| === bdmurray changed the topic of #ubuntu-bugs to: Ubuntu BugSquad | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad | Documentation: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/HelpingWithBugs | If you have been triaging bugs for a while, please apply to https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol/ | Want to report a bug? Read https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs | User support (not related to triage) is in #ubuntu | ||
| Rocket2DMn | ogra, are you available? | 01:40 |
|---|---|---|
| Rocket2DMn | nvm ogra , sorry to bother | 01:47 |
| === mrtsunami__ is now known as mrtsunami | ||
| === mrtsunami_ is now known as mrtsunami | ||
| bliZZardz | w.r.t bug #228003 , openoffice.org-java-common is not part of the OO install. This does not look like a packaging bug but more of a an upstream one. Can someone give some ideas or correct me if i am wrong. | 05:37 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 228003 in openoffice.org "Impossible to enable java in openoffice.org" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/228003 | 05:37 |
| === LucidFox is now known as WebstripFox | ||
| === WebstripFox is now known as LucidFox | ||
| mcas | hi | 10:07 |
| bliZZardz | hello | 10:08 |
| kgoetz | sigh. trying to build 5-a-day on etch is a pita. all sorts of ubuntu-only packages i need to try and rebuild | 10:48 |
| hefe_bia | Hi! I have a short question: On bug 223280 somebody set it to Committed for the Ubuntu package while it is only fixed in upstream CVS. Should I set it back to confirmed? | 14:30 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 223280 in rdiff-backup "rdiff-backup fails on file with unknown unicode character" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/223280 | 14:30 |
| techno_freak | hefe_bia, fix has been committed in the upstream source | 14:32 |
| techno_freak | hefe_bia, hence it is the right status | 14:33 |
| hefe_bia | Ok, thanks. I think https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status is a little misleading in this case. | 14:35 |
| hefe_bia | Maybe "For an Ubuntu package, the changes are pending and to be uploaded soon (it's what PENDINGUPLOAD was in Bugzilla)" should be amended with "or fixed upstream." | 14:37 |
| Hobbsee | techno_freak: or "fixed somewhere" ie "there is a fix" | 14:39 |
| Hobbsee | it doesn't necessarily have to be in the upstream source, afaik. | 14:39 |
| techno_freak | Hobbsee, ok :) | 14:39 |
| Hobbsee | oh, interesting, it's changed meanings slightly. | 14:40 |
| hefe_bia | So I guess anywhere where it will make it into the Ubuntu package someday? | 14:41 |
| techno_freak | hefe_bia, you can also comment it to the bug report | 14:41 |
| hefe_bia | techno_freak: It's already commented there. | 14:43 |
| hefe_bia | I was mislead by Bugs/Status - I thought "For an upstream project..." rule would only apply to the bug status regarding a "project", not the Ubuntu package. | 14:44 |
| Hobbsee | bug 150484 | 14:50 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 150484 in batik "batik has FTFBS forever" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/150484 | 14:50 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| bliZZardz | w.r.t bug # 241018, there is no 'fix' as such.. what should the bug status be? | 16:20 |
| gnomefreak | bug 241018 | 16:28 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 241018 in openoffice.org "OOo 2.4.1 crashes on Export (to PDF) - Spreadsheet" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/241018 | 16:28 |
| bliZZardz | gnomefreak : (am tempted to ask this Q to u ) is GNOME's memory footprint larger than KDE? | 16:30 |
| gnomefreak | adding the upstream bug to the lp bug report is a good start so it can move to confirmed | 16:30 |
| gnomefreak | bliZZardz: offhand not sure | 16:30 |
| gnomefreak | but decide what upstream link you should use | 16:30 |
| gnomefreak | since they are different upstream bug numbers | 16:30 |
| bliZZardz | gnomefreak : even the upstream doesnt have a 'fix' - they just said the same | 16:31 |
| gnomefreak | bliZZardz: if they are still open it would suggest they are being worked on? | 16:31 |
| gnomefreak | theme integration is optional as i recall and if its needed to make it not crash there is a problem that needs to be fixed | 16:32 |
| bliZZardz | gnomefreak : they are CLOSED upstream. Am not sure what is the equivalent of 'CLOSED' in lp. | 16:32 |
| gnomefreak | bliZZardz: invalid | 16:32 |
| gnomefreak | fix released if ther eis a fix | 16:33 |
| gnomefreak | there isnt | 16:33 |
| bliZZardz | ok - then i will invalidate it | 16:33 |
| gnomefreak | i still think ther eis a bug there that needs to be looked at or others will crash it since theme integration isnt manditory but i dont do OO.o fixes | 16:34 |
| bliZZardz | and what to do if Windows bug is reported in LP :P ? (bug 240159) | 16:34 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 240159 in openoffice.org "Last page isn't printed..." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/240159 | 16:34 |
| bliZZardz | ok - i get your point. i shall mention the same in the comment. | 16:34 |
| bliZZardz | but that means that an equivalent bug in upstream also should be opened - isnt it? | 16:35 |
| gnomefreak | bliZZardz: i commented on it | 16:36 |
| gnomefreak | that bug needs an upstream bug attached if it happens on windows maybe its jus the locale being used | 16:36 |
| gnomefreak | bliZZardz: there maybe one already that they havent seen yet | 16:37 |
| bliZZardz | you mean an upstream bug which is already existing for the former bug? | 16:39 |
| gnomefreak | its very possible | 16:40 |
| gnomefreak | there should be upstream bugs on both bugs that i looked at | 16:40 |
