| === eMxyzptlk is now known as eMxyzptlk[away] | ||
| bimberi | $ bzr branch lp:hwtest | 02:32 |
|---|---|---|
| bimberi | bzr: ERROR: Revision {david.murphy@canonical.com-20080417161838-a2tfnk26kx1q7vjf} not present in "revisions.kndx". | 02:32 |
| bimberi | 'bzr co --lightweight' works (but not just 'bzr co'). | 02:33 |
| jml | hmm | 02:46 |
| jml | bimberi: what happens if you do 'bzr branch http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~hardware-certification/hwtest/trunk'? | 02:48 |
| jml | bimberi: I appear to get the same error. At a guess, I'd say that the branch needs to be fixed by someone who has a copy | 02:58 |
| bimberi | jml: your command worked | 03:00 |
| jml | *interesting* | 03:00 |
| jml | bimberi: are you a member of the hardware-certification team? | 03:02 |
| wgrant | I thought they said that they fixed all of those branches. | 03:05 |
| wgrant | After they broke them a few weeks ago. | 03:05 |
| bimberi | jml: no (sorry so unresponsove, frequently afk atm) | 03:05 |
| wgrant | (they being lp-bzr people) | 03:05 |
| jml | wgrant: I am they. | 03:05 |
| wgrant | jml: I always forget which team you're in, sorry. | 03:06 |
| jml | wgrant: np :) | 03:06 |
| wgrant | Too many LP people. | 03:06 |
| jml | wgrant: when we fixed up the branches that the LP bug corrupted, we noticed other corrupted branches that were not caused by us. | 03:07 |
| rockstar | I've seen corrupt branches on launchpad that were user errors... | 03:07 |
| jml | right. | 03:07 |
| jml | or bzr client errors. | 03:08 |
| * jml tries fetching the branch over sftp | 03:08 | |
| jml | if it works there, then it's probably a bazaar bug. | 03:09 |
| * bimberi retries lp:hwtest - same error. Now retrying http://... | 03:09 | |
| bimberi | "Branched 300 revision(s)." | 03:16 |
| bimberi | So yes it worked. | 03:16 |
| wgrant | But that'll be an outdated version. | 03:16 |
| rockstar | wgrant, why would it be outdated? | 03:18 |
| anilm | do you guys know about this? | 03:19 |
| anilm | Sorry, there was a problem connecting to the Launchpad server. | 03:19 |
| jml | anilm: what URL were you connecting to? | 03:19 |
| anilm | jml: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~amakhijani/survv/blog/files | 03:19 |
| jml | anilm: I've also had problems connecting to the code browsing service. | 03:20 |
| wgrant | rockstar: If the branch is broken on SFTP, won't it not have been pushed to HTTP for a while? | 03:20 |
| anilm | jml: ahh ok | 03:20 |
| rockstar | jml would know authoritatively, but I think not. | 03:21 |
| jml | wgrant: if you don't have write access, you should get the same version of the branch no matter what protocol you use. | 03:21 |
| wgrant | jml: Ah. | 03:22 |
| * jml can get the branch via sftp, but not via bzr+ssh | 03:23 | |
| jml | I'm guessing this is a Bazaar bug. | 03:24 |
| jml | afaict, the version of the branch that I've got (as a non-team-member) is the latest. | 03:24 |
| jml | I can't see any relevant errors in the logs I've got on hand. | 03:26 |
| jml | I'll chase it up with the Bazaar guys tomorrow. | 03:26 |
| nixternal | not being able to connect to bazaar in LP, is that known yet? | 04:17 |
| nixternal | give me the "try reloading in a few" message | 04:18 |
| beuno | nixternal, Loggerhead? as in "view revisions/code"? | 04:18 |
| nixternal | yes | 04:18 |
| beuno | well, it's been misbehaving for a few days now | 04:18 |
| nixternal | k, it was working perfectly earlier, as it was flying allowing me to steal, I mean research, other's code :) | 04:19 |
| beuno | heheh | 04:19 |
| nixternal | k, I will try again later then...thanks beuno | 04:19 |
| beuno | I think the devs are aware, and, AFAIK, a new version is being rolled out on wednsday, which should make it work much better | 04:20 |
| nixternal | groovy | 04:20 |
| lifeless | beuno: generally any misbheaviour is considered a severe problem and should be escalated, for future reference | 05:19 |
| beuno | lifeless, ah, alright. Since jml was notified above, and it has been the case for the past days, I didn't think it was worth bothering anyone. I'll make sure to be more annoying next time :) | 05:20 |
| lifeless | beuno: uhm, I think he interpreted it as a branch specific thing | 05:21 |
