/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/06/24/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

ftaasac, which distros are building ff with xul sdk like us ? do we know ?00:08
asacfta: fedora does00:09
asacfta: i have it now installed in VM :)00:09
asacjdhore: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/xulrunner/xulrunner-1.9.head00:09
asacfixed in rev 29500:09
asacbut i will not upload instantly. have to think about that approach and if its really worth it00:09
asacso ... let it bake in fta PPA :)00:09
asacfta: gentoo too :)00:10
asacfta: debian now as well and not sure about suse or mandrake00:10
asacthey are quite inactive in mozilla community00:10
asacand are known to run-behind :)00:10
ftadebian started after us, i guess gentoo too (armin76 ?), any idea for fedora ?00:11
ftado they have changelogs ?00:11
asacfta: they started after us00:12
asacbut release b5 in fedora 9 like 2 weeks after hardy was out00:12
jdhoreasac, do i only have to pull the xulrunner from head or do i have to pull firefox from head as well?00:12
asacfta: caillon started on the packages while i was porting epiphany00:12
ftaso we started 1st ? :)00:12
asacjdhore: you need to build xulrunner from that branch. then you have to respin firefox unfortunately as well00:12
jdhorei can do that00:13
asacfta: sure00:13
jdhoreAs long as i don't have to pull FF from bzr as well :)00:13
ftaasac, if branches are stable, i can update my ppa now00:13
asacfta: even when we started to seriously port things to xulrunner in the beginning of hardy we were the only ones using it00:13
ftacool00:14
asacfta: let me open ubuntu300:14
ftaasac, i already have an ubuntu3 (ff)00:15
asacfta: any changes?00:16
asacah ok00:16
asaci  see00:16
ftaasac, tell me when i can start the sync00:17
asacfta: 300:18
asacfta: 200:18
asacfta: 100:18
asacrev 28600:18
asac:)00:18
asacfta: ^^00:18
asacxul is now 296 i guess00:19
asacfta: at least fedora uses versioned pkglib dirs too00:20
ftaexpected, if they still have xul 1.800:20
asacfta: no they dont00:21
asacfta: they always had versioned dirs :)00:21
asacat least thats what i remember00:21
ftabut pkglib dir is not versioned00:21
asacfta: no? xulrunner-1.9pre?00:21
asacthats versioned imo00:22
asacfta: xulrunner-1.900:22
asacfta: firefox-3.0b500:22
asacfta: so i meant $pkglibdir :)00:22
asacnot pkglib dir like in /usr/lib/pkgconfig :)00:22
ftaah00:22
fta+       echo $(DEBIAN_XUL_DIR) > debian/xulrunner-1.9/etc/ld.so.conf.d/xulrunner-1.900:23
ftaeh????00:23
asacfta: hold on00:23
ftawhat ?00:23
asacfta: i messed up 286 on ffox 3 :)00:23
asacshould be fine now00:23
asacfta: yes, thats the painful thing00:24
asacor is that wrong?00:24
asac$(DEBIAN_XUL_DIR) == /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9 right?00:24
ftawhy do you need that ? there's already a -rpath something pointing to that00:25
asacfta: not on the binaries00:25
asacafaik there is no -rpath in general00:26
asacas xulrunner+firefox is not supposed to be installed a fixed location by upstream philosophy00:26
asacthats the whole point of the /etc/gre.d/ things ;)00:26
ftahm, -Wl,-rpath-link,/usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9/bin  wtf?00:27
asacfta: well. you see why that doesnt work?00:31
asacfta: xul 297 pushed. i think that should be the final one. though ldconfig is automagically added00:31
asacfta: if you want you can wait till the build finishes here00:32
ftai don't see 29700:33
asacfta: hmm ....00:33
asacnow?00:33
ftagood00:34
asacfine00:34
asaclets try that for a while ... and see if shirish or someone else on your sources cry :)00:35
asacfta: do you provide hardy builds from .head in your PPA?00:40
asacjust curious00:41
asaci think this jemalloc change doesnt really qualify for an SRU. however, i am wondering if we want to do regular uploades to hardy-backports to reduce the divergence ;)00:42
asacjust an idea fo rnow00:42
asacsounds like work though :)00:42
asacnot much, but still on top00:42
ftai still do hardy, but not sure for how long00:45
ftapushed00:46
asacfta: cant you keep pushing to hardy and ring the alarm bells if build breaks=00:47
asac?00:47
asace.g. not looking by yourself00:47
asac(if you dont have time)00:47
ftai wanted my bot to do that, but i still need to put that in place, i lack time00:49
asacfta: maybe you can push your bot code somewhere?00:50
asacthough chances might be low there exists the chance that gnomefreak will fix it ;)00:50
asac p > 000:51
asacbut i guess its more a matter of deployment than code ;)00:52
asacright?00:52
ftaright00:52
ftai can also just link my ppa scripts together00:53
asacfta: maybe for stable backports the bot shouldnt consider to track upstream trunk ;)00:53
asacbut well00:53
asaci guess that we need the upstream logic as .head upstream version moves ahead too00:54
asacfta: ok, so what is xulrunner-1.9.head branch now? i assume it tracks 1.9 branch00:54
asacwhich is a stable branch now00:54
fta1.9.0.x00:54
asacyeah ok00:55
asacwe have luck. i think they stay on trunk ;)00:55
ftai have another head branch for 1.9.100:55
asacyeah00:55
asacfta: as 1.9.1 branched from 1.9 initially?00:55
ftayes00:55
asacs/as/was/00:55
asacfta: can we try to sync uip to 1.9.1 for the time being?00:56
asaci think the branches should still be quite related00:56
ftai do that from time to time, but manually as 1.9.1 already has it's own life00:56
asacfta: hmm. ok00:57
ftaits00:57
asacwy is that a problem?00:57
asaci think if you removed not wanted changes during one merge it will not try to do that same on next merge attempt00:57
asaci would like to be sure that the 1.9.1 branch gets the released 1.9 changelogs in00:57
asacwell, not 100% sure, but for now i think I want to know what was applied and what wasnt00:58
asacdo you see my point?00:58
asacor is it a void point?00:58
asacbecause we use a different source package name anyway?00:59
ftaas long as 1.9.1 is not officially in intrepid, i will merge changelogs too00:59
asacfta: but will you also document in 1.9.1 changelog if things are removed during merge?01:00
asace.g. not just in merge commit message01:00
asace.g. i add patchX1 in 1.9.0.101:00
asacand remove it during merge to 1.9.101:01
asacobviously that removal needs to be documented in debian/changelog too :)01:01
asacwhere?01:01
ftahttp://paste.ubuntu.com/22466/01:01
asactechnically its in 1.9.0.1+101:01
asac:)01:01
asacfta: the conflicts are there because you did it manually in the past01:02
asacthe adding file conflicts01:02
asacjust from that merge it looks still reasonable to do01:02
asacresolve the current conflicts once in the merge commit01:03
asacand next time all should be fine01:03
asacof course we might need to check what applies against upstream codebase then01:03
asacbut thats just a technical issue ;)01:04
asacfta: did you bzr mv debian/xulrunner-1.9.1-gnome-support.postinst01:05
asacerr01:05
asacfta: did you bzr mv debian/xulrunner-1.9-gnome-support.postinst debian/xulrunner-1.9.1-gnome-support.postinst01:05
asac?01:05
ftai'll see that tomorrow, once again, it's late, and i have to work tomorrow. i'm tired of being tired each and every morning :P01:05
asacsure go ahead01:05
ftaprobably yes01:05
asacsleep well ;)01:05
asaci know what you mean :)01:05
ftai tried to use bzr as much as possible, but diverged patches and stuff were manual01:06
asacyeah sure01:06
asacmaybe i will experiment a bit locally. not sure either what is best here ;)01:06
asacwe can talk tomorrow or later ;)01:07
asacstupid me01:16
asacfta: the build will fail. i should probably go to bed too :/01:19
asacxul 29801:19
asacdoing a test build now :)01:20
asacthats it ... i am out too01:21
asaccu tomorrow01:21
gnomefreakam i reading this right? "You can start Firefox in hidden mode" is that for all platforms and how?02:52
* gnomefreak starting to get pissed with gmail+IMAP+Thunderbird02:59
* gnomefreak just lost a shit load of replys thanks to cant log in03:00
gnomefreakalso seems that they often fail to copy to Drafts03:04
gnomefreakJazzva: you around? and do you know who the last person to work on our firebug package is?03:09
Jazzvagnomefreak, sort of, for few more minutes03:10
Jazzvalemme check...03:10
