[04:00] <owh> Does anyone else get the sense that JB is upset and angry in addition to being frustrated? I'm just wondering if there is a way to help him through that.
[04:00] <owh> I think I'd rather not loose him as a resource.
[04:04] <bbyever> hello owh
[04:05] <owh> Hiya bbyever, just digesting :)
[04:05] <owh> So, where are you at?
[04:05] <bbyever> i've got the out put of the commands. 
[04:05] <owh> Did that make sense?
[04:05] <bbyever> yep
[04:06] <owh> While chairing the meeting I made two mistakes, one is I sent mootbot commands to the room, not to mootbot, the other is that I didn't use the AGREED command to finalise ideas.
[04:06] <owh> So, you'll note that at least two IDEAS are slight modifications/updates. The last one of those was the final one.
[04:07] <bbyever> ok
[04:07] <owh> It mostly happened around the Mission Statement and Objectives part.
[04:07] <bbyever> so it just needs to have the names added and the ideas sorta mixed up with the action in the relevant topics?
[04:08] <owh> The ACTION items are important because they are what make things happen in such a way that there is feedback to the person and the team.
[04:08] <owh> bbyever: Yup
[04:08] <bbyever> ok
[04:08] <owh> bbyever: Did you see the ubuntu-server meeting log I sent, that's a good way of making it accessible in a way that others can get a feel for the meeting without needing to plow through the log.
[04:09] <owh> LINK items are really as external references, good idea to include, just as a bullet list where they belong in the time-line.
[04:09] <owh> The reason I split out each of the MootBot commands is that you can then delete the duplicate/updated things before putting it all back together.
[04:10] <bbyever> ok
[04:10] <owh> Is there anything I can help you with, as I said, I'm not trying to drown you in your volunteer scribing effort :)
[04:10] <owh> s/not trying/trying not to/
[04:11] <bbyever> no, im great with it. i almost always do it for the mexican loco meetings :)
[04:11] <owh> All good then :)
[04:11] <bbyever> i didnt really see the diference between your log and Flannel's log... 
[04:12] <bbyever> i didnt read them both completely, i only read one, but the number of lines was almost the same
[04:12] <owh> bbyever: You'll note that there are parts, just around the split, where some comments are sent to some people. So among those were comments I didn't actually see, which is why I sent both, and used the irclogs.ubuntu.com site to note the meeting logs on the wiki.
[04:13] <owh> 99% of them is the same, the catch is in where they're different :)
[04:14] <bbyever> ah ok
[04:14] <owh> bbyever: Thanks again for your efforts, I'm sure they will be appreciated by the rest of the gang.
[04:14] <bbyever> np :)
[04:14] <owh> Ping me if you need to.
[04:14] <owh> @now
[04:14] <owh> Hmm, so much for that :)
[04:14] <bbyever> i'll re read the log by tomorrow and send you a second draft
[04:14] <owh> It's 11:14 here.
[04:14] <owh> bbyever: Cool.
[04:14] <bbyever> 10:14 here
[04:15] <owh> All good then.
[04:15] <owh> Ah, but you're PM I'm guessing :)
[04:15] <bbyever> yes
[04:16] <owh> That would be 22:14 then ;0
[04:16] <bbyever> ah, yes hehe
[04:16] <owh> Go sleep, I need to be here at 23:00 local time for a ubuntu-sever meeting :)
[04:17] <bbyever> and i've got an exam tomorrow at 8, so i'll be leaving 
[04:17] <bbyever> bye and thanks!
[04:17] <owh> Pleasure
=== pep` is now known as pep
=== pep` is now known as pep