/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/06/19/#ubuntu-installer.txt

xivulonah nice, shall I change them to fix released then?00:00
xivulonis wubi 503 in as well?00:00
xivulonnot sure how to check that00:00
evand503> no, I'll look into that after I get back from jogging tonight or in the AM.00:02
ryoohkianyone here have a kickstart file for ubuntu 8.04 server amd64 that installs /boot + LVM?00:03
xivulonthanks, to test 503 you need to have lupin 0.20 or manually apply the last patch at first boot00:04
ryoohkii cannot get the preseed directive to install the LVM using kickstart00:05
ryoohkiit always fails and leaves me at the partitioning disks screen00:06
hardwireok.. so, my friend is booting boot.img.gz from USB via EEPC boot menu00:09
hardwirelinux loads and installs the usb storage before the flash storage modules :)00:10
hardwireI dunno what modules they are right now.00:10
hardwireso installing to /dev/sdb won't cause issues, i'd imagine.. it's mostly UUID based, but I dunno if grubs setup (hd1,0) will interfere00:11
hardwirestrike that00:11
hardwireit should work fine00:11
hardwiremaybe I should enable edd?00:11
MortisAlright.01:26
MortisSo if it's not detecting my CR-Rom drive, does it mean I'm screwed? Or can it be fixed?01:26
cjwatsonusually, it's a kernel problem01:29
cjwatsonworth comparing with the live CD to see if it manages to find the CD drive01:29
cjwatsonthat's a good way to narrow down whether it's a kernel problem or some kind of installer bug01:29
cjwatsonI assume you're working with a released version of Ubuntu here rather than an alpha release or a daily build or whatever01:30
MortisYeah, I'm using 8.04.01:30
MortisHow would I figure out if it's a kernel issue or if it's a bug?01:31
cjwatsonlike I say, try the live CD, see if it works01:32
MortisAs in run it in windows?01:32
cjwatsonno, boot it normally01:32
MortisOh, I've done that.01:32
hardwiredid you run the cd verification?01:32
cjwatsonerr, sorry, I was assuming you were working with the alternate CD?01:32
MortisI've tried that as well01:32
cjwatsonperhaps you could give me a bit more context on exactly what you're doing01:32
hardwiredid it verify?01:32
MortisI'm assuming it is a matter of my drive not being able to read the disc01:32
MortisOr vice versa.01:33
MortisIt verified when it burned01:33
Mortisyes01:33
MortisHere.01:33
hardwirewhen you booted it did you run the cd verification?01:33
MortisI burned the ISO to a CD at 40x spped01:33
Mortisspeed*01:33
MortisWhat do you mean?01:33
MortisThere was no CD verification. >_>01:33
hardwire:)01:33
hardwirewhat iso are you using?01:33
cjwatsonthere is an option on the boot menu to check the CD01:33
MortisYou mean check it for Defects?01:33
MortisI did that. lol01:33
cjwatsonyes01:33
cjwatsonhowever, it is unfortunately not 100% reliable01:34
hardwireMortis: did it pass?01:34
MortisSorry. It just did the same thing, opened up busy box01:34
cjwatsonit's possible for a CD to pass that and then fail in other ways01:34
MortisWhen I try to install it opens up BusyBox01:34
cjwatsonCD drives are some of the flakiest bits of hardware in the universe01:34
Mortisand doesn't install a thing.01:34
hardwireMortis: interesting01:34
cjwatsonit is often the case that cleaning the drive can work wonders01:34
hardwirewhere did you get the .iso?01:34
MortisWhen I try to verify the ISO, it does the same.01:34
MortisWhen I run the alternate install, it can't mount the image, or read a file called 'release'.01:35
Mortisfrom Ubuntu.com01:35
Mortisdirect download.01:35
hardwiredo you still have the image?01:35
MortisI deleted it. :-/01:35
hardwireif so, do an md5 sum check on it01:35
MortisI already check summed it01:35
MortisIt was fine.01:35
hardwireyou're a ton of help :)01:35
hardwireok01:35
cjwatsonhardwire: I would not suspect a broken image here.01:35
hardwireso sounds like your drive sucks eggs01:35
MortisProbably.01:35
cjwatsonhardwire: no, it could also be a kernel problem01:35
cjwatsonplease don't jump to conclusions too quickly01:35
MortisWell, it does the same with Xubuntu.01:36
hardwirecjwatson: not finding the right cd?01:36
cjwatsonXubuntu uses the same kernel01:36
cjwatsonhardwire: yes01:36
MortisOh.01:36
MortisWell. Let's see then. Maybe Ubuntu doesn't like my PC at all.01:36
cjwatsoncleaning the drive is a worthwhile step before going any further01:36
hardwireMortis: maybe download the cd at http://www.insert.cd/ and burn that01:36
hardwiretry booting it01:36
MortisWhat would you suggest?01:36
cody-somervillecjwatson, Mortis got some output from casper01:36
MortisOh yes.01:36
