=== andre___ is now known as andre|afk | ||
genii | Not sure if my situation is a bug or not. Totem seems caught in some codec loop. | 03:15 |
---|---|---|
genii | ON2/VP6 codec, flv video. Codec needed... installs (video). Codec needed (audio)...installs. Video codec now seems re-needed. Etc ad infinitum | 03:17 |
genii | Should I file this as per topic? | 03:20 |
awalton__ | genii, I would if I were you, seems quiet in here. | 03:21 |
awalton__ | out of curiosity, what video is it? flash? | 03:22 |
genii | awalton__: Yes | 03:22 |
awalton__ | just a whatever.flv or flash in the browser? | 03:22 |
persia_ | genii: If the file causing the issue can be added to LP, that would be a great help in reproducing the loop. | 03:23 |
genii | awalton__: I copied out of browser to desktop as flv. | 03:23 |
genii | persia_: OK, thanks | 03:23 |
awalton__ | ah. | 03:24 |
genii | persia_: After some searching I can't find the original site of the video. Is it possible to post the actual one I have here someplace on the site? | 03:38 |
genii | Sorry nvm see the "Attach" now at bottom | 03:39 |
persia_ | genii: Actually, the developers usually complain when they are only given a link. I don't know the license for the file you have, but if you are allowed to share, adding it as an attachment is better. | 03:39 |
persia_ | If you aren't allowed to share, maybe it's better not to add it, as you'd be making to available to the public (or making Launchpad make it available to the public) | 03:40 |
genii | It was on a public site, it is footage of an interview regarding a new beauty product. | 03:44 |
genii | I was trying to preview it on Totem before editing and copying to one of their video display terminals which would run it in a loop. | 03:45 |
genii | Bug is now reported https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/235648 | 03:53 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 235648 in ubuntu "Totem, infinite codec install loop (ON2/VP6)" [Undecided,New] | 03:53 |
genii | persia_ awalton__ Thanks for the advice and guidance. | 03:56 |
=== Admiral_laptop is now known as Admiral_Chicago | ||
hrlr | anyone around able to help me confirm a bug? :) | 07:00 |
hrlr | Or "potential bug". | 07:00 |
techno_freak | hrlr, ? | 07:04 |
persia_ | hrlr: Best way is to report the bug (searching for dupes, etc.). Once registered, ask for confirmation here with the URL. | 07:07 |
hrlr | persia: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/99740/comments/6 | 07:10 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 99740 in compiz "Firefox problems with desktop-effects" [Medium,Confirmed] | 07:10 |
persia_ | hrlr: I'm not in an environment to confirm that now, but it's definitely in better form than the first :) | 07:11 |
persia_ | Anyone else have firefox & compiz up for a test case? | 07:11 |
* techno_freak raises his hand | 07:15 | |
hrlr | Thanks techno_freak! | 07:16 |
techno_freak | it looks like some bug i triaged during the hug day for FF3 | 07:17 |
techno_freak | when maximized and restarted the border goes out of bounds.. | 07:18 |
techno_freak | umm.. was it firefox... nopes.. some game | 07:18 |
hrlr | This bug seems to only appear when the javascript calls for the window to be maximized. I can't reproduce it any other way. | 07:19 |
hrlr | My first guess was that it was firefox but that was eliminated when I turned off "Visual Effects" and had the same results. | 07:21 |
hrlr | *different results | 07:21 |
hrlr | techno_freak: how'd it go? | 07:38 |
techno_freak | hrlr, manually resize the window.. the title bar and borders were just moving out of visible portion of the screen | 07:39 |
hrlr | techno_freak: yup... that's what I did. I just wanted to see if the steps I wrote down for reproducing the bug and correcting it were good. | 07:41 |
techno_freak | hrlr, think its ok. | 07:41 |
hrlr | techno_freak: thanks again! | 07:42 |
techno_freak | :) | 07:42 |
techno_freak | it seem's to be a problem in lot of apps when the window is maximized or run in fullscreen mode.. hmmm.. | 07:43 |
