sistpoty | aaaaahhh... all my mail seems to be gone | 00:07 |
---|---|---|
sistpoty | dear kmail, please don't shock me like this, sincerely yours, stefan. | 00:08 |
cyberix | If I send a patch for Hardy, should I send the patch for Intrepid too? | 00:14 |
persia | cyberix: The general rule is that nothing not fixed in intrepid will be uploaded to hardy. | 00:17 |
geser | cyberix: for an SRU? | 00:17 |
persia | To avoid confusion, I'd recommend putting both patches in the same bug. | 00:17 |
cyberix | no, just a small patch | 00:18 |
cyberix | Actually there is no use to ship this for Hardy | 00:18 |
persia | cyberix: Any change to hardy at this point is an SRU, even a just a 1-bit change | 00:18 |
cyberix | I'm just trying to understand how the processes work | 00:18 |
cyberix | k | 00:18 |
cyberix | so it is stable instead of source :-) | 00:19 |
geser | has someone an idea what went wrong during this build? http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15562990/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-i386.libgnupg-interface-perl_0.36-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 00:24 |
sistpoty | geser: hm... "which gpg ... gpg (GnuPG) not found at Makefile.PL line 21." might give some clue? | 00:26 |
persia | sistpoty: But build-essential depends on dpkg-dev, which depends on gnupg | 00:27 |
sistpoty | persia: which doesn't mean that Makefile.PL is correct thought ;) | 00:27 |
persia | sistpoty: True. | 00:27 |
geser | sistpoty: it builds in my pbuilder | 00:28 |
sistpoty | geser: hm... strange | 00:28 |
* persia tries in sbuild, to see if it is due to pbuilder-satisfybuilddepends | 00:28 | |
sistpoty | persia, geser: oh, dpkg-dev doesn't b-d on gnupg | 00:29 |
persia | ! | 00:30 |
sistpoty | (at least not 1.14.20ubuntu1) | 00:30 |
persia | How did that become Suggests: ? That's rather unexpected. | 00:30 |
geser | but gnupg is installed (see the gpg signature check after the source is extracted) | 00:30 |
persia | No, that's just me reading apt-cache output wrong. | 00:31 |
persia | geser: There's something very odd: that buildlog also has "sh: gcc: not found" | 00:33 |
sistpoty | hm... dear kmail, don't disconnect me from the outside world, by not letting me receive mails from a local mbox. thanks. | 00:33 |
persia | Builds cleanly in my intrepid sbuild chroot. | 00:33 |
sistpoty | persia: hm... however it has: "Setting up g++-4.3 (4.3.1-1ubuntu2) ..." | 00:34 |
persia | sistpoty: Right, which is why I thought "sh: gcc: not found" was odd. | 00:34 |
persia | I find it especially odd right after "Toolchain package versions: ... gcc-4.3_4.3.1-1ubuntu2" | 00:35 |
geser | if I understand the Makefile.PL correnctly the second "gpg" in the line "which gpg ... gpg" should come from the system() call, right? | 00:35 |
persia | geser: Right. I would have expected "/usr/bin/gpg" | 00:36 |
persia | I think that system($gpg_find) is returning nothing, and the second gpg is coming from 'die "gpg (GnuPG) not found";' | 00:37 |
geser | yes, you are correct | 00:38 |
geser | perl -e "system('which gpg')" returns here /usr/bin/gpg | 00:38 |
persia | Looks like this was the first build since edgy. Maybe this is a case of someone hand-adjusting things. | 00:39 |
geser | persia: gcc-4.3 only provides /usr/bin/gcc-4.3, /usr/bin/gcc is in gcc but that's also installed | 00:39 |
persia | geser: Still, it's odd to see a report that gcc is not found. | 00:39 |
geser | true | 00:40 |
geser | someone messing with $PATH? | 00:40 |
persia | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/3087635/buildlog_ubuntu-edgy-i386.libgnupg-interface-perl_0.33-6_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz looks rather different: Makefile.PL likely changed a bit upstream. | 00:41 |
persia | Could be the common situation with arch:all that the Debian build wasn't run in a sanitised chroot... | 00:41 |
geser | but why does the same source package build in my pbuilder and your sbuild but not on the buildd? | 00:43 |
persia | Do you have gnupg installed in your chroot? It seems to be in mine. | 00:43 |
bobbo | sistpoty: thanks for sponsoring my memaker upload :) | 00:44 |
sistpoty | bobbo: thanks for providing a debdiff in the fisrt place ;) | 00:44 |
bobbo | sistpoty: hehe, my pleasure | 00:44 |
geser | persia: I have, but how did dpkg-source (on the buildd) check the gpg signature without gnupg? (gpg: Signature made Tue Jun 24 07:31:19 2008 BST using DSA key ID 9725F63B) | 00:46 |
* sistpoty goes to bed now... gn8 everyone | 00:46 | |
geser | persia: the "sh: gcc: not found | 00:49 |
geser | " seems to be normal now | 00:49 |
geser | it's also in successfully build logs, e.g. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15590444/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-i386.apache2_2.2.9-2ubuntu1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz | 00:50 |
persia | That's very odd. Maybe the "gcc" package isn't installed, or poorly configured, or something. | 00:51 |
geser | "Setting up gcc (4:4.3.1-1ubuntu2) ..." seems ok to me | 00:53 |
persia | geser: I have to agree that gpg is installed. I don't know why "which gpg" wouldn't work. | 00:54 |
geser | persia: n8, I'll try to ask the buildd admins if they have an idea why libgnupg-interace-perl FTBFS (and also about the "sh: gcc: not found" thing) | 00:54 |
LaserJock | is anybody using sbuild+some apt cacher with both Debian and Ubuntu ? | 00:54 |
* persia checks the default /bin/sh in the sbuild schroot | 00:54 | |
persia | No, I seem to have dash, so that's not it. | 00:55 |
* persia is baffled | 00:55 | |
geser | persia: a reason why gcc and gpg are not found could be that /usr/bin is not in the PATH for some reason on the buildd | 00:56 |
persia | geser: Maybe, but why would it be able to call dpkg-source (also in /usr/bin)? | 00:57 |
persia | Further, dpkg-source checks for the existence of /usr/bin/gpg, but then calls gpg without a prefix path. | 00:57 |
persia | It's backticks rather than system(), but that oughtn't be sufficient to make it work or fail. | 00:58 |
geser | does it get called as "dpkg-source" or "/usr/bin/dpkg-source"? | 01:01 |
geser | hmm, dpkg-source calls gpg without the full path to do the signature check, so PATH seems to be ok | 01:02 |
persia | Right. | 01:02 |