JazzvaWell, jetsaredim is the last uploader for the package03:11
JazzvaI think shirish mentioned something about new version... and that jetsaredim said that he is a bit busy right now, so someone else can do it. Not sure if shirish will prepare the new package.03:12
JazzvaYep, shirish opened the bug report. I think he might be doing it. bug 24216503:13
ubottuLaunchpad bug 242165 in firebug "Upgrade firebug 1.2b21+svn573 to firebug1.2.0b3" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/24216503:13
Jazzvagnomefreak ^03:13
gnomefreakJazzva: thanks i will use this to help this bug.03:13
Jazzvaok. Now I'm off... :)03:14
JazzvaHave fun03:14
gnomefreakyou too03:15
gnomefreakasac: i might not be here when you get here in morning but please check your email for my mailing list post.03:18
gnomefreakgod i hate the thought of looking into that damn broken ass toolbar03:32
gnomefreakok smoke than a couple of things and im gone for night.03:32
asacgnomefreak: no idea what people refer to by "hidden" mode09:17
=== jt1 is now known as jtv
=== asac_ is now known as asac
armin76fta_: yeah, we do10:54
armin76asac: mozilla bug 40919211:14
ubottuMozilla bug 409192 in Preferences "Applications prefpane is broken if shell service isn't available at runtime (Applications preferences dialogue is empty, no way to add applications)" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40919211:14
asacarmin76: hmm11:16
asacarmin76: thats known11:16
armin76i know, you fix11:20
gnomefreakasac: when he asked about hidden mode he wanted to start Firefox without viewing Firefox when started, I will see if someone answered him or not.11:29
asacgnomefreak: so a tray-icon?11:29
asaci think there is an extension11:29
asacnot sure if he can start it directly in hidden then11:30
gnomefreakasac: ah ok i have never heard of it without using bg flash in terminal11:30
gnomefreak-flash + flag11:31
gnomefreakif i mark a mailing list post as junk on Tbird will that marl all of those mailing lists as junk?]11:31
gnomefreaki seem to have gotten a bunch of kiddie porn span on mailing list :(11:33
asacgnomefreak: you need to teach tbird a spam and ham11:34
asacthat should work11:34
asacif you only marked one mail as spam and that one is from a mailing list, yuo might end up having all mail detected as spam11:35
gnomefreakthats what im afraid of. is there a way to mark the "from" part as spam?11:36
gnomefreaksender is mailinglist+myemail11:36
gnomefreaki think i got it11:38
gnomefreakha it worked :)11:38
asacfta_: can you repush xul 1.9?11:42
armin76no :P11:45
* gnomefreak is starting to get really sick of gedit12:21
rzrgnomefreak: ever heard of emacs ?12:29
gnomefreakrzr: yes12:29
gnomefreakalso heard of vi/vim :)12:29
rzrso why using gedit ?12:29
gnomefreakall i wanted to do was view 2 lines in a file its easier to use gedit than vi or emacs for that12:30
gnomefreakcat would have been too easy12:30
gnomefreakjdong is still MIA or atleast when i am around but still havent gottena reply from email i sent him12:50
gnomefreak07:50 <      gnomefreak > asac: can you please look/test/upload flash 10 to  hardy backports?12:51
gnomefreakhttp://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=flashplugin-nonfree is the revu link12:51
gnomefreakthan read line above about jdong12:51
asac!seen jdong12:57
ubottuFactoid seen jdong not found12:57
asacwhat worthless bots we have12:57
TrionaGreetings.12:58
Mohjive_hello13:01
Mohjive_why did I get a message about candidate builds and backports just now?13:02
asacMohjive_: i sent out an announcement on the qa.tracker website13:03
asacMohjive_: apparently i hit the wrong button and the mail went out to more than just those that previously contributed to testing :)13:03
asaci Triona13:04
Mohjive_apparantly...13:04
Mohjive_:)13:04
asacMohjive_: feel free to ignore the mail ... or help testing :)13:04
Mohjive_hehe, it'd be the first then, since I have preferences to another browser13:05
* Mohjive_ hides13:05
asacMohjive_: testing with "fresh"-profile is one point of the testplan :)13:06
asacgnomefreak: did you test those flash builds?13:16
gnomefreakyes for about a month13:16
gnomefreakothers have tested as well13:16
gnomefreakasac: they are in my PPA13:16
gnomefreakthere are atleast 3 bugs that people have tested on and it fixes thier issue13:17
asacgnomefreak: is it just me or does flash 10 require you to click on flash before playing?13:37
asacok flashblock13:38
gnomefreakthat would be the reason13:39
gnomefreak;)13:39
armin76asac: ah, looks like that ppc segfault is due to >=gcc-4.2 or glibc-2.813:40
gnomefreaki will talk to crimsun tomorrow about gutsy backport to see how we are gonna handle that see if he knows what PA packages to upgrade (least amount as possible) to get it to work in gutsy13:40
armin76because with 4.1.2 and glibc 2.6 it doesn't segfault13:41
asacgnomefreak: i am too dumb for the backports procedure13:42
asacwhat do i need to do?13:42
asacarmin76: glibc 2.8 ;)13:43
gnomefreakasac: AFAIK just push to backports once tested but let me see if i can find something to help you im sure i have a wiki or 3 on it13:43
asacgnomefreak: there is something about ubuntu-archive on the wiki page13:45
asachow are archive admins involved?13:45
asacdo they need to push them manually=13:45
asac?13:45
gnomefreakto accept it13:45
asacah ok13:45
asacso where is the bug?13:45
gnomefreakas i recall its the same process but ill ask one of them if i can recall who they are ;)13:45
gnomefreakasac: bug 23513513:46
ubottuLaunchpad bug 235135 in flashplugin-nonfree "[MASTER] Please backport flashplugin-nonfree version 10 beta" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/23513513:46
armin76!info libc6 intrepid13:47
asacgnomefreak: and the asound-plugins bug?13:47
ubottulibc6 (source: glibc): GNU C Library: Shared libraries. In component main, is required. Version 2.8~20080505-0ubuntu6 (intrepid), package size 4262 kB, installed size 10556 kB13:47
asacgnomefreak: you should add that package to the same bug i guess13:47
armin76asac: i'll check in ubuntu now13:47
gnomefreakasac: why asound-plugins? it doesnt work with them see post https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/235135/comments/1913:48
ubottuLaunchpad bug 235135 in flashplugin-nonfree "[MASTER] Please backport flashplugin-nonfree version 10 beta" [Undecided,Confirmed]13:48
asacgnomefreak: do we really want libflashsupport in -backports? afaict, it still crashes13:48
gnomefreakasac: it doesnt crash here at all13:48
gnomefreakmaybe 64bit?13:48
asacgnomefreak: go to youtube and watch video. hit back ... wait, hit forward, watch video ... repeat 10 times or so13:49
gnomefreakasac: thats looking for a crash if your PC cant handle the load13:49
asacgnomefreak: no13:50
asacthats a race13:50
gnomefreakflash is flash no matter what version you use13:50
asacthats the original crash we had ... it still exists13:50
gnomefreakill try it13:50
asacwe should not use libflashsupport13:50
asacso we need asound-plugins13:50
gnomefreakwe shouldnt have to backport asound anyway since the version in Hardy is conpatible with flash 1013:51
asacgnomefreak: it doesnt have the set-pulseaudio feature afaict13:51
gnomefreakthat was more for gutsy, as long as hardys is enabled it will work13:51
asacgnomefreak: well ... i needed the asound plugin from your ppa from what i can tell13:51
gnomefreakill spin it but i doubt asound-plugins are gonna be enough13:52
gnomefreakcan you please verify that is the only package from my PPA that is needed to get it to work13:52
asacgnomefreak: leaving for lunch now. but install wise it was the only needed (i didnt instlal libflashsupport)13:54
gnomefreakasac: ok13:55
gnomefreakasac: this is strange TBH but read the following13:57
gnomefreak08:56 <            jpds > gnomefreak: they do the backporting with their  sscripts13:58
TrionaI got caught in the previously mentioned mailing  I'm actually somewhat interested in helping out.14:01
asacTriona: cool14:01
Volansasac: Hi, I have read now your email for FF 2.0.0.15 QA tests... I can made the QA test on Gutsy that I use abitually or on a virtulised Hardy...14:01
TrionaDo you use Litmus for testing?14:02
