[00:10] cjwatson, thanks, my xchat buffer scrolled off over the long weekend. [00:51] boot.cat and a *CN.hlp file in isolinux/ is bad, it seems...maybe I generated the md5sum file wrong? [07:26] Does ubiquity do raid and/or lvm yet? [07:26] no, sorry [07:27] No problem, thanks. === foka_ is now known as foka === davmor2 is now known as davmor2_away === davmor2_away is now known as davmor2 [13:02] some users claim that .17 kernel breaks wubi, can somebody please test that and confirm? [14:45] evand ^ [14:46] also do you recall the discussion about http://www.sendspace.com/file/vwm18u ? the chap does in fact have an sda5 partition, not sure why partman has issues with it [14:50] I think that's due to a problem in wubi's preseeding that will happen for any non-English installs [14:50] cjwatson: can you expand? I cannot access the logs from here [14:51] xivulon: I think you need to apply http://paste.ubuntu.com/15325/ (untested) [14:51] that form of preseeding was needed before hardy, but was buggy in this kind of way and hardy introduced a better scheme [14:52] the installation guide documents the form in that patch now [14:52] Will do, wasn't aware of that [14:52] looks like I missed that wubi used that [15:07] odd that it wasn't triggered in other installs [15:39] was thinking the same thing, anywy will ask the user to try that [15:44] anything else I should change in the preseed file? [15:46] I didn't see anything else obvious, at least not in the same category of problems [15:46] didn't do a full audit though [15:55] I opened bug #235518 if you can think of anything else, feel free to put it in there [16:42] cjwatson http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=5062712&postcount=29 [16:45] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=5062902#post5062902 [18:17] xivulon: sorry for the late start on the verbose test just got busy. It's running now and put the log file online as soon as it has finished :) [18:18] I have a package that is a custom GRUB bootloader. The package name is TrustedGRUB, but I indicate that it provides linux-boot-loader. Is there anyway in the seed file to have that selected as the bootloader instead of traditional GRUB, while using the seeded answers from the GRUB debconf questions? [18:32] where might I find information/source for the installer that handles bootloaders? I would like to see how grub is installed and create a custom version that will installer TrustedGRUB from a package that I have created? [18:50] xivulon: which log file did you want? [18:51] was it casper.log [18:51] evand my branching naming convention was to keep one per release i.e. wubi/hardy lupin/hardy and then branch off for intrepid development [18:51] davmor2: can you remind me of the bug in question? [18:52] evand, do you prefer to have a single trunk, and only create branches for *.proposed? [18:52] bug 234974 m-a not functioning in wubi [18:53] davmor2 you have to install in verbose mode, then from ubuntu tgz /var/log/installer [18:53] password might be in there (although hashed) [18:54] xivulon: right no probs [18:54] davmor2: thx [18:56] evand, also didn't you mention that new changes didn't have to be in trunk but in a separate branch a few days ago'? [18:57] xivulon: correct, I'd prefer for future branches that you create project.trunk or something similar and then branch for things like hardy-proposed, that way there's no confusion or unnecessary branch creation when a new release comes out. [18:57] I don't see any need to change existing branches, however. [18:58] I have no strong preference for branch naming, will do as you say in the future [18:58] ok, thanks [18:58] would you think it is appropriate to rename the current hardy branches to trunk or simply branch off and start fresh? [18:59] I think they're fine as-is for now. [18:59] so intrepid development will take care in a new branch called trunk/devel [18:59] but I wont complain if you want to rename them. [18:59] whatever you prefer [19:02] I don't think a new branch is the right solution. Assuming LP supports branch renaming, changing *.hardy to *.trunk is suitable, though I don't think there's any rush to do that. [19:02] evand re pm-utils had a message yesterday about a user that had a corrupted fs because of hard reboot after hibernation [19:03] so yes, I'd like to see that in 8.04.1 [19:03] xivulon: It's up I chmoded the file so you can access it. [19:03] http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=5054940&postcount=6 [19:08] for 230716 cjwatson confirmed that the code was ok in casper, doing that in lupin-casper would be more invasive [19:08] evand ^ [19:09] ok [19:10] on 222546 I had a quick exchange with Lamont via the bug comments, didn't hear anything else since [19:11] for 229000 yep, didn't have time to look at the code yet, but will do so [19:11] that was intended more as a reminder for self === ebel_ is now known as ebel