cjwatsonMortis: cleaning the drive is a worthwhile step before going any further01:36
MortisHere I'll post what it said.01:36
cjwatsonhardwire: I don't think that will be very helpful01:37
Mortisstdin: I/O error01:37
Mortisinit: /init: 1: cannot open /dev/sdc: no medium found01:37
MortisAnd that same error came up in numeros paths with variations of /dev/sdc, sdf, sdd, sde01:37
hardwirecjwatson: you may be right, it's an older kernel and it's a small download01:38
cjwatsonhardwire: (a) it has a different kernel (b) imagine a speck of dirt at a certain point on the lens; now imagine that it hits a critical bit of the Ubuntu kernel, but something irrelevant on the Insert CD01:38
MortisSomeone suggested seeing if Gutsy may work.01:38
hardwireI suggested it because he didn't know if it was a kernel issue, try a different kernel01:38
cjwatsonhardwire: trying random other CDs doesn't really help narrow it down much, I'm afraid01:38
cjwatsonMortis: yes, that just means "kernel completely failed to read from CD", not much more01:38
MortisWell, how do I fix it?01:38
MortisCleaning my drive?01:38
hardwirecjwatson: I suppose he could md5sum the cd.01:39
MortisAnd if so, do you mean defragmenting the disc, or just uninstalling apps?01:39
cjwatsonhardwire: would you mind leaving this one to me?01:39
cjwatsonI think us both chiming in is confusing01:39
cjwatsonMortis: no no, physically cleaning the CD drive01:39
cjwatsonthe lens tends to get dirty01:39
cjwatsonyou can get cleaning kits fairly cheaply, or there are guides on the web for cleaning them01:39
MortisAwsome. Someone just called and rick roll'd me.01:39
MortisOh.01:40
MortisJesus01:40
cody-somervillerick roll'd?01:40
MortisI01:40
MortisYeah.01:40
cjwatsonit sounds trivial but it's a common cause of failures like this01:40
MortisYou ever heard the song "Never Gonna Give you Up" by Rick Astley?01:40
cody-somervilleYes...01:40
MortisYeah.01:40
MortisSomeone called me and played that song.01:40
MortisIt's a 4chan meme...bleh.01:40
MortisIt was probably my friend.01:41
cjwatsonhowever, if that doesn't do any good (it may not), then get a dump of the PCI IDs of your system (you should be able to extract it from some other operating system too), and dump that into a bug report on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux describing your symptoms as accurately as you can01:41
cjwatsonthe PCI ID of your CD drive should identify it accurately enough to pin down the kernel driver responsible01:41
Mortisbut if my disc drive was dirty, wouldn't that mean it can't read anything?01:42
cjwatsonit varies01:42
cjwatsonoften it affects just particular parts of the disk as read01:42
MortisOkay.01:42
MortisWell, does cleaning the disc your self involve opening the PC?01:42
cjwatsonif you get lucky, it makes no difference; if you get unlucky, it flips a bit in your kernel and the universe implodes01:42
cjwatsonI believe doing it properly does, but personally I've had decent luck with cleaning kits which are basically a little brush attached to a CD-like object01:43
* cjwatson does not work for a cleaning kit manufacturer, for the avoidance of doubt ;-)01:43
cjwatsonwith the latter, you stick it into the drive and run a little program on the disk, it whirs around for a bit01:43
MortisEh. I don't have any money, and plus, I don't really want to wait.01:44
MortisI may have to try cleaning it myself.01:44
MortisI don't know though.01:44
cjwatsongoogle for CD drive cleaning01:44
MortisI'm going to try some other things before I do that.01:44
cody-somervilleMortis, Have another CD-rom drive?01:44
cjwatsonI doubt you'll be able to get it fixed without either drive cleaning, fairly serious kernel hacking (assuming that it is a kernel bug at all), or hardware substitution01:45
MortisNo, I don't.01:45
MortisYou guys really think it's that serious?01:45
Mortis:-/01:45
MortisIf anything, it's probably a shit drive. It's probably 3 or 4 years old.01:45
cjwatsonwell, it ain't working ;-)01:45
cjwatsonyou could try writing a netboot CD - http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/hardy-proposed/main/installer-i386/current/images/netboot/mini.iso01:45
hardwireI'd like to know if the image he wrote matches the md5sums01:45
MortisIt does.01:46
hardwirethat would help verify if it's a kernel issue or not.01:46
cjwatsonhardwire: not really, no01:46
hardwireif it matches, then it's possibly a kernel issue01:46
MortisEither way, my md5 sums match up01:46
hardwireif it doesn't we can almost throw out kernel issues01:46
cody-somervillehardwire, Are you new to the channel?01:46
