/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/06/02/#ubuntu-bugs.txt

emgentmorning02:50
=== asac_ is now known as asac
=== hggdh is now known as hggdh|away
=== jjesse_ is now known as jjesse
=== hggdh is now known as hggdh|away
=== ubot3` is now known as ubot3
=== persia_ is now known as persia
IulianHey12:44
steve555Hi there.12:45
IulianHello steve12:45
steve555Hi Iulian12:45
steve555Where are you from?12:46
steve555I did have an annoying problem over the last few days.I'm running Kubuntu Hardy Heron,over the last week,after about an hour of booting into Kubuntu,the whole desktop used to completely freeze-up!it would take a few re-sets to get it going again.So I investigated inside my P.C suspecting it was my Graphics Card.I took my Graphics Card out of it's slot,blew as much dust as I could from it's fan,and made sure it was se12:54
steve555curely seated in it's AGP slot and started up again.So far my computer hasn't froze since :)12:54
james_whi Iulian, congratulations on becoming a member.12:58
IulianHello james, thank you.13:02
IulianHey pedro13:02
* Iulian - lunch!13:02
=== _[PUPPETS]Gonzo is now known as [PUPPETS]Gonzo
=== mdz_ is now known as mdz
bddebianBoo15:25
jpds!gary15:26
ubottube afraid, be *very* afraid15:26
bddebian:)15:26
=== Everegete is now known as Evergete
affluxhi15:43
=== jjesse_ is now known as jjesse
=== jjesse_ is now known as jjesse
jcastrostgraber: I'm going to start posting to the brainstorm blog starting today17:10
jcastrostgraber: I figure one developer response every few days, since some are rather large17:11
stgraberjcastro: ok17:12
tzdI was wondering if it's possible to suggest a "fix" for the Firefox3 packet? I'm on kubuntu and i've noticed a few other kubuntu users have this issue: greyed out default application for extensions box in FF17:37
tzdthe fix one guy suggested in a forum solved my issue and probably a lot of others as well. By installing the packet "firefox3-0-gnome-support" it worked like a charm. I was wondering if it's possible to have that automatically included when choosing to install the Firefox3 packet please?17:39
Hewustzd: you can file bugs at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug , but check first that it hasn't already been reported17:40
tzdHewus: ah ok, thanks!17:40
Hewustzd: no worries, thank you for helping!17:40
Hewusbug #37272 documents an old bug fixed in gparted, but "new" in xfsprogs. I suspect the bug didn't apply to this package in the first place; is it safe to just mark it invalid, or should I still ask for info and mark it incomplete?17:41
ubottuLaunchpad bug 37272 in gparted "gparted segfaults on access to XFS volume on LVM" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/3727217:41
ubot3Malone bug 37272 in gparted "gparted segfaults on access to XFS volume on LVM" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/3727217:41
ubottuLaunchpad bug 37272 in gparted "gparted segfaults on access to XFS volume on LVM" [Medium,Fix released]17:41
Hewuswhoa, bot fight17:42
bdmurraytzd: firefox-3.0-gnome-support is suggested by firefox-3.0.  How did you install?17:44
tzdbdmurray: i right clicked on Firefox-3.0 in adept and choose install... it only adds that packet17:44
bdmurrayhmm, that might be a feature of adept17:45
tzdbdmurray: ah ok... so if i do it via apt-get i'll get the gnome support included?17:45
bdmurraytzd: no, you'd need to use aptitude, update-manager or maybe synaptic17:46
bdmurraymvo_: can you help here?17:46
tzdbdmurray: ok, although since it won't work with adept i should still file a bug report right?17:47
bdmurraytzd: I don't belive so not every package manager installs "Suggested" packages17:47
mvo_tzd: none of the package managers install suggests by default17:48
\shthat's what I thought right away when I saw this discussion..recommends yes (aptitude) but not suggests17:49
