[00:07] <nedko> i've got my package uploaded to ftp://revu.tauware.de/incoming/ shouldnt it go to somewhere else automatically?
[00:08] <nedko> if my key is not in the keyring what should i expect to happen?
[00:08] <nedko> in revu uploaders keyring
[00:09] <nedko> aha!, it needs time :]
[00:29] <vorian> nedko: yes, about 10 minutes or so
[00:32] <nedko> any idea how to check whether my encrypting subkey is ElGamal one?
[02:26] <emgent> night.
[03:03] <ion_> Anyone feel like reviewing http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=compcache-setup? :-)
[03:07] <RAOF> ion_: Haven't you and ogra been back-and-forthing in #ubuntu-devel about that?
[03:08] <ogra> RAOF, only for the part thats in initramfs
[03:08] <ogra> thats the one for hardcore hackers :)
[03:09] <RAOF> Right.
[03:09] <ogra> for normal users there should be a config tool
[03:10] <ion_> The version of compcache-setup i uploaded interacts with the compcache changes that were implemented to initramfs-tools.
[03:10] <ogra> ion_, i'll drop an eye tomorrow (and update the coment thing, sorry missed that) but i got a conf call in 4h and need to sleep a bit before :)
[03:11] <ion_> Alright :-)
[04:09] <dhude> hello
[04:10] <dhude> I just read about this on ubuntu planet
[05:20] <RAOF> asac: Is there a reason why the gnash 0.8.3 merge is sitting on MoM?
[05:20] <RAOF> asac: Or, in other words, mind if I grab that merge?  I want the newer gnash :)
[05:32] <RAOF> asac: Or, perhaps a better question.  Why has Ubuntu's gnash pacakge not been mereged from Debian since gutsy :)
[06:29] <TheMuso> .c
[06:36] <RAOF> Hmph.  I think I know why gnash hasn't been merged since gutsy.  It takes that long to build.
[06:37] <ion_> :-D
[06:37] <mouz> Would somebody mind doing a second review on my packaging of stjerm (a light weight terminal emulator)? Bug 216603, http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=stjerm. Thanks :)
[07:01] <dholbach> good morning
[07:12] <Iulian> Good morning Daniel.
[07:13] <dholbach> hiya Iulian
[07:30] <mouz> ey dholbach I decided to do bugsquad stuff for a while. I believe it is a good way to learn about the development procedures and such :)
[07:31] <dholbach> mouz: that sounds great! :-)
[07:31] <dholbach> keep it up!
[07:38] <Festor> Anybody can review my packages?
[07:38] <Festor> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=gendesign
[07:38] <Festor> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=amsn-desktop-integration
[07:38] <Festor> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=amsn-transparent
[07:38] <Festor> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=lh-abc
[07:38] <Festor> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=rarcrack
[07:38] <Festor> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=ted-tv
[07:49] <Festor> hi?
[07:49] <RAOF> Yeah, we're here.  Just busy :)
[07:50] <Festor> ok.. :/
[07:50] <\sh> grmpf.
[07:50] <\sh> looks like I can't even attend the next UDS :(
[07:51] <RAOF> :(
[07:51] <\sh> because it's in the US :(
[07:52] <\sh> why can't google move to canada?
[07:52] <RAOF> And you're not allowed back in, not after the incident with the mule?
[07:53] <\sh> hehe...nope...until they don't change laws and until they are treating visitors as guests and not as criminals
[08:04] <Iulian> OT: Does anyone know what "Deine Schuld" means?
[08:05] <dholbach> "your fault"
[08:07] <Iulian> dholbach: Ah cool, thanks. Btw Die Ärzte rocks ;-)
[08:07] <dholbach> Iulian: it's been a while since I last listened to anything they wrote :)
[08:07] <dholbach> like 13 years or something :)
[08:08] <Iulian> Hehe, wow.
[08:09] <\sh> dholbach: oh "Die Ärzte"
[08:09] <\sh> The last time I saw them live was during the "Kiss" reunion concert in dortmund 1996 or so
[08:10] <\sh> oh more fun...dns attack scenario...
[08:18] <YokoZar> I want to sync a package that's in Debian's new archive (libtorrent-rasterbar was just added to Debian).  The requestsync tool complains that it doesn't appear to be a package within Debian.
[08:19] <YokoZar> Should I do this manually, or is there something else I should do?