cjwatsonhardwire: he's already said several times that the checksums verified01:46
hardwireMortis: if you make an image of the cd you made, then md5sum it.. just curious01:46
cjwatsonhardwire: no, we can't throw out kernel issues due to that.01:46
hardwirecjwatson: the iso he downloaded verified.01:46
cjwatsonhardwire: enough with the checksums, please.01:46
Mortislol01:47
MortisSo what is this netboot?01:47
hardwireI'm not trying to be stupid.. sorry01:47
hardwirecody-somerville: yes, I'm new01:47
hardwirebut I'm not *new*01:47
cjwatsonMortis: the netboot image is a very small CD image that installs by downloading practically everything from the network01:47
cody-somerville(no, not the entire network, just all the packages from the network instead of the local cd ;])01:48
cjwatsonMortis: assuming you have the network bandwidth to install that way, it may help you dodge this kind of issue01:48
MortisOk. What are my options for installing without a CD?01:48
cjwatsontry the netboot CD image first01:48
MortisHow do I get it to start downloading the files?01:48
MortisJust open it up?01:48
cjwatsonfollow the prompts01:48
cody-somervilleMortis, You would boot it like you would Ubuntu01:49
MortisOkay.01:49
cjwatsonyou should try the netboot image because (a) it's much smaller and so less likely to run into physical errors due to e.g. dirt on the lens (b) loading it only involves the BIOS and syslinux, not the Linux kernel01:49
MortisWhat if it can't read this CD either?01:49
cjwatsonand so it has a decent chance of avoiding both plausible causes01:49
cody-somervilleMortis, you can do it with floppies01:49
cjwatsoncross that bridge if we come to it01:49
MortisAlright, I'll give it a try.01:50
cjwatsoncody-somerville: not on Ubuntu01:50
MortisOh definitely not.01:50
MortisIt's 700MB01:50
cjwatsonDebian supports that (ish), Ubuntu never has01:50
cody-somervillecjwatson, I thought I saw something for Ubuntu01:50
MortisI don't know of any 700MB floppys01:50
cjwatsonfloppies, for the avoidance of doubt, are just the installer bit not the whole 700MB01:50
MortisWhat speed would you recommend writing this iso to?01:50
cjwatsonassuming they were supported, which they aren't01:50
Mortis40X01:50
Mortis?01:50
cjwatsonMortis: as low as possible01:50
MortisOkay.01:50
MortisIt'll correct itself, right?01:50
cjwatsonusing the lowest possible speed is always a good idea when you have problems like this01:50
cjwatson40X is vastly ambitious01:51
* cody-somerville has never burnt anything that fast.01:51
MortisThat may be why01:51
MortisIs it possible for it to skip over files from going so fast?01:51
cody-somervilleYour cd passed the verifier, remember?01:51
MortisOh. True.01:51
MortisAnyways, I'm going to try this mini.iso01:51
MortisWhat should the write method be?01:52
MortisI have SAO01:52
cjwatsonwrite method?01:52
MortisYeah.01:52
cjwatsonoh, doesn't matter, you're not going to be doing multisession01:52
cjwatsonjust use the defaults01:52
MortisSession-at-Once, Track-at-Once01:52
MortisOh okay.01:52
MortisSorry, I don't burn CDs often. Heh.01:52
cody-somervilleMortis, your paranoia is understandable ;]01:52
MortisWow. That wa sfast O_o01:53
MortisI'm just trying to do everything I can before I start messing with my PC01:54
MortisI don't want to break my PC over a Linux distro01:54
MortisAlright.01:54
MortisWish me luck. I'm going with the mini.iso. I'll probably be back real soon.01:54
MortisThanks guys01:54
cjwatsonhardwire: I didn't mean to be rough, I've just dealt with a *lot* of these issues where the checksum verifies fine and I've learned that, while it's worth checking quickly to avoid silly mistakes, it doesn't pay to fixate on the checksums01:55
hardwireyou stretched for time or something?01:56
cjwatsonnot especially?01:56
cjwatsonbut I don't like to waste users' time either01:56
hardwireyou're approach was fine, I bet its going to work and waste less of a users time01:56
cjwatsonand it didn't sound like a checksum problem at all to me01:57
cjwatsonchecksum problems don't produce I/O errors like that01:57
hardwirethen why worry about burn speed?01:57
cjwatsonno reason not to play safe :-)01:57
* cody-somerville nods.01:57
* hardwire sighs01:57
hardwiresure.01:57
cjwatsonyou don't get "stdin: I/O error" from an incorrect image, though01:58
hardwirewe all have our own way of doing things, mines just weirded.01:58
hardwireweirder.01:58
cjwatsonthat means either a physical problem, or that the kernel is hallucinating a physical problem01:58
hardwireI thought I remembered him saying the cd defect didn't even load01:58