geser | what about giving it back to the buildds and hope that it gets tried on a different buildd? | 01:05 |
persia | That's why they put the button there :) | 01:06 |
geser | nothing changed :( still FTBFS | 01:11 |
* geser goes to bed now | 01:12 | |
persia | geser: Sleep well. | 01:13 |
=== macd_ is now known as macd | ||
=== rockstar` is now known as rockstar | ||
RAOF | Hm. Gnome-do-plugins in Ubuntu has a do-plugins as its source package, but gnome-do-plugins in Debian has gnome-do-plugins as its source package. I'm rebasing the Ubuntu package on the Debian package; do I upload as gnome-do-plugins and ask for removal of do-plugins? | 07:56 |
wgrant | RAOF: Please... do. | 08:11 |
RAOF | wgrant: :P | 08:12 |
RAOF | wgrant: Do you know if I need to ask for the removal of do-plugins source before uploading gnome-do-plugins? Otherwise there'll be a binary package name conflict, and I'm not sure how those get dealt with. | 08:16 |
wgrant | RAOF: As long as the version is greater, it will be fine. | 08:16 |
wgrant | They'll go through binary NEW, but then dominate the old binaries, so your new ones won't be removed with the old source just because they have the same name.\ | 08:17 |
wgrant | Grmph. Why is Full Circle Magazine recommending Webmin? | 08:24 |
wgrant | And 'sudo su'? | 08:24 |
wgrant | Ehem, and they used a pre-Hardy interview... | 08:36 |
wgrant | And they recommend using Debian packages. Ew ew ew. | 08:38 |
Flannel | wgrant: Where? | 08:49 |
wgrant | Flannel: To which bit? | 08:50 |
\sh | moins | 08:51 |
Flannel | wgrant: Um, all of them if theyre convienent | 08:51 |
jpds | wgrant: I think you can find them lurking in #fullcirclemagazine ;-= | 08:51 |
jpds | moin \sh | 08:51 |
wgrant | jpds: Ah, perhaps. | 08:51 |
wgrant | Flannel: I glanced through the latest edition (#14). | 08:51 |
wgrant | They're fairly easy to find with any search functionality. | 08:52 |
Flannel | wgrant: Alright, thats all I needed to know | 08:52 |
Flannel | Didn't want to start from 0 | 08:52 |
Iulian | G'morning | 09:03 |
sistpoty | hi folks | 12:07 |
geser | hi sistpoty | 12:11 |
sistpoty | hi geser | 12:12 |
sistpoty | hm... last nights dist-upgrade with many kde parts getting upgraded left me with a gnome session... epic fail *g* | 12:12 |
geser | sistpoty: it's part of the hidden master plan to convert all kde users to gnome :) | 12:13 |
sistpoty | haha | 12:13 |
elky | i like the sound of this plan... | 12:14 |
RAOF | Hm. I'm just trying Intrepid KDE. Again. | 12:15 |
RAOF | Is the display settings panel _meant_ to do anything, or just look (not) pretty? :) | 12:16 |
jussi01 | someone remind me of the build a .dsc command? | 12:16 |
RAOF | sbuild -d intrepid foo.dsc ? :) | 12:17 |
RAOF | On the other hand: dear GTK: please implement something like the smooth animation of the output list. | 12:17 |
jussi01 | no, the dpkg one? | 12:17 |
RAOF | Is there one? | 12:17 |
jussi01 | hrm... /me goes to google more | 12:18 |
RAOF | You dpkg-source -x it, then dpkg-buildpackage the extracted source. | 12:18 |
RAOF | (or debian/rules binary, if you're confident it's policy-compliant :)) | 12:18 |
jussi01 | RAOF: ahh, yeah thats the one | 12:18 |
jussi01 | RAOF: its just a personal thing, nothing for ubutnu atm. | 12:19 |
RAOF | Um. Why does Kubuntu default to playing a 'ding' every time I press a button? | 12:19 |
wgrant | RAOF: Because it's kool. | 12:29 |
RAOF | Gah! KDE is so easy to break! | 12:29 |
RAOF | I seem to have created a panel covering my entire second monitor. | 12:30 |
wgrant | Nice! | 12:31 |
wgrant | KDE4 or not? | 12:31 |
RAOF | Kwin now believes that maximise about 30x20 pixels in the top left corner, too. | 12:33 |
RAOF | KDE4 | 12:33 |
RAOF | Hm. It is apparently imperitive that I don't alt-tab, lest kwin consume 100% cpu and lock the desktop. | 12:35 |
persia | RAOF: Just use the panel on your second monitor to control which app you are using. That way you won't need the keyboard at all :) | 12:36 |
RAOF | The panel on my second monitor is entirely empty, and unresponsive to mouse clicks :) | 12:37 |
RAOF | Maybe it's not even a panel? Maybe something just decided to fill my second monitor with all black. | 12:38 |
=== Kopfgeldjaeger2 is now known as Kopfgeldjaeger | ||
RAOF | Oooh, maximising works again! | 12:39 |
RAOF | I was going to spend some time using kde to file some bugs, but kubuntu appears to be composed entirely of bugs. I must be an expert kde-breaker. | 12:42 |
StevenK | "I'd file bugs, but maybe what I think are bugs are really features." | 12:42 |
persia | Everything in a feature, for the right use case... | 12:43 |
RAOF | The biggest "feature" seems to be semi-awareness of dual head. | 12:43 |
RAOF | It knows my laptop's running at 1680x1050, so the panel is 1680 wide. | 12:43 |
RAOF | However, when it started up my two monitors were cloned. Thus, the desktop is the size of the smaller of the two. | 12:44 |
RAOF | Sadly, this means that the left hand side of the panel, containing, among other things, the launcher, is offscreen. | 12:44 |
StevenK | Teehee | 12:44 |
RAOF | W.T.F? | 12:45 |
* RAOF blinks again. | 12:45 | |
persia | Right-justification is always correct :) | 12:45 |
RAOF | Pressing the "configure this panel" button (not labelled as such in any way, of course) brings up, among other things, 3 arrows. | 12:46 |
RAOF | In some as yet undiscovered way, these three arrows influence the size of the panel. | 12:46 |
StevenK | That sounds intutive. | 12:47 |
RAOF | As well as some left/centre/right justification boxes. | 12:47 |
RAOF | Also intuitively: selecting the text which is left justified causes the panel to be right justified on my right hand monitor. | 12:47 |
RAOF | Centre works as expected, but the right-justification button causes it to be right-justified on my left monitor. | 12:48 |
RAOF | Hm. How do I make the clock show 12h time? Hint: it doesn't involve right clicking on the clock, apparently. | 12:51 |
StevenK | RAOF: You switch to Ubuntu? | 12:52 |
RAOF | Entirely possible, yes. I'd like to file at least _some_ bugs first, though. | 12:52 |
RAOF | Such as "has no concept of multi-head" | 12:52 |
