[00:25] <bdmurray> sbeattie: shouldn't the verification-needed tag be removed from bug 209534?
[00:27] <sbeattie> bdmurray: I was unsure whether it should be changed to -done, in that I confirmed that the intended change functioned properly, or -failed, because I don't think the intended change is sufficient.
[00:27] <bdmurray> well pitti seems to have flipped it to triaged so I'd read that as being insufficient
[00:28] <bdmurray> or I could be totally wrong which seems to be the case after looking at the activity log
[00:30] <sbeattie> Well, his followup agreed with my belief that it was insufficient, so I should probably just mark it failed.
[00:37] <sbeattie> okay, should be updated in a minute or so.
[00:55] <chuckf> I have a question about bug triaging. This was brought up at a meeting last night and just want to be sure I gave the right answer
[00:56] <bdmurray> Alright, what is it?
[00:56] <chuckf> A member asked if you need to have signed the CoC in order to work on bugs. I answered no because I could not find anything that said otherwise
[00:57] <chuckf> I thought that the only real prereq was to have a launchpad account
[00:57] <bdmurray> Yes, that is correct.  However, to join the Ubuntu Bug Control team it is a requirement to have signed the CoC.
[00:58] <chuckf> cool, that's about what I thought and suggested
[00:58] <bdmurray> What kind of meeting was this?
[00:58] <chuckf> loco
[00:59] <chuckf> Maryland team
[00:59] <bdmurray> Cool, looking at a Bug Jam?
[00:59] <chuckf> the global thing
[00:59] <bdmurray> Great!
[00:59] <chuckf> I've suggested doing them before and was told no interest. I suggested this one and have 6-7 already interested
[01:00] <crimsun_> when is the global one?
[01:00] <chuckf> I've got the space set and am in the process of flushing things out
[01:00] <bdmurray> The weekend of August 10th I believe
[01:00] <chuckf> 8-10
[01:00] <chuckf> we'll be doing our group thing on the 9th
[01:01] <crimsun_> in columbia?
[01:01] <chuckf> yup
[01:01] <chuckf> columbia, maryland
[06:12] <darthanubis> Bug #237801
[13:32] <persia> Is there a handy LP page that shows the packages with the most bugs, or does one need to query that with something like python-lp-bugs?
[13:48] <thekorn> persia, I only know of pages like https://edge.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-team/+packagebugs which give an overview of all bugs int the packages a team/user is subscribed
[13:50] <persia> thekorn: Yeah.  I was hoping for something for all of Ubuntu, but https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+packagebugs is lost
[13:52] <thekorn> hmm, strage thing is: if I understand this right  https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugs/+packagebugs should give the data you need, because ubuntu-bugs is subscribed to all packages
[13:53] <thekorn> persia, but this is not working
[13:53] <persia> I thought ubuntu-bugs was subscribed to all bugs in ubuntu, rather than each of the individual packages
[13:56] <thekorn> it is getting even better: ubuntu-bugs is bug supervisor for ubuntu, and when I hover the "show package report"-link on https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugs/+subscribedbugs it says:
[13:57] <thekorn> A summary report for packages where Ubuntu Bugs is a bug supervisor.
[13:57] <thekorn> this is confusing me
[13:57] <persia> It's not the supervisor for any packages, just the distribution.
[14:00] <thekorn> ok, makes sense, but why is ubuntu-bugs then direct bug supervisor for about 15 packages listed here: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugs/+packagebugs
[14:01] <persia> thekorn: Probably double-subscribed
[15:32] <cthuljew> Is there a ticket for keyboard layout reverting to en_US on reboot in GNOME with 8.04?
[15:35] <mrooney> cthuljew: have you searched launchpad?
[15:36] <cthuljew> mrooney: Yeah. Nothing seems like my problem.
[15:36] <cthuljew> Oh wait.
[15:37] <mrooney> find one?
[15:43] <cthuljew_> Er, dumb.
[15:44] <cthuljew_> Yeah, okay, it's https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/173721 but no one seems to care to fix it. Oh well.
