/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/07/12/#ubuntu-motu.txt

* NCommander usually uses dpatch00:00
persiaNCommander: I really don't care.  I use what's there, or what the Maintainer likes, or what whoever is reviewing a new package on Mentors likes.00:00
* persia is likely the least good person to ask about patch system preferences, having only one strong opinion: it doesn't make sense to have a patch system and changes outside debian/ in diff.gz.00:01
NCommanderah00:01
NCommanderThat bugs the crap out of me00:01
NCommanderI think its against policy now00:01
persiaIt ought be, if it's not.  I don't mind if someone does just diff.gz patches (although it's nicer when they have a VCS), but mixing is just evil.00:05
NCommanderpersia, its usually older ones that aren't00:06
NCommanderBut there is virtually no oversight with DD package submissions00:06
persiaThat's why we have REVU: helps get team review of everything.  While there is the occasional package that misses REVU, most things have at least two sets of eyes, and sometimes four or five before they get uploaded.00:06
NCommanderBecause no MOTU can directly upload to incoming, right?00:08
persiaWell, anyone can, but anyone who does is likely to have someone else ask them about it.00:08
persiaQuestions like "Who did the second ACK for that?" or "Why didn't you put it on REVU?".  Nobody likes trying to come up with an answer, so we just use REVU.00:09
persiaREVU logs all the uploads and comments to a public list, so it's easy to audit against -changes mail.00:10
NCommanderCool00:10
NCommanderI actually think debian should adopt that system00:10
NCommanderBut man, people would go apeshit if anyone every suggested it00:10
devfilNCommander: Debian uses mentors.debian.net00:11
persiaThere was some talk about it, both the REVU code and the process.  Last I knew it was stalled.00:11
NCommanderI have NEVER seen a DD use that00:11
devfilNCommander: if a DD don't use it is a problem, but mentors exists00:11
persiaI've seen DDs in collaborative teams upload to VCS and ask for comments before uploading, which is at least an example of good process.00:11
NCommanderThere just isn't any oversight00:12
NCommanderBut the DD process is so rigid, it weeds out a lot of .... lesser developers00:12
NCommanderSo my changes will go on REVU, and then intro intrepid?00:13
persiaNCommander: Maybe.  It tries.  Personally, I find agressive peer review of most changes to be almost as good in terms of patch quality.00:13
persiaNope.  Your changes go to the sponsors queue, where a second person looks at them, and uploads.00:13
persiaMOTU upload patches like that directly.00:13
persiaThe changes are then posted, and as all the packages are team-maintained, we all have an interest in fixing any broken uploads (no NMU barrier).00:14
* NCommander looks forward to some of his FTBFS fixes going00:14
NCommanderThis is the third one today (not counting the giveback)00:14
devfilpersia: no maintainer in ubuntu is a great thing, in Debian I see a lot of package not updated because the maintainer is away00:15
* NCommander is guility of that >.>;00:15
persiadevfil: Yes, but no Maintainer in Debian is a bad thing: Ubuntu relies on the Debian maintainers to develop good relationships with upstream.  We do in some special cases (like you with WX), but in most cases, we're too busy chasing all the little bugs to concentrate properly on each package.00:16
NCommanderWhat I never get is how some packages seem to be not buildable on normal linux systems00:16
NCommanderAnd usually require one or two big patches00:16
persiaNCommander: Different envionment used upstream (e.g. Solaris).00:17
NCommanderI mean with Debian packages00:17
persiaYes, as do I.00:17
NCommanderi.e., nginx00:17
NCommanderIt requires IOV_MAX to be defined00:17
NCommanderBut its not defined on Linux00:17
persiaI thought nginx upstream used Mac OS X.00:17