persia | Could anyone explain why pycentral might report "pycentral: pycentral pkginstall: not overwriting local files", as in http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14327059/DpkgTerminalLog.txt? Is this likely due to user customisation, or is it a packaging issue? | 13:00 |
geser | persia: looking into /usr/bin/pycentral this seems to be set from the option "overwrite-local" in /etc/python/debian_config | 13:05 |
geser | I don't have it set in my /etc/python/debian_config | 13:06 |
wgrant | persia: I've seen the problem with a Dapper upgrade. | 13:06 |
geser | man pycentral mentions this option in the FILES section | 13:07 |
wgrant | But it doesn't look like it could be the problem here. | 13:07 |
persia | So, do I need to do anything to the package to fix it, or just leave it alone? (I'm processing NBS, so like to minimize actual changes) | 13:07 |
wgrant | In my case, python-opengl didn't conflict with python2.4-opengl, so pycentral refused to overwrite the python2.4 opengl bits. | 13:07 |
wgrant | Adding a conflicts against it was the solution there, but it could be a local installation in this case. | 13:08 |
persia | Should python-csound conflict with python2.5-csound, just to be sure? | 13:09 |
persia | It currently Provides: it, which makes me think that such a package used to exist (or maybe python2.4-csound) | 13:10 |
geser | the provides are generated: Provides: ${python:Provides} | 13:12 |
emgent | morning | 13:13 |
persia | geser: Right. I'm just wondering if it needs a conflicts, or if bug #227651 is not really valid. | 13:15 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 227651 in csound "package python-csound 1:5.08.0.dfsg2-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/227651 | 13:15 |
persia | Grumble. Publisher appears out of date for glib2.0-dev on archive.ubuntu.com :( | 13:21 |
wgrant | persia: Hm? | 13:25 |
wgrant | There is no glib2.0-dev, is there? | 13:26 |
wgrant | And all right libglib2.0-devs are there.. | 13:27 |
persia | Err. Right. libglib2.0-dev. 1ubuntu2 is in packages for amd64, and 1ubuntu3 is in the pool (1ubuntu2 is gone). I presume it will catch up soon. | 13:27 |
wgrant | Oops. | 13:27 |
wgrant | That is a bug. | 13:27 |
wgrant | Though it may be a sysadmin bug. | 13:28 |
persia | Yep. The first package I ran worked, but the ~12:00 UTC run seems to have befuddled it. | 13:28 |
persia | Is the bug likely to be a Packages.gz construction issue, or just a timing issue? | 13:28 |
wgrant | Um, glib2.0 has been a sync for three weeks now. | 13:29 |
wgrant | No ubuntuX. | 13:29 |
geser | persia: hardy or intrepid? | 13:31 |
wgrant | Oh, right, Hardy makes more sense. | 13:31 |
wgrant | I forget that it still exists. | 13:31 |
persia | geser: intrepid. I'm tesing bare package install now, rather than looking at a build failure, just in case I did something wrong. | 13:32 |
wgrant | What's the full version you want? | 13:32 |
wgrant | 'Version: 2.17.2-1' | 13:33 |
wgrant | That's in amd64 Packages.gz on a.u.c. | 13:33 |
persia | Right. I'm not sure where I got the error. I may have inadvertantly spelled intrepid h-a-r-d-y. | 13:34 |
wgrant | Heh | 13:34 |
krzysz01 | A have a project readfile. i have made .debs for it and they are in my ppa (krzysdrewniak on launchpad) check it out. | 13:37 |
krzysz01 | what should i do now? | 13:37 |
krzysz01 | i made a .deb of wine 1.0 | 13:37 |
persia | krzysz01: What is your goal? | 13:37 |
krzysz01 | i'm trying readfile into the repos, but it needs some polishing still | 13:38 |
persia | krzysz01: Are you up for polishing it, or do you need review? | 13:39 |
krzysz01 | i am adding some new features before i submit it for review | 13:40 |
krzysz01 | i'm still working on it | 13:40 |
persia | krzysz01: Then the answer to the question "what should i do now?" is "add some new features before submitting it for review". | 13:41 |
krzysz01 | stay tuned it will probably be good when i get to 1.0 | 13:41 |
krzysz01 | see ya | 13:41 |
DktrKranz | bah... packages.{ubuntu.com,debian.org} are not responding | 13:42 |
persia | DktrKranz: packages.qa.debian.org, launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/$(pkgname) | 13:44 |
DktrKranz | unluckily, I needed them for some tests, so I guess I have to wait | 13:45 |
devfil | persia: can you please take a look at https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/crystalspace/+bug/242961 ? I need 2 sponsors for it | 13:45 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 242961 in crystalspace "Please update crystalspace to 1.2.1" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 13:45 |
persia | devfil: I really know nothing about crystalspace, except that it's a mess. Anyway, why do you need two sponsors? | 13:46 |
devfil | persia: it is a new package | 13:46 |
DktrKranz | NEW? mmh | 13:47 |
devfil | persia: a new huge work as wxwidgets2.8 | 13:47 |
devfil | not new package, new version, sorry | 13:47 |
DktrKranz | probably it deserves four eyes to look at it, but it's not NEW :) | 13:47 |
rzr | there are a few RC in crystal space affecting debian's release | 13:49 |
devfil | rzr: this is why I upgraded it to the latest stable version | 13:50 |
rzr | good job | 13:50 |
devfil | rzr: I also asked Debian maintainer to let me work at it (NMU), but I didn't receive any reply for now | 13:53 |
rzr | i know him personnaly | 13:53 |
rzr | he's offline now | 13:53 |
rzr | can you NMU it ? | 13:53 |
devfil | rzr: yes | 13:54 |
bliZZardz | what is NMU? | 13:54 |
devfil | bliZZardz: Non Maintainer Upload in Debian | 13:55 |
geser | Non-Maintainer Upload (Debian) | 13:55 |
rzr | only DD can NMU packages right? | 13:55 |
bliZZardz | and does that mean that people who do not maintain it, contribute a patch/feature? | 13:55 |
devfil | rzr: I don't know, if I do it, probably, Debian maintainer should sponsor it | 13:56 |
DktrKranz | rzr, DD can upload packages, but everyone can propose a NMU if there's RC or release-goal bugs | 13:57 |
rzr | devfil: well I would attach a debdiff to the bug first | 13:57 |
bliZZardz | i was exploring Dbus yday, i need some mentor to help me out understand it better. Would this be the right forum? | 13:57 |
persia | rzr: A debdiff of a new upstream? Isn't that hard to read (and might it be impossible to generate given binary changes in the upstream tarball)? | 13:58 |
