[00:01] <cwong1> asac: I can do it now.  What is the quickest and safest way to do it?
[00:01] <asac> might miss some details, but i think checkout master
[00:01] <asac> then git merge NAMEOFBRANCH
[00:02] <asac> is a good start
[00:02] <cwong1> ok
[00:02] <asac> then fix conflicts
[00:02] <asac> and commit
[00:02] <cwong1> ok
[00:02] <asac> there shouldnt be much conflicts
[00:02] <asac> if any at all
[00:02] <asac> cwong1: you can finish QA while this is in -proposed
[00:03] <asac> giving it a good test before uploading is appreciated though
[00:03] <cwong1> asac: I can only test it with internal xulrunner because of the https problem.  Is that ok?
[00:04] <asac> cwong1: https? get the correct sources.list lines for hardy-propsed from jimmy (i assume its the same issue)
[00:04] <asac> the build should be much faster that way
[00:05] <cwong1> asac: but I thought the https sites dont work when Jimmy build it with the new xulrunner.  Did you fix that already?
[00:05] <asac> cwong1: the only issue i am aware of is the gconf problem
[00:06] <asac> at best test it with that xulrunner (minus the gconf setting test) and for the rest go with in-source xul.
[00:06] <cwong1> asac: yes that is why the https site dont work, right?
[00:06] <asac> ill check it with the PPA xulrunner to be sure before uploading
[00:06] <asac> cwong1: not sure, but i guess yes.
[00:06] <asac> i did the merge for testing here and it worked
[00:06] <asac> (not being behind a proxy)
[00:07] <cwong1> yes, it works fine with direct connection but not if it is behind a proxy.
[00:07] <asac> ok thats gconf then
[00:07] <asac> ill check that before uploading
[00:08] <asac> but please check once with in-source xul so we know that the merge is not broken in general for this case
[00:08] <cwong1> I will do the merge and let you know as soon as I am done.
[00:08] <asac> you can do that test after you pushed to master ;)
[00:08] <asac> thanks!!
[00:08] <cwong1> ok
[00:29] <asac> bug 205010
[00:33] <fta> asac, tb3 is moving fast toward xul-sdk upstream. at least, faster than ever
[00:37] <asac> nice
[01:18] <cwong1> asac: I have merged the RC1 branch into Master. .. I am going to do some testing tonight.
[03:56] <saivann> asac : ping
[04:00] <saivann> asac : Little reminder, my packages are ready for review : bug #230209 . You can email at anytime in the next 2 weeks. I'll be on vacancy after that.
[05:02] <asac> ok i need to re-roll xul 1.9 RC1 ... fun
[10:06] <gnomefreak> asac: people in Debian want ubufox to install plugins for them like we have it
[10:46] <gnomefreak> bug 234726
[10:54] <gnomefreak> asac: are you planning on fixing bug 102684 for Ffox-2, I marked wont fix due to reason in https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/102684/comments/8
[11:33] <gnomefreak> asac: if you added new icon to sunbird its than we need to look into it, If i get time i will but im trying a clean install or sunbird to see if it happens during install since upgrade it didnt change icon
[11:42] <asac> gnomefreak: how do you know that debian wants plugins like we do?
[11:43] <gnomefreak> someone sent an email to one of the mailing lists about it
[11:43] <gnomefreak> i want to say its pkg-debian or something like that
[11:44] <gnomefreak> let me know if you have it if not i can look for it in my gmail account from website
[11:47] <gnomefreak> i cant find the damn hebrew locale bug that was fixed in 'he' it has upstream bug on it.
[11:53] <fta_> Bug 237030
[11:54] <fta_> cannot reproduce
[12:09] <asac> Bug Management  13937 (Karma wh0re)
[12:11] <asac> fta: can we get error console in-place for prism?
