[15:37] <psyke83> kwwii, hey, I got the theme, nice work. One small issue, though. When ubuntulooks gets deprecated from the CD, the metacity for Human-Murrine and Human-Clearlooks will become available. Perhaps you can move it to Human-Murrine/metacity-1 and update the index.theme descriptors?
[15:37] <psyke83> *will become unavailable
[15:37] <psyke83> so, it'll have to go into the human-theme package
[17:02] <kwwii> psyke83: right, I was waiting to move that (trying to avoid extra effort) :-)
[17:05] <kwwii> oh yeah, if anyone is interested in installing all this on hardy I set up a PPA for it
[17:05] <kwwii> https://launchpad.net/~kwwii/+archive
[17:10] <psyke83> kwwii, cool, want me to mention it on ubuntuforums?
[17:13] <kwwii> I avoid the forums :p
[17:15] <kwwii> is there a thread about it?
[17:15] <nothlit> I'll put it on the wiki FAQ (people always want to see the state of things), with a disclaimer of course
[17:15] <kwwii> hi nothlit!
[17:15] <kwwii> cool
[17:16] <nothlit> hey
[17:16] <nothlit> do we have the goahead to shuttle all wallpapers to ubuntu-art.org and the mailing list btw?
[17:17] <nothlit> or are we keeping everything on the wiki
[17:17] <kwwii> nothlit: from canonical's standpoint we can do what we want but because they are not in control of ubuntu-art.org we will still need to the wiki to represent the official news and such
[17:18] <psyke83> kwwii, no current threads  about a theme, but there's a thread on "interesting updates" for Intrepid. I posted screenshots and a link to your PPA for Hardy users. Maybe some of the feedback will be constructive there, who knows
[17:18] <nothlit> oh kk cool
[17:18] <kwwii> so we can work out a system to put everything on ubuntu-art.org first and then move it to the wiki when necessary
[17:18] <kwwii> psyke83: cool, I can't wait to hear what people say :-)
[17:19] <kwwii> we could start having meetings again and discuss exactly how and when to do it
[17:19] <kwwii> that was for nothlit
[17:19] <kwwii> nothlit: or we could just work out an idea and then present it
[17:26] <nothlit> kwwii: i was wondering if we would have an #ua-devel in the same manner for organising purposes
[17:27] <kwwii> nothlit: yeah, I am still waiting for a response on setting up another mailing list
[17:27] <kwwii> we could start another irc channel in the meantime
[17:29] <kwwii> although to be honest, so little goes on in this channel that we could just decide it all here :p
[17:33] <nothlit> Well, I was just wary of instances like the email
[17:33] <nothlit> But yeah we definitely could
[17:37] <nothlit> I'm going to link to this article http://www.linux.com/feature/119212 for license advice until we get an answer from the lawyers--and mention that its only important if the artwork is actually released  and built with the software rather than packaged and loaded seperately as a theme.
[17:59] <nothlit> bah, cody d/ced, i have xubuntu logo mockups
[18:18] <kwwii> cool
[18:19] <kwwii> I think that in the end we will need to use the CCbySA for everything just because it is company polidy
[18:19] <kwwii> policy
[18:23] <nothlit> cc-by-sa is incompatible with gpl, but it shouldn't be a problem since we're mostly theming. I'm not sure how integrated the isolinux splash is though. Also usplash is loadable/themeable, but its C code.
[18:24] <kwwii> right, the problem will be with pushing stuff up to debian
[18:24] <kwwii> debian is pretty much the only one that has a problem with it
[18:24] <kwwii> I guess that everyone else could just include lgpl if they want to
[18:27] <nothlit> i'll bbl, quick first revision of Licenses page https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Documentation/Licenses