asacTriona: no. i guess thats an automization tool?14:02
asacVolans: every test welcome .... dapper most desparately needed though ;)14:02
Trionaasac, litmus.mozilla.org14:02
asacTriona: does that run tests in your browser?14:03
TrionaCorrect.14:03
Volansasac: indeed I have a old pc with dapper on it... mmmh I can try to make the test if necessary14:04
Trionawell.. it shows you tests that you run14:04
Volanss/a old/an old/14:04
asacVolans: VM dapper would also be fine. BUt just do what you can ;)14:04
asacTriona: ill look into this after lunch. for now we just have mozilla.qa.ubuntu.com ... where there are instructions14:05
Volanswith VBox I have always the fear that all works because of the clear fresh installation and the simple hardware14:06
asacVolans: right. but for ffox case we dont want to test hardware (well lets hope)14:06
TrionaI used to participate in mozilla test days  / bug days, so just starting again14:06
asacVolans: so should be more than fine14:06
Trionafigured I'd get involved here too when I saw the spam :)14:06
* asac out for lunch14:07
Volansok :)14:07
asacTriona: yes, lets talk about that after lunch :-D14:07
Trionahehe14:07
Trionaok.. poke me whenever... I'm gonna go back to bug day for a bit.14:08
TrionaI've been slacking for the better part of a year14:08
Trionahehe14:08
armin76asac: ha! segfaults14:20
gnomefreakasac: when you et back you can read this. I have it going through the right channels finally i should have reported it against *-backports but as a project not a package like i was doing.14:20
armin76(firefox:21964): Gtk-WARNING **: Useless empty GtkIconSource14:20
armin76(firefox:21964): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed14:20
armin76Segmentation fault14:20
gnomefreakglib too high of a version?14:21
gnomefreakalthough it wouldnt build14:21
armin76asac: now, buy me a ppc!14:21
gnomefreakok im gone for a while its starting to get hot in here14:22
huatsI have heard about free hugs !14:24
VolansNote for asac: I took the liberty to made little changes on the plugin table in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/QA , hoping for a better appearence14:25
djdarkmanhello, how can I apply for the test?14:40
Volansdjdarkman: Hi, you mean how to made the test or where to put the results?14:43
djdarkmanVolans: I found the test pages, but don`t know where do I need to submit the results after14:44
Volansfrom the email: The testing is done by running a test plan [ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/QA ] and submitting the results to the mozilla QA site: http://mozilla.qa.ubuntu.com14:45
djdarkmanand does it matter if I test it under gnome or KDE? I don`t have ubuntu CD`s right now14:45
Volansmaybe matter for the latest points in the QA test, I think you must specify which DE you have used14:47
Volansbut for more specific questions is better to wait asac that is at launch now...14:48
Volansfor me too is the first QA... I'm upgrading an old dapper to do the test14:48
vadi2Is there a specific reason as to why ubuntu was removed in the ff3 user agent string by default? It was in ff2.14:49
djdarkmanok thanks Volans, I need to assemble my laptop first anyway14:50
asacok i anwered djdarkman question in -testing too15:05
djdarkmanok asac I found it, the log in link is very tiny, that`s why I didn`t find it (22" LCD screen)15:05
Volansasac: but after the login where to submit?15:06
asac:)15:06
asacyeah. the website is still "beta"15:06
asacVolans: mozilla.qa.ubuntu.com ...15:07
asacthere select the build you are testing15:07
asace.g. dapper ...15:07
asacor gutsy ...15:07
asacor whatewver15:07
asacand there you should be able to confirm the testcases15:07
Volansok... :D15:07
VolansI thinking that the link on the build are for the packages :D15:07
asacVolans: yeah ;)15:07
asacroom for improvement. that site sometimes has some easter-eggs15:08
djdarkman_that virtualbox help mentioned in the mail is a little old btw15:09
asacdjdarkman_: oh. really?15:10
Volansasac: the proper way for a new profile creation is trough a command line option or elsewere in FF1.5?15:12
djdarkman_I think it`s a little simpler to install virtual box15:13
asacVolans: move your .mozilla folder to some backup space .... then start15:13
Volansok15:13
asacwhen finished remove the new .mozilla directory ... and move the backed-up one back in place15:13
djdarkman_asac: is this the iso I should get? ubuntu-6.06.1-desktop-i386.iso15:13
asacdjdarkman_: read the instruction on top of http://mozilla.qa.ubuntu.com/15:13
armin76asac: where's my ppc :P15:14
Volansdjdarkman_: yes if you want to virtualise a dapper for doing the test ;)15:14
asacdjdarkman_: ah. this was about getting dapper setup. right.15:15
asaci think thats the right iso (telling from name)15:15
djdarkman_yes I want to test it under dapper, luckly my laptop can hendle virtualbox :)15:15
djdarkman_*handle15:15
asacgrewat15:16
Volansasac: there was a question on the default user agent string on FF3 from vadi2 at 15:48 CEST (if you want to look at)15:16
asacdapper is mui important as we maintain our own backports15:16
Volansdjdarkman_ for vbox you can install it from packages as any other program in the repositories15:16
asacvadi2: not sure what you mean by "removed the ff3 user agent string" ...15:17
asacmaybe give me a hint!15:17
asacdjdarkman_: yes. apt-get install virtualbox15:17
djdarkman_I have virtualbox, grabbed it from sun`s website15:18
vadi2asac: because it was in ff2 but not in ff315:18
vadi2asac: ff3 in ubuntu simply reports "linux"15:19
Volansdjdarkman_ why? vbox have two version one open and one closed15:19
asacvadi2: ok. so you say that "ubuntu" is missing?15:19
asacvadi2: your initial question suggests that we dont have a user string at all :)15:19
vadi2no... "vļ»æadi2: Is there a specific reason as to why ubuntu was removed in the ff3 user agent string by default? It was in ff2."15:20
djdarkman_Volans: dunno, sun`s license seems a little non-opensource(but that doesn`t stop me from using it), but there was(is) a version that I`m sure is open source(but has many bugs)15:20
asacvadi2: point is that we had issues in the past with content-filtering ... e.g. some ubuntu users couldnt access some websites because some content filter thought they were a trojan15:20
asacvadi2: yeah. sorry, misread then15:21
Volansasac: the hot june make some strange effect on you :)15:21
asacVolans: wish it was hot here15:21
vadi2er what?15:21
djdarkman_yep there are two versions15:21
djdarkman_http://www.sun.com/software/products/virtualbox/get.jsp15:21
asacdjdarkman_: ah ok. sorry for the confusion then. i ment what we have packaged as virtualbox15:22
asacbut i dont mind :) ... anything that works is ok. its just that virtualbox from our archive should work fine15:22
Volansdjdarkman_ I know, I use packaged virtualbox  (OSE version) since 1 year without any problem or crashes... I don't know the procedure to install the SUN's version...15:23
djdarkman_I use Sun xVM VirtualBox 1.615:23
Volansthe most simple and quick is via apt-get15:23
asacdjdarkman_: not sure. i'd suggest just to apt-get install virtualbox and try that. its just a few seconds away and is more or less proven to work for ubuntu15:25
asacdjdarkman_: but if suns virtualbox works fine let me know :)15:25
djdarkman_asac: I use suns virtualbox, I`m a web developer and I use it to test webpages under evil platforms and evil browsers15:26
asacdjdarkman_: hehe15:28
vadi2asac: so... ubuntu won't be back in the user agent string at all now?15:30
asacvadi2: havent seen a reason why15:31
asacvadi2: why?15:31
vadi2just messes with all web stats completely, and doesn't help since websites filter "linux" more.15:31
asacvadi2: who would be interested about ubuntu in webstats?15:33
djdarkman_and let`s show the world how many ubuntu users are out there :)15:33
vadi2quite a lot of people15:33
asacvadi2: for what reason?15:33
djdarkman_asac: some people use webstats for statistics (not too smart of them)15:33
vadi2support for one.15:33
asacsupport? so you want to deny support for firefox that runs on ubuntu?15:34
asacor getting an idea what the user is running when he opens bugs?15:34