persia | bliZZardz: For some very limited types of questions, yes. For deeper questions, probably not. | 13:58 |
bliZZardz | persia : and that would be? | 13:59 |
bliZZardz | persia: you :) ? | 13:59 |
persia | Not I, no :) | 13:59 |
devfil | rzr: why Debian maintainer of crystalspace is offline? | 14:05 |
rzr | he probally has a life :) | 14:05 |
DktrKranz | not so bad, after all | 14:06 |
sistpoty | bah, rl is overrated *g+ | 14:06 |
=== bliZZardz is now known as bliZZardz_ | ||
DktrKranz | bliZZardz_, I guess the most qualified person is pitti, but he's on holidays at the moment and he's a very busy developer | 14:07 |
bliZZardz_ | DktrKranz : presently i am doing some triaging, but i would like to get into Dev - hence am looking out for some mentors. I am comfy with Python. | 14:08 |
DktrKranz | whoa! I've just become a DM! \o/ | 14:09 |
persia | DktrKranz: Congratulations! | 14:09 |
=== bliZZardz_ is now known as bliZZardz | ||
DktrKranz | persia, thanks | 14:09 |
bliZZardz | DM? (deb mentor?) | 14:10 |
DktrKranz | bliZZardz, well... if you're comfortable with dbus (or utopia-related stuff), pitti has some mentoring slots available | 14:10 |
bliZZardz | DktrKranz: just started with DBus..need some initial pointers | 14:11 |
DktrKranz | so I guess triaging bugs should be good at the moment | 14:12 |
DktrKranz | personally, I haven't any documentation available | 14:12 |
bliZZardz | DktrKranz: what abt projects(in python) that have mentoring slots available? | 14:13 |
DktrKranz | bliZZardz, for python related bugs, you may want to look at pythonistas bugs | 14:14 |
bliZZardz | DktrKranz : yes - am there. | 14:15 |
DktrKranz | cool :) | 14:15 |
bliZZardz | just getting a feel of the bugs ; looks like most of them need complete module knowledge | 14:16 |
DktrKranz | I'm sure there are some entry-level bugs | 14:16 |
DktrKranz | eventually, you can look at bugs marked as bitesize | 14:17 |
\sh | we made it ! http://leonov.tv/content/leonov-launchpad-desktop-client-first-coming | 14:31 |
persia | \sh: Congratulations. Nice job. | 14:32 |
\sh | persia: thx :) | 14:32 |
* \sh is sweating like hell | 14:32 | |
devfil | \sh: great job! | 14:33 |
persia | \sh: The bugs will come. Have no fear :) | 14:33 |
bliZZardz | persia : LOL ") | 14:33 |
\sh | persia: seele was reviewing our work already...so I have a lot of them already :) and no, I don't fear any bugs :) | 14:33 |
sistpoty | \sh: apt-cache showsrc leonov doesn't yield a result... please fix :P | 14:34 |
persia | sistpoty: Please file a needs-packaging bug to request new software :p | 14:35 |
DktrKranz | ACK from me, please upload to NEW queue :D | 14:35 |
\sh | sistpoty: lol | 14:36 |
* sistpoty is now off again, enjoying the weekend... cya | 14:42 | |
tacone | \sh: congratulations :) when will we be able to download bug informations for offline usage? (ok ok.. jocking) | 14:43 |
\sh | tacone: please file a wishlist report (seriously) :) | 14:43 |
\sh | tacone: I thought about that already, tbh | 14:44 |
tacone | \sh: I feared you would have asked that. | 14:44 |
tacone | ehehe | 14:44 |
tacone | \sh: seems I can't mark it as wishlist myself https://bugs.launchpad.net/leonov/+bug/243960 | 14:47 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 243960 in leonov "Please store bug information for offline usage" [Undecided,New] | 14:47 |
\sh | tacone: done :) | 14:48 |
tacone | \sh: nice | 14:48 |
\sh | ah da nixternal | 14:48 |
\sh | phew... | 14:52 |
nixternal | yay power | 14:52 |
persia | nixternal: You're one of those kubuntu folk right? Are you guys chasing NBS yet? There seems to be a few packages listed... | 14:53 |
\sh | nixternal: dude, you are also mentioned in our announcement :) | 14:54 |
nixternal | what announcement? | 14:55 |
\sh | nixternal: check p.u.c | 14:55 |
nixternal | persia: dunno, ask Riddell...I have been working to much lately, so unfortunately I haven't been that close to what is going on | 14:55 |
nixternal | hehe, \sh...that has come along quick man...I liked reading the posts seeing how much it changed almost daily | 14:58 |
nixternal | good job! | 14:58 |
geser | \sh: p.u.c is ambiguous: people.u.c, packages.u.c, planet.u.c :) | 14:59 |
\sh | nixternal: that's only the beginning of something really bug^Wbig | 14:59 |
wgrant | popcon as well! | 14:59 |
wgrant | I wonder if any other letter is as ambiguous. | 14:59 |
nixternal | geser: ya, I did packages.ubuntu.com at first :P | 14:59 |
\sh | damn...b.u.c is missing...beer.ubuntu.com ;) | 14:59 |
nixternal | then I went, OH! Planet! | 14:59 |
\sh | packages is pkg.u.c. ;) | 15:00 |
Riddell | persia: NBS? | 15:29 |
geser | siretart: Hi, as you seem to care about ffmpeg-free: should "ffmpeg-config --libs avformat" result in the same output as "pkg-config --libs libavformat"? | 15:38 |
geser | I ask because I stumbled about a package which FTBFS (moc) because ffmpeg-config still lists "-la52" | 15:38 |
persia | Riddell: http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-archive/NBS/ | 15:42 |
persia | Looks like either there's a lot of changes expected, or lots of rebuilds to process. | 15:42 |
Riddell | changes are expected, since we moved to KDE 4 | 15:45 |
persia | Riddell: OK. I won't poke them then. Thanks. | 15:47 |
siretart | geser: ffmpeg-config will go away in the next upload. please make the package use pkg-config instead | 15:50 |
geser | siretart: I've done that. I just wondered if the output of ffmpeg-config should match the output of pkg-config as long as ffmpeg-config still exists. | 15:55 |
siretart | geser: it probably should. that's one of the reasons why we want to get rid of ffmpeg-config | 16:04 |
persia | Does anyone have a good ddeb recovery hook for sbuild? I'm generating ddebs, but throwing them away, which doesn't seem ideal. | 16:20 |
=== wolfger__ is now known as wolfger | ||
devfil_ | persia: wow, a lot of upload today | 16:26 |
persia | devfil_: Trying to clean up some of the outstanding transitions for universe. | 16:27 |
devfil_ | persia: good job | 16:27 |
AnAnt | Hello | 16:27 |
devfil_ | hi AnAnt | 16:27 |
persia | Bah. Uploaded things out of order again :( At least the retry button works. | 16:28 |
AnAnt | persia: that brainstorm discussion is dead ? | 16:29 |
devfil_ | persia: nobody is perfect | 16:29 |
persia | AnAnt: I think so. | 16:29 |