| jml | lifeless: no I didn't. | 05:21 |
| lifeless | oh | 05:21 |
| jml | I interpreted it as an intermittent thing. | 05:21 |
| lifeless | well, I'm chasing it | 05:22 |
| jml | thanks. | 05:22 |
| lifeless | its up and running | 05:34 |
| beuno | thanks lifeless :) | 05:35 |
| Zic | hi, I've a question not close related to Launchpad : I'm an Ubuntu Member with an @ubuntu.com alias mail which I use mainly into the free software world mailing-list, I recently change to a new domain name my email server, and @ubuntu.com alias alway forward mails to the old one | 08:57 |
| Zic | I just changed my default e-mail contact in my launchpad account | 08:58 |
| Zic | (to my new zic@newdomain.org) | 08:58 |
| wgrant | It should change automatically within a few days. | 08:58 |
| Zic | How long Launchpad "rehash" email alias ? | 08:58 |
| Zic | few days ? thanks for your help :) | 08:58 |
| wgrant | Might be nightly, I forget. | 08:59 |
| Zic | can you confirm that Launchpad use the e-mail contact defined in accounts ? because, after my migration, I use my @ubuntu.com alias for e-mail contact on Launchpad | 09:00 |
| Zic | I just changed it to my newdomain, because I thought Launchpad use the contact adress to do the alias forward | 09:00 |
| wgrant | I believe that setting your ubuntu.com alias as your primary Launchpad address will cause problems. | 09:01 |
| wgrant | But IANALPD, I've just heard it happen to people. | 09:01 |
| Zic | yes, I believe it too, it's why I set it to my new email adress | 09:01 |
| geser | doesn't LP use the first non @ubuntu.com email address for mail forwarding anymore? | 09:15 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| === Spads_ is now known as Spads | ||
| persia | geser: That matches my experience, but the tales of those who manipulate accounts with primary set to @ubuntu.com are legion: likely best to set something else primary before any adjustment, and once complete, maybe set back @ubuntu.com | 11:46 |
| cyberix | Please give me a feature that helps me keep track about the Ubuntu packages I have been working with. | 14:13 |
| wgrant | cyberix: What do you mean by "keep track"? | 14:13 |
| cyberix | My use case is as follows | 14:13 |
| cyberix | 1) I'm working on a new Ubuntu package | 14:13 |
| cyberix | 2) Someone points out a bug in my packaging | 14:13 |
| cyberix | 3) I realize I did the same error on all my previous packages | 14:14 |
| cyberix | 4) I try to remember all the packages I created | 14:14 |
| wgrant | 5) Look at https://launchpad.net/people/+me/+packages. | 14:14 |
| wgrant | 6) ??? | 14:14 |
| wgrant | 7) Profit. | 14:14 |
| Matt-W | Hello. There seems to be a lock stuck on one of my project's bzr branches. | 14:14 |
| cyberix | wgrant: Thank you. That is just what I'm looking for. | 14:15 |
| wgrant | Matt-W: Use bzr break-lock on it, if it says it's held by you. | 14:15 |
| Matt-W | wgrant: unfortunately it's held by somebody else | 14:15 |
| Matt-W | for 951 hours and counting | 14:16 |
| wgrant | Matt-W: Who supposedly has it held? | 14:16 |
| Matt-W | held by jamesbrashko@bazaar.launchpad.net on host vostok [process #25147] | 14:16 |
| Matt-W | locked 951 hours, 31 minutes ago | 14:16 |
| Matt-W | he's the other person with commit access to the branch | 14:16 |
| wgrant | You can probably safely break it - I doubt he's still doing anything with it after 40 days | 14:17 |
| spiv | It's highly unlikely that they've actually been doing a commit for the last 951 hours :) | 14:17 |
| cyberix | What happens to translations that people contribute for Ubuntu? | 14:17 |
| Matt-W | he's not been able to commit at all this may explain it | 14:17 |
| wgrant | cyberix: They go into the next language pack update. | 14:17 |
| cyberix | The language pack then overwrites the translations that I ship? | 14:17 |
| cyberix | the ones that are included in my original package | 14:18 |
| Matt-W | woo, a successful commit | 14:18 |
| Matt-W | Thanks | 14:18 |
| wgrant | cyberix: Those translations aren't in your package if said package is in main. | 14:19 |
| wgrant | cyberix: If your package is in universe or multiverse, it is not translated in Launchpad at this time. | 14:19 |