NCommanderI fixed it by aliasing it to the equivelent preprocessor macro (UIO_MAXIOV)00:17
NCommanderBut the package is in debian stable00:17
NCommanderand it built on unstable without such a fix00:18
NCommanderI don't get it ...00:18
persiaCheck the m68k logs?00:18
NCommandermaybe-successful00:18
NCommanderIt always bugs me00:19
NCommanderOh, hrm00:19
NCommandervery weird00:20
NCommanderhrm, oh I see00:21
NCommanderYOu need to define __need_IOV_MAX it appears to get it00:22
NCommanderMust be a change in glibc00:22
NCommanderdo any of you run intrepid directly?00:23
nhandlerNCommander, I run Intrepid directly00:24
persiaMany of us, and those that don't have intrepid chroots for testing.00:24
NCommanderI'm running the chroot00:24
NCommanderI ran into issues when I ran gutsy directly00:24
* NCommander uploads nginx00:30
* NCommander reviews the list of FTBFS again00:32
* NCommander waits patiently for one patch to just reach revu ;-)00:34
persiaREVU?  On what are you waiting?00:35
NCommanderYou said that someone will likely put the updated package files to REVU for review ...00:36
persiaNo.  NEW package go to review.  Current packages get reviewed by the sponsors.  Other people watch -changes, and complain if there is a bad upload. (well, some people both sponsor and watch changes, but...)00:37
NCommanderack00:38
persiaErr.  NEW packages go to REVU.  Other packages get reviewed.00:38
* NCommander hides under his desk for being an idiot :-)00:38
* persia gets confused by homonyms again00:38
NCommander...00:38
NCommanderFive diet cokes00:38
NCommanderI think I can kiss sleep goodnight00:38
NCommanderSo, instead, I'm waiting for one of my packages to get reviewed, and someone to smite me and tell me to try again ;-)00:39
NCommanderI'm going home, see you all laptop00:43
NCommander...;00:43
NCommanderlater00:43
cody-somervilleNCommander, cya :)00:44
nxvlpersia: why did you delete last line of the wiki?00:46
nxvlpersia: to much attention for you?00:46
nxvl:p00:46
sistpotypersia: looking at /srv/uploads/rejected, maybe a keying sync would be adequate (together with moving the .changes files back to /srv/uploads)?00:48
sistpoty;)00:48
sistpotycody-somerville: oh, sorry, I just finished going through the key-teams thread, and I doubt I'll have a summary before going to sleep00:55
cody-somervillesistpoty, How far away is that?00:55
sistpotycody-somerville: quite a bit... I just finished pasting any significant bit (and reading through it)00:56
cody-somervilleI meant, how far away is going to sleep?00:56
sistpotycody-somerville: actually going to sleep is in the next half hour00:57
sistpotycody-somerville: but as I haven't really structured plain comments yet, I don't think I'll be able to this during that timeframe00:57
cody-somervilleOkay.00:58
cody-somervilleDo you want to aim for gobbying it tomorrow?00:58
sistpotycody-somerville: I'll try... but actually I'm not certain I'll do it00:59
sistpotycody-somerville: bad thing is, that I'll be mostly afk from somewhen tomorrow afternoon to sunday evening (utc+2 pov)00:59
sistpoty(we have 10 year class meeting this weekend)00:59
sistpotycody-somerville: not too sure how best to proceed actually... if you come up with s.th., I guess it might be better to just sent it to -motu...01:01
sistpoty(sorry again)01:01
cody-somervilleok01:02
* sistpoty goes to bed now... cya01:14
udienz-sistpoty: is revu server re-sync again?01:23
NCommanderWhat are SRU bugs?01:30
cody-somervilleNCommander, SRU stands for "Stable Release Updates". You can find more information regarding SRUs at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates01:33
Drk_GuyREVU hasn't synced01:36
NCommandercody-somerville, Thank you :-)01:37
cody-somervilleNCommander, np01:38
NCommandercody-somerville, I just migrated from Debian to Ubuntu, and spent most of the afternoon fixing FTBFS ;-)01:38
cody-somervilleNCommander, Awesome :)01:38