AnAnt | persia: ok, I know I'm asking for a big thing, I mean about glibc | 16:40 |
persia | -ECONTEXT | 16:41 |
AnAnt | huh ? | 16:41 |
AnAnt | what's that ? | 16:41 |
persia | Context error, meaning I have no idea about what you are writing | 16:41 |
AnAnt | persia: the suggestion I mentioned on brainstorm post | 16:42 |
laga | persia: i prefer this: http://heresabunnywithapancakeonitshead.com/ | 16:42 |
AnAnt | is packages.ubuntu.com working ? | 16:42 |
persia | AnAnt: Oh, right. Alternate calendars. I have no idea how that might work, but think it deserves it's own idea on brainstorm, rather than getting mixed in with that one. | 16:48 |
AnAnt | is there a problem with packages.ubuntu.com ? | 16:49 |
i4x | hi everyone! | 16:52 |
i4x | I want to use a .deb package to install some files, but I'm not sure where to put them. I'm using the openweakhardy/PackagingA tutorial and the only problem I have is to install that files! | 16:55 |
i4x | where do I put them? in ed-0.9/debian/ folder?? | 16:56 |
i4x | I created 'ed-0.9/debian/tmp/mp/' and 'ed-0.9/debian/tmp/database/' folders. made the 'debuild -us -uc' and it returned no errors! | 16:58 |
persia | i4x: What kind of files? | 16:59 |
i4x | but when installing, the postinst can't find the folders and .... | 16:59 |
i4x | persia: I need to install: /tmp/database/mp.sql and /tmp/mp/runner (script) | 17:00 |
bobbo | AnAnt: yeah package.ubuntu.com is down for me too | 17:01 |
bobbo | s/package/packages | 17:02 |
nhandler | I have a quick question. The package I am working on comes with .desktop files (not the debian directory). The package does not have a patch system in place. Should I add a patch system to the package in order to modify the .desktop files? If so, which type of patch system should I use? Or should I just modify the .desktop files in the debdiff? | 17:02 |
persia | i4x: You really don't want to install anything to /tmp. Why not install the sql into /usr/share/$(package)/$(package).sql, and embed the script in the postinst? | 17:02 |
geser | nhandler: I'd only add a patch system for big changes | 17:03 |
nhandler | geser, So for this instance, it would be better to modify something outside of the /debian directory in the debdiff than to add a patch system? | 17:03 |
persia | nhandler: I'd recommend checking other packages by the same maintainer, and possibly introducing a patch system that matches their style. | 17:03 |
geser | nhandler: especially if the package has already some changes (from Debian) adding a patch system isn't wise (for small changes) as you end with some changes as patches (Ubuntu) and some changes applied directly (Debian) | 17:04 |
* persia very strongly agrees with geser about packages with changes in diff.gz | 17:04 | |
i4x | persia: the script will be installed to init.d to run at startup, and the database will only be used once by postinst that installs the database and then removes it. | 17:05 |
geser | nhandler: depending how much you want to change, I wouldn't add a patch system just to change a few lines in a .desktop file | 17:05 |
persia | i4x: For the init script, investigate dh_installinit. For the sql, I still think it belongs in /usr/share/$(package)/$(package).sql for later reference by the user. | 17:06 |
nhandler | geser, It looks like I'll just be adding Icon lines to a few .desktop files that are in the package. I might also be making a few minor changes to the .desktop files to make them validate. | 17:06 |
persia | geser: I've had more success getting patches into Debian when I follow the maintainer's style, which is why I recommend that research. | 17:06 |
i4x | persia: I know there are some .ex files as init.d.ex .. but I don't understand so much to use them. and, are you saying to install the sql to /usr/share/$(package)/$(package).sql ? if so, how? | 17:08 |
persia | i4x: Put it in debian/ then add it to your $(package).install file. | 17:09 |
i4x | persia: hm, ok.. I'll search for the *.install file.. | 17:10 |
persia | i4x: read the manual pages for dh_install and dh_installinit | 17:10 |
nhandler | persia and geser: It looks like the Debian maintainer only has 7 packages. I'll look at them and see if I can find a preferred patch system. If I can't, I think I'll just include the changes in the debdiff | 17:10 |
i4x | persia: thx, I'll do that! (y) | 17:11 |
nhandler | persia, I just checked all 7 of the Maintainer's packages. None of them use a patch system. In this case, do you agree that I should just include the changes to the files that are outside of the debian directory in the debdiff? | 17:18 |
persia | nhandler: Very much so. | 17:18 |
nhandler | geser and persia: Thank you for your help. I'll go and make the changes now. | 17:18 |
porthose | warp10: ping | 17:32 |
alex-weej | i'm looking to build the debian package for nautilus-open-terminal on Hardy | 17:38 |
alex-weej | the version for Debian Experimental requires a newer version of libpango (i guess because it was just built against it) | 17:38 |
alex-weej | how do i get the source from DebExp? | 17:38 |
ScottK-laptop | If it's in experimental, it's probably there for a good reason. | 17:39 |
alex-weej | there's nothing much experimental about nautilus-open-terminal | 17:39 |
alex-weej | it gets about 3 commits a year | 17:39 |
ScottK-laptop | One was is to go to packages.qa.debian.org, find the package package page, and then dget -x the .dsc. | 17:39 |
alex-weej | thanks, i see the DSCs | 17:40 |
ScottK-laptop | It might be building against the new libpango is the only reason it's there. | 17:40 |
alex-weej | ScottK-laptop: that got me a .orig.tar.gz and a .diff.gz | 17:41 |
ScottK-laptop | Did you use -x? | 17:41 |
alex-weej | (sorry, i'm used to apt-get source wiping my bottom for me) | 17:41 |
alex-weej | yes | 17:42 |
ScottK-laptop | It should have unpacked the source too then. | 17:42 |
ScottK-laptop | If it didn't, you can dpkg-source -x filename.dsc to unpack it. | 17:42 |
alex-weej | it bombed here" dscverify: can't find any Debian keyrings | 17:42 |
ScottK-laptop | So it couldn't verify the signature. | 17:43 |
ScottK-laptop | IIRC, the package with the Debian Keyring in it is deceptively called debian-keyring. | 17:43 |
ScottK-laptop | I've got a little X windows problem here, so I'll be back (hopefully) in a little bit. | 17:44 |