hrlr | To me it seems like compiz is "snapping" to something out of range. But that's just my best guess. | 07:44 |
techno_freak | am not sure of compiz being the reason, haven't tested anything without it, should do | 07:45 |
techno_freak | tata | 07:45 |
techno_freak | err.. sorry | 07:45 |
=== seb128_ is now known as seb128 | ||
=== ogra_ is now known as ogra | ||
Deeta | I think I read in the wiki that when I ask someone a question about supplying more info I should set the bug to be assigned to me. Then later later info has been provided it should be set to 'nobody' again. Yet I notice that often the bug is left at 'nobody' even though inquiry for more info has been made. So I wondered what of both ways is the correct one. | 11:59 |
james_w | Deeta: hi, can you point to the page that tells you to do that? | 12:01 |
james_w | I know it exists, I just can't find it right now. | 12:01 |
techno_freak | Deeta, that's something we followed long ago, not triagers need not assign it to themselves for incomplete bugs | 12:06 |
techno_freak | s/not/now | 12:06 |
techno_freak | Deeta, when you are asking for more info, set status to incomplete but do not assign it to yourself unless you plan to work on it | 12:07 |
Deeta | Ahh ok techno_freak :D thank you very much for the info :D I am not sure where I read it, it is a bit ago. My best guess would be the chat protokol in the wiki | 12:31 |
techno_freak | Deeta, it was there in the documents that way when I read it last year, but we changed the way based on a mail from bdmurray to the list sometime this January IIRC | 12:32 |
techno_freak | or was it dholbach, not sure | 12:33 |
Deeta | ah so still brand new :D, well no matter who ordained it :D just wondered how it should be done :) and now I know it :) ^_^ thanks | 12:33 |
techno_freak | Deeta, ;) | 12:38 |
klesssou | hi, i'm with ubuntu hardy proposed and an upgrade have removed firefox-3.0 :-/ | 13:46 |
klesssou | m without any firefox :-( | 13:46 |
klesssou | now, I'm without any firefox :-( | 13:47 |
seb128 | what do you use to do upgrades? | 13:47 |
seb128 | well, next time read what the software wants to do before acking? breaks have been used to stop the upgrade while everything is not available | 13:47 |
klesssou | the GUI | 13:47 |
seb128 | what gui? update manager doesn't remove things installed | 13:47 |
klesssou | It asks me if I want to do a dist-upgrade | 13:48 |
klesssou | I said 'yes' ... (why not ? :-) | 13:49 |
seb128 | and does a summary of the actions | 13:49 |
klesssou | yes | 13:49 |
klesssou | removing firefox3 ... | 13:50 |
pochu | synaptic? | 13:51 |
mvo | klesssou: could you put the last few lines of your /var/log/dist-upgrade/apt.log file somewhere? | 13:52 |
seb128 | the goal is to block the update while everything is not built | 13:52 |
mvo | last ~20 maybe | 13:52 |
seb128 | now if you don't read and just acknowledge actions | 13:53 |
pochu | ...then you shoudln't be running proposed :) | 13:53 |
klesssou | mvo i will | 13:53 |
Hobbsee | klesssou: which unofficial repositories are you using, btw? | 13:54 |
klesssou | pochu: :-) don't worry | 13:55 |
seb128 | Hobbsee: no need to run an official one to get the issue, the new xulrunner-1.9 breaks on the applications which need a reply and some didn't build yet | 13:55 |
Hobbsee | seb128: oh. good thing i haven't upgraded yet. | 13:56 |
seb128 | mvo: just try to dist-upgrade now, you will get the issue | 13:56 |
klesssou | deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/banshee-team/ubuntu hardy main | 13:56 |
seb128 | mvo: aptitude is smarter and put xulrunner-1.9 in hold, apt-get wants to remove things | 13:56 |
klesssou | deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu hardy partner | 13:57 |
klesssou | that's all | 13:57 |
Pici | komputes: 64bit? | 13:58 |
klesssou | Investigating firefox-3.0-gnome-support | 13:58 |
klesssou | Package firefox-3.0-gnome-support has broken dep on xulrunner-1.9-gnome-support | 13:58 |
klesssou | Considering xulrunner-1.9-gnome-support 313 as a solution to firefox-3.0-gnome-support 1 | 13:58 |
klesssou | Removing firefox-3.0-gnome-support rather than change xulrunner-1.9-gnome-support | 13:58 |
