| windmill | cool, It's done, the apport-cli tool is really very easy to use | 00:12 |
|---|---|---|
| === mroone1 is now known as mrooney | ||
| === jjesse_ is now known as jjesse | ||
| Awsoonn | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/237284 what package | 03:32 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 237284 in ubuntu "Receiving a file via bluetooth fails" [Undecided,New] | 03:32 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| === symptom is now known as symptom_ | ||
| === symptom_ is now known as symptom | ||
| kdiggdy | hello? | 07:39 |
| === persia_ is now known as persia | ||
| dupondje | hi ogasawara :) | 09:18 |
| === Hewus is now known as Hew | ||
| === gnomefre1k is now known as gnomefreak | ||
| === ogra_ is now known as ogra | ||
| === LucidFox_ is now known as LucidFox | ||
| === _neversfelde is now known as neversfelde | ||
| === emgent_ is now known as emgent | ||
| thekorn | bdmurray, hi, I would like to comment on the bug-metrics blueprint. what's the prefered way: commenting in the whiteboard section in lp or in the comment section of the wiki page? | 16:10 |
| bdmurray | thekorn: the discussion section of the wiki page | 16:14 |
| thekorn | ok | 16:15 |
| ogasawara | dupondje: hi - one of the kernel guys is now working on your bug which has to go through the SRU process | 16:15 |
| Nightrose | bdmurray: hi :) would you be so kind to extend my membership in the bugsquad team? it is about to expire | 16:15 |
| bdmurray | Nightrose: done! | 16:17 |
| Nightrose | bdmurray: thanks :) | 16:17 |
| zul | mvo: can I take care of your uucp merge? | 16:39 |
| mvo | zul: too late, I just filed a sync request for it | 16:42 |
| mvo | (~15min ago) | 16:42 |
| mvo | zul: but if you feel there is something to merge, just go ahead and close the sync request | 16:43 |
| * mvo has no idea why he ended up with uucp anyway :) | 16:43 | |
| zul | mvo: heh | 16:43 |
| mvo | bug 238576 (just FYI) | 16:44 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 238576 in uucp "Please sync uucp 1.07-19.2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)." [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/238576 | 16:44 |
| zul | mvo: gotcha | 16:45 |
| bddebian | Boo | 17:24 |
| mrooney | bdmurray: ping | 17:37 |
| mrooney | wow sudo is maxing out my CPU, that's neat | 17:41 |
| bdmurray | mrooney: pong | 17:42 |
| mrooney | bdmurray: I was just wondering if you were aware that the workflow script will add the header text more than once if multiple subscribers match (bug #192945) | 17:42 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 192945 in transmission "missing icon on window border and window list" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/192945 | 17:42 |
| mrooney | I fixed it by adding a break; in the 'if', but I wasn't sure if that was intentional since you have them as separate strings | 17:43 |
| bdmurray | mrooney: there is an updated version of the script | 17:46 |
| mrooney | bdmurray: ahh okay, sorry, where might I find it? | 17:46 |
| bdmurray | mrooney: I just copied it to http://people.ubuntu.com/~brian/greasemonkey/lp_workflowreports.user.js | 17:47 |
| mrooney | bdmurray: thanks! | 17:50 |
| mrooney | is anyone aware of this sudo cpu bug? I just saw a 'fix' today I thought come in, in -updates | 17:50 |
| mrooney | I have no idea how to get rid of the process, other than restarting | 17:51 |
| mrooney | I shall restart now | 17:52 |
| === Everget3 is now known as Evergete | ||
| qense | ping bdmurray | 19:11 |
| === Spec[x] is now known as Spec | ||
| === blueyed_ is now known as blueyed | ||
| jdstrand | bdmurray: hi! | 20:10 |
| jdstrand | bdmurray: I used to use in some scripts: | 20:11 |
| jdstrand | if not 'ubuntu-bugs' in bug.subscriptions: | 20:11 |
| jdstrand | bug.subscribers.add("ubuntu-bugs") | 20:11 |
| bdmurray | it's fixed in bzr and in -proposed | 20:11 |
| jdstrand | bdmurray: ah | 20:11 |
| jdstrand | bdmurray: that is what package, python-launchpad-bugs? | 20:12 |