[08:19] <RAOF> YokoZar: Is it out of NEW yet?
[08:19] <YokoZar> RAOF: no.  How long does that take?
[08:19] <RAOF> GAH!  Allow me to read your actual question more thoroughly :)
[08:20] <RAOF> An indeterminate period of time.  And it need not make it out of NEW at all.
[08:20] <RAOF> I think a couple of weeks is a fairly reasonable upper bound.
[08:21] <RAOF> Presumably you want to sync it so that one of the hojilion torrent apps which include their own copy of (some) libtorrent can be built against the external lib?
[08:21] <YokoZar> RAOF: Yes, namely a new package I'm making
[08:22] <RAOF> If so, I believe standard practice is to copy the package from NEW, append a ~build1 or somesuch, and upload.
[08:22] <YokoZar> RAOF: no sync request needed?
[08:22] <RAOF> No.  I don't think we can sync from NEW.
[08:23] <YokoZar> RAOF: I guess I need to manually change the maintainer and such to MOTU
[08:23] <YokoZar> Which is handled nicely when someone else is doing the syncing ;)
[08:23] <RAOF> Not for fakesyncs, which is what this is.
[08:23] <YokoZar> oh
[08:24] <YokoZar> Nice, that's even easier :)
[09:33] <dushara> hi all
[09:37] <dushara> ﻿Q: I'm getting "Version number suggests Ubuntu changes, but there is no XSBC-Original-Maintainer field" with the version in changelog set to "0.3.4-0ubuntu1". Any ideas?
[09:41] <StevenK> dushara: You need to follow the DebianMaintainerSpec
[09:43] <dushara> StevenK: Even though this is ubuntu native?
[09:45] <StevenK> Hmm.
[09:45] <StevenK> It can be ignored
[09:47] <dushara> What I meant by Ubuntu native is that I'm packing my own sw from scratch... so -0ubuntu1 in the end is correct isn't it?
[09:52] <Iulian> dushara: Yes, it's correct.
[09:53] <Festor> One question: all Edgy error-related could be deleted?
[09:55] <Iulian> Festor: What do you mean by "could be deleted"?
[09:56] <Festor> Iulian, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/+bug/77390
[09:57] <Festor> because: http://lwn.net/Articles/274910/
[09:58] <Iulian> Festor: It cannot be deleted. It will be in Launchpad forever.
[09:59] <Iulian> Festor: I think it should be closed but not sure.
[09:59] <RAOF> We might want to mark it as invalid, yes.
[09:59] <Festor> Sorry, I mean invalid no deleted
[10:16] <Iulian> Riddell: Giver -2 is now in Sid. Please have a look at #246863
[11:43] <hefe_bia> Hi MOTUs, I have a question: Where do I have to put application icons? /usr/share/icons or /usr/share/pixmaps?
[11:46] <Festor> /usr/share/pixmaps
[11:47] <hefe_bia> thanks. So I did it right :)
[11:47] <luisbg> what can I do if I am packaging something for Hardy that depends on a version of a library that isnt in Hardy and just in Gutsy?
[11:49] <hefe_bia> luisbg: Are you sure it isn't there? Maybe it has been renamed because of an API change?
[11:49] <luisbg> hefe_bia, libdb4.2-java
[11:49] <luisbg> it isnt backwords compatible
[11:49] <luisbg> hardy has 4.5 and 4.6, gutsy has 4.2 and 4.4
[11:50] <luisbg> if it was renamed how can I look for it?
[11:51] <wgrant> luisbg: You make it work with the newer one.
[11:52] <luisbg> wgrant, library isnt backwords compatible
[11:52] <wgrant> Even so.
[11:52] <hefe_bia> wgrant: the java packages have been dropped entirely
[11:52] <hefe_bia> See http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/d/db4.2/db4.2_4.2.52+dfsg-4/changelog
[11:53] <hefe_bia> I don't know a solution
[11:53] <wgrant> You could always not use Java :P
[11:53] <luisbg> hefe_bia, why have they been dropped?
[11:54] <luisbg> wgrant, I am just packaging this piece of software... months of work in an engineering team, they wont change it all now
[11:54] <luisbg> I don't understand why Java has been dropped
[11:55] <wgrant> The Debian maintainer apparently didn't bother to document that rather important change.
[11:55] <wgrant> Check for bugs on it, I guess.