cjwatsonthere is a vanishingly small chance that the kernel got corrupted, but you'd have to be pretty unlucky for it to carry on working and pretend like the CD was busted01:58
hardwirecd defect detector01:58
cjwatsonit failed in the same way - the CD defect check involves mounting the filesystem on the CD01:59
cjwatsonwhich is the step that was failing01:59
hardwireyup01:59
cjwatsonit's a file-by-file check01:59
hardwireI'm familiar01:59
hardwireyeh.. I'm on it01:59
hardwirethat's why I wanted the iso checked01:59
hardwirejust so he knew what happened01:59
cjwatsonchecking the ISO is worthless in the case of an I/O error01:59
cjwatsonit will almost never help01:59
hardwireI missed the I/O error part01:59
cody-somervillehardwire, next time you might want to take things a bit slower to ensure you read everything that is being said.02:00
hardwireI've got another window open where I'm helping somebody who can't seem to download a checksum verified image for the life of him right now.02:00
cjwatsoncertainly, that kind of thing does happen (a lot ...)02:00
hardwirecody-somerville: thanks for the advice guys, you're probably right on the money.02:00
* hardwire ungrinds teeth02:01
hardwirenot a huge fan of admitting i've been overniced.02:01
cody-somervillehardwire, well, atleast you don't throw chairs. :]02:02
hardwireI rather like this chair.02:03
hardwireIt would be a shame to toss it02:03
* cjwatson blinks at gfxboot02:03
cjwatsonwhy are you calling ProgressUpdate before ProgressInit02:04
hardwiremeh.. I'd guess so it gave a more "instant" feel :)02:04
hardwireor fail.. meh.02:04
cjwatsondoing so crashes02:04
hardwireeePC users are so very green02:05
hardwireI've helped a few now put ubuntu onto them02:05
hardwireit's almost like I need an image I can just flash onto them02:05
hardwireI haven't messed with OEM mode ever.02:05
cjwatsonoh, ouch, I bet this is an interaction between com32 and gfxboot02:08
cjwatsonthat would explain why suse didn't see it02:09
hardwireI've been meaning to try out wubi02:09
hardwirebut I have no windows to try it on02:09
hardwireI'll have to sneak it onto some other persons laptop02:10
cody-somervilleIt is substantially more fragile02:10
cody-somervilleIf the ntfs disk gets flagged dirty, *buntu will drop to busybox.02:10
hardwireon a different note, coLinux is teh wild.02:11
MortisOk.02:24
MortisI think I messed up.02:24
MortisIt was partitioning, but it wasn't showing any progress...I figured it mucked up so I restarted it.02:24
MortisNow it won't resize any partition.02:24
cjwatsonthat was indeed a mistake02:24
MortisIt just sat there at 0% D:02:25
MortisI think windows fixed it though...02:25
cjwatsonyou should be able to rectify it by running filesystem checks on those partitions02:25
cjwatsonif they're Windows partitions, booting Windows ought to do that, yes02:25
MortisOk02:25
MortisWell, it fixed it then02:25
MortisI think I'm just going to use an entire spare drive for linux02:25
Mortisand back up all my music02:25
cjwatsonthere are indeed parts of the partitioner that will spend time working but without accurate progress information, I'm afraid02:25
MortisThat's all I use my D: drive for anyways.02:25
MortisOkay.02:26
MortisWell, next time I'll be sure to go make a sandwhich and watch TV or something02:26
MortisInstead of sitting in front of my PC being inmpatient.02:26
Mortisimpatient*02:26
Mortisthe mini.iso does indeed work though.02:27
MortisThank you so much02:27
cjwatsongreat, glad to hear it02:27
MortisActually, I think I will have to resize my partition.02:27
MortisI need FLstudio and a ton of other things on this drive.02:27
MortisI'm going to go try again and see if it will let me resize.02:27
MortisIs there anyway to check if my partitions are messed up or anything02:28
Mortisbefore I go wasting my time if it doesn't work02:28
cjwatsoneasiest way to do that is to boot the mini.iso and see if it likes it :-)02:28
Mortislol02:28
MortisOkay.02:28
MortisI'm going to back some stuff up on my D: drive first.02:28
MortisAnd when it sets up a partition, if I use the max space available, does that mean it's using both drives?02:29
Mortisor hard discs rather02:29
cjwatsonno, just one02:30
MortisThat's odd. Why does it say I can use 117 gigs then?02:30
cjwatsonyou have to use LVM or RAID to spread a partition across multiple disks02:30
MortisWhen my two CD drives together only have about 70-80 gigs of space.02:30
Mortisfree space, mind you.02:31
cjwatsonwithout knowing exactly which bit of text you're referring to, perhaps it means the total you could use if you resized your Windows partition to the smallest possible size02:31