| bdmurray | jdstrand: that's right and comment on the bug if it works for you. ;) | 20:12 |
| jdstrand | bdmurray: when was it pushed to -proposed, today? | 20:13 |
| jdstrand | bdmurray: ah yes, it was | 20:13 |
| jdstrand | oh no, it was into -updates as of today | 20:13 |
| jdstrand | bdmurray: fixed it, and commented-- thanks! | 20:18 |
| === ember_ is now known as ember | ||
| afflux | hi | 21:16 |
| bdmurray | afflux: hi! | 21:24 |
| afflux | bddebian: hi! I like your idea of everyone in bugcontrol being able to review applications, by the way :) | 21:26 |
| afflux | bd<tab>: bdmurray ^ | 21:26 |
| PsySine | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay needs some update I think | 21:36 |
| bdmurray | PsySine: fixed, thanks! | 21:38 |
| PsySine | is there a bug day once a week or so? | 21:38 |
| bdmurray | PsySine: every Tuesday and Thursday for the most part | 21:39 |
| PsySine | oh ok | 21:39 |
| mrooney | is there a certain process that is good to go through for creating a blueprint in ubuntu? | 22:09 |
| mrooney | (and/or, is there a better channel for discussing such matters) | 22:11 |
| james_w | mrooney: what's your blueprint about? | 22:12 |
| mrooney | james_w: well Ubuntu now has a nice system in place to install available drivers when you plug them in | 22:13 |
| mrooney | and there are lots of packages in the ubuntu repos for drivers | 22:14 |
| mrooney | but there isn't a linkage between the two that I am aware | 22:14 |
| danbhfive | what about the restricted-drivers manager? | 22:14 |
| mrooney | it would be nice for it to be aware of what drivers are out there, so it can download the driver, otherwise it can require a fair amount of knowledge | 22:15 |
| mrooney | danbhfive: well, that could work but a) the drivers aren't necessarily restricted b) how does the user know to use that | 22:15 |
| danbhfive | you know, I don't even know how drivers are installed. I thought it was all automatic | 22:16 |
| james_w | restricted-manager is now called jockey, which is the system that installs drivers | 22:16 |
| james_w | it detects hardware that it knows something about, and installs the driver if you don't have it. | 22:17 |
| mrooney | should it work for printers? maybe mine was an isolated case | 22:18 |
| james_w | mrooney: are you referring to all the -source packages in the archive? | 22:18 |
| james_w | mrooney: no, it doesn't work for printers, but I believe that is planned for 8.10 | 22:18 |
| danbhfive | mrooney: I thought gutsy was supposed to have it work for printers, but it still doesnt work well | 22:18 |
| mrooney | I had to search on the internet for using a Brother 240C in Ubuntu and found brother-cups-wrapper-[bh7|extra] | 22:19 |
| mrooney | I installed those and then could select the driver from the 'Printing' dialog in Administration | 22:20 |
| james_w | mrooney: pitti is the person that knows all about this, if it is about printers then tkamppeter will be involved. | 22:20 |
| james_w | I know they are working on something, let me see if I can dig up some more information. | 22:20 |
| mrooney | it just would have been wonderful if instead of installing it in text-only mode, it had known about and offered to install those packages | 22:21 |
| james_w | https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/jockey-printer-driver-support | 22:21 |
| james_w | https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/printerdriverautodownload | 22:21 |
| mrooney | ahhh, what is the "edge" aspect | 22:22 |
| mrooney | I searched blueprints for 'print' but those didn't turn up | 22:22 |
| mrooney | thanks james_w, those look like exactly what I want! | 22:22 |
| james_w | edge is the testing server for launchpad, it uses the same data. | 22:23 |
| james_w | I searched for "jockey", and they were the two results. | 22:23 |
| Hammerhead | anyone seen this "This utility only unmounts cifs filesystems." | 22:25 |
| Hammerhead | umounting a samba share | 22:25 |
| james_w | Hammerhead: using what tool? | 22:26 |