asacin anycase, we can readd that in intrepid. changing user agent in hardy is most likely not within the bounds of SRUs15:35
Trionaasac, are you back from lunch now?15:36
asacTriona: yeah ;)15:36
asacsorry15:36
Trionanah, it's ok... looks like you guys are quite busy here :)15:36
asacTriona: did you look at the mozilla.qa.ubuntu.com website? there are instructions how to get the test packages15:37
Trionayep.15:37
TrionaBookmarked.15:38
asacTriona: great.15:38
* djdarkman_ loves virtualbox15:38
asacTriona: you can submit results by clicking on the builds that are on that page15:38
TrionaGreat.15:39
asacbtw. 3/3 doesnt meant that that build had enough testing15:39
asacjust means that every testcase was at least done once :)15:39
Trionahehe15:39
djdarkman_fiesty needs testing too right?15:39
asacdjdarkman_: yes15:39
asacdjdarkman_: but dapper is more crucial as its LTS and its 1.5 (backports)15:39
asacfeisty gets somewhat implicit testing through gutsy/hardy as its the same code15:40
djdarkman_asac: I`m installing dapper right now, but gonna download fiesty while it`s installing15:40
asacgreat ;)15:41
djdarkman_have 60 GB, there`s room for even breezy :D15:41
asachehe15:41
asacdjdarkman_: would be soooo cool if you could keep your VMs and help on next upgrade too :)15:42
asacin general new ffox every 3 month15:42
Volansasac: in dapper I'm trying to login on a SMF forum, but FF don't tell me if he must remember my password or not... and the settings seems to be all ok15:42
asacVolans: can you try the version currently in dapper and see if its works better?15:42
asace.g. is it a regression15:43
VolansI have also FF2 installad in /opt, I can try with that?15:43
djdarkman_asac: even if I wouldn`t keep them I could re install them every 3 months :)15:45
Volansdjdarkman_: you are very patient... :)15:45
asacdjdarkman_: yeah ;) ... but maybe you can help testing tbird too :)15:47
* asac takes the other arm 15:47
djdarkman_Volans: the isos download with 3MB/s my laptop has 1,4GB RAM, I don`t need to be patient15:47
Volanswith 5GB per virtualisated OS I think is better to leave them then reinstalling everytime ;)15:48
Volansasac: with the same preferences FF2 tell me to save the pass15:49
VolansI can try the regression if necessary15:49
Volans(you have read my note on the wiki QA page?)15:50
Volanswait... on mail.google it works (the password remeber)15:51
asacVolans: yes. i think 1.5 was broken for some forms from the beginning15:55
asacVolans: you could try the last official upstream build to see15:55
Volansok, I will try later15:55
asacVolans: for now assume that its ok (if other forms work well)15:55
Volansuntil now I have only a LoadPlugin error on the shell but without any crash15:55
asacVolans: which plugin?15:56
Volansrpnp.so15:56
Volansfailed to initialize shared library15:56
Volansundefined symbol: __pure_virtual15:56
Volansasac: strange situation in certificate test:16:04
VolansI have removed all trusted certificate, the site tell me to import, I have imported and the site do not ask for a certificate BUT16:05
Volansbut now I can't remove the certificates anymore16:05
Volansif I restart firefox they will be there, is normal?16:05
asacVolans: is that with a fresh profile?16:06
Volansyep16:06
asacVolans: are you trying the cacert test?16:07
Volansyes16:07
asacVolans: you see any error in javascript console?16:08
asacwhen trying to remove the cert?16:08
VolansI can open the console also after have removed the cert?16:08
Volans(it logs anyway)16:08
Volansis empty...16:09
lastenthi, I received a mail about testing the 2.0.0.15 Candidate, do I have to register or something like that?16:09
Volanslastent: yes on brainstorm/QA site16:09
asaclastent: just create an accoung on mozilla.qa.ubuntu.com16:10
asacand then start to submit your test results16:10
lastentok16:10
Volansasac: there is also a little bug but is upstream related.... if I select all the certificates and click remove the popup with the list is bigger then the window and I can press ok only using keyboard ;)16:10
asaclastent: instructions how to get the packages should be on top of that page too16:10
asac[reed]: where can we get archived mozilla builds from?16:11
asacftp-archive.mozilla.org?16:11
asac[reed]: i cant find the last 1.5.x build that was released - which i would like to use to check if issues are regressions16:11
gmathtHi, I get " firefox: Depends: libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.12.3) but 1.12.2-0ubuntu3 is to be installed" when I use16:12
gmathtdeb http://ppa.launchpad.net/asac/ubuntu dapper main universe16:12
gmathtIs this a bug?16:12
Volansmaybe this one asac? http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/1.5.0.12/16:12
asacgmatht: oh. have you enabled dapper-security in software sources?16:12
asacgmatht: thats important. you need to upgrade dapper to latest security updates (e.g. enable dapper-updates and dapper-security)16:13
gmathtAh, no. Not in my debootstrap16:13
asacgmatht: yeah. add dapper-updates and security ... then upgrade to get the latest bits16:13
Volansor this one asac: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/latest-1.5/ (but are dated May 2007, correct?)16:15
gmathtOdd... "Get:8 ftp://ftp.iinet.net.au dapper-security/main Packages [152kB]" but still get 1.12.2-0ubuntu316:15
asacVolans: that looks good16:15
asac1.5.0.1216:15
asachttp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/1.5.0.12/16:16
Volansthere is a double mozilla.org folder... I don't know why... :)16:16
djdarkman_btw asac I would love to test thunderbird too16:17
asacdjdarkman_: \o/16:17
asacVolans: i think you need that as otherwise you would get redirected to releases.mozilla.org ... which only has recent builds16:17
gmathtIts not a prob with the iinet archive "Get:3 http://archive.ubuntu.com dapper-security/main Packages [152kB] ...  but 1.12.2-0ubuntu3 is to be installed"16:17
asacgmatht: did you add dapper-updates ?16:18
asacand dist-upgraded?16:18
Volansasac: I don't have to restart firefox... just close and reopen the show certificate popup.... they automagically re-appears16:20
gmathtAh, the -updates were missing.16:20
Volansis cert8.db file?16:20
gmathtI hadn't dist-upgraded since adding the -security,but that wasn't what was causing it.16:21
asacVolans: let me try to reproduce16:21
Volansok, I'm checking file permissions16:21
Volans-rw------- user user cert8.db16:21
asacVolans: so how did you add certificate?16:22
asac"accept forever" .... or did you click on the root certificate link?16:23
VolansI followed the QA procedure16:23
Volansremove all, go to Cacert certificate page16:23
Volansclick import checking for trusted websites16:23
asacVolans: so which certificates reappear?16:25
asacthe cacert one?16:25
Volansno, all certificated in the last tab16:25
Volansand 4 certificate in the websites tab16:25
asacVolans: ah. well. all except the one you added cannot be removed16:25
asacthey are built-in16:25
asacVolans: you can remove Root CA16:25
Volansbut also those in website tab reappears16:26
Volansthat wasn't here before16:27
Volansthe cacert test16:27
asacVolans: for me nothing is added to websites16:27
asacif i install a root certificate16:27
asacthat tab is only populated by "accept permanently" when you get the warning dialog16:28
asacso what do you have in there?16:28
VolansI have do this: if so do import and select "Trust this CA to identify websites"16:28
Volansfrom the QA wiki page16:28
asacVolans: if i do that, it gets added to the "Authorities" tab16:29
asachttp://www.cacert.org/index.php?id=316:29
asacdo you use the first link of the "Class 1" cert?16:29
* asac looks on wiki16:29
Volansid=3 ??? on wiki is id=116:30
asaclet me test the wiki16:30
Volansahahah ok16:31
asacVolans: found?16:31
Volanswhat? (I'm not sure to follow you...)16:32
asacVolans: for me it works16:32
asacVolans: i remove my .mozilla dir .... then i start firefox16:32
asacclick on the .crt link16:32
VolansI will try with a ne profile16:32
asacit gets added to the "Authorities" tab16:32
asacnot the website16:32
Trionahmm... I still don't get something :P How is bugzilla easier to find than either the ubuntu firefox support page or mozilla support page16:33