MortisWell, doing that can cause serious problems in windows, right?02:31
MortisIf I ever do use it again?02:31
MortisAnd when I was partitioning, I think it was doing it on my C: drive...how do I switch it to the other drive?02:32
cjwatsonyou ought to back everything valuable up first, of course, but it ought not to trash Windows02:32
MortisOr is partitioning only for your home drive.02:32
cjwatsonC: and D: are Windows-style names for drives02:32
MortisWell, I have the XP disc, so I'm not too worried about windows.02:32
cjwatsonLinux calls them /dev/sda and /dev/sdb (usually, possibly hda and hdb instead)02:32
MortisOh.02:32
MortisWell02:32
cjwatsonselect the one you want02:33
MortisIt didn't give me that option when I was resizing.02:33
cjwatsonthe automatic resizing thing won't, no02:33
cjwatsonbut you can use manual partitioning02:33
MortisEh. I don't want to mess anything up...02:33
MortisIt's not complex is it?02:33
cjwatsonif you're going to stick everything on your second disk, then there's no reason to resize Windows on your first disk02:33
cjwatsonthe automatic resizing widget assumes that you want to resize Windows for a good reason, i.e. to use some of the space it was using02:34
cjwatsonthere is fairly substantial documentation on the web; you'd do well to look over it first02:35
MortisDang, Spyware Terminator was taking up 33 gigs02:35
MortisI'm just going to use my D: drive.02:35
MortisI freed up enough space for all my music02:35
cjwatsonthere is an automatic partitioning option to use an entire disk02:35
cjwatsonerasing anything that was previously on it02:35
cjwatsonyou select use entire disk, then you select the disk you want to use. it will ask you for confirmation before actually doing anything02:36
cjwatsoncheck the size of the disk it suggests carefully; it might be that Linux detects your disks in the opposite order to Windows02:36
MortisYeah02:37
MortisWell, when I did that, it aid both had 120 gigs of space02:37
MortisIt didn't list how much was free :-/02:37
cjwatsonah, difficult02:37
MortisYeah...02:37
* cjwatson <- not responsible for what happens if you don't take backups02:37
MortisObviously XD02:37
MortisIs there any way you know of that I could check?02:38
cjwatsonthe manual partitioner may be more informative here02:38
MortisOkay.02:38
MortisI'll try that one then.02:38
cjwatsonyou could drop into it and see if it helps you02:38
cjwatsonyou can delete or resize a partition there, then select guided partitioning and tell it to just stick Ubuntu partitions in a free region02:38
MortisUh oh...02:39
cjwatsonjust note that, unless it says otherwise, it doesn't touch your disks until after you've acknowledged a confirmation message02:39
MortisI can't delete anything from my recycle bin -_-02:39
cjwatsonso if you think you've screwed up, just reboot02:39
MortisOkyy.02:40
MortisI'll be trying that in a moment.02:41
* cjwatson -> bed02:43
MortisLater. Thanks for your help02:43
=== cr3_ is now known as cr3
giosue_chi!  can anyone answer a question about the ubuntu-desktop metapackage?03:55
giosue_cI am trying to modify the list of packages installed by default on my ISO03:55
hardwiregiosue_c: What kind of modification?03:57
giosue_chardwire: i want to not install a certain package03:58
hardwireubuntu-desktop?03:58
giosue_chardwire: i removed a dependency from the xubuntu-desktop metapackage and rebuilt the ISO... but the package still gets installed03:58
hardwirehave you checked to see if it is required by other packages as well?03:59
giosue_ci see that is is "suggested" by another packages03:59
hardwireah, that wouldn't matter03:59
giosue_cthat's what i thought.03:59
hardwireare you at a full xubuntu install right now?03:59
giosue_cafter the system boots I can remove the package without other packages being removed... so i don't understand.04:00
giosue_cyes04:00
hardwireif you apt-get --purge --auto-remove remove packagename does it try to uninstall anything that xubuntu-desktop uses?04:00
giosue_ci have the modified system and a clean system at my fingertips04:00
giosue_clemme check...04:00
giosue_cso i executed apt-get remove --purge --auto-remove apmd04:02
giosue_cand it says apmd* will be removed04:02
giosue_cthat is it.04:02
giosue_cto me that means my package modification is good, but i don't know why apmd was still installed in the first place.  nothing depends on it.04:02
hardwirehmm04:04
giosue_cwhen i look at the preseed for d-i it looks like they just install xubuntu-desktop and that causes everything else to be installed.04:04
giosue_cso that is why i modded that package04:04