ScottK-laptop | Hopefully that will be better. | 17:48 |
alex-weej | OK, nautilus-open-terminal package in Debian Experimental builds fine on Hardy | 17:48 |
alex-weej | and works as expected | 17:48 |
alex-weej | what do i need to do to get it pushed into Hardy Universe? | 17:48 |
ScottK-laptop | It needs to get into Intrepid. | 17:48 |
alex-weej | can it then go via hardy-backports->hardy-updates? | 17:49 |
ScottK-laptop | Not usally. | 17:49 |
ScottK-laptop | What bug are you fixing to get it updated? | 17:49 |
alex-weej | the on-desktop behaviour drops you in $HOME previously | 17:49 |
ScottK-laptop | Is there a bug? | 17:49 |
alex-weej | it was fixed, with the old behaviour being in a gconf option | 17:49 |
alex-weej | a long time ago | 17:49 |
alex-weej | and 0.9 was released on 28 February 2008, so the debian packages have just been lagging | 17:50 |
ScottK-laptop | Intrepid already has 0.9 | 17:50 |
alex-weej | oh... hmm... i probably should have just used that | 17:51 |
alex-weej | haha, oh well | 17:51 |
alex-weej | yay, now to just drop the habit of typing cd ~/Desktop every time i open a terminal | 17:52 |
ScottK-laptop | alex-weej: I don't think this qualifies for -updates. It's not a regression, data loss, or crash issue. | 17:53 |
ScottK-laptop | You could get the new version in -backports. | 17:53 |
alex-weej | ok, is it a lot of effort? | 17:54 |
ScottK-laptop | No. | 17:54 |
alex-weej | what do i do? | 17:55 |
ScottK-laptop | You've already done virtually all the work (testing). | 17:55 |
ScottK-laptop | !backports | alex-weej | 17:55 |
ubottu | alex-weej: If new updated Ubuntu packages are built for an application, then they may go into Ubuntu Backports. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports - See also !packaging | 17:55 |
ScottK-laptop | You file a bug against the hardy-backports project as described above. | 17:55 |
alex-weej | got it, thanks | 17:55 |
ScottK-laptop | alex-weej: Ping me when it's done and I'll approve it. | 17:56 |
alex-weej | well... i haven't really tested it properly... :S | 17:56 |
alex-weej | i mean, it works | 17:56 |
alex-weej | maybe i should use it for a bit first | 17:56 |
ScottK-laptop | For backports, the standard is "Builds, installs, runs" - You pass that. | 17:57 |
ScottK-laptop | More testing is welcome, but you've done the minimum. | 17:57 |
ScottK-laptop | Note that backports is not enabled by default for what are generally considered good reasons ... | 17:57 |
ScottK-laptop | Actually we have very few problems. | 17:57 |
alex-weej | yeah of course | 17:57 |
alex-weej | ok just a mo | 17:58 |
alex-weej | ScottK: you beat me to the original bug :P | 18:03 |
ScottK-laptop | ;-) | 18:03 |
alex-weej | i will link it in the backport request | 18:03 |
=== _neversfelde is now known as neversfelde | ||
alex-weej | ScottK: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hardy-backports/+bug/244017 | 18:06 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 244017 in hardy-backports "Backport nautilus-open-terminal 0.9 from Intrepid to Hardy" [Undecided,New] | 18:06 |
ScottK-laptop | alex-weej: Mark it confirmed to show you've tested it. | 18:07 |
alex-weej | done | 18:08 |
ScottK-laptop | alex-weej: Approved and passed to the archive-admins. It should get backported the next time the process backports. | 18:10 |
alex-weej | cheers | 18:10 |
i4x | ppl, I'm trying to understand how to use 'dh_install', but I'm confused.. anyone knows how to use it and gives me an example? I just need to understand how the package recognizes the folders/files to install and moves them! | 18:13 |
ScottK-laptop | i4x: Did you read man dh_intall? | 18:14 |
i4x | ScottK-laptop: yes, I did! | 18:16 |
ScottK-laptop | i4x: Did you see the bit about "debian/package.install"? | 18:17 |
i4x | ScottK-laptop: I've no '($package).install' file.. | 18:19 |
ScottK-laptop | Make one that lists the files you want installed. | 18:19 |
i4x | ScottK-laptop: do I have to modify anything in rules? | 18:20 |
i4x | ok, but where do I create it? debian/ ? | 18:20 |
ScottK-laptop | Yes. | 18:21 |
i4x | and what should I put there? | 18:21 |
ScottK-laptop | A list of the files to install. | 18:21 |
i4x | '/folder/to/create/file' ?? only? | 18:22 |
i4x | and will the 'package.install' be recognized automatic while debuilding? or should I run 'dh_install' something? | 18:25 |
ScottK-laptop | Is your debian/rules cdbs or debhelper? | 18:25 |
ScottK-laptop | If it's CDBS, it's automatic magic. If it's debhelper, dh_install needs to be called, but it's in the standard template. | 18:26 |
i4x | ScottK-laptop: "# Sample debian/rules that uses debhelper." | 18:31 |
i4x | 'standard template'? | 18:31 |
ScottK-laptop | Yes. | 18:32 |
i4x | ScottK-laptop: what do you mean with 'standard template'? | 18:33 |
ScottK-laptop | When you run dh_make to start making a debhelper based package, it makes a standard rules file. That's what I mean. | 18:34 |
i4x | ScottK-laptop: "dh_install needs to be called, but it's in the standard template." it means that the rules (standard template) calls 'dh_install' ? | 18:37 |
i4x | if so, my problem is resolved. if not, how when and how do I call dh_install? | 18:37 |
ScottK-laptop | i4x: Please pastebin your debian/rules. | 18:38 |
i4x | ScottK-laptop: http://pastebin.com/d400d5b5d | 18:41 |
ScottK-laptop | Looking | 18:42 |
ScottK-laptop | i4x: Look at line 74. It's commeted out. Remove the "#" and you should be good. | 18:43 |
i4x | ScottK-laptop: ok, I'll do that! another 2 questions: since the package has the name 'ed-0.9', should I create 'debian/ed-0.9.install' ? and to use 'dh_installinit' is the same thing as 'dh_install', isn't it? | 18:50 |
ScottK-laptop | No and No. | 18:51 |
i4x | ScottK-laptop: so, what name I call the 'package.install' file? | 18:53 |
ScottK-laptop | ed.install | 18:54 |
ScottK-laptop | -0.9 is the version. | 18:54 |
ScottK-laptop | jdong: Just because it's summer vacation for you doesn't mean you're off duty on backports. | 19:09 |
* ScottK-laptop just ack'ed ~20 for Hardy. | 19:09 | |
nxvl | siretart: around? | 19:16 |
i4x | ScottK-laptop: I'm having this problem: "cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp//tmp/mp/runner': No such file or directory" after 'dh_install --sourcedir=debian/tmp' | 19:23 |