| cyberix | Oh | 14:19 |
| cyberix | Interresting | 14:19 |
| cyberix | Ofcourse it makes sense to atleast have them separate | 14:20 |
| cyberix | otherwise the task of translating Ubuntu would grow insanely big | 14:20 |
| wgrant | It's actually largely due to technical issues with getting the universe translations to end users, I believe. | 14:20 |
| cyberix | I'm having trouble with creating a process to handle Launchpad translations for a piece of software I wrote | 14:22 |
| cyberix | I change one letter in the original software | 14:22 |
| cyberix | then I have to create a new translation template | 14:22 |
| cyberix | which makes all translations go fuzzy | 14:22 |
| cyberix | and as, my software is not very common, no-one will check those | 14:22 |
| cyberix | I'm currently "just including" all the translations I get from Launchpad | 14:24 |
| cyberix | but I've understood that this leads to broken user experience | 14:24 |
| cyberix | Also I'm not sure, if I'd like to do new releases all the time because some translation was updated. | 14:25 |
| cyberix | I should find myself some guide for managing this | 14:27 |
| cyberix | It is just that most guides concentrate on the technical issues | 14:27 |
| shirish | hi all, if a bug affects two versions of Ubuntu, say Intrepid as well as Hardy, how can I show that? | 14:40 |
| shirish | I have seen those kind of bugs but don't know how people affected that change. | 14:41 |
| shirish | nominate for release? | 14:41 |
| persia | shirish: If you've tested against both, and you think it's important enough to get fixed as a stable release update, you can Nominate it for hardy. | 14:42 |
| shirish | persia the bug I've bug #240191 affects both hardy and intrepid, its a merge request of a package from debian | 14:44 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 240191 in postr "Please merge postr 0.12.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/240191 | 14:44 |
| Hobbsee | that doesn't affect hardy. | 14:45 |
| Hobbsee | as in, hardy doesn't get 'merges' | 14:45 |
| shirish | Hobbsee: ah ok, it should be called a sync then or what, somebody else reported it, I just added stuff. | 14:46 |
| persia | Also, #ubuntu-bugs is a better place for this sort of discussion. | 14:46 |
| shirish | ah ok, sorry guys | 14:46 |
| Hobbsee | it should be caleld a stable release update, adn only the critical changes should be pushed into hardy. | 14:46 |
| Hobbsee | or the entire thing backported. | 14:46 |
| Hobbsee | neither of which is a merge. | 14:46 |
| shirish | true, so the description needs to be changed. | 14:47 |
| Hobbsee | no, it shouldnt, as it's valid for intrepid. | 14:48 |
| Hobbsee | which is what hte bug was first for. | 14:48 |
| Hobbsee | before you attempted to sidetracker. | 14:48 |
| Hobbsee | er, side track it. | 14:48 |
| shirish | ok I would be just happy when I get the updated package, that's about it | 14:50 |
| phobie | Are watch-files parsed on PPA? | 15:42 |
| Hobbsee | phobie: parsed how? | 15:44 |
| phobie | show me if my package is up to date | 15:45 |
| phobie | like uscan or on debian.net | 15:45 |
| Hobbsee | ppas do not have internet access, so, no | 15:45 |
| Hobbsee | (beyond the mirror, anyway) | 15:46 |
| phobie | http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/maintainer.php?name=eric | 15:47 |
| Rugby471 | hi guys, is there anyone here who can delete the series located here for me | 18:13 |
| Rugby471 | https://launchpad.net/crunchbang-tips/random/ | 18:13 |
| Rugby471 | ? | 18:15 |
| === ubuntu-laptop is now known as gnomefreak | ||
| === meepix is now known as meepix^away | ||
| === eMxyzptlk[away] is now known as eMxyzptlk | ||
| === mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson | ||
| === eMxyzptlk is now known as eMxyzptlk[away] | ||
| === damdam is now known as meepix | ||
| jml | bimberi: btw, I filed https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/242232 as a followup to our conversation over the weekend. | 23:52 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 242232 in bzr "Branch accessible via file, sftp & http, but not bzr+ssh" [Undecided,New] | 23:52 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!