[15:45] <cthuljew_> Well, not "no one seems to care," but, "no one has done it yet".
[15:53] <mrooney> bdmurray: ping?
[16:28] <bdmurray> mrooney: hardly awake what's up?
[16:30] <mrooney> bdmurray: good morning! just wondering if that script you used to generic launchpad stats like # of bugs touched, commented, importance/status changed, etc, was available anywhere?
[16:30] <mrooney> generate, that is
[16:31] <bdmurray> mrooney: not yet, I've though of putting it in a bzr repository
[16:31] <bdmurray> mrooney: hold on though
[16:32] <mrooney> okay
[16:32] <mrooney> by the way, I love the karma gm script, I always found myself clicking around on users to figure it if they have a good chance of knowing more than I do or not
[16:33] <mrooney> now it is so easy :)
[16:33] <bdmurray> It can be a useful guide
[16:34] <bdmurray> http://pastebin.osuosl.org/8492
[16:35] <mrooney> bdmurray: thanks! this looks bandwidth heavy, I assume to use it quite in moderation for the sake of launchpad?
[16:36] <bdmurray> it requires an mbox file from http://people.ubuntu.com/~listarchive/
[16:37] <bdmurray> that's the mailing list archive for a specific month
[16:38] <bdmurray> it then looks at the e-mail bodies if they don't have NEW in the subject to see what happened
[16:38] <mrooney> oh, I see, how clever, so it tells you for each month
[16:38] <bdmurray> I'm not sure how it will behave that far back because NEW didn't always exist in the subject
[16:39] <mrooney> I see
[16:39] <mrooney> I could probably make a version which uses launchpad and the all bugs touched page or something
[16:39] <mrooney> bug that would be much slower
[16:39] <mrooney> *but
[16:40] <bdmurray> Yeah, working with the mboxes is quite fast and they capture some things the mailing list doesn't like tags added
[16:40] <bdmurray> er some things launchpad doesn't
[16:40] <bdmurray> and assigning to a package
[16:40] <Carb0n> hi, anyone know any follow-ups to #180415?
[16:41] <mrooney> bug 180415
[16:45] <Carb0n> I know.. but I think I know a suggestion (sorry for the delay)
[16:45] <Carb0n> yuo can set the BLOCKSIZE by default
[16:45] <Carb0n> the install program can do that
[16:48] <mrooney> hmm, interesting
[16:50] <Carb0n> setting the BLOCKSIZE by default will (apparantly) make these programs print the correct file/block sizes
[16:53] <Carb0n> Should I do the same for Debian too?
[17:02] <Carb0n> I wonder why nobody's noticed this before :(
[17:06] <mrooney> but what about things that use BLOCK_SIZE
[17:09] <Carb0n> mrooney: BLOCK_SIZE affects only df(1), du(1) and ls(1) it seems
[17:09] <Carb0n> maybe you can set BLOCK_SIZE=$BLOCKSIZE
[18:01] <afflux> wah, where did the restricted gfx drivers (nvidia-*, fglrx) go?
[18:02] <afflux> they don't seem to be in src:linux-restricted-modules anymore
[19:50] <greg-g> fyi, 10 minutes till "How to Run a Bug Jam" in #ubuntu-meeting
[22:50] <siretart> report from bugjam nuernberg:
[22:50] <siretart> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.searchtext=&orderby=-importance&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INVALID&field.status%3Alist=WONTFIX&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.status%3Alist=FIXRELEASED&assignee_option=any&field.assignee
[22:50] <siretart> 20 bugs triaged :)
[22:52] <afflux> this link gives me 156554 results o.o
[23:54] <afflux> huh
[23:55] <afflux> I've the impression quite some applications are broken, (at least aptoncd and ccsm) because they use FileChooser.get_filename(), which seems to have returned an absolute path in the past, and returns only a filename currently.
[23:55] <persia> bdmurray: About "Fix Committed" to "Fix Released": is there not a chance this may disrupt the existing SRU process?