pochu | Hobbsee: but that's only with -proposed | 13:59 |
pochu | so no need to worry | 13:59 |
Hobbsee | pochu: i have that. i just keep forgetting to update. | 13:59 |
komputes | Pici: que? | 13:59 |
Pici | komputes: I fail at tab-completion today. | 14:00 |
komputes | Pici: i'm guessing tab | 14:00 |
komputes | yeah | 14:00 |
komputes | it's cool | 14:00 |
hggdh | siretart, good morning. Are xine-lib bugs ever forwarded? | 14:26 |
Pici | *sigh* | 14:27 |
siretart | hggdh: darren (who is both upstream and maintaining it in debian together with me) is looking from time to time at them, but I don't think we forwarded a single ubuntu bug yet since xine switched to bugzilla | 14:38 |
hggdh | siretart, thanks. I am slowly building the DebuggingXineLib page... | 14:42 |
erUSUL | is this the place to ask about broken proposed updates ?? | 14:42 |
hggdh | siretart: by bugzilla you mean bugzilla.gnome.org? | 14:42 |
seb128 | hggdh: "use gstreamer" ;-) | 14:42 |
hggdh | seb128 :-) | 14:42 |
hggdh | seb128 I am building a Debugging page for xine-lib, following siretart's suggestions | 14:43 |
hggdh | seb128 being slightly deaf (at least that's what my sons & S.O. tell me, I have a reduced need for sounds, anyway ;-) | 14:44 |
siretart | hggdh: no, with bugzilla I mean http://bugs.xine-project.org | 14:44 |
siretart | hggdh: xine is not related to gnome in any way | 14:45 |
seb128 | hggdh: I'm wondering if xine is worth spending efforts on it, but I'll not say it too loud to not make people angry at me there ;-) | 14:45 |
hggdh | siretart: thanks. I will note it in the page... and you see how far my knowledge about sounds (and packages) goes ;-) | 14:45 |
siretart | hggdh: but you do ask very interesting questions, that are pretty clear and obvious to me, and I forget that they actually aren't obvious! that's really helpful to me! | 14:47 |
Pici | Sigh, way too many people have Proposed enabled it seems. | 14:47 |
siretart | erUSUL: maybe. but the relevant bug might be an even better place to ask, because it is guaranteed to reach the developer that way | 14:50 |
hggdh | siretart, you are welcome ;-) | 14:51 |
erUSUL | Pici: i do that for help in what i can. Just trying to let revelant people know about the problem | 14:51 |
erUSUL | Pici: can't find the bug in launchad | 14:51 |
Pici | erUSUL: Sorry, wasn't complaing about you. | 14:52 |
erUSUL | Pici: no problem ;) | 14:52 |
erUSUL | siretart: do yopu know the bug report about this broken updates ? | 14:53 |
hggdh | siretart: more questions, if you do not mind. xine-lib builds a series of packages (and I have them from the ./debian/control) but there are additional libxine* packages outside it. Are they all under your guard? | 15:01 |
Hobbsee | erUSUL: it's already known, even if there's no bug. | 15:01 |
siretart | erUSUL: look in the changelog of the package you've downloaded. the latest upload needs to include the bugnumber by policy | 15:04 |
siretart | hggdh: yes, they are | 15:04 |
pochu | anybody using hardy + vinagre? | 15:22 |
thekorn | bdmurray, hi, I'm using the ROCKING ubuntu-gm-scripts you showed me at UDS, but the 'add tag' one is not working for me | 16:08 |
thekorn | i expect it to add the tag i clicked on, | 16:09 |
thekorn | but it does not work | 16:09 |
bdmurray | it takes a bit for it to execute | 16:09 |
bdmurray | mine is working | 16:10 |
bdmurray | Have you done any testing of p-lp-b with the new lp roll out? | 16:11 |
thekorn | everything seems to work so far, apart from bug 235681 | 16:13 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 235681 in python-launchpad-bugs "new LP rollout broke subscription" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/235681 | 16:13 |
bdmurray | Cool, I just saw that | 16:13 |
thekorn | my testcases currently only check parsing, and this all works | 16:13 |
thekorn | bdmurray, I waited for minutes, the 'add tag'-script is definitely not working for me, unfortunatly I don't know enough js to debug this further, will have a closer look at it tomorrow morning | 16:33 |
bdmurray | thekorn: which one did you specifically install? | 16:35 |