giosue_care there any other mechanisms that they use to specify what it installed?04:04
hardwirewhat about ubuntu-minimal04:04
hardwireand ubuntu-standard04:04
giosue_care those metapackages too?04:05
hardwiresure04:05
giosue_ci'll rip those open and see what they depend on.04:06
hardwireapt-cache rdepends apmd04:06
giosue_ci get a list... but how can i tell what from that list is on my system?04:07
giosue_cis there a neat trick for that?04:07
hardwirehard work :)04:08
giosue_cdarn!04:08
hardwireactually, apt should know how it all works04:08
hardwirehence removing it should remove the foul creature that installed it04:08
hardwirewhats up, why is apmd bugging you?04:08
giosue_cwell... it is sort of a proof of concept.  apmd is one of many packages that I will be removing.04:09
giosue_cthe systems that these ISOs will be installed on have very limited HDD.  normally i run a script that does a bunch of installs and removes.04:09
giosue_ci'm getting fancy though... ;)04:09
hardwireand is aptitude being told to install suggested packages?04:09
hardwiregiosue_c: sounds like you're better off managing your own metapackages04:10
giosue_chmm..  dunno.  i just let the installer run and this is what i end up with.04:10
hardwirealso.. xubuntu-desktop is in upstream pools04:11
giosue_cyea.  i agree.  this is sort of dipping my toe in the water.  I wanted to see if it would work how i expected.04:11
hardwireerr.. it's in pools that you can't control04:11
hardwireso if you're installing xubuntu-desktop from a cd you modified, eventually that package is going to get updated somewhere else in the world and your computer will install apmd04:12
giosue_cmy final solution I'll have a whole new metapackage... similar to xubuntu-desktop but with a different name04:12
giosue_cright04:12
hardwireif you are doing an xubuntu install *AND* using a network mirror, you're probably going to pull down the latest xubuntu-desktop package instead of use whats on the cd04:12
hardwireall during the install04:12
giosue_cok.04:12
giosue_coh...04:13
hardwireheaddesk?04:13
giosue_cwhat is headdesk?04:13
hardwirenevermind :)04:13
hardwirehttp://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=headdesk04:14
hardwiremaybe it's not the right term for what you probably just felt.04:14
giosue_cheaddesk.04:15
giosue_cwell.  the master plan is now to create a new metapackage very similar to xubuntu-desktop04:15
giosue_cand put it in the preseed file04:15
hardwireyou should maybe make your own metapackages, make your own package pool, and then make a preseed that uses them04:15
hardwirecall it giosue-desktop or something ;)04:15
giosue_ccan do04:15
giosue_cor hardwire-desktop04:16
hardwireyou'd name your baby after me?04:16
hardwirehow sweet.04:16
giosue_c:)04:16
giosue_ci'm still not sure i understand how apmd got installed on my system though...04:17
giosue_c:(04:17
giosue_cwhen i remove, nothing else gets removed.04:17
giosue_cyou mentioned aptitude can be told to install suggested.  surely that isn't the behavior at installer time...04:17
giosue_cyou would end up with all sorts of junk in there.04:18
hardwirehappy junk04:18
hardwirebut it was just a thought, not really an answer04:18
hardwireI'm guessing while you are installing off your new cd image you are using the "use a network mirror" option before you finish the install04:19
hardwireand it pulls down a list of more recent packages than what is on CD04:19
hardwireone of which.. probbably, being xubuntu-desktop04:19
hardwireso it's superseding your changes04:19
giosue_chmm.. i am using the alternate-installer04:19
hardwireand what modifications did you make to the alternate installer cd?04:20
giosue_cand if i installed an updated xubuntu-desktop i wouldn't have been able to remove it.04:20
hardwireit doesn't have to be installed for xubuntu to do it's magic04:20
hardwireit just needs to be installed once04:21
giosue_chmm.  interesting.04:21
hardwireI'm not sure how you're handling things, at least well enough to tell you exactly what's causing this04:21
giosue_cso the dependencies come from the packages file in the mirror.04:21
hardwiregiosue_c: most of the time more recent version of packages are available on mirrors04:21
giosue_cI should probably give my package a ridiculously high version number to test this theory04:22
hardwirethat's one way of doing it :)04:22
giosue_cor make sure it is pointing at my own special mirror.04:22
giosue_cthe hardwire mirror ;)04:22
giosue_canyway.  these are all helpful leads you've given me04:23
hardwirecertainly a charming little fella04:23
