[00:08] <geser> siretart: the timeouts on bug 230350 are "normal". the bug has that many tasks that LP timeouts regularly
[00:28] <sistpoty> geser: well, it displays on edge, and I'm starting to learn the email interface right now :)
[03:03] <paulburton> does anyone know if launchpad is having some kind of problem right now with uploads to PPAs?
[03:03] <paulburton> I upload a package and nothing happens
[03:05] <paulburton> oh, there we go, just a little late :P
[03:20] <sayers> Is there a way I can attach a .odf to a blueprint?
[04:24] <whs> hello, I'm pushing lp:~clubuntu/clubuntu/packages branch to bzr and I noticed that I put the wrong series so I hit ctrl+c and when I push again, it have a remote lock. how can I break this lock?
[04:27] <jamesh> "bzr break-lock url-of-remote-branch"
[04:29] <whs> thanks
[04:32] <whs> why https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu still focus at gutsy?
[05:10] <LaserJock> any vcsimport person around?
[05:11] <LaserJock> mwhudson_: around?
[05:29] <whs> Why there is Launchpad PPA <no_reply@launchpad.net> and Launchpad Buildd System <noreply@launchpad.net>
[06:41] <mwhudson__> LaserJock: yeah
[06:45] <LaserJock> mwhudson: the openbabel vcsimport seems to have died
[06:46]  * mwhudson looks
[06:47] <mwhudson> LaserJock: i'm 90% sure that it will fix itself when the code import slaves get updated to hardy
[06:47] <LaserJock> right
[06:48] <mwhudson> which is very soon, i hope
[06:48] <LaserJock> seemed like it was blaming pysvn
[06:48] <mwhudson> yeah
[06:48] <mwhudson> often a good target
[06:48] <LaserJock> ok cool, I'll watch for the announcement and ping you if it doesn't fix itself after then
[06:49] <mwhudson> i could test on staging (the staging machines are on hardy already)
[06:49] <mwhudson> but it's a bit of a fiddle -- have to copy a bunch of files around
[06:49] <mwhudson> and it's sunday afternoon for me :)
[06:49] <LaserJock> yeah np
[06:58] <mwhudson> i'll give the sysadmins another poke too
[08:35] <Valsum> Hello! I'm trying to update my GPG key in LP, but it seems the keyserver is down.
[08:36] <Valsum> ...since yesterday
[14:18] <mish__> Hello - I'm having trouble registering my openPGP key on launchpad.  It uploads fine, and launchpad tells me it has sent me an email, but I have not received any email.
[14:18] <Hobbsee> !weekend
[14:19] <mish__> I receive plenty of other email from launchpad fine (comments on bugs mainly), so I'm a bit confused.  Any advice?  Google didn't help much ...
[14:45] <mish__> my email address is mishd@fastmail.fm - in case that helps track it down, or I leave and some lovely person wants to email me a link to the obvious solution I missed while googling ... ;-)
[14:45] <Hobbsee> \o/ another fastmailer
[14:45] <Hobbsee> mish__: it's not in the junk mail or anything?
[14:47] <mish__> ah just checked a folder it got filtered into - and it's there
[14:47]  * mish__ hangs head in shame
[14:48] <mish__> but thunderbird should have checked that folder and told me about it - the email has been there 18 hours without thunderbird noticing
[14:48] <mish__> sigh
[14:48] <mish__> thanks for responding to me anyway
[14:49] <Hobbsee> mish__: is thunderbird only checking for new mail in your inbox?
[14:49] <Hobbsee> mish__: and are you subscribed to that folder in thunderbird?
[14:51] <mish__> no it should be checking for email in quite a few folders, including that one.  I am subscribed to it - at least if I right click on the folder, choose properties, the box "Check this folder for new messages" is ticked.
[14:51] <mish__> So I'm a bit confused, but never mind.
[14:53] <Hobbsee> mish__: there's a specific option in thunderbird.
[14:53] <Hobbsee> mail.check_all_imap_folders_for_new --> add it, and set it to tru
[14:53] <Hobbsee> e
[14:53] <Hobbsee> then it will get all the mail for all the folders that you're subscribed to - or the headers of it, anyway.
[14:54] <mish__> is that in the advanced options bit?  the thunderbird equivalent of about:config ?