bdmurray | Are you on epiphany? | 16:36 |
thekorn | on ff3, I'm using lp:~ubuntu-dev/ubuntu-gm-scripts/ubuntu | 16:36 |
bdmurray | weird, are you running the new ff3 in -proposed? | 16:36 |
thekorn | 3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 | 16:38 |
emgent | bdmurray: ping | 16:39 |
emgent | bdmurray: do you know why launchpad sent to me a mail with information about your ubuntu-bugs join? I'm only simple member.. | 16:40 |
emgent | but i saw that i can change and manage your status in this group.. | 16:41 |
emgent | possible bug ? | 16:41 |
bdmurray | You were an admin of the team, but that should be fixed now. | 16:41 |
bdmurray | Where fixed means you shouldn't be anymore. | 16:41 |
emgent | uhm true, but seems now i can manage your approvation | 16:42 |
emgent | bdmurray: http://thc.emanuele-gentili.com/~emgent/lp.png | 16:43 |
emgent | Hello Emanuele Gentili, | 16:43 |
emgent | The membership status of Ubuntu Bug Control Team (ubuntu-bugcontrol) in | 16:43 |
emgent | the team Ubuntu Bugs (ubuntu-bugs) was changed by Brian Murray (brian- | 16:43 |
emgent | murray) from Administrator to Approved. | 16:43 |
emgent | so, it`s ok now | 16:43 |
bdmurray | Great, and I've spammed everyone | 16:44 |
Hobbsee | yeah, thanks... | 16:44 |
emgent | lol | 16:44 |
* Hobbsee beats bdmurray with a dead ferret. | 16:44 | |
emgent | hi Hobbsee :) | 16:44 |
Hobbsee | hey emgent! | 16:45 |
stgraber | bdmurray: you *only* sent 4 mails to each member of a 197 members large team. that's only 788 mails :) | 16:48 |
bdmurray | stgraber: 4? that's launchpads fault then | 16:48 |
Hobbsee | stgraber: i got 3... | 16:48 |
stgraber | yep, I received 4 here ... | 16:48 |
Hobbsee | stgraber: but did you count all the indirects too? | 16:48 |
emgent | gh | 16:49 |
stgraber | Hobbsee: I don't think there are any direct member in this team except bdmurray so yes :) | 16:49 |
stgraber | I received "Membership change: ubuntu-bugcontrol in ubuntu-bugs" twice (in 6 minutes) and "brian-murray joined ubuntu-bugs" + "brian-murray made admin by brian-murray" | 16:50 |
emgent | lol | 16:50 |
stgraber | so one is LP's fault, the 3 others are bdmurray's fault :) | 16:50 |
bdmurray | I don't know why the membership change had to happen 2x | 16:50 |
stgraber | the only difference between those two mails is the time they were sent, nothing else ... so let's say it's LP's fault | 16:51 |
Hobbsee | stgraber: yeah, but i can't beat launchpad with a dead ferret, though | 16:53 |
* Hobbsee keeps thumping bdmurray with it, to compensate | 16:53 | |
* jpds hugs bdmurray | 16:53 | |
bddebian | Boo | 16:59 |
jpds | hi bddebian | 16:59 |
bddebian | Hello jpds | 16:59 |
greg-g | jpds: you just read the message from freenode too? :) | 17:00 |
jpds | greg-g: yep. | 17:01 |
bdmurray | I've written some new bug 'reports' that might be interesting | 17:42 |
bdmurray | http://people.ubuntu.com/~brian/reports/database/ | 17:42 |
bdmurray | There are reports for the oldest bug in a particular state and bugs with the most duplicates too | 17:43 |
heno | bdmurray: looks good | 17:44 |
bdmurray | heno: oh hey! thanks | 17:44 |
heno | the ordering of the last 3 seems a bit random | 17:45 |
heno | what is it based on (not just bug # I guess) | 17:45 |
bdmurray | date reported | 17:45 |
heno | odd that it doesn't always correlate with the bug # | 17:46 |
bdmurray | It might get better with more recent bug reports | 17:48 |
james_w | bdmurray: thanks, there looks like there are some things there that should be easy to clean up | 17:50 |
james_w | I guess a lot of the "New" bugs in the duplicates list could at least be "Confirmed" | 17:50 |
bdmurray | james_w: right, it be nice to unprivatize and bugs w/ lots of duplicates and confirm those yes | 17:51 |
james_w | it's probably worth pointing dholbach at these, as he may be able to get some information for the things he is working on | 17:51 |
bdmurray | yeah, system-config-samba | 17:58 |
=== _neversfelde is now known as neversfelde | ||
=== boomer` is now known as boomer | ||