cody-somervilleNCommander, did you push your changes upstream where appropriate?01:38
NCommanderI filled bug reports with Debian if that's what you mean01:39
* cody-somerville nods,.01:39
NCommanderI got a rather angry email saying not to bug him about FTBFS's on Ubuntu :-/01:39
NCommanderI'd just want to get some review on my debdiffs01:40
persiaSome Maintainers are like that, although most are happy to adopt.  In many cases, it also FTBFS in Debian (always good to check), which can help get them adopted.01:40
NCommanderI'm fairly sure I did it all right01:40
=== SoylentGrun is now known as gaurdro
NCommanderCan I simply debootstrap an i386 chroot on aamd64 system, or do I need to do something stupid?01:53
persiaNCommander: You can debootstrap both i386 and lpia on amd6401:55
NCommanderWhat is lpia?01:55
persiaLow Power Intel architecture.  It's a low-power memory-limited i686 with no VMX, etc.01:56
NCommanderGoogle tells me its the libertarian party of iowa, but I don't think thats right ;-)01:56
NCommanderThat sounds like the Asus EEE and friends01:56
NCommander(aka Intel Atom based machines)01:56
persiaChips that it runs on today are Intel A100, Intel A110, and Intel Atom.  For userspace, it's not really that different than i386.  The kernel is a little different.01:57
persiaWell, most Eee s are actually VIA C7-M, which is a i586 based chip, and can't boot an lpia kernel.01:57
NCommanderi586?01:57
NCommanderEw.01:57
NCommanderI'm suprised01:58
persiaThere's a few i586s out there still.  Probably some i486s too, although I'm not sure Ubuntu supports those.01:58
persiaI know we don't support real i386s (and never have).01:59
NCommanderI think Ubuntu compiled targetting i386 like Debian01:59
NCommanderOh01:59
NCommanderHrm01:59
NCommanderNo clue then01:59
persiaNo, even in the beginning it was i486.  Anyway, I don't think lenny will run on a real i386 without some significant tinkering.01:59
NCommanderWhich leads into the next question, what specifically is a softfreeze?01:59
persiaDuring a soft freeze, we avoid uploading anything that ends up on one of the images for the test.  For this freeze, it's Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, Edubuntu, and Ubuntu Server.  Ubuntu Studio, Ubuntu Mobile, and Mythbuntu aren't participating in the Alpha for one reason or another.02:01
NCommanderSo that means things like FTFBS fixes aren't going to move?02:01
persiaNCommander: Only for things that end up on the CDs.  The Freeze ought be ending soon anyway.02:15
NCommanderThe CDs is just main, or main and select universe?02:15
persiaselect main and select universe.02:16
NCommanderah02:16
NCommanderCan I cast a pointer on a i686/32-bit as unsigned long?02:20
NCommander(that's the fix for this package on amd64, but I don't want to then cause a FTBFS on i686 ;-))02:20
persiaI believe so.02:20
persiaAnyway, we don't have i686, just i586 and lpia, neither of which is quite an i686.02:21
NCommanderClose enough ;-)02:21
RAOFNCommander: If you're going to do pointer arithmetic, intptr_t is the winning type.02:26
NCommanderintptr_t?02:26
RAOFIt's an int which is guaranteed to be big enough to hold a pointer.02:27
NCommanderShould I just use that inplace of the cast for unsigned long?02:27
RAOFPresumably you need a bit more than just an unsigned long cast, though?02:27
RAOFYou need to actually change the destination type?02:28
RAOFOr were they doing something strange like "unsigned long ptr = (int)the_pointer;"?02:28
RAOFOf course, casting to unsigned long isn't portable; that will definately fail on win64, for example.02:30
NCommanderneither is intptr_t02:30
RAOFintptr_t should be supported by any C89 (C99?) compiler.02:31
NCommanderWell, it was doing just a unsigned int cross02:31
persiaC99 I'd think.02:31
NCommanderand it works for me now02:31
emgenthello people02:33
RAOFHowdie.02:33
NCommanderROAF: thanks for that hint, it works great :-)02:35