daynahI got an email this morning about Firefox version 2.0.0.15... is that right?16:33
asacdaynah: yeah. asking for help testing the bits16:33
Trionaexample being: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44027316:34
daynahasac: will future ubuntu versions be using FF2 or FF3?16:34
ubottuMozilla bug 440273 in OS Integration "Can't view flash videos since downloading Ubuntu 8.04 with FF3" [Major,Resolved: invalid]16:34
Volansasac: I have italian layout, maybe I have confused the "CA to identify websites" statement16:34
asacdaynah: hardy has ff3 as main browser ... and we probably wont go back16:34
daynahasac: thank you! good luck!16:34
asacdaynah: still we do security support for existing one. thats what this is about16:34
asacVolans: maybe ;)16:35
asacVolans: better try with LANG=en_US firefox ;)16:35
Volansok I change now16:35
Volanswhere to change? -contentLocale en_US does not work...16:37
asacVolans: run from command line like above16:37
asacLANG=en_US firefox16:37
Volansah ok sorry...16:38
asacthat should work ;)16:38
Volanswork with a gtk warning of Locale not supported by C library16:39
Volansmaybe uninfluent16:39
asacthat doesnt matter, right16:39
VolansI must remove the certicifates in Authorities tab or not?16:40
asacVolans: just the one you added (e.g. root ca)16:41
asaci guess i should attach screenshots for the not-so-obvious operations16:42
Volansno, I'm very very very stupid... for a strange case I was not clicking on the link in wiki page that is open in this computer and write down the link manually.... i missed the https!!!!!!!!!!!!16:42
asacha16:43
Volansok, now works!16:45
asacyeah16:45
asacgreat16:45
VolansI'm so sorry16:45
asacnot sure what error you hit16:45
Volanshttps://www.cacert.org/index.php?id=1 I open it in http, not https16:45
asacso you didnt see a warning ;) ?16:46
VolansI see one, that install other certificates16:46
Volans4 certificate, non root one16:46
gmathtOK, so I got "(firefox-bin:23499): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_drag_set_icon_default: assertion `GDK_IS_DRAG_CONTEXT (context)' failed16:47
gmathtSegmentation fault16:47
gmatht" but I don't have anything in /var/crash. Can I still get a backtrace (should I) (1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.15~prepatch080614c-0ubuntu1~qa)16:47
exactt_hello16:47
asacgmatht: can you reproduce it?16:47
exactt_John Vivirito around?16:47
asacexactt_: his nick is gnomefreak and he is not here atm16:48
asacbut usually he pops in and out twice a day or so16:48
exactt_thx asac16:48
exactt_i stay tuned16:48
Volansasac: how to test all the plugins? (in the meantime I have rearranged the layout of the wiki page when you where at launch ;))16:49
asacVolans: not required to test all. the most important ones would be appreciated16:50
Volansok16:50
Volansthe standard test on dapper is ok! only plugins to test16:50
asacVolans: like in the announcement mail (flash, totem)16:50
asacVolans: yeah. plugins are most likely not that important16:51
asacflash is probably even broken16:51
Volansin the announcement mail that I received you don't spoke about plugins ;)16:52
asacVolans: really?16:52
asacoh most likely only on blog :)16:52
asaci must have dreamt it ;)16:52
VolansI received a mail from qatracker16:52
VolansAT stgraber.org16:52
Volansahahh16:52
asacyeah. i didnt mention plugins :)16:53
asachttp://www.asoftsite.org/s9y/archives/144-QA-Tracker-Firefox-2.0.0.15-Candidate-Builds-and-Backports.html16:53
asacthats the blog post16:53
asacwith the free-hug offer :-D16:53
asacoh i posted it twice16:53
asacdam s9y16:54
Volansahahah16:54
Volansok, I received the text of the second blog postwithout the free-hug offer :D16:54
Volansacroread plugin works well16:55
gmathtCould not reproduce. Occured while browsing http://www.zudacomics.com/node/101 in full screen mode (using adobe flash plugin)16:55
Volansflash working16:56
asacgmatht: ok. which flash version?16:57
asacgmatht: if its just a one time crash i wont be too concerned (especially since flash was on)16:57
asacgmatht: try to stress-test the build a bit by using heavy ajax/javascript sites16:58
gmathtWas just doing "15 min regular use"16:59
Volansasac: I see "no picture" in a site with an embedded wmv video16:59
gmathtGmail seemed fine though.16:59
Volansbut I have vlc, mplayer and totem plugins... don't know what fails17:00
asacVolans: totem?17:00
asacVolans: install one at a time only17:00
asacVolans: totem might not work in chroot as it needs dbus17:01
Volansno is a real dapper install17:01
asacyou need to start dbus in chroot to get it working i guess17:01
asacok17:01
Volansthe plugins was previously installed17:01
VolansI can remove them and try only with totem17:01
asacVolans: that would be great.17:01
Volansmaybe adding some test page where to test the plugins in QA wiki page would be better ;)17:04
Volansand faster17:04
Trionasorry, got busy elsewhere17:05
asacVolans: we started to do that once ... but i think we didnt find pages for everything17:05
Trionaasac, anyway, what I was mentioning before lunch... litmus17:05
Trionait's what mozilla qa uses to organize manual tests17:06
Volansmaybe doing some test page and hosting it somewhere?17:06
asacVolans: if you know about sites feel free to add them to the plugins table17:06
Volansok17:06
asacVolans: yeah. but we need free content in order to host it17:06
TrionaThere's a pretty large base of testcases there that you may want to look at. :)17:06
asacTriona: ok, so its their "feedback" site?17:06
asacTriona: oh cool.17:06
asacTriona: can you add pointers to the QA wiki page? e.g. as comments at the bottom?17:07
Trionait gets used for test days17:07
TrionaNot sure that you guys want to be running tests in there because of how the results are submitted17:07
asace.g. what tests should be added and so on17:07
Trionabut... you probably want to be running some of the same tests17:07
asacTriona: i dont think we want to use their infrastructure (for now) ... but steeling testcases ... why not :)17:08
Trionawhich page... MozillaTeam/QA?17:13
asacTriona: yes17:17
asacTriona: just add a "comments" section at the bottom and add sync your brain there ;)17:17
asacanyway ... i am now off to sports ... will be back in 2hours or so.17:17
Triona*clicks save*17:18
TrionaAnyway... testday in a few hours :)17:18
Trionaerr17:18
Trionabugday17:18
QwellYou have got to be kidding me.  Spam on my wiki email address?  Seriously?17:21
* asac hugs Qwell 17:24
asacQwell: read: http://www.asoftsite.org/s9y/archives/144-QA-Tracker-Firefox-2.0.0.15-Candidate-Builds-and-Backports.html17:24
Qwellasac: Bad form dude.17:24
asac.917:24
asaclook for UPDATE:17:24
asac:)17:24
QwellThe fact that it's even possible for that mistake to be made, is what needs to be corrected...17:27
Volansasac: dapper tests passed and submitted to QA site, if I found some time I will test also gutsy...17:45
MurielGodoiHi all, Anyone knows why Firefox menu text color is getting the color from standard text and not from window text as desired?18:10
ScottKasac: I saw your excessively distributed note on Firefox update testing.  I have Dapper I can test on.  Just point me where I need to go.18:24
VolansScottK: asac is not here now, but he made a mistake, see here: http://www.asoftsite.org/s9y/archives/144-QA-Tracker-Firefox-2.0.0.15-Candidate-Builds-and-Backports.html18:25
* ScottK looks18:25
Volans(the update section in particular)18:25
ScottKRight.  Got that off of planet.18:28
ScottKI assume you still need test help for Dapper.18:28
Volansevery test is always appreciated! :)18:29
Volans for dapper the direct link is:  http://mozilla.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/test/1651 (see also comments for previous tests like mine)18:29
Volansin the asac's blog post there is the link for the QA test, the other two test are 15 minutes normal use with a fresh profile and the existent profile18:29
Volansto create a fresh profile, move the ~/.mozilla folder away and start firefox that autogenerate a new profile18:30
ScottKThanks.  Installing now.   I'll work through the test cases in a bit.18:32