ScottK-laptop | i4x: Try it without the /tmp | 19:24 |
i4x | * "cp: cannot stat `debian//tmp/mp/runner': No such file or directory" | 19:25 |
ScottK-laptop | I suspect you also need $(curdir)/debian (that's from memory so the syntax may not be perfect. | 19:25 |
i4x | the problem is in the both '/' in the middle! | 19:31 |
i4x | 'rules' has 'dh_install --sourcedir=debian' | 19:31 |
i4x | and the 'ed.install' has 'tmp/mp/runner' . | 19:31 |
i4x | but it puts 2 '/' in the middle! | 19:31 |
i4x | but ScottK-laptop, do you know why it puts the // between 'debian' and 'tmp/mp/runner' ? | 19:36 |
nxvl | ScottK-laptop: is there any doc somewhere on how to test you .debs? | 19:38 |
ScottK-laptop | i4x: No, but I don't think it matters. | 19:39 |
ScottK-laptop | nxvl: Context please? | 19:39 |
nxvl | ScottK-laptop: i still have an rpath issue with augeas, but i don't know how to test the .debs to see if they still have it | 19:40 |
ScottK-laptop | How do you know you still have it? | 19:40 |
nxvl | ScottK-laptop: because siretart say i still have it (after reviewing it) | 19:41 |
ScottK-laptop | Ah. | 19:41 |
ScottK-laptop | Does lintian run against the .deb complain about it? | 19:41 |
nxvl | and i don'y want to try to fix the problem, upload it, and wait for someone to tell me it's already fixed or not | 19:41 |
nxvl | i have run it | 19:41 |
nxvl | but nothing shows up | 19:41 |
ScottK-laptop | nxvl: Have you seen http://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue | 19:44 |
nxvl | ScottK-laptop: yep | 19:45 |
ScottK-laptop | nxvl: What happens when you grep aclocal.m4, configure.in or configure.ac for hardcode_into_libs | 19:47 |
i4x | ScottK-laptop: it makes the 'cp' return: "cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp//tmp/mp/runner': No such file or directory". So I think that the problem is there! | 19:47 |
i4x | * "cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp//mp/runner': No such file or directory" | 19:47 |
ScottK-laptop | i4x: At this point I usually login to my pbuilder chroot, use debuild to build the package and then see what dirs/files are present when it dies. | 19:48 |
nxvl | ScottK-laptop: a lot of "yes" show up | 19:49 |
ScottK-laptop | nxvl: Then based on that wiki page, I'd say that's how you know. | 19:50 |
nxvl | ScottK-laptop: yes, but the problem is: should i use a patch system? or should i run sed on the debian/rules (this hasn't worked early) | 19:51 |
ScottK-laptop | nxvl: I'm not sure. I'd tend to go with patch system. | 19:52 |
nxvl | ScottK-laptop: but patch is before configure | 19:53 |
warp10 | porthose: pong | 19:58 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
porthose | warp10: can I send you a pm :) | 20:03 |
warp10 | porthose: for sure! BTW, I'm just reading your mail :) | 20:03 |
porthose | cool that's what it's about | 20:04 |
porthose | warp10: email me with what you decide please, have to get ready for work (sigh) | 20:07 |
warp10 | porthose: no problem at all about a new mentee for me. BTW, once big Cesare expressed some concerns about people mentoring people speaking the same mother-tongue | 20:08 |
norsetto | warp10: I'm not big, I'm just weight-challenged | 20:09 |
warp10 | norsetto: heh... speaking about the devil... | 20:09 |
norsetto | warp10: yes, its part of the guidelines we discussed, try to avoid mentor-mentee of the same mother-tongue | 20:11 |
porthose | norsetto: np have another I can send warp10 after I do the work thing | 20:13 |
porthose | warp10: would that be Ok | 20:13 |
warp10 | norsetto: I definitely agree. BTW, no problem for me on taking a new mentee (also because David is a little busy at now) | 20:13 |
warp10 | porthose: sounds good! | 20:14 |
norsetto | porthose: sure, how are things going? having fun :-) ? | 20:14 |
porthose | norsetto: getting organized and trying to make my first match | 20:15 |
porthose | norsetto: but alas duty (work) calls, bye | 20:17 |
norsetto | porthose: bye | 20:17 |
warp10 | bye porthose | 20:18 |
norsetto | warp10: say the truth, you are also looking forward to working on Sunday, or Christmas Eve | 20:19 |
warp10 | norsetto: I like to work on Sunday, but not on Christmas Eve, indeed! | 20:19 |
bobbo | warp10: hey Andrea! | 20:21 |
warp10 | Ciao bobbo! How do you do? | 20:21 |
bobbo | warp10: un-banned from the computer :D | 20:22 |
bobbo | unfortunately im on holiday for a week tomorrow, then have a job all summer, but at least i can check my emails | 20:22 |
warp10 | bobbo: unbanned? great! Intrepid really needs your help to be a rocking distro! | 20:23 |
bobbo | warp10: hehe, 30 uploads so far in Intrepid, itll be rocking already :P | 20:24 |
* norsetto didn't even know there was a way to see how many uploads one did | 20:25 | |
warp10 | bobbo: 30, really? sounds great! | 20:26 |
bobbo | norsetto: i wrote my own PHP+MySQL app to log my uploads, i add the details into the db then it shows a load of statistics etc about it | 20:26 |
bobbo | warp10: hehe, i think its around 28 at the moment, but i have some to add in when my server gets back up | 20:27 |
warp10 | norsetto: Dktrkranz wrote a small python script to get the ranking | 20:27 |
* warp10 runs the script | 20:28 | |
norsetto | bobbo, warp10: interesting, how do these scripts work? bobbo one I guess is local, but the dktrkranz one I guess is operating on the LP db? | 20:28 |
bobbo | norsetto: yeah mine is local, Dktrkranzes sounds interesting | 20:29 |
warp10 | norsetto: nope, it gets data from <distro>changes@ mailing list | 20:30 |
norsetto | warp10: ah, I didn't know the uploader was in those emails | 20:30 |
bobbo | warp10: have you got a link to that script? | 20:30 |
warp10 | norsetto, bobbo: http://paste.beeseek.org/36 | 20:31 |
bobbo | warp10: thanks :D | 20:31 |
warp10 | bobbo: ;) | 20:32 |
norsetto | warp10: ah, ok, thats not the uploader then | 20:32 |
warp10 | norsetto: nope, it's just the "changed by" field. | 20:33 |
warp10 | bobbo: you are 23rd in the list, with 26 packages | 20:33 |
bobbo | 26 packages, almost 30 (ish) :P | 20:33 |
norsetto | warp10: I guess one could also see the uploader by checking the gpg key though | 20:33 |
bobbo | 1Jonathan Riddell (266 packages) o.0 | 20:34 |