[12:11] <fta> yes
[12:11] <asac> i guess its helpful to prove reports where the real but is
[12:11] <asac> bug is
[12:12] <asac> fta: can you put that on a key? e.g. ctrl+F2
[12:12] <asac> or something
[12:12] <fta> there's a menu at the bottom
[12:12] <asac> at the bottom? if i start prism-google-reader, i dont get any menu :/
[12:12] <fta> then Tools / Error console
[12:12] <asac> well prism-google-mail i tested a day back or so
[12:13] <asac> cant remember a menu
[12:13] <fta> the wheel icon in the toolbar
[12:13] <gnomefreak> asac: did you add the fix for the he locales in Hardy lang-packs
[12:14] <asac> gnomefreak: no idea which fix you are talking about
[12:14] <fta> or start in shell with prism-something -d
[12:14] <asac> most likely not i guess
[12:14] <gnomefreak> asac: it was the font rendering for hebrew (still looking for bug atm) but its not looking that i will find it
[12:15] <gnomefreak> it would have been added either just before UDS or during UDS
[12:16] <asac> i can remember a maili about he. .. not idea if it was a bug
[12:16] <asac> but most likcley you are right
[12:17] <gnomefreak> asac: im thinking it was bug 234029
[12:17] <fta> mozilla bug 428848
[12:17] <fta> regression
[12:18] <gnomefreak> yep that would be the bug it looks like
[12:25] <asac> gnomefreak: ok thats fixed then in proposed i'd say
[12:25] <gnomefreak> yep im noting it on another bug atm
[12:26] <gnomefreak> im thinking bug 23267 is same issue so i made a few comments on how to test it
[12:30] <gnomefreak> yep sunbird clean install still has calendar as icon
[12:30] <gnomefreak> ill set it up again later
[14:49] <Flop> Why doesn't the Mozilla Team put FF3 in a PPA repository?
[14:50] <fta> it is
[14:51] <fta> hardy-proposed, ~mozillateam, and ~fta (in that order depending on what you want.. from more stable to fresher)
[14:51] <Flop> I mean RC1
[14:52] <Flop> hardy-proposed contains other packages which may not be desirable.
[14:52] <fta> rc1 is there
[14:53] <Flop> mozillateam seems to contain alpha7
[14:53] <Flop> fta gives me an error
[14:53] <fta> ?
[14:54] <fta> mozillateam has firefox-3.0 - 3.0~rc1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.0mt1
[14:54] <fta> fta has firefox-3.0 - 3.0~rc2+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~fta1~hardy
[14:55] <Flop> where is that repository (mozillateam)?
[14:55] <fta> https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive
[14:56] <Flop> Oh, I don't know what I was looking at, I'll try that one
[14:57] <Flop> finally, that one works
[14:57] <Flop> thank you
[14:58] <fta> np
 fta gives me an error <= what do you mean ?
[14:59] <gnomefreak> 3.0~rc1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1 0
[14:59] <gnomefreak>         500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com hardy-proposed/main Packages
[14:59] <gnomefreak> its in hardy repos
[14:59] <Flop> When I tried to install firefox-3.0 using fta, it wanted to uninstall a lot of stuff like ubuntu-desktop and some other things
 hardy-proposed contains other packages which may not be desirable.
[14:59] <gnomefreak> than install firefox and nothing else
[15:00] <gnomefreak> after installing comment it out
[15:00] <gnomefreak> it will end up in security after some testing (although since we have been testing it it should be pushed into security
[15:01] <Flop> Well, eventually RC2 will come out
[15:01] <fta> Flop, hm, it should not do that. are you sure you were getting both firefox-3.0 *and* xulrunner-1.9 from my ppa (and not just ff3) ?
[15:01] <gnomefreak> you need 2 acks IIRC to get it pushed from proposed to security (or updates) cant remember what one off hand
[15:01] <Flop> fta, i even tried using the update manager
[15:02] <Flop> it said it could only do a "partial upgrade"
[15:02] <Flop> and firefox-3.0 was greyed out
[15:02] <gnomefreak> Flop: try using apt-get upgrade and let fta know the error :)
[15:02] <fta> strange, i'm using my ppa (obviously) and i have no problem on both hardy and intrepid, and noone else reported that either
[15:03] <gnomefreak> mines fine here
[15:03] <gnomefreak> from official and your PPA
[15:03] <Flop> the mozillateam one worked for me
[15:04] <gnomefreak> you shouldnt have both of the repos together use one or other fta's gets updated more than MT or mine
[15:04] <gnomefreak> i cleaned mine up finally and uyploaded a few packages
[15:04] <Flop> fta, did you say your repository has RC2? How is that possible?