mvo_personally I think that firefox should depend on fierfox-3.0 and gnome-support and for people who do not want this, they should just install firefox-3.017:49
mvo_but that is a decision of the package maintainer of ff17:49
tzdbdmurray: adept usually installs required packages... don't know if there's a difference in handling "required" or "suggested" but shouldn't this gnome support be included since it won't work properly without it? Or does it interfere in some other way perhaps?17:49
mvo_\sh: yep17:49
\shif adept is installing suggests, it's a bug17:50
mvo_tzd: I'm pretty sure its only "suggests" because some people think they should be able to get ff without the gnome libs it pulls in17:50
Hobbseebdmurray: suggests ahve never been installed by default...17:51
Hobbseebdmurray: that being said, i don't think adept currently supports recommended packages being installed by default.17:51
tzdmvo_: hmm ok. Oh well, I'll leave it then.17:51
bdmurraymvo_: Is there a table somewhere of package managers and how they deal with recommended / suggested?17:52
mvo_tzd: just open a whishlist bug so that it becomes a recommends. we install those by default now in intrepid17:52
mvo_bdmurray: in intrepid it should be all consistent again "recommends-by-default" by everything, suggests by nothing17:52
tzdmvo_: ah ok. Can i do it here: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug#form-start ?17:52
mvo_bdmurray: in hardy it was "recommends-by-default: aptitude", "recommends-by-default for everything else only for packages in the section "metapackages"17:53
\shbdmurray, if i'm  correct: aptitude == recommends by default, no suggests, apt-get == no recommends (for hardy and before), no suggests, for intrepid recommends by default17:53
bdmurraymvo_: okay, thanks17:53
mvo_tzd: that sounds right, please check if this bug is not reported already and please also add a bit of information what functionatlity is misisng without -gnome-support17:53
tzdmvo_: yeah will do. Haven't found any similar though17:54
mvo_bdmurray: it was a bit inconsistent in the past, mostly for historical reasons, but its all good now (I hope :)17:54
jcastrostgraber: If an ubuntu developer wants access so they can post under the developer comments I should send them to you guys?18:01
stgraberjcastro: yep18:04
stgraber(until we have Launchpad integration done)18:04
jcastrook18:06
tzdmvo_: ok I've filled it out, although i can't see any alternative to change it to "wishlist" ?18:10
tzdshall i just add that to the title perhaps?18:11
=== kees_ is now known as kees
bdmurraytzd: I can set it to wishlist for you what bug number is it?18:15
tzdbdmurray: cool, I'll just post it :)18:16
tzdbdmurray: #23685018:18
=== _neversfelde is now known as neversfelde
amikropHello. Any progress with the Change Keyboard Layout bug?18:57
amikropI think it is quite serious.18:57
mattikHello, my kubuntu-kde4 was cracked19:43
mattikand it wasupdated19:43
hggdhmattik: what do you mean by "was cracked"?19:44
mattikthere is usename named in zenoss in /home-folder19:44
hggdhmattik: you mean you now have a new user in /home, and you did not create it?19:45
mattikI had hole in my firewall, but I hadn't installed ssh19:45
mattikit was in 22-port19:46
mattikYes, I mean19:46
mattikYou can scan my ports now. I'm in windows19:47
hggdhmattik: we will *not* scan you19:47
mattikok19:47
hggdhmattik: what version of Ubuntu are you running?19:48
mattikHardy, and kde419:48
hggdhmattik: is this your personal computer?19:48
mattikyes it is19:48
mattikInform I cert.fi?19:49
hggdhmattik: perhaps, if you can gather more data19:49
mattikhggdh, where can I paste screenshot on zenoss home-folder?19:50
hggdhmattik:  use pastebin services, for example http://pastebin.ca19:51
mattikthank you19:51
hggdhand then post the URL19:51