[11:56] <luisbg> isnt this a huge regression?
[11:56] <hefe_bia> I'd say so
[11:56] <luisbg> :(
[11:57] <hefe_bia> You should report a bug against the package (or maybe it is already there)
[11:57] <hefe_bia> Maybe also to the Debain BTS
[11:58] <hefe_bia> At least that should clarify why Java has been dropped
[11:58] <luisbg> BTS?
[11:58] <hefe_bia> Bug Tracking System
[11:59] <luisbg> ok
[11:59] <sebner> luisbg: bugs.debian.org
[12:01] <luisbg> cant find the launchpad page of the ubuntu package to see if there is something commented there
[12:02] <hefe_bia> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu and then search for db4.2
[12:03] <hefe_bia> Or https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/db4.2
[12:03] <luisbg> hefe_bia, not there... just ruby one
[12:04] <hefe_bia> The java packages belong to the db4.2 source package
[12:05] <luisbg> true, sorry
[12:08] <hefe_bia> Have to head for work now. If there are MOTUs here it would be great if you could have a look at my packages:
[12:08] <hefe_bia> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=tomboy-blogposter
[12:08] <hefe_bia> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=gebabbel
[12:42] <\sh> vorian: welcome on board :)
[12:44] <vorian> thanks \sh :)
[13:16] <zul> !revu
[13:44] <nedko> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=jack-audio-connection-kit
[14:13] <mouz> vorian thanks for advocating stjerm :)
[14:14] <mouz> i will take your suggestion
[14:15] <vorian> the package was great
[14:24] <Iulian> mouz: It would be great to get stjerm in Debian too. It's a very nice tool.
[14:24] <Iulian> mouz: Is the upstream active?
[14:31] <mouz> Iulian: IMO there are better alternatives ;)
[14:31] <mouz> yakuake, tilda. both are in lenny
[14:31] <mouz> but whether upstream is responsive needs to (and will be) tested soon
[14:37] <bluefoxicy> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Specs/InrepidDesktopEffects  Uh guys?  :P
[14:37] <goshawk> hi
[14:37] <goshawk> i've a problem with cdbs
[14:37] <goshawk> it seems that it does not call make install
[14:37] <goshawk> but just make
[14:40] <goshawk> http://www.pastebin.ca/1066658
[14:47] <Iulian> If anyone has some spare time and would like to review a package - http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=salasaga (it's an IDE for producing eLearning).
[14:51] <goshawk> maybe i solved that problem...
[15:06] <bddebian> Heya gang
[15:06] <geser> Hi bddebian
[15:07] <bddebian> Hi geser
[15:11] <Iulian> Hello bddebian.
[15:16] <bddebian> Hi Iulian
[15:36] <mouz> Would someone like to review my patch for bug 246106? Thanks :)
[15:49] <jpds> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=irssi-plugin-otr <- vorian
[15:50] <vorian> :)
[15:52] <bliZZardz> quick Q : how do i find the version of a package installed in my system?
[15:53] <jpds> bliZZardz: dpkg --status <package> | grep Verion
[15:53] <jpds> Version*
[15:54] <bliZZardz> got it..thanks
[15:58] <Festor> Anybody can review my packages?
[15:58] <Festor> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=gendesign
[15:58] <Festor> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=amsn-desktop-integration
[15:58] <Festor> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=amsn-transparent
[15:58] <Festor> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=lh-abc
[15:58] <Festor> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=rarcrack
[15:58] <Festor> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=ted-tv
[15:58] <null_vector> Anyone willing to look at the patch on #
[15:58] <vorian> :o
[15:59] <null_vector> #246406
[15:59] <bliZZardz> bug 246406
[15:59]  * Hobbsee mumbles something about the sponsorship queue
[15:59]  * Hobbsee mumbles something else about the second link in the topic, which talks about the sponsorship queue, among other things.
[16:02]  * Festor is sad....
[16:06] <slytherin> Festor: Have patience
[16:06] <Festor> ... how much?
[16:06] <laga> about 200ccm
[16:06] <Festor> xD
[16:07] <slytherin> Festor: lot of. That is all I have to say. :-)
[16:08] <null_vector> I say that because I had to add -fno-stack-protector but I don't know if there's a better way to handle that.
[16:23] <geser> emgent: hi, how familiar are you with the hardening done in Ubuntu?