| gnomefreak | but that is up to OO.o guys | 16:40 |
| bliZZardz | gnomefreak : but shouldnt WE link it to upstream | 16:42 |
| gnomefreak | bliZZardz: we should | 16:47 |
| gnomefreak | we do | 16:47 |
| gnomefreak | we sometimes file it upstream for the users atleast we as in mozilla-ubuntu devs do | 16:48 |
| macd | bug 222804 seems fairly important, and is indicated its fixed, however it is not | 16:56 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 222804 in fail2ban "fail2ban fails to start after reboot" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/222804 | 16:56 |
| gnomefreak | it says confirmed from what i see | 17:16 |
| gnomefreak | it maybe fixed in intrepid just not hardy could be fora few reasons | 17:18 |
| sectech | hello hello | 17:18 |
| gnomefreak | may not meet SRU and if so noone felt like filing a backport bug for it but make sure it doesnt meet SRU before filing backport bug | 17:19 |
| gnomefreak | hi sectech | 17:19 |
| === mcas is now known as mcas_away | ||
| macd | gnomefreak, yeah its fixed in intrepid, as sid has it already, just not in hardy, but it really seems like it should be a SRU for hardy | 18:22 |
| gnomefreak | than i would folloow the instructions on the wiki for SRU and get it done that way | 18:24 |
| * gnomefreak gone for the rest of today ive caught up on my work for this week | 18:24 | |
| macd | gnomefreak, ty I was planning on that ;P | 18:25 |
| === geser_ is now known as geser | ||
| iustin | hi, anyone could help me with pointers on how to deal with a bug? | 18:49 |
| techno_freak | iustin, sure | 18:51 |
| iustin | thanks | 18:51 |
| techno_freak | iustin, never ask to ask, just ask your question :) | 18:51 |
| iustin | so I'm one of the Debian maintainers for the package ganeti, and in Ubuntu there's a (valid) bug (243828) about the version of the package in hardy | 18:52 |
| techno_freak | bug #243828 | 18:52 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 243828 in ganeti "should depend on python-simplejson" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/243828 | 18:52 |
| iustin | the version in debian is fixed for a while, but hardy has an old version without the fix | 18:53 |
| iustin | since I think hardy is released, can this be fixed in the hardy version? or is it too minor? | 18:53 |
| techno_freak | Iulian, if am not wrong, we can mark it as fix released. can you comment in that bug, as well confirm it? | 18:53 |
| techno_freak | err... iustin ^^ | 18:53 |
| techno_freak | sorry Iulian | 18:54 |
| Iulian | No problem. | 18:54 |
| iustin | so, the bug editor allows me to choose either confirmed or fix released; should I do it in two steps? (first confirmed, and then fix released) | 18:55 |
| techno_freak | Iulian, on the above bug, do we mark it as sync request or something? | 18:55 |
| techno_freak | iustin, fix released and comment will do :) | 18:55 |
| iustin | ah, ok1 | 18:55 |
| iustin | err, ok! | 18:55 |
| Iulian | I think the fix is in Intrepid, not in Hardy. | 18:56 |
| iustin | indeed | 18:56 |
| Iulian | iustin: Check the version from Intrepid. | 18:56 |
| iustin | the version in intrepid is fixed indeed | 18:57 |
| iustin | but the hardy one not | 18:57 |
| techno_freak | so it is fix released right? | 18:57 |
| Iulian | techno_freak: Yes | 18:57 |
| techno_freak | :) | 18:57 |
| iustin | ok, I marked it as such | 18:58 |
| iustin | thanks for the help! | 18:58 |
| techno_freak | welcome anytime :) | 18:58 |
| Rocket2DMn | OK, I need some help on this bug 245645 - should that be added to Wishlist rather than keeping it closed? | 19:10 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 245645 in sun-java5 "There is no ubuntu package for a 64-bit JVM on the 32-bit linux system" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/245645 | 19:10 |
| jonpackard | is there a better getting started guide than the HowToTriage page on the wiki? | 19:43 |
| Rocket2DMn | jonpackard, the guides are really spread out over a few pages | 19:47 |
| Rocket2DMn | there are separate pages for Status, Importance, Responses, and Assignment to name a few | 19:48 |
| jonpackard | thanks! I will keep looking around. I am looking for a good way to get involved. | 19:53 |
| Rocket2DMn | right on | 19:54 |
| jonpackard | I am testing Intrepid right now.. I seem to have my hands full reporting bugs =) | 19:55 |
| jonpackard | It has helped me to get my feet wet with bug reporting and I have seen some good responses to my bug reports. Launchpad is a very positive environment. | 19:57 |
| Rocket2DMn | well if you havent been to this page, its a good place to start - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DocumentationTeam | 20:00 |
| Rocket2DMn | you would want to join DocuMENTORS | 20:00 |
| Rocket2DMn | wait wtf am i saing | 20:00 |
| Rocket2DMn | ignore that | 20:00 |
| Rocket2DMn | wrong channel, lol | 20:00 |
| Rocket2DMn | you want the Bugsquad team on LP | 20:00 |
| Rocket2DMn | jonpackard, once you get a little more experience handling bugs, you can apply for ubuntu-bugcontrol | 20:02 |
| Rocket2DMn | https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol | 20:02 |
| savvas | I'm going to need some help on figuring out the culprits of debian control file fields | 20:09 |
| savvas | I made an sqlite database and imported all the ubuntu packages and ended with these fields: | 20:09 |
| savvas | http://www.pastebin.ca/raw/1063994 | 20:09 |
| savvas | the x-original-maintainer | 20:10 |
| savvas | sorry, the x-original-maintainer should be xsbc-original-maintainer ? | 20:10 |
| jonpackard | Rocket2DMn: Thanks for the tips! | 20:33 |
| === Tyfius is now known as Tyfius_ | ||
| === Tyfius_ is now known as Tyfius | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!