnerasac: and every browser on linux have to hack into the code to allow that now?13:39
gnomefreakasac: fails as well13:39
gnomefreakasac: look at the LP bug it has a couple on there13:39
gnomefreaklet me find the bug13:40
gnomefreakbug 12284813:40
ubottuLaunchpad bug 122848 in firefox "doesnt recognize dash "-" in URL (dup-of: 121467)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/12284813:40
ubottuLaunchpad bug 121467 in firefox "unable to access URLs (doesnt recognize dash "-" in URL)" [Unknown,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/12146713:40
gnomefreakthe summary has 213:40
gnomefreakhttp://-js-.blogspot.com13:40
gnomefreakhttp://-js-.smugmug.com13:40
gnomefreakeven if FF did add fix that doesnt fix all the browsers13:41
sebnergnomefreak: I see13:42
gnomefreakso could there be a bigger underlining issue13:42
sebnerbut we shouldn support unvalid things :\13:42
gnomefreakthe way "linux" handles them?13:42
gnomefreakthat could be one reason why we dont see a fix13:42
gnomefreakcant be too invalid since upstream did patch FF13:44
asacok lunch13:44
sebnerasac: hf13:44
sebnergnomefreak: but it's nevertheless not valid.  http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2396.html13:44
* gnomefreak gone for a bit too i have to shut this POS down. people on hardy/gutsy please test flash 10 in my PPA please so i have something to give backporters if needed13:45
gnomefreaksebner: that is true13:45
sebnergnomefreak: sry. i have intrepid :P13:46
gnomefreaki already know it works in intrepid :)13:46
gnomefreakmaybe ill test harder on hardy later13:46
gnomefreaki have things to get done for now13:46
armin76asac: fta: i've tried building debian's xulrunner, they don't use Werror, you guys do15:53
armin76http://paste.ubuntu.com/15094/15:55
armin76although i don't know where the Werror comes from, since i've used the same configure parameters for both15:56
asacarmin76: i know15:58
asacthat debian dropped the flag15:58
armin76asac: fix then :P i'll test16:00
fta2i prefer to keep it, especially for alignments.. otherwise, we could create a situation like openssl16:00
asaci dont see why we want to ignore alignment issues, true.16:01
asaclets fix it for real or come up why its not a problem in this case16:02
asacwe could then special case that particular file16:02
asacor something16:02
ftahm, after a reboot under hardy, my ~/.Xauthority is owned by root, and unreadable18:26
ftawaa, and after i fixed it, xauth is still not able to lock it18:27
fta-proposed is broken :P18:27
asacfta: tell bryce if there was a xorg update18:56
sebnerfta: *lol*. hmm I shouldn't reboot my intrepid xD18:56
armin76fail *g*19:17
ftahm, so we'll have ff3 RC2..22:52
sebnerfta: hmm?22:52
ftamozilla decided to create a RC222:53
sebnerfta: when?22:53
ftaI guess once those are ready: http://tinyurl.com/57uue222:56
sebnerfta: k, thanks =)22:56
ftaThe proposed, estimated RC2 schedule is as follows:22:57
fta   Code Freeze: Wed, May 28, noon PDT22:57
fta   Start Builds: Thu, May 29, early am PDT22:57
fta   Start QA: Thu, May 29, noon PDT (as builds become available)22:57
fta   QA Complete: Thu, June 522:57
ftamozilla bug 40566922:57
ubottuMozilla bug 405669 in www.mozilla.com "Linux system requirements need updating" [Major,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40566922:57
sebnerfta: I see :)22:58
sebnerdholbert: are you the half-cousin of dholbach? ^^23:15
ftalol23:16
dholbertsebner: Haha, no23:16
dholbertsebner: Though, Jono Bacon asked me a similar question when I met him at LugRadioLive USA23:16
sebnerha!23:16
sebner^^23:16
asacdebian bug 48079623:22
ubottuDebian bug 480796 in kazehakase "Don't build depend on libxul-dev" [Wishlist,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/48079623:22
asacpatch attached23:22
ftahm, seamonkey 2 wants 1.9.1.x,23:23
ftathey'll have to move to hg too23:24
ftai wonder what it means for mozilla-central23:24

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!