Volansok, thanks for testing, I have made the test before and asked asac for many things... then if you have some problem try to ask maybe is the same thing I have asked to asac before :)18:34
chao1how do i test the new candidate for firefox 2.018:41
Volanschao1: have you received the email?18:42
Volansthere should be all the useful links to do that18:47
chao1yes. didn't know if that was spam or not. and if not . . .18:48
Volansis not properly spam... only a mistake on the destination group, see here: http://www.asoftsite.org/s9y/archives/144-QA-Tracker-Firefox-2.0.0.15-Candidate-Builds-and-Backports.html18:49
Volansif you want to help in the test, there ill be the links and the procedure, there are 3 different test, 15 minutes normal use with your profile and a new profile and a the specific QA test explained in the wiki page18:50
chao1ok18:50
chao1thank you for the help18:50
* djdarkman_ is back and has a virtual dapper and a fiesty18:52
Volansgreat djdarkman_ !!! :)18:53
VolansI have done the dapper test, maybe see my comments on the QA site when you test18:54
djdarkman_ok Volans, I was shopping and now I will have dinner, after that I will install 2 more VMs18:57
* Volans sponsor djdarkman_ for the virtual man of the day medal!18:58
djdarkman_:D19:02
Volansdjdarkman_ you have also djdarkman in the chan ;)19:03
[reed]asac: archive.mozilla.org19:03
djdarkman_asac: I have a fresh install, all I have to do (besides add the ppas) is to sudo apt-get update and sudo apt-get dist-upgrade?19:04
Volans[reed]: is the same of http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla.org/ ?19:05
djdarkman_(actualy I have two fresh installs)19:05
Volanswe have found this before: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/1.5.0.12/19:05
Volansseems the same of this one [reed]: ftp://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/1.5.0.1219:06
Volansdjdarkman_ asac is not here at the moment, but yes, the install il fresh or updated?19:06
[reed]Volans: they aren't the same technically, but yes, that's right19:06
Volansok thanks19:07
VolansI think is better if you update the OS before and only after add ppa19:08
Volansalso check to have the correct repositories activated19:08
Volanslike -security and -updates19:08
pidouzhi everybody !19:36
asacola19:38
asacdjdarkman_: you need to ensure that dapper-updates and dapper-security is enabled in "Software Sources"19:38
asacand that your system is up to date on those archives19:38
Volansasac: I go to dinner in a couple of minutes, reed replied to you that the correct one is:  ftp://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/1.5.0.12 but in practice the content is the same in that case19:39
asacVolans: yeah. thanks. saw [reed]'s reply19:40
djdarkman_asac: security and updates are enabled by default right?19:40
ScottKdjdarkman_: That's correct.19:41
asacdjdarkman_: depends. if you used debootstrap: "no" ... if you installed from CD (aka VM), then hopefully yes19:41
asacScottK: you still need info?19:41
asacScottK: all should have been in the mail ;) ... the apt lines are documented at http://mozilla.qa.ubuntu.com/19:41
ScottKI think I'm OK.19:42
asacgreat19:42
ScottKI have it installed, but am distracted by $WORK so I haven't actually done the procedure yet.19:42
asacthanks for helping out.19:42
asacScottK: thats ok. take your time :)19:43
VolansI go, maybe I come back later, asac I have leaved my comments on dapper tests in mozilla.qa site. I hope the builds works fine for all as for me...19:44
ScottKasac: Have you seen the fix in Debian Bug #473557?  I would LOVE to have that fixed.19:46
ubottuDebian bug 473557 in iceweasel "iceweasel: Forgets standard application for application/pdf mime types" [Normal,Closed] http://bugs.debian.org/47355719:46
asacScottK: i saw that patch.19:52
ScottKasac: Do we have it?19:52
ScottKI have been plagued with this problem since forever.19:52
asacScottK: are you on KDE?19:52
ScottKIt's one of the main reasons I use Konqueror as my main browser.19:52
ScottKYes.19:52
asacyeah ok. i can prepatch it, but wanted to give bz a bit time to review it before pulling it in19:53
ScottKPing me if you want testing for it.19:53
ScottKWho is bz?19:53
asacScottK: you have a bugzilla account?19:53
asacbz == Boris Zbarsky19:53
asachttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44084019:53
ScottKAh.19:54
ubottuMozilla bug 440840 in File Handling "mailcap handling may fail due to race conditions between thread waiting and system()" [Normal,Assigned]19:54
asacthats the upstream bug19:54
ScottKYes.19:54
asacScottK: maybe CC yourself. i might see the review+ mail late.19:54
ScottKMozilla is the first open source project I contributed to through bug triaging.19:54
ScottKOK.19:54
asaccool ... if you see that bz likes the patch let me know :)19:54
asacwe can prepatch it for intrepid. for hardy i would like to have it go into upstream tree19:55
asacso we get it through security update19:55
asacactually, i already looked a bit at this kde issue during development cycle, but found nothing about mailcap in the source19:57
asacthats why i thought that previously broken feature was removed19:57
asacand didnt look closer19:57
ScottKHmm.  I've signed up for the bug.20:00
ScottKI'll ping you if I see something.20:00
asacthanks20:00
asac[reed]: any hints how i can effectively reduce bugmail from bugzilla?20:00
asacthe bug folder is almost as scary as the ubuntu ffox3 bug folder :)20:01
asacand i usually treat it with lower priority than ubuntu bug mail20:01
asacunfortunately that makes me miss requests for follow-up :(20:01
[reed]asac: turn off bugmail for things you don't care about?20:02
asac[reed]: thats the problem :) i care about a bunch of components. and i am watching glandium and caillon for instance20:03
Trionaremember to unsub yourself from bugs you no longer care about too.20:03
asac[reed]: maybe filter out status "NEW" would be a good start :)20:03
Trionaasac, unconfirmed is the one I'd be filtering :)20:03
Trionathat one's scary hehe20:04
asacyeah i ment unconfirmed obviously ;)20:04
* asac goes to bugzilla preferences20:04
Trionanew is post-triage at least20:04
Trionaor at least someone with a canconfirm bit filing them.20:05
asaci know what what state stands for. but i have the feeling that filtering out unconfirmed will maybe reduve bug count by 10-20%20:05
asacbugmail count20:05
asacTriona: yeah20:05
asacok -> priority changes => off ;)20:06
asacerr. i can only turn off for relations: "Assignee  QA Contact  Reporter  CCed  Voter "20:06
asacwhat about when i am subscribed to a component? or monitor a user?20:06
asac"Any field not mentioned above changes "20:07
asacany idea what changes those are?20:07
asaccan i safely turn them off?20:07
Trionaare you watching a qa contact?20:07
asacseveral :)20:07
asacthose for the most interesting components: e.g. embedding, toolkit ;)20:07
asaccan i filter out bugs filed against "general"?20:08
asachmm20:08
TrionaMaybe.20:08
asacor is that a differen qa contact anyway20:08
asacnot sure what "  Some attachment data changes " means. I'll disable that now20:10
Triona"The CC field changes "20:10
Trionathat's a good one to turn off20:10
asacalready done :)20:11
asacwas one of the more obvious ones ;)20:11
asacok only unconfirmed mails if i am the assignee20:11
asacis there a header included in mail that tells me that i get that mail because i am monitoring a contact?20:12
Trionathe ones I'd leave on are resolved/reopened, new attachments, new comments, dependancy tree20:12
asaci would like to push those to separate folders ;)20:13
Trionaa footer in he body20:13
Trionathe20:13
asacTriona: right. i have those turned on20:13
asaci also have enabled "I'm added to or removed from this capacity "20:13
Triona------- You are receiving this mail because: -------20:13
TrionaYou are on the CC list for the bug.20:13
Trionaat the end of the mail20:14
asacin body.20:14
asacthats not really modern :)20:14
asacfilterwise ;)20:14
asacanyway. lets hope that this reduces the bugflood to a consumable amount20:14
Trionaapparently there's some headers too20:14
TrionaX-Bugzilla ones20:14
TrionaI just never looked at them20:15
asacis there a document describing what is encoded in mail headers?20:15