[15:04] <gnomefreak> Flop: snapshot daily releases
[15:04] <fta> because code is frozen upstream
[15:04] <gnomefreak> we had ff3 testing since alpha1
[15:05] <Flop> aren't those supposed to be highly unstable
[15:05] <gnomefreak> no RC is fairly good
[15:05] <gnomefreak> Flop: mozilla has been known to push RC1 into final if no bad bugs
[15:05] <fta> no, rc1 and rc2 are really close. very few changes
[15:05] <gnomefreak> im gone be back after work
[15:07] <Flop> I assume the RCs fix all the problems people had with beta5
[15:09] <fta> indeed
[16:08] <armin76> mozilla bug 426228
[16:08] <armin76> fta: asac ^
[16:10] <fta> hm
[18:15] <fta> xul 1.9.1 and ff 3.1 are now alive :)
[18:31] <cwong1> asac: ping
[19:20] <armin76> yay ff3.1 released! *g*
[19:21] <fta> lol
[19:34] <gnomefreak> asac: on bug 102684 do you plan on fixing this in Ffox-2.0?
[19:57] <gnomefre1k> @now new_york
[19:58] <gnomefreak> @whoami
[19:58] <gnomefreak> @login
[19:58] <gnomefreak> @whoami
[19:58] <gnomefreak> thanks
[19:58] <fta> lol
[20:02] <armin76> @login
[20:02] <armin76> @kick fta
[20:08] <gnomefreak> the following is because i get booted not sure if it was seen by anyone
[20:08] <gnomefreak> 14:34 <      gnomefreak > asac: on bug 102684 do you plan on fixing this in  Ffox-2.0?
[20:11]  * gnomefreak thought bugs for hugs were ran by the bug team leader(s)
[20:19] <gnomefreak> ok looks like its working  :)
[20:22] <ubuntu-laptop> well nowi will see if its irssi or connetion that is dumping me :)
[20:23]  * gnomefreak wonders if asac should be at that meeting with the rest of the devel team
[20:42] <gnomefreak> ill be back for meeting
[20:44] <asac> which meeting?
[20:46] <gnomefreak> for me the CC meeeting
[20:47] <gnomefreak> theres one going on now with all the devs "hugs for bugs meeting"
[20:50] <asac> ah
[20:51] <asac> gnomefreak: looks more like a TB meeting
[20:51] <asac> TOPIC: core dev application of XXX
[20:51] <gnomefreak> yeah im seeing that now
[21:38] <ubuntu-l1ptop> hmmm i guess that means its my conection
[21:40]  * ubuntu-laptop has alot of work to do on this connection :(
[21:46] <gnomefreak> yay gnome updates :)
[21:46] <gnomefreak> !cc
[21:51]  * gnomefreak gonna miss meeting tonight im gonna see if i can fix this connection
[21:55] <ubuntu-laptop> Host 'FeistyFawn', running Linux 2.6.20-16-generic - Cpu0: Mobile Pentium II 299 MHz; Up: 1:45; Users: 3; Load: 1.86; Free: [Mem: 5/313 Mio] [Swap: 881/918 Mio] [/: 32039/36653 Mio]; Vpenis: 23.4 cm;
[22:04] <mgol> gnomefreak: at this site: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/PreviewArchives, there is a sentence: "These packages have been signed with gnomefreak's key, to add this key: ", but I can't see there the mentioned key. So, where is it?
[22:06] <fta> mgol, this sentence is obsolete, it's a leftover from before PPA ever existed. PPA are not signed (yet)
[22:07] <mgol> fta: ok, thanks. :) I think sb should remove this sentence, it only makes confusion.
[22:07] <fta> done
[22:09] <gnomefre2k> what the fuck