RAOFCare to work out why mcs segfaults while compiling evolution-sharp on AMD64 in a clean chroot for me, then? :)02:36
NCommanderROAF: If you can work on reviewing my FTBFS fixes ;-)02:37
Hobbseeoh yeah, motu meeting02:42
emgentHobbsee: ? :)02:45
* Hobbsee forgot about it, but wasn't here anyway02:45
emgentWho is emma?02:45
Hobbseeyou don't want to know02:46
Hobbseeeither way, she can come and lurk now02:47
Hobbseeemgent: we've had a fair bit of trouble with her in userland.02:47
crimsunhmm?  As in being obnoxious, or..?02:49
Hobbseecrimsun: yeah, mainly.  prattling on about how irseek is so evil, because it's in the channel, ignoring ithe calls that she's offtopic, arguing for hours any time she gets told off or banned, and kept advertising her channel to users.02:51
Hobbseewhihc, oddly enough, people were reporting as abuse.02:52
Hobbseeshe caused enough trouble to get an #*ubuntu*-wide channel ban.02:53
emgentargh02:54
RAOFI need to make xserver-xgl build again.  In order to do this, I need to include the mesa source somewhere.  The .orig.tar.gz would be more appropriate than in the .diff, right?02:54
RAOFOh, crap.  That'd mean I'd need to include the appropriate copyright stuff.  Urgh.02:55
Hobbseeemgent: so, she's partially reformed.  She still sticks random stuff in channels, like ':)', and doesn't contribute terribly useful, and still argues for hours when she gets told off, though.  But it seems there's progress, so she can lurk.02:55
Hobbsees/useful/usefully/02:55
emgentunderstand :)02:56
crimsunHobbsee: hmm, if this is the same 'emma', I'll have a face-to-face chat, or have someone speak to her.02:57
crimsunwe're all in the same city02:58
Hobbseeoh, interesting.  could have used your help a couple of months ago02:58
NCommanderRAOF, what was that package you wanted me to check on?02:58
RAOFNCommander: evolution-sharp.  That wasn't serious, though I'd _love_ you to find out the reason.02:59
crimsunHobbsee: heh, I'm kinda scarce these days, so I'm not useful.  :)02:59
RAOFIt's awkward and annoying, and probably a mono bug.02:59
NCommanderRAOF, are you a MOTU by any chance?02:59
RAOFYah.02:59
NCommanderRAOF, if I fix it, will you review my pending FTBFS fixes ;-)03:01
RAOFAbsolutely.  How many of them?03:01
NCommander4 or 503:01
NCommanderI lost count ;-)03:01
NCommanderI didn't have anything to do this afternoon ...03:01
RAOFI'll certainly look at them if you fix evolution-sharp :)03:02
NCommanderBuilding GCC on m68k is a slow process03:02
RAOFHeh.03:02
RAOFI'll possibly look at them anyway, but after breakfast :)03:02
NCommanderRAOF, 7-10 days on average for m68k03:02
NCommanderThe error I see evolution-data-server is too new O_o?03:02
RAOFNCommander: You're looking at the wrong packages, then.  You're after evolution-sharp 0.17.4-0ubuntu103:03
RAOFWhere mcs segfaults on amd64 only.03:03
NCommanderthe buildload on qa.ubuntuwire.com is old then03:03
* NCommander looks on amd6403:03
NCommanderlink to your buildlog?03:03
RAOFIt was on launchpad, but apparently it's being rebuilt?03:05
RAOFWhat's happening there?03:05
NCommanderWhere on launchpad03:05
NCommander(I use the qa page)03:05
NCommander(but it seems to sometimes lag on newer packages)03:05
NCommander*grumbles* it did successfully build on unstable03:05
RAOFlaunchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-sharp03:06
RAOFNo, I don't think it did; they have 0.17.1.03:06
NCommanderI don't see failure logs03:06
RAOFIt's quite possible that the same package _will_ build on unstable, though...03:06
RAOFNCommander: Yeah.  For some reason it's getting rebuilt.03:06
RAOFWait a couple of minutes, and it'll fail.03:06
RAOFhttps://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-sharp/0.17.4-0ubuntu1/+build/66656103:07
RAOFThere we go!03:07
NCommanderoooh03:07
NCommanderWhat a misirble failure03:07
NCommanderRAOF, what's your timezone?03:09
RAOFGMT+1003:09
RAOFMoar pancakes!03:10
ion_gief03:10