asacits easier than guessing through emperical tests :)20:15
TrionaThat I wouldn't know, I'm just looking at my own bugmail.20:15
asac[reed]: so what relationship do i have to a bug when i monitor a QA contact? is it configured through CC?20:17
Trionawww.bugzilla.org might know...20:17
[reed]asac: no, QA contact20:17
Trionaasac, if I'm reading the info on the email prefs, you have the same relationship as who you are watching20:17
asac[reed]: ah. makes sense.20:18
asachmm20:18
asacyou are right. there is even a sentence about that right below the table :)20:18
Trionawhich... I guess is important if you watch someone other than a qa contact :)20:19
asacnot sure20:19
Trionasince the other purpose of a watcher is to let you fill in for someone else20:19
asaclets see how far i get with the configuration i have now :)20:19
asaclets see if i should hit the reset button to see if things improve :)20:21
asacjust 1600 unread mails. thats less than i expected :-P20:22
asac*sigh*20:22
asacdamn. and the first 10 mails i looked at were actually interesting/semi-important20:22
asac"You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug."20:23
asac:)20:23
asaclets see if thats a person or a QA20:24
asack thats a person20:24
pidouzIs that normal that, after installing Firefox 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.15~prepatch080614c-0ubuntu1~qa1 on Dapper, my "About Firefox" window states that i'm using Firefox 1.5.0.12eol ?20:25
ScottKMine says that too.20:26
asacyes thats normal20:26
pidouzOK, thank you !20:26
asacwe are working towards a 1.5.0.15 release upstream with other distros20:26
asacthen eol will most likely stay, but the version would be bumped20:26
asacafter all its 1.5.0.15~prepatch :)20:27
FuturePilothello, I heard something about an email and free hugs :P20:29
asacFuturePilot: did you get that email?20:30
FuturePilotyes20:30
* asac hugs FuturePilot 20:30
asac:)20:30
FuturePilot:)20:30
FuturePilotI'd be happy to test though20:30
asacnow help testing ;)20:30
asacgreat!20:30
FuturePilotI noticed that there's not many Feisty testers20:31
FuturePilotI think I'll go dig up my old Feisty CD20:31
asacFuturePilot: you can use virtualbox if you dont want to do a full install20:31
FuturePilotYes, that's what I was going to do :)20:31
asacfor that its easiest to download the .iso; installation from a file .iso is way faster20:31
asacbut CD should work too20:32
FuturePilotoh yes, I could do that too20:32
Trionahrm... I should set up virtualbox.20:32
asacbut i guess the feisty torrents are not that active anymore ;)20:32
asacwe should consider to distribute "ready-to-use" images for virtual box20:32
FuturePilotthat would be nice :)20:33
asacbut i think #ubuntu-testing should do that20:33
asachavent got an answer so far from them on that question20:33
* asac asks again :)20:33
pidouzI followed the testplan, everything seemed OK. I submitted my result on the site20:36
pidouzI didn't write any comment, because I didn't notice anything wrong. I hope that's the right way to do it20:38
* asac hugs pidouz 20:38
asacpidouz: yes. if nothing unusual happens we dont need a comment20:38
pidouzIt was my first (little) contribution, I hope I will have opportunities to be usefull in the future !20:40
pidouzbye everybody !20:41
asacwe also have little gutsy testers20:48
fta_hi21:01
=== fta_ is now known as fta
asachi fta21:02
asacfta: did you get an email about firefox testing?21:03
asac:-D21:03
=== jdhore1 is now known as jdhore
riffianhello21:05
asachi21:05
riffianI wonder if it's possible to have both Firefox 2 and 3 running on Ubuntu?21:05
asacriffian: at the same time?21:06
riffianNot necessarily at the same time, no21:06
asacor on the same system21:06
riffiansame system - 7.0421:06
asacriffian: i think going down might break your profile21:06
asacriffian: 7.04?21:06
asacyou mean 8.04?21:06
riffianNo, Feisty (I can't upgrade!)21:07
asacriffian:  think there is no firefox 3 build yet available for feisty21:07
asacmaybe we should do one21:07
asacriffian: why cant you upgrade?21:07
riffianWireless network card problem on my laptop21:07
asacriffian: so no network?21:08
riffianboth gusty and hardy seem to have a problem21:08
asacah21:08
asacriffian: did you install or just try the livecd?21:08
riffianlivecd21:08
riffiandidn't adre install !21:08
asacriffian: on livecd there might be drivers missing21:08
riffiansorry dare21:08
asacwhat card/chipset?21:09
riffianintel - I'll just check21:09
jcastrothat's weird, intel should just work21:10
asacjcastro: no :)21:10
asacdepends21:10
jcastrowell, let me rephrase .. it always works for me on my hardware. :D21:11
asaclucky jcastro ;)21:11
jcastroI've never seen intel wireless hardware not work21:11
jcastroin recent releases21:11
riffianPRO/Wireless 3945ABG21:11
riffianI think I've seen some threads about there being a problem with this21:12
asacriffian: ok that causes issues for _some_ in some environments in hardy. on gutsy it should work. but i think its not really usable on livecd21:12
riffianAnd I posted (and bumped) a question in Ubuntu forums about this but got no replies at all :-(21:13
riffianSo i thik: if it ain't broke...   ;-)21:13
riffian*think21:13
djdarkman_on dapper if I have the right firefox how can I check it`s version?21:13
asacriffian: it should work everywhere on real installs. on hardy it can be shaky, but you can try to install the linux-backport-modules driver21:13
asacthose should work better21:14
asacriffian: cant you fork out a small partition to try a full install?21:14
asacdjdarkman_: in terminal21:14
asacdjdarkman_: COLUMNS=200 dpkg -l firefox21:14
riffianI'd like to, but I have a few VMs to take care of...21:14
asacdjdarkman_: and in Help -> About should be 1.5.0.12eol (but that was like that for the few last uploads)21:15
riffianand a smallish HDD21:15
djdarkman_asac: have it21:15
riffianGood idea though!21:15
riffianI'll back up the VMs and temporarily remove them to get space21:15
riffianasac: thanks21:16
asacwelcome.21:16
* asac out grabbing some food21:16
djdarkman_asac: where is the report form? (url)21:16
asacdjdarkman_: on mozilla.qa.ubuntu.com you click on the version you want to submit results for21:17
asacfrom there on you should be able to find your way21:17
asacdjdarkman_: you might need to create an account first?21:17
djdarkman_asac: have ubuntuforums acount :D21:17
asacdjdarkman_: not sure if that works ;)21:18
asacdjdarkman_: http://mozilla.qa.ubuntu.com/21:18
asactry to log-in (top right corner)21:18
asacotherwise register21:18
ftaasac, yes, got it21:18
djdarkman_asac: I taught those were package links :D21:18
asacfta: interesting. thought you were one of the few that didnt receive it ;)21:18
asacfta: that means it really went everywhere :)21:19
asacdjdarkman_: yeah. you are not alone :)21:19
asacothers complained about that already21:19
ftaasac, you mean 2.0.0.15, right?21:19
asacfta: yes.21:19
asacfta: i pushed the wrong button and the mail went to 17k users :-P21:19
asacthat was fun21:20
ftalol21:20
asacfta: i wasnt aware that the database of qa.ubuntu.com was coupled with brainstorm and wiki :)21:20
asacand what else21:20
asaci just did the same as last time "submit to all registered on this site"21:21
djdarkman_silly question #1 asac does FF 1.5 has live bookmarks?21:23
armin76fail21:25
djdarkman_ok someone could help me out on this one? how do I make a live bookmark(of an rss probably) under ff1.5?21:26
asacdjdarkman_: yes21:29
asacyou can add them when you click on the RSS symbol in the location bar21:30
djdarkman_ok thanks btw, I`m not a full fleged firefox user, that`s why I don`t know these features :)21:31
ftadamn21:39
ftaThe following NEW packages will be installed:21:39
fta  libgluezilla libmono-mozilla0.2-cil libmozjs0d libxul0d21:39
asacfta: what pulls in libgluezilla?21:40
ftaasac, something is re-introducing xul1.8 in intrepid21:40
asacfta: most likely a sync21:40
ftayep, maybe libgluezilla21:40
asacfta: i guess thats synched, but it caned be the cause21:40
asacsomething else probably has added libgluezilla21:40
asacto depends21:40
ftait happened when i forced libmono-winforms2.0-cil libuniconf4.421:41