warp10 | norsetto: well, I would like to modify that script using gpg keys to make a sponsors ranking, indeed | 20:34 |
warp10 | norsetto: it shouldn't be that difficult | 20:35 |
norsetto | warp10: the difficult bit would be to collect all the gpg keys | 20:35 |
warp10 | norsetto: indeed. That would probably require some work with Launchpad | 20:36 |
* norsetto wonders who root was | 20:38 | |
warp10 | norsetto: the real mysterious one is 141??????? (1 packages) | 20:39 |
norsetto | warp10: also, i was surprised to see that siretart had only 1 upload, until I saw that he is uploading with his real name too :-) | 20:40 |
warp10 | :D | 20:40 |
=== bmk789__ is now known as bmk789 | ||
i4x | norsetto: are you there? | 21:37 |
norsetto | i4x: yes sir | 21:38 |
=== pgquiles_ is now known as pgquiles | ||
i4x | norsetto: already there? I'm having problems building a package.. because it puts 2 '/' between 'debian' and 'tmp/mp/database.sql', returning error. | 22:23 |
i4x | *still there? | 22:24 |
norsetto | i4x: that shouldn't be a problem; anyhow, check dir names in debian/rules (and perhaps also debian/*.install) | 22:25 |
i4x | I checked! | 22:27 |
i4x | norsetto: debian/rules has 'dh_install --sourcedir=$(CURDIR)/debian' and debian/ed.install has 'tmp/mp/database.sql' | 22:29 |
i4x | I can't understand why appears '//' between 'debian' and 'tmp/...' | 22:30 |
i4x | norsetto: | 22:33 |
i4x | dh_install --sourcedir=/home/i4/Desktop/final/package2/ed-0.9/debian | 22:33 |
i4x | cp: cannot stat `/home/i4/Desktop/final/package2/ed-0.9/debian//tmp/mp/temporario': No such file or directory | 22:33 |
i4x | any idea? | 22:34 |
norsetto | i4x: the path seem wrong, you should use relative paths only unless you want things to fails in chroot, pbuilder, etc. | 22:36 |
warp10 | Any REVU admin around? | 22:37 |
jpds | warp10: key sync? | 22:43 |
geser | i4x: and that path is really there? | 22:44 |
warp10 | jpds: no, REVU still sees me as a contributor, I would like to fix that | 22:44 |
jpds | warp10: One moment please. | 22:45 |
i4x | norsetto and geser: this is the path: '/home/i4/Desktop/final/package2/ed-0.9/debian/tmp/mp/' | 22:46 |
i4x | but I just need one '/', not 2. | 22:47 |
jpds | warp10: "Altering warp10@ubuntu.com to level reviewer"- | 22:48 |
geser | i4x: what gives "ls -l /home/i4/Desktop/final/package2/ed-0.9/debian//tmp/mp" ? | 22:50 |
warp10 | jpds: mmm... my login is warp10@libero.it, but if you can change it to warp10@ubuntu.com I would prefer it. If I try to login with @ubuntu.com, it says "There is no REVU account for warp10@ubuntu.com, yet." | 22:51 |
i4x | geser: that returns: ls: cannot access /home/i4/Desktop/final/package2/ed-0.9/debian//tmp/mp: No such file or directory | 22:51 |
jpds | warp10: You'll have to upload a package with that email. | 22:51 |
jpds | warp10: Unless you'd prefer to use the old login. | 22:51 |
warp10 | jpds: I am seen as a contributor with the old login. BTW, I should upload a package within days, that should fix everything | 22:52 |
jpds | warp10: OK, ping me when you've uploaded with the new email and I'll bump the level. | 22:53 |
* jpds goes to bed. Night all. | 22:54 | |
nxvl | why do we install recommends by default | 22:54 |
nxvl | is a mess | 22:54 |
nxvl | :S | 22:54 |
geser | i4x: the extra / should hurt, does "ls -l /home/i4/Desktop/final/package2/ed-0.9/debian//tmp" work? | 22:54 |
warp10 | jpds: great. Thank you so much! | 22:54 |
norsetto | i4x: the problem is surely not the doubl / | 22:54 |
geser | nxvl: :) just file bugs about wrong recommends | 22:54 |
i4x | norsetto and geser: it seems that 'debuild' removes the folder debian/tmp !! | 22:55 |
i4x | and then, when needed, it can't find it! | 22:56 |
geser | yes, the clean target gets called before build | 22:56 |
i4x | geser: what should I do? | 22:57 |
i4x | :S | 22:57 |
nxvl | geser: all? | 22:57 |
nxvl | :D | 22:57 |
geser | nxvl: if all are wrong then yes | 22:57 |
nxvl | yes | 22:57 |
nxvl | they ALL are wrong | 22:57 |
nxvl | :P | 22:57 |
geser | i4x: can you pastebin your debian/rules? | 22:58 |
geser | nxvl: now you have a good reason to fix it now :) | 22:58 |
i4x | sure! | 22:58 |
i4x | geser: ..a moment, please! | 22:58 |
i4x | geser: http://pastebin.com/d312c383d | 23:00 |
nxvl | geser: i mean, the recommends are not strictly necesary and they affect the choose option | 23:01 |
nxvl | it's just wrong | 23:01 |
i4x | geser: should I move 'dh_install --sourcedir=$(CURDIR)/debian' before 'dh_clean' ? | 23:01 |
geser | no, your rules file looks ok | 23:04 |
i4x | geser: do you have any idea? | 23:05 |
geser | not yet | 23:08 |
albert23 | i4x: do you have a file debian/compat? If so, which value is in it? | 23:08 |
i4x | albert23: 5 | 23:08 |
geser | i4x: can you make the whole source package available? so I can look at it | 23:09 |
i4x | iupiiiiiii!! | 23:10 |
i4x | it seems it worked!! | 23:10 |
i4x | geser and albert23: I changed debian/rules with 'dh_install --sourcedir=/home/i4/Desktop/final/package2' | 23:11 |
i4x | and moved the folder 'tmp' from debian/ to /home/i4/Desktop/final/package2/ | 23:12 |
i4x | now the tmp is available to dh_install ! | 23:13 |
geser | how did you create the files in debian/tmp before? | 23:14 |
geser | i4x: I guess you don't need the --sourcedir anymore which has also the advantage that other people can build the package too | 23:15 |
i4x | geser: before, I moved the files to debian/tmp.. | 23:16 |
geser | i4x: which is bad as dh_clean removes the debian/tmp dir as that's where usually make install temporarily installs the build source and dh_install moves the files from there to the specified locations | 23:19 |
i4x | and this is only a practice exercise. I'm making a mini-project to Sistem Programming (school).. but as I ever wanted to know how the packages are made, I decided to deliver de mini-project in one package! so I don't need to burn virtual-machines nor a big manual to the teacher evaluate! now, the teacher just installs the package! | 23:20 |
i4x | geser and albert23: thank you a lot for the help and time spent! See you someday.. I hope have some time to start building some decent packages! and learn how to fix some bugs! :D | 23:26 |
nxvl | siretart: around? | 23:30 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!