giosue_cI gotta go try it04:23
giosue_cwill drop in later if it works... or doesn't04:23
sriiam getting problem while booting up the livecd "08:32
srimount: Mounting /dev/loop0 on //filesystem.squashfs failed: Invalid argument08:32
sriCan not mount /dev/loop0 (/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs)    on //filesystem.08:32
srisquashfs08:32
sri"08:32
srican anybody know the solution08:34
sristdin: erroe 008:35
sriplz tell me08:38
sriiam getting problem while booting up the livecd  " mount: Mounting /dev/loop0 on //filesystem.squashfs failed: Invalid argument Can not mount /dev/loop0 (/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs)    on //filesystem.squashfs"10:04
xivuloncjwatson: fyi have merged the gobby dump to the wubi intrepid wiki, since noticed you mentioned that in the meeting10:04
sriiam getting problem while booting up the livecd  " mount: Mounting /dev/loop0 on //filesystem.squashfs failed: Invalid argument Can not mount /dev/loop0 (/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs)    on //filesystem.squashfs"10:47
cjwatson(a) please don't repeat yourself (b) is this a modified live CD? otherwise check dmesg after you get dropped to a busybox prompt10:51
cjwatson"Invalid argument" (a.k.a. EINVAL) is a famously uninformative kernel error code10:51
cjwatsonxivulon: it's usually a good idea to avoid specifications that are largely lists of bullet points; furthermore, I'm sure there are items in there that we discussed and said were infeasible for intrepid, and these should not be in the wubi-intrepid spec10:54
cjwatsonthis spec should be a concrete description of things to do for intrepid, rather than a wishlist10:55
CIA-2os-prober: cjwatson * r217 ubuntu/ (5 files in 4 dirs): merge from Debian 1.2611:08
CIA-2os-prober: cjwatson * r218 ubuntu/debian/changelog: releasing version 1.26ubuntu111:13
xivuloncjwatson I will clean it up in the coming days11:14
xivulonis there a wiki for proposed usability enhancements in ubiquity for intrepid?12:07
xivuloncjwatson, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WubiIntrepid take-2, did a bit of cleanup will spend more time on it later on12:43
xivulonmpt can you please review the "Ubiquity Partitioning Page Mockup" in there?12:47
mpt"Wubi" is the coolest program name ever12:48
xivulonhehe12:48
mpthowever12:51
mptxivulon, I don't think "Migrate the existing Wubi installation" is quite human-centric enough12:52
xivulonah sure, feel free to edit12:52
mptsomething like:12:53
mptYou currently have Ubuntu installed on Windows.12:53
mpt(*) Copy all files and settings from this installation into a dedicated partition12:53
mpt( ) Install Ubuntu from scratch12:54
xivulondone12:55
mpthmm12:55
xivulonevand did you talk to slangasek re ntfs-3g patch?13:40
xivulonhmm I wonder if dm-loop can be used with LVM2 to create resizable virtual disks, looks like they are part of the same project...13:48
xivuloncjwatson, you mentioned you had a discussion with don re umountfs, from the notes it seems the safest approach is to unmount /proc/mounts in reverse order, do we still need -l option?13:55
xivulonI wouldn't think it hurts, particularly if we unmount items before / (/host in particular). man shows -l is only supported in 2.4.11+, shouldn't be an issue.13:58
cjwatsonI don't think it matters, if you're doing things in reverse order13:59
xivulonI'd think that it is relevant for /host (unless we stop at /)13:59
cjwatsonstopping at / seems to make sense14:00
xivulontrue, but lazy unmounting /host is also desirable14:00
xivulonsince now we do not really unmount it... nor remount it ro14:00
cjwatsonI suppose14:01
xivulonas for -f, man mentions it might be useful for "unreachable NFS system"14:01
xivulonnot sure what happens in that case14:01
xivulonbut surely -f creates problems to bindmounts (which I think it is a umount bug by the way)14:02
cjwatsonI'd leave -f alone14:02
xivulonif we keep -f, then we need weakmountpoints or fixing umount14:02
xivulonre /host, on second thought, not sure -l would help14:03
xivulonsince /host contains / which is only remounted ro, so /host would never be unmounted anyway14:03
evandxivulon: No, I got back late last night.  I'll talk to him during his core hours today.14:11
xivulonI think we could ask pitti now14:12
xivulonhe sponsored other patches on ntfs-3g already14:12
xivulonwould you agree if we bring it on #ubuntu-release?14:13
evandagree to bring it on #ubuntu-release?  Sure.14:15
xivulonwould it be feasible to handle wubi-migration stage 2 with a custom d-i based initrd?15:26
xivulonso we use ubiquity for stage 1 and d-i in stage 215:27