NCommanderheh03:10
NCommander-5 GMT here03:10
ion_:%s/GMT/UTC/g03:11
RAOFHm.  It seems something's filing automated FTBFS bugs, but not doing it correctly.03:13
RAOFI posit the recently-reopened: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-sharp/+bug/194456 as a symptom.03:13
ubottuLaunchpad bug 194456 in evolution-sharp "FTBFS in latest archive rebuild test" [High,Confirmed]03:13
HobbseeRAOF: when was that closed?03:20
RAOFIn Hardy, methinks.03:20
RAOFOr, rather, it wasn't visible when I checked the bugs yesterday.03:21
RAOFWhich, I assume, means it was closed.  I belive that hardy's evolution-sharp did build from source.03:21
NCommanderROAF: Any idea what's causing this FTFBS?03:21
Hobbseeactivity log doesn't show it being closed.03:21
RAOFOooh, never noticed that button.03:22
Hobbseeyeah, i remember seeing a uvfe for it, and approving it - but i wouldn't bet that bug got closed as well03:22
RAOFHm.  I wonder what happened, then.03:22
RAOFI really wasn't visible yesterday!03:22
NCommanderUVFE?03:22
RAOFNCommander: No, I really dont' have any good ideas.03:22
HobbseeNCommander: upstream version freeze exception03:22
NCommanderWhat have you tried?03:23
* NCommander is right now thinking connecting gdb to mcs is the easiest way to find where the bug is03:26
RAOFI've tried that, but mono is not very amenable to gdb.03:29
NCommanderIt should at least show you where the SIGSERV is though o_O;03:30
RAOFI've got a core file if you'd like to check :)03:30
NCommanderThat would be handy03:35
NCommanderI'm reading tips on using GDB with mono03:35
NCommanderRAOF, I'm probably going to guess a pointer is getting mutated somewhere03:37
NCommanderJust suprising its only happening on amd6403:37
RAOFRight.03:37
RAOFAlso surprising: only happens in a clean chroot.  I can build it just fine in my Intrepid install.03:38
NCommanderMy chroot isn't clean03:38
NCommander(I have some cruft in it)03:38
NCommanderand it still SIGSERVed03:39
ion_SERV?03:39
RAOFNCommander: http://cooperteam.net/core03:40
NCommander*SIGSEGV03:40
NCommanderThis backtrace is real pretty03:40
NCommanderBut it looks like its tripping a bug in pthreads ....03:41
NCommanderpthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.203:41
NCommanderWTF?03:41
RAOFThat's not necessarily where it died, though.03:41
RAOFThat could just be where some non-segfaulting thread was when mono died, right?03:41
NCommanderIt's always dying in the same place03:42
NCommanderEVen after running it a bunch of times03:42
NCommanderSometime makes a thread, and bing, diad03:42
NCommander*dead03:42
NCommanderI just don't get why its @@GLIBC_2.3.203:42
NCommanderlibc6-dbg gets me symbols, right?03:43
RAOFYeah.  Or libc6-dbgsym.  Doesn't really matter which.03:43
NCommanderAt least there is a mon-dbg package03:46
NCommanderwell, installing symbols makes a lot more interesting debug data03:50
NCommanderRAOF, it's a memcpy() call that's triggering the code to go boom03:53
RAOFHm.  Another data point: that package builds just fine in sid.03:54
RAOFIt might be time to start looking at ubuntu-applied mono patches.03:54
NCommanderI'm trying to localize where in the native code its oblierating itself03:55
NCommandermaybe its worth building mono sans patchs and see if this builds03:55
RAOFQuite possibly.03:56
NCommanderArgh03:57
NCommanderI can't see what the arguements are to memcpy03:57
RAOF:(03:57
NCommanderWhat's the command to make it load symbols for a library03:57
NCommander(I haven't used GDB in awhile)03:57
NCommanderWhat. The. ****.04:03
NCommanderIt just built04:03
NCommanderI cd'ed into evolution and typed make04:03
NCommanderand04:03
NCommander... it built04:03
RAOFYeah, it does that.04:03
NCommanderwtf O_O;04:03
RAOFSometimes it builds, sometimes it doesn't.04:03
RAOFAlthough it seems to _always_ fail in automated environments.04:04
Drk_Guythis is pissing me off04:04
NCommanderSounds like a *shiver* thread locking issