=== asac_ is now known as asac [00:18] heya [00:22] howdy [04:34] hmmm, why are aptitude and apt-get so different for installing python-epydoc [04:34] apt-get will install it juuust fine [04:34] but aptitude wants to pull in 230 megs of deps for a total of ~500MB unpacked [04:34] is that some sort of bug [04:34] no. aptitude installs Recommends by default, too. [04:35] oh, well is it a bug against epydoc that it recommends so much? that seems off [04:35] but, maybe not! [04:36] no, it's not a bug in either aptitude or epydoc. [04:36] crimsun_: okay, fair enough [04:36] I'll just use apt-get for it [04:37] thanks! [04:37] mrooney: You can turn off the recommends-by-default logic on a case-by-case basis; I think it's --without-recommends. [04:38] RAOF: thanks, that is good to know, I will probably do that [04:38] I have never seen such a large set of recommends [05:15] Installing devscripts on sid wants to bring in all sorts of things - citadel-common, x11-common, subversion, dillo, mysql-common to name a few. === LucidFox is now known as GamingFox === GamingFox is now known as LucidFox [06:46] \/join #ubuntu-in [06:46] err...sorry for that === mdz_ is now known as mdz === sebner_ is now known as sebner === sebner_ is now known as sebner [15:30] when a bug is a duplicate, then what should be it's status ? [15:33] got it - thanks! [15:44] if there is a known issue in upstream, then how should the bug be changed? should the status of the bug be changed to 'Confirmed'? [15:46] bliZZardz: it should be Triaged, but if you don't have the permissions to set it, Confirmed is ok [15:49] pedro_ : kindly have a look at Bug #241808, and let me know whether my response was right. [15:49] Launchpad bug 241808 in libavg "simple script returns seg fault on ubu64" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/241808 [15:54] bliZZardz: that's ok, also it doesn't seems to be an openoffice.org issue so you might want to reject that task [15:54] hi Iulian [15:55] Hello pedro === bdmurray changed the topic of #ubuntu-bugs to: Ubuntu BugSquad | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad | Documentation: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/HelpingWithBugs | If you have been triaging bugs for a while, please apply to https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol/ | Want to report a bug? Read https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs | User support (not related to triage) is in #ubuntu === ubott2 is now known as ubottu [18:14] Anybody in here got some spare time to look at new attachments for bug #219584? /give instructions for further "research"... [18:14] Launchpad bug 219584 in pm-utils "long first wakeup after suspend" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/219584 [18:46] I'll be doing a class on interpreting apport retraces in about 17 hours, and wondered if anyone had a favorite apport bug with a good stacktrace to nominate for investigation during the session? [18:59] persia: bug 136371 maybe? [18:59] bdmurray: Bug 136371 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/136371 is private [19:01] bdmurray: That could work. I tend to like longer traces (10 or more calls) as they are easier to explain. Do you have an interest in that bug specifically? [19:02] persia: not really just rss-glx seems to be a mess [19:02] a mess of apport crashes that is [19:03] bdmurray: Makes sense. I'll look about and see if I can find a more complex crash, hopefully in hardy. [19:03] On the other hand, I'm guessing most of the problem is with GL issues, which are a little special :( [19:03] that particular one has some more recent duplicates [19:04] 9! Wow. Now I understand why it's interesting :) [19:04] persia: will you be covering a python crash at all too? [19:06] bdmurray: There's usually only time for one, and I have more experience with C than with python. Do you have a good python candidate? I'd be willing to do a python, as I've had a few of the same students at previous sessions, and they may like variety. [19:06] (said differently: I'll do a python one if I can figure it out before class :) ) [19:07] heh [19:09] displayconfig-gtk has a fair number of crash reports but I believe the application is deprecated so that might not be best [19:14] Not only that, but it likely breaks because of issues with which video drivers support what operations. [20:37] pedro_: ping [20:41] bdmurray: hi [20:41] Did you already have a hug day planned for tomorrow? [20:41] bdmurray: nothing for tomorrow, I'm more looking to next week [20:42] pedro_: okay, great [22:05] hello [22:05] is this a good place to discuss general ubuntu "wish" idea? [22:08] LimCore: maybe brainstorm.ubuntu.com [22:08] yeas I know it, ok [22:09] but is it brainstorm really usefull? Most ideas get a lot of votes... and what then? [22:09] I dunno, I've posted several ideas in several places, and none have gotten any attention from anyone important [22:10] Developers have started responding to ideas on brainstorm [22:10] * LimCore is a developer too \o/ [22:11] If I'm awesome C++ devel, can I get $$$ for developing for ubuntu? [22:11] any sponsorhip etc? [22:11] *spelling === Spec is now known as Spec[x]