[16:33] <sistpoty|work> hi folks
[16:33] <sebner> huhu sistpoty|work
[16:34] <sistpoty|work> hi sebner
[16:35] <sistpoty|work> Iulian: looks like you did a binary upload (salasaga) to revu which is stuck in the rejected queue. please upload only source packages to revu, thanks
[16:36] <emgent> geser: pong, I'm a contributor in this group. But i worked primarly in ubuntu security.
[16:39] <emgent> geser: and auditing/pt
[16:40] <geser> emgent: ok, you don't know by coincidence if adding -fno-stack-protector is a correct fix for problems with the stack protection?
[16:40] <Iulian> sistpoty|work: I did upload a source package but first I uploaded the binary one.
[16:41] <emgent> geser: no I'm not, sorry
[16:41] <sistpoty|work> Iulian: ah, ok. binary package -> removed ;)
[16:41] <emgent> geser: feel free to ask in #ubuntu-hardened
[16:42] <geser> null_vector: ^^ for your question about -fno-stack-protector
[16:42] <Iulian> sistpoty|work: Okay. I didn't know that revu don't accept binary packages. Sorry
[16:42] <sistpoty|work> Iulian: no problem, was not more hassle than a rm command ;)
[16:43] <Iulian> Cool then.
[16:44] <null_vector> thanks geser
[16:51] <sistpoty|work> nedko: seems like there
[16:51] <sistpoty|work> nedko: + is also a binary upload from you (jack-audio-kit) on revu
[16:52] <sistpoty|work> or jack-audio-connection-kit, to be precise
[16:53] <nedko> sistpoty|work: i think that may be my first attempt, i need to clean it, where it is?
[16:53] <sistpoty|work> nedko: it's stuck in the rejected queue (I've just deleted it)...
[16:54] <nedko> ah, nice and thanks
[16:54] <sistpoty|work> nedko: to create a source package instead of a binary one, you'll need to pass -S (for source package) and -sa (to include the .orig.tar.gz) to dpkg-buildpackage / debuild
[16:54] <sistpoty|work> np
[16:54] <nedko> yes i got that after my first attempt
[16:54] <sistpoty|work> heh
[16:55] <nedko> i got impression that dput will not allow it and i acted bold
[16:56] <nedko> "Please do not upload unsigned source or binary packages. The allow_unsigned_uploads = 0 in the [revu] stanza in dput.cf should be enforcing this anyway."
[16:56] <nedko> "Uploads to REVU should only be signed source files, with the original tarball."
[16:56] <nedko> i misread the text
[16:56] <nedko> i have misread
[18:05] <null_vector> is there any kind of a pastebin script?
[18:11] <sistpoty|work> null_vector: maybe in package pastebinit?
[18:12] <gnomefreak> pastebinit is the script i thought. there is also webboard
[18:15]  * sistpoty|work heads home now... cya
[18:15] <null_vector> wow, didn't think something like that would have it's own package
[18:16] <slytherin> null_vector: I find webboard easier. It automaticallies copy content from clipboard, then you can just clock a button and once it is done the url is in clipboard for you to paste it anywhere.
[18:19] <null_vector> I'm in screen right and needed a buildlog
[18:20] <gnomefreak> slackwarelife1: pastebinit is easier since you give it a file and it gives you an address
[18:20]  * gnomefreak pastebinit /etc/apt/sources.list and poof it gives me link to it
[18:21] <null_vector> thanks
[18:21] <gnomefreak> np
[18:37] <Laney> geser: Are you happy with my response on bug #246720?
[18:41] <emgent> hello
[19:01] <geser> Laney: waiting is one option, but it would be nice if we could fix it before the next ffmpeg-free upload
[19:01] <Laney> geser: Well the maintainer seems to be happy to do that, so I don't know if it's worth carrying a delta that he's already said isn't necessary
[19:04] <geser> Laney: we could add a small delta which could be dropped on the next occasion again
[19:14] <Laney> geser: OK then, I'll do that
[19:18] <Laney> Although I don't know whether it could be considered "small" given the re-autotoolise required ;)
[19:20] <geser> Laney: I'd probably just patch configure and make sure that the check for ffmpeg-config fails, e.g. let it check for ffmpeg-config-obsolete which is definitely not there
[19:29] <Laney> oh ok
[19:31] <leleobhz> how is the best way to make symlinks in a package?