asacso its libmono-winforums21:41
asacwhat pulls that in?21:41
ftadonno, it was blocking my upgrades21:41
asacfta: what rdepends does that lib has?21:41
asachave21:41
asac:)21:41
asachttp://paste.ubuntu.com/22690/21:42
asacthats in hardy21:42
asacdo you have more?21:42
djdarkman_hmmm so far soo good under dapper here goes the plugins21:42
ftaasac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/22691/21:42
asacikvm?21:43
asacerr21:43
asac:)21:43
asacanyway. i think libgluezilla is the one that needs to be fixed here21:43
asacdebian is probably already on it :-D21:43
asaci looked at it once, but found that i hate mono bindings too much to do more than necessary on that21:44
ftastrange, i can remove libmono-winforms2.0-cil without removing anything else21:44
asacnecessary == main21:44
asacfta: then its a Recommends :)21:44
asacthose get installed by default now21:44
ftai hate mono21:44
asacargh21:44
asacmost likely it gets pulled by some other recommends?21:45
ftahttp://paste.ubuntu.com/22694/21:45
asacwhat i hate about mono is that i couldnt find any documentation on how to do bindings the "manual" way21:46
asaconly these high-level xml things21:46
asacwhich i have hard time to get special things into without becoming a master21:46
djdarkman_asac: I installed mozilla-acroread, but firefox fails to recognize it as a plugin21:46
djdarkman_am I`m missing something herE?21:46
asacdjdarkman_: not sure. take that plugins list with a grain of salt21:46
asacnobody seriously reviewed if those are actually usable in all ubuntu versions21:47
asacdjdarkman_: but i think someone else confirmed today that it worked in dapper21:47
asac(on the test builds)21:47
djdarkman_nobody in it`s right mind would use adobe pdf reader under linux imho21:47
ftawaoo, people are still using dapper ?21:48
asacdjdarkman_: yeah. not sure about the state in evince21:48
asacfta: sure21:48
asacfta: those that done want to bother upgrading21:48
asaci met three people in the train that had an ubuntu installed21:48
djdarkman_btw dapper doesn`t have java621:48
asacin the last three month21:48
asacwell i guess its more than three month ;)21:48
asacanyway, all had dapper and said they waited for hardy21:49
asacor a new LTS21:49
asacso yes, there are people using LTS and skip the other releases21:49
* djdarkman_ could never wait for even releasees, betas and alphas rule!21:49
asacdjdarkman_: yeah. but you are on IRC. that means that you are already special21:50
asacour target audience doesnt know about IRC ;)21:50
riffianI certainly didn't know about IRC until today!21:52
riffianAbout half an hour ago21:52
djdarkman_asac: I think I`m a good tester than because I don`t use firefox(just for development), and don`t know the "quirks" and "workarounds"21:53
djdarkman_than someone who used firefox every day21:53
riffianHow does FF3 compare to FF2 in terms of memory usage?21:55
djdarkman_riffian: they say it`s better and faster, has fewer memory leaks21:56
riffianthat's what I need then!21:56
djdarkman_ok can someone tell me where can I test the vlc plugin? :)21:56
Pauldbhey people21:57
Pauldbi juste received a mail from mozilla21:57
asacPauldb: from mozilla? or from me?21:58
Pauldbmozila21:58
Pauldbtalking about Firefox 2.0.0.15 Candidate Builds and Backportsā€¸21:58
asacPauldb: no, that was me :)21:58
Pauldbit says that we have to come in this chan to know more ...21:58
asacyeah21:59
Pauldbwell here i am21:59
asacPauldb: want to help?21:59
Pauldbyup21:59
asacthe mail gives you all the basic informations. you can decide which ubuntu release to test21:59
asacthen either just install the packages (instructions are on top of page at mozilla.qa.ubuntu.com)21:59
asacor setup a VirtualMachine if you dont have the ubuntu release installed that you want to test22:00
asacPauldb: what do you want to test?22:00
asacdo you have a gutsy install?22:00
Pauldbwhat if i have already mozilla firefox installed on my ubuntu 8.04 ?22:00
Pauldbv3.022:00
asacPauldb: if you want to test hardy you should backup your $HOME/.mozilla directory first22:01
asacand after the tests put it back22:01
Pauldbbut why is it ff2 ?22:01
Pauldbff3 has just been released and you're testing ff2 ...22:02
Pauldbis it a mod or something ?22:02
asacPauldb: no22:04
asacPauldb: its a security update. and since we ship firefox-2 as an alternative you can also test that in hardy too ;)22:05
asacdefault is ffox 3 ... firefox 2 is still availabel for those that dont want to use ff322:05
djdarkman_asac: I`ve tested flash and java, what esle should I test, that should work?22:07
asacdjdarkman_: totem?22:08
asacnot sure if it exists in dapper though22:08
asacif there is a totem-mozilla package then it probably should work22:08
djdarkman_asac: where shoudl I test it?22:09
djdarkman_(url)22:09
asacdjdarkman_: good question. wait a second22:10
asaci have a page i use for that ;(22:10
asachttp://digital-desert.com/mpg-videos/22:10
asacthere are a bunch of mpegs22:10
asacnot embedded though22:10
asacdjdarkman_: the other site i know that has embedded videos, but probably needs you to download codecs is http://www.apple.com/getamac/ads/22:11
asac:-D22:11
asacno, i havent found that myself. its used in a testcase to crash firefox which caused a bunch of crashes ;)22:12
djdarkman_The following packages have unmet dependencies:22:12
djdarkman_  totem-gstreamer-firefox-plugin: Depends: totem-gstreamer (= 1.4.1-0ubuntu4) but 1.4.3-0ubuntu1 is to be installed22:12
djdarkman_E: Broken packages22:12
djdarkman_djdarkman@ubuntu:~$22:12
asacdjdarkman_: did you upgrade your system?22:13
asacdo you have dapper-updates in your sources.list?22:14
djdarkman_yes asac22:15
asacdjdarkman_: not sure .. for me it  works22:17
asacdjdarkman_: please paste your /etc/apt/sources.list22:17
asacto http://paste.ubuntu.com22:17
djdarkman_http://paste.ubuntu.com/22705/22:21
asacdjdarkman_: you need universe and maybe multiverse everywhere22:29
asacdapper-updates just has main + restriceted22:29
=== FuturePilot_ is now known as FuturePilot
asacfor instance22:29
djdarkman_ok I`ll continue tomorrow22:34
djdarkman_goodby22:34
djdarkman_e22:34
asacdjdarkman_: cu22:36
asacthanks a bunch22:36
asacok gecko-sharp merged :/22:59
* Volans back23:09
asacfta:  i guess you dont mind that i take your devhelp merge ;)23:20
asacwell its finished ;)23:20
fta?23:21
ftaasac, ?23:22
asacmerged and uploaded ;)23:22
asacfta: well you were listed as "merger" ;)23:22
asacbecause you did the last upload23:22
asachttp://merges.ubuntu.com/main.html23:22
asacfor instance you are listed for the next vim merge too :-D23:23
asaccair23:23
asaco23:23
asacdevhelp is now done :)23:23
asacliferea even ;)23:23
asacanything you dont want to do ?23:23
ftai've already sent cairo to seb 2 weeks ago, it's pending because of a MIR23:24
asacah great23:24
ftait's not that i don't want to do anything, i just lack free time23:24
asacthats dealt with then ;)23:24
asacfta: no no ... its fine23:24
asacfta: its just that its "polite" to ask before taking a merge from someone :)23:24
ftasure23:25
asacbetter keep a bit free time ;)23:25
asacotherwise burn out comes :)23:25
asacthis enigmail merge is harder than expected ;)23:33
* asac break23:33
asacwhat did i do to debian enigmail ;)23:33
asacmaybe its a "back-merge" ?23:33
asacdamn ;)23:33
asacis it worth to fix it for real? :-P23:34
asacwater on all fronts ;)23:39
asacunread bugmail == 3000 :)23:39
asac_reconnect23:51
ftano more cloak23:55
asac_me?23:55
ftayes23:56
fta asac_ (n=asac@e177168193.adsl.alicedsl.de) has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam23:56
asac_fta: maybe a race?23:56
ftayour zombie23:56
asac_i am cloaked now ;)23:56
asac_i think its while leaving/joining23:56
asac_oh23:57
asac_darn23:57
asac_bug in freenode?23:57
asac_i linked both nicks23:57
ftaboth are unclocked in xchat23:57
asac_fta: strange ... here /who tells me cloak for asac, but not for asac_23:58
asac_00:51 >> NickServ: Auth Request from NickServ on freenode.23:58
asac_00:51 >> NickServ: The NickServ nickname asac_ could not be found on freenode.23:58
Volansasac_: you are a phantom! :)23:59
fta /whois asac_  => still alice :)23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!