xivulonthat would spare people troubles with burning CD, bios, overrding usb content and such15:27
xivulonsince it is an automated installation d-i might even use usplash as frontend15:27
evandIMO, we should stick to the plan we came up with at UDS, but if cjwatson disagrees then I can be persuaded as well.15:35
nijabahello15:38
nijabadid anyone work on something similar to oem-config for server?15:39
xivulonevand, I must admit I haven't touched the d-i initrd since lupin 7.04 so I might misjudge the complexity of the task, but if doable it would be a more userfriendly approach, and we wouldn't need to edit raw disk bits to flag gfxboot...15:41
xivulonwe will need to add local HD preseeding to d-i anyway, and once that is done and provided we keep a list of udeb dependencies, is that much more work than the Ubiquity+gfxboot approach?15:45
evandoffhand, I'm not sure15:52
cjwatsonevand: I'm not especially happy with redesigning it on the fly now unless there is a fatal problem with the agreed design16:01
cjwatsonnijaba: not as yet16:01
cjwatsonxivulon: sticking usplash in front of d-i would be very hard work16:02
cjwatsonxivulon: let's stick with what we agreed16:02
xivuloncjwatson, usplash is a detail, I don't think we thought about d-i in stage 2 at UDS and wanted to bring it up now16:02
nijabacjwatson: what would be the best course of action to start working on it?16:02
xivulonas it might be relatively easier to implement and certainly more user friendly16:03
cjwatsonnijaba: write a text frontend to oem-config16:03
evandcjwatson: ok, agreed16:03
nijabacjwatson: ok thanks16:03
cjwatsonxivulon: I don't think that approach is likely to be more user-friendly16:03
cjwatsonmuch though I love d-i16:04
cjwatsonits strengths are power and flexibility, not user-friendliness16:04
xivulonwell if it is non-interactive that does not matter...16:04
xivulonbut it avoids problems with burning a CD (bad medium) and booting off CD/USB (bios or people ejecting)16:05
xivulonbasically all the user has to do is reboot and choose Ubuntu again16:06
xivulonthen d-i kicks in and completes the installation, then next reboot you are in a dedicated partition installation16:07
xivulonsure the progress bar won't be as pretty but I think that is ok16:08
xivulonso in stage 1 all we do is create a preseed, download d-i initrd/kernel in /boot, and replace menu.lst16:10
xivulonwell have added a note to the wiki for reference16:22
CIA-2debian-installer: cjwatson * r924 hardy-proposed/debian/changelog: No-change rebuild to pick up new components.19:56
CIA-2debian-installer: cjwatson * r925 hardy-proposed/debian/changelog: releasing version 20070308ubuntu40.420:01
CIA-2debian-installer: cjwatson * r941 ubuntu/ (4 files in 3 dirs): Move mainline architectures to 2.6.26-2 kernels.20:11
evandso if I understand correctly, rosetta-merge-all needs to be run over debian-installer/ and installer-po/ now, correct?20:44
=== evand_ is now known as evand
xivulonevand, does the iso you tested with include the latest partman-auto-loop?21:01
xivulon6V,BHP90G821:02
xivulon^kids21:02
evandoh lovely, there's no ubiquity with partman-auto-loop 0ubuntu14 in hardy-proposed21:14
evandso if I understand correctly, rosetta-merge-all needs to be run over debian-installer/ and installer-po/  now, correct?21:15
evandcjwatson: ^21:15
cjwatsonI think so - if you're uploading anyway, certainly21:16
cjwatsonI think debian-installer/ is more important21:16
cjwatsonfrom a quick scan of the languages, it has the packaged languages whereas installer-po/ has the ones which are new in LP, but I'd do both if I were you just to be sure. rosetta-merge-all will skip any ones that aren't already in ubiquity anyway21:17
evandok, thanks21:17
evandGiven that I have to upload a new ubiquity, is it reasonable to include the missing translation updates as well?21:18
cjwatsonI think so, yes21:18
evandok, I'll make an SRU request for the both21:18
cjwatsoncheck with Steve whether that's actually necessary21:18
cjwatsonor whether it just counts as syncing up with other stuff21:19
evandHrm, the Khmer translation appears to be broken.21:22
evandI'll leave that one out21:22
evandArr, and part of the Spanish one.21:26
cjwatsoncheck the Portuguese (and maybe Brazilian, I forget) ones - there was a report of #-#-#-# type breakage there22:06
evandthey look OK22:08
xivulonevand is http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/hardy/daily-live/20080619.3 any good?23:31
xivulonguess not, it contains ubiquity 1.8.11 :(23:40

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!