[19:32] <Laney> leleobhz: dh_link
[19:32] <leleobhz> like busybox links (ls > /bin/busybox ls)
[19:38] <Laney> geser: Uploaded fix to the bug, hope it's ok now
[19:40] <geser> Laney: thanks, will upload it once I'm back home
[19:41] <leleobhz> can i request a package sync with debian?
[19:41] <leleobhz> (have a package that exists in debian but not in ubuntu)
[19:41] <geser> sure, file a sync request and subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors
[20:36] <goshawk> hi
[20:36] <slytherin> goshawk: hi
[20:37] <goshawk> i've uploaded a package to revu
[20:37] <goshawk> hoe much time should i wait until i'll see it in revu.taware.de?
[20:38] <goshawk> s/how/how
[20:39] <slytherin> goshawk: when did you upload it?
[20:39] <slytherin> goshawk: and which package?
[20:40] <goshawk> package dsss
[20:40] <goshawk> uploaded just 5 minutees ago
[20:40] <slytherin> goshawk: it usually takes 10-15 minutes
[20:41] <goshawk> ok thanks
[20:43]  * goshawk reads SponsorshipProcess wiki page
[21:05] <goshawk> 44 minutes have been passed.... in revu.tauware.de the is not the dsss package...
[21:05] <goshawk> any idea?
[21:06] <slytherin> goshawk: what command did you use to upload the package?
[21:07] <goshawk> dput revu mypackage........changes
[21:07] <goshawk> dput answers: Successfully uploaded packages.
[21:08] <goshawk> it's my first package
[21:08] <goshawk> it's signed with my gpg key
[21:08] <slytherin> goshawk: is your public key already synced in revu keyring?
[21:08] <goshawk> ubuntu keyring.. yes
[21:09] <goshawk> my account in launchpad has it enabled
[21:09] <slytherin> goshawk: what is ubuntu keyring?
[21:09] <goshawk> keyserver.ubuntu.com
[21:09] <slytherin> goshawk: no, not that. Are you part of https://edge.launchpad.net/~revu-uploaders ?
[21:09] <RainCT> goshawk: is your account in LP group revu-uploaders?
[21:09] <slytherin> I mean member of
[21:10] <goshawk> no i'm not
[21:10] <goshawk> signing
[21:10] <goshawk> oops joining
[21:11] <goshawk> no
[21:11] <goshawk> i'm already a member
[21:12] <goshawk> joined on 2006-08-14
[21:15] <goshawk> uhm... if i try to login to revu.tauware.de with username and password from launchpad it does not login
[21:16] <slytherin> goshawk: revu doesn't use launchpad user/pass
[21:16] <Se7h> hello all
[21:16] <slytherin> goshawk: ﻿see if you got any mail on your mail id about upload failure.
[21:17] <Se7h> motu's: python-mmpython package needs fixing
[21:17] <slytherin> goshawk: and for login to revu, use you email id with blank password and then on next page generate a password.
[21:17] <slytherin> Se7h: File a bug.
[21:18] <goshawk> slytherin: no, no mails either on spam folder
[21:19] <Se7h> slytherin where can i do that? mmpython lp home, or what?
[21:22] <slytherin> Se7h: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mmpython
[21:23] <Se7h> hum, i might take a look at interprid mmpython source to check if it's fixed already
[21:26] <Festor> Anybody can review my packages?
[21:26] <Festor> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=gendesign
[21:26] <Festor> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=amsn-desktop-integration
[21:26] <slytherin> goshawk: can't help much, I am not a developer
[21:26] <Festor> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=amsn-transparent
[21:26] <Festor> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=lh-abc
[21:26] <Festor> and
[21:26] <Festor> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=rarcrack
[21:26] <Festor> please...
[21:26] <slytherin> Festor: Please don't put review request here everyday
[21:26] <Festor> slytherin, no?
[21:26] <Festor> and then when?
[21:27] <slytherin> Festor: You upload to revu and just be patient. When someone has time, they will be reviewed
[21:41] <bdrung> why does building a package needs so long? xmms2 0.5 was published in intrepid two day ago and there  is no binary package available.
[21:42] <bdrung> vorian: ping
[21:43] <vorian> bdrung: hi
[21:44] <slytherin> bdrung: check build logs on launchpad. AFAIK, it fails to build
[21:45] <bdrung> vorian: i saw you marked bug #179828 as fix released.