sbeattie | bdmurray: would it be useful in those reports to include the title of the bug, to refresh the memory of those who might be looking over those lists? | 18:34 |
sbeattie | Or do you have a greasemonkey script that's doing that for you already? | 18:34 |
bdmurray | I'd just been using the color of the hyperlink to tell whether or not I'd looked at it. ;) | 18:35 |
sbeattie | Heh | 18:36 |
bdmurray | That'd be easy to add though | 18:36 |
=== fdd-0 is now known as fdd | ||
* thekorn wonders why the bug number and the 'date reported' are not linear | 18:43 | |
hggdh | thekorn: entropy... | 19:08 |
thekorn | hggdh, maybe, although I'm not sure what this means ;) | 19:10 |
thekorn | bdmurray, I've a one line fix for lp_buttontags.user.js in the ubuntu branch, should I file a bugreport or just paste the diff somewhere? | 19:13 |
bdmurray | thekorn: the diff would be great | 19:14 |
thekorn | bdmurray, http://paste.ubuntu.com/15598/ against rev 20 of lp:~ubuntu-dev/ubuntu-gm-scripts/ubuntu | 19:15 |
bdmurray | hunh | 19:17 |
bdmurray | You should have used my branch. ;) | 19:20 |
bdmurray | I'm not sure why it didn't get merged right... | 19:20 |
thekorn | na, this way I learned some javascript ;) | 19:22 |
=== asac_ is now known as asac | ||
grgorio | Anybody here? | 21:21 |
norsetto | grgorio: nobody | 21:21 |
bdmurray | grgorio: I am | 21:22 |
norsetto | grgorio: bdmurray doesn't count, he is ALWAYS here | 21:22 |
grgorio | Cool. I was wondering if someone could help me out. I found a bug while using Open Office in Ubuntu. I'd like to participate in the process of identifying and resolving bugs, but I'm kinda new to this process. | 21:23 |
grgorio | First part of text got cut out..."I was wondering if someone could help me..." | 21:24 |
james_w | grgorio: great. if you describe the bug that you have found then we can help you get the necessary information. | 21:26 |
grgorio | Ok, cool. | 21:26 |
norsetto | grgorio: have you checked if this particular bug has been reported already? | 21:26 |
grgorio | Norsetto: No. I read the documentation about submitting it to LaunchPad, and it seemed like I should go here first. How should I search? | 21:27 |
grgorio | I'm not sure A) where to search, and B)exactly how to describe the bug. | 21:28 |
james_w | grgorio: firstly, open office is split in to several parts, which are you having trouble with? | 21:29 |
james_w | (spreadsheet, word processor, etc.) | 21:29 |
grgorio | I think it happens in both. Hang on one moment, and I'll check. | 21:29 |
grgorio | It happens in both spreadsheet and word processor. Perhaps this is not actually a bug with OO.org, but rather the application that saves the files. | 21:31 |
james_w | you are unable to save? | 21:31 |
grgorio | As far as I can tell, the bug only happens when trying to save a document in Open Office. In the dialog box that pops up when I click "Save As", if I copy and paste text in the file name box, then Open Office freezes. | 21:31 |
grgorio | It only happens when I copy and paste a file name, or a portion of a file name. | 21:32 |
james_w | where are you pasting from? | 21:32 |
grgorio | Usually just from another file name in the same dialog box. | 21:32 |
grgorio | Everything works great in OO.Org. I use it every single day, and really enjoy it. But it's kind of frustrating to not be able to copy and paste in the dialog box. | 21:33 |
james_w | using ctrl-c, ctrl-v, right click, or middle mouse? | 21:33 |
grgorio | I guess it's a pretty minor issue, but I wanted to do my part and make sure it's reported. | 21:34 |
james_w | I can't find anything in the dialog to copy | 21:34 |
grgorio | It happens if I use Ctrl-C or use the mouse. | 21:35 |
grgorio | Some times Open Office will run very sluggish after that, and other times I get the pop up box asking me if I want to force-quit. | 21:36 |
james_w | are you on ubuntu hardy (8.04)? | 21:37 |
grgorio | Isn't it actually Nautilus that handles the saving of files from open office, or am I wrong? | 21:37 |
grgorio | Nope, 7.04 Feisty Fawn | 21:37 |
* thekorn finds nothing to copy in the save-dialog | 21:37 | |
james_w | it's not nautilus, it's a gnome or gtk file chooser, I forget which. | 21:38 |