hggdhmattik: did you install zenoss packages (http://www.zenoss.com)19:54
mattikoh yes19:54
mattiksorry19:54
mattikI wondered how I have heared it :D I'm really sorry19:55
mattikThat's good to hear19:56
mattikI didn't become cracked19:56
affluxmattik: in general, you can't get cracked by just having a port "not blocked" in any firewall, unless you really have a service running on it.19:57
mattikok, but I don't trust browsers19:58
hggdhmattik: probably not... but it is a good lesson to keep in mind19:58
mattikok, thanks19:58
hggdhmattik: you need code running on your computer to be owned.19:59
mattikok, thanks. This is good to hear19:59
mattikSo I don't need firewall on kubuntu20:00
hggdhmattik: you should have a firewall, and a paranoid view20:01
mattikhggdh: what is firewall for kubuntu? Is it firestarter?20:02
mattikI have router's firewall20:02
mattikthank you :) I'm glad that you don't laugh me out20:09
=== greg_g is now known as greg-g
jcastrostgraber: what do you think about a "wontfix"-style resolution for brainstorm?20:48
jcastrosomething like "thanks but the idea, but this won't be implemented."20:48
stgraberjcastro: indeed, I'm not 100% sure of the point of having "Inaplicable" as for me it'd then be wontfix, deleted or not an idea20:50
stgraberjcastro: btw, you should join #ubuntu-testing so you can also speak with Nicolas20:50
hggdhjcastro: just out of curiosity -- an explanation of why it "won't be fixed" will be provided, right?20:50
jcastrohggdh: well yes, of course.20:51
stgraberhggdh: a developer comment would be added then yes20:51
hggdhgood idea, then20:51
=== emgent_ is now known as emgent
dupondjehttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/235889 somebody check plz :)21:41
ubottuLaunchpad bug 235889 in linux "BUG: scheduling while atomic: archhttp64/7146/0x1000000001" [Undecided,New]21:41
ubot3Malone bug 235889 in linux "BUG: scheduling while atomic: archhttp64/7146/0x1000000001" [Undecided,New]21:41
jpdshmm, two bots21:42
dupondjeseems so :P21:42
dupondjeanyway ? can check ?21:44
dupondje:)21:44
ogasawaradupondje: I'll take a look21:47
dupondjethx ogasawara :)21:47
ogasawaradupondje: I think the kernel team recently rebased the Intrepid kernel with 2.6.24-rc421:48
ogasawaradupondje: so I may have you test when it's available21:48
dupondjebut then I have to upgrade to Intrepid ?21:48
ogasawaradupondje: not really, I've got instructions for testing from the kernel-ppa21:48
dupondjeisn't it possible to patch it in the Hardy kernel ?21:49
ogasawaradupondje: if we can narrow down the exact patch21:49
dupondjeI can try some patches ...21:49
dupondjefrom diffs of the 2 kernels ...21:50
ogasawaradupondje: do you have an idea which patches to test?21:50
dupondjebut what file would be important ? :)21:50
ogasawaradupondje: might be easier doing a git bisect21:50
ogasawaradupondje: if you're familiar with performing one21:50
dupondjeI tried to patch the scheduler with the 2.6.26-rc4 diff :p21:51
dupondjebut didn't fix it21:51
dupondjethe BUG message is printed from scheduler.c right ?21:53
dupondjebut what triggers it ? :)21:53
ogasawaradupondje: I'll post some info to the report just in case others running into the same bug might benefit21:54
dupondjeokie :D21:54
dupondjewill try it this weekend ... cause the pc is not here :)21:54
ogasawaradupondje: ok thanks21:54
dupondjeI need to thank you :)21:55
ogasawaradupondje: just curious when you tested the upstream 2.6.26-rc4 kernel did you use an ubuntu kernel config to build the kernel?22:02
dupondjeyes22:03
dupondjejust copyed it ;)22:03
ogasawaradupondje: great thanks22:03
dupondjeand made a .deb from it22:03
dupondjewith make-kpkg ?22:03
dupondje:)22:03
emgentheya22:10
* dupondje reads22:28
dupondje:P22:28
dupondjethx for instructions22:34
dupondjei'll try this weekend ...22:35

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!