[21:45] <vorian> ah, meant to mark "in progress"
[21:46] <bdrung> vorian: is this version already committed?
[21:46] <vorian> thanks for pointing that out
[21:46] <slytherin> bdrung: I was wrong about xmms2, it is built
[21:46] <vorian> bdrung: it was merged, and bumped
[21:47] <bdrung> vorian: have a look at bug #246299
[21:48] <slytherin> bdrung: The xmms2 binaries are waiting in 'NEW' queue for review.
[21:49] <slytherin> bdrung: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid/+queue
[21:49] <tjaalton> siretart: vdr-plugin-xineliboutput could've been synced, since vdr-dev already exports those flags :)
[21:50] <vorian> bdrung: how old was the source you were working with, most of those changes have already been committed
[21:50] <tjaalton> siretart: the new one I merged today
[21:52] <bdrung> vorian: about which package are you talkingß
[21:52] <bdrung> -?+?
[21:52] <bdrung> -ß+? i mean
[21:53] <Yasumoto> can someone take a look at https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tftp-hpa/+bug/73233
[21:53] <tjaalton> siretart: anyway, no big deal
[21:53] <Yasumoto> I submitted a debdiff, and want to double-check that it's correct. thanks :)
[21:57] <geser> Yasumoto: please add "(LP: #73233)" to your changelog entry so the bug gets automatically closed when it gets uploaded
[21:57] <geser> besides this your debdiff looks ok
[21:58] <geser> subscribe ubuntu-main-sponsors to that bug when you're ready
[21:58] <Yasumoto> geser: ah, kk
[21:58] <Yasumoto> geser: thank you
[22:06] <Yasumoto> Updated and subscribed
[22:24] <ScottK> gnomefreak: For your Flash Plugin backports, please get me a list with version and revision of the neede packages for Gutsy and Hardy.  Make sure they match what is in Intrepid.  Also attach any needed debdiffs (are there any?)
[22:25] <gnomefreak> ScottK: you want versions of the uploaded packages and debdiffs>?
[22:26] <gnomefreak> thats alot of debdiffs ;)
[22:28] <gnomefreak> version in gutsy diffed against intrepid version with backport revision is gonna be huge for one not to mention all 8 or so from gutsy+hardy
[22:28] <ScottK> gnomefreak: Debdiffs needed, if any, for the Intrepid packages when being uploaded.
[22:28] <ScottK> Not gutsy -> intrepid, but intrepid -> gutsy-backports
[22:29] <ScottK> None needed if all that needs changing is the revision.
[22:29] <gnomefreak> ScottK: oh ok thats easy no change other than libflashsupport
[22:29] <gnomefreak> for gutsy
[22:29] <ScottK> But I want a list of the package, version, and revision
[22:29] <gnomefreak> addded changelog entry for all and only libflashsupport for gutsy changed anything
[22:30] <gnomefreak> i know i can do that but they dont have gutsys revision since archive admins do the pushing and they change it anyway
[22:30] <gnomefreak> with thier scripts or selves or however they do it
[22:30] <gnomefreak> so what i give you isnt final gutsy or hardy
[22:41] <gnomefreak> ScottK: there isnt anything i can do with Gutsy's anyway and that is the only change that needed to be done since crimsun said he would worry about pulse and since libflashsupport depends on libpulse we would need to find out what he is going to do. I packaged the minimum that i needed to to test on this system. hardy had no changes and doesnt need pulse backported unless crimsun is going to do it for hardy as well as gutsy
[22:41] <gnomefreak> i hope that ended with the word gutsy
[22:42] <ScottK> It did.
[22:42] <ScottK> OK.
[22:42] <ScottK> How about a list for Hardy then?
[22:44] <gnomefreak> ScottK: ok
[22:48] <gnomefreak> ScottK: since im tried i posted the last 2 changelogs one intrepid and one backport of flash and libflash but i need to go laydown and hopfully fall asleep
[22:48] <gnomefreak> ill do debdiffs tomorrow if you need them
[23:09] <nedko> what is correct way to update package uploaded to revu?
[23:09] <Laney> nedko: dput it again
[23:10] <nedko> ok, thanks
[23:21] <sebner> gn8 folks
[23:26]  * nedko is looking for reviewers/advocates of hisjack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.x packages