james_w | I think it may have changed for Hardy though, so that's why we can't reproduce it. | 21:38 |
grgorio | That would be the best case scenario. | 21:39 |
james_w | well, I guess it will still annoy you, as you can't copy anything any more | 21:39 |
james_w | it does have autocomplete as you type though, which might be as good. | 21:40 |
grgorio | Yeah, but it is a small annoyance, really. That's a good point on the autocomplete. | 21:40 |
grgorio | So, for future reference....how do I not be a noob on bug reporting and search for them on my own? | 21:40 |
grgorio | Through LaunchPad? | 21:41 |
james_w | so, you can start at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/ | 21:42 |
james_w | there is a search box there you can use | 21:42 |
grgorio | Ok, cool. | 21:42 |
james_w | if you know the source package then you can narrow the search, in this case it would be good to start at | 21:43 |
james_w | https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org | 21:43 |
grgorio | And how can I get more involved in this bug squashing process, through the same site? | 21:43 |
james_w | if you don't find your bug already you can find it by clicking the "Report a bug" button towards the top right. | 21:43 |
james_w | yep, we work through launchpad, let me get you a link. | 21:44 |
grgorio | Cool. | 21:44 |
james_w | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/HelpingWithBugs | 21:44 |
james_w | there's lots of ways to help, for instance you could look at all the bugs for your favourite pacakge and ask the submitters questions if there isn't enough information. | 21:45 |
james_w | or we have other lists like the list of bugs that haven't got a package associated with them, those you can make a best guess about the package | 21:46 |
grgorio | Hey thanks a lot James. I've been using Ubuntu for a few years now, and I'd like to do my part to help. | 21:46 |
james_w | the biggest target is anything in the "New" state, from there you want to move it to "Incomplete" if it needs more information, or "Confirmed/Triaged" if there is enough. | 21:47 |
james_w | no problem, feel free to hang around on this channel and ask questions if you are unsure about anything. | 21:47 |
grgorio | Ok. I'm sure I can learn an awful lot about Linux by participating in that fashion. | 21:47 |
grgorio | I do have one other question. | 21:47 |
james_w | there's also #ubuntu-bugs-announce if you want to snipe bugs are they are reported. | 21:47 |
grgorio | It's a non bug related question though. How would I access the source code for an application...it's called "Wanda the Fish" on gnome, and "fortune" on bash. | 21:47 |
grgorio | I guess it's fortune that I really want to see. I'd like to port this application to another platform. | 21:48 |
james_w | so the fortune program lives in the fortune-mod package (dpkg -S $(which fortune)) | 21:48 |
james_w | "apt-get source fortune" will get the source code | 21:49 |
james_w | you may need to add some "deb-src" lines to your sources.list first, "Software Sources" can do this for you I think. | 21:50 |
grgorio | Ok. I understand all of that except "Software Sources" can do this for you. | 21:50 |
grgorio | Is "Software Sources" an application that I download to find out what deb-src lines to add or something? | 21:51 |
james_w | System->Administration->Software Sources | 21:51 |
james_w | there is a "source code" checkbox | 21:51 |
james_w | if you know what a deb-src line is then you can do it by hand of course | 21:51 |
grgorio | Ok. If I check "Source Code" on System->Administration->Software Sources, I don't get a check mark, I get a horizontal line. | 21:54 |
grgorio | I'm confused as to what that means. | 21:54 |
james_w | click again I think | 21:57 |
james_w | I don't know what that mean | 21:57 |
grgorio | Well, I clicked on it, and am doing an update now. I'll do some googling to find out how. But I think you have me pointed in the right direction. | 21:58 |
grgorio | James, thanks so much for the great help. Have a great day! | 21:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!