| Hammerhead | I know about bug# 461048 but there is no answer or workaround | 22:26 |
| Hammerhead | umount | 22:26 |
| Hammerhead | umount <share name> | 22:26 |
| Hammerhead | It mounts fine | 22:26 |
| Hammerhead | Only way to remove the share is to reboot | 22:27 |
| Hammerhead | mtab lists the share | 22:27 |
| Hammerhead | df does not | 22:28 |
| Hammerhead | running 8.04 | 22:28 |
| Hammerhead | thought upgrading was a good idea.....WRONG!! | 22:28 |
| Hammerhead | No audio | 22:29 |
| Hammerhead | No modem | 22:29 |
| Hammerhead | and now this | 22:29 |
| Hammerhead | ;-) | 22:30 |
| james_w | Hammerhead: it sounds like the bug report you gave is exactly your problem? | 22:33 |
| Hammerhead | james_w The bug report is from January though........ | 22:37 |
| xnox | is anyone here? or do I have internet problems | 22:54 |
| danbhfive | xnox: i read you | 22:56 |
| xnox | Oh good. Thanks | 22:56 |
| xnox | Why is everyone so quite? | 22:56 |
| xnox | or am I supposed to be hard preparing for the Hug day =D | 22:57 |
| greg-g | prep hard, train hard, triage hard! | 23:01 |
| bdmurray | greg-g: heh | 23:01 |
| greg-g | reminder: bug jam tonight in Michigan at 6:30 Eastern (30 minutes from now) | 23:02 |
| xnox | greg-g: Well it will be first time for me =D got to reboot into ubuntu =D | 23:08 |
| mrooney | am I missing something with bug #209999, it is Invalid but has 8 dups? | 23:13 |
| ubottu | mrooney: Bug 209999 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/209999 is private | 23:13 |
| Old_Soldier | lol private duplicated invalid bug :) | 23:15 |
| * Old_Soldier whistles and walks away like nothing happened :) | 23:15 | |
| bdmurray | mrooney: did you look for the bug pedro says it is a duplicate of? | 23:17 |
| mrooney | bdmurray: no, I went to check back on it and I see that IT has duplicate bugs | 23:23 |
| mrooney | probably a good thing to do | 23:23 |
| mrooney | what do you think of tagging bugs like that also with 'likely-dup', so we can search for Invalid+'likely-dup' to find bugs which are known dups but not identified yet | 23:24 |
| mrooney | those could be a good candidate for a Hug Day | 23:24 |
| bdmurray | I'd rather not spend time looking at bugs like that one. | 23:25 |
| mrooney | haha, I have no idea if that is a serious comment or not | 23:26 |
| bdmurray | mrooney: it's probably a dupe of bug 216244 | 23:26 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 216244 in brasero "brasero crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/216244 | 23:26 |
| bdmurray | Seriously! ;) We have lots of other more fruitful ways we could be looking at bug reports. | 23:27 |
| mrooney | interesting, that bug was filed after 209999 | 23:29 |
| mrooney | though I wouldn't, I don't think, want to mark a non-private bug a dup of a private bug, that would hide them all, or at least the master, which seems unproductive | 23:30 |
| bdmurray | the new bug, 216244, is more complete in that it has an upstream bug watch | 23:30 |
| mrooney | indeed, that does seem better | 23:33 |
| mrooney | although it means if pedro is correct that there is still another floating around | 23:34 |
| bdmurray | hmm? | 23:35 |
| mrooney | well pedro said in 209999 on 4-01-08 that it was already reported but didn't know which bug it was, but 216244 was filed on 4-12-08, so that can't be the bug he was referring to | 23:35 |
| mrooney | meaning the bug he was referring to is still "out there" | 23:36 |
| bdmurray | ah, that makes sense | 23:36 |
| mrooney | bdmurray: by the way, what is the proper thing to do in a couple weeks when my BugControl membership expires? just ping you? | 23:40 |
| bdmurray | mrooney: right, ping me before it expires | 23:41 |
| mrooney | great, is it bad if it is after it expires. I don't really know how to find exactly when I was approved | 23:41 |
| bdmurray | mrooney: no, not really you'll be warned well before it expires anyway | 23:42 |
| mrooney | oh okay, that shall do, thanks! | 23:43 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!