[14:54] <mish__> just found it
[14:54] <mish__> it was false.  Thank you for that :)
[14:55] <Hobbsee> yes :)
[14:55] <Hobbsee> y/w :)
[15:13] <Susana> hi, is there a way i can find out a list of applications that belong to ubuntu main repository and whose development is made in lauchpad?
[15:20] <ahmadtarek> Hi, is there any launchpad admin who can remove this release from linuxlittle project (https://edge.launchpad.net/linuxlittle/0.1.x/0.01)?
[15:28] <Hobbsee> ahmadtarek: try the /toipc
[15:31] <ahmadtarek> @Hobbsee I posted to answers but no one respond to me
[16:30] <mpt> Goooooooooooooooooood afternoon Launchpadders!
[16:31] <Hobbsee> midnight greetings, mpt!
[18:58] <RainCT> Hi
[18:59] <RainCT> Is there any LP developer arround? I think I've just found an evil bug :P
[18:59] <RainCT> (but a really evil one :))
[19:00] <intellectronica> RainCT: yes?
[19:01] <RainCT> intellectronica: In code.launchpad.net, if you go to «Change branch details» it seems like the Owner field doesn't contain teams of which you are an indirect member
[19:02] <intellectronica> RainCT: it may be intentional, i'm not sure
[19:02] <RainCT> intellectronica: so the box defaults to the first value which is yourself, and if you change something else and submit you are changing the owner of the branch to yourself
[19:05] <RainCT> intellectronica: and to make it even nicer, if you are indirect member of a team you can't request direct membership and so you can't change the ownership back to the original team :)
[19:05] <intellectronica> RainCT: are you ok to file a bug at https://edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-bazaar/+filebug ?
[19:06] <intellectronica> RainCT: the launchpad-bazaar should be around in a couple of hours, so that way you they'll pick it up promptly
[19:08] <intellectronica> RainCT: if not, i'm happy to raise it myself
[19:08] <RainCT> ok, bug #240210
[19:08] <RainCT> thanks for your help
[19:09] <intellectronica> RainCT: thank /you/ !
[19:33] <laga> do the PPAs support .ddebs these days?
[19:47] <rhkfin> Hi! Are there any guidelines of what kind of teams are ok. Is it OK that Launchpad groups becomes Facebook2: a group for those with dogs, another for people who hate dogs. A team for smokers: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-smokers
[20:10] <rockstar> rhkfin, Well, since it lacks the social network aspects, I suspect that a group like that still wouldn't be very helpful.
[20:28] <Spads> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-l10n-en-us-fargo
[20:37] <cyberix> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pq/+bug/237300 Why was this changed to invalid for wine?
[20:37] <cyberix> The upstream bugbase says resolved
[20:52] <bimberi> cyberix: The upstream resolution is set to "WORKSFORME" which is, in essence, a rejection.
[20:52] <rhkfin> rockstar: I agree.. But my question was that are people allowed to start any groups they want or are groups moderated in any way? I think that a group for smokers is not needed (but exists already: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-smokers )
[20:53] <rhkfin> hmm.. or https://edge.launchpad.net/~canonical-smokers
[22:20] <Festor> hi
[22:20] <Festor> I want make deb packages for all version of Ubuntu
[22:20] <Festor> of aMule 2.2.1
[22:21] <Festor> but when I send the diff.gz with the same orig.tar the PPP rejects it
[22:23] <Festor> hi,  I want make deb packages for all version of Ubuntu of aMule 2.2.1 but when I send the diff.gz with the same orig.tar the PPP rejects it. Despite I specified in every changelog the Ubuntu version
[22:25] <Festor> hi,  I want make deb packages for all version of Ubuntu of aMule 2.2.1 but when I send the diff.gz with the same orig.tar the PPP rejects it. Despite I specified in every changelog the Ubuntu version
[22:26] <geser> Festor: there can only be one version/release in your PPA
[22:27] <Festor> :(
[22:27] <Festor> ok
[22:27] <geser> so if you want to have packages for gutsy/hardy/etc. you need to make an upload for each one with a slight different version
[22:28] <geser> e.g. attach the distibution name to the revision
[22:28] <Festor> even change the changelog for evey version of Ubuntu doesnt worj
[22:28] <Festor> work*
[22:33] <geser> Festor: all the debs for one of your packages share a directory and as only the version string is included in the filename and not the distribution name you need to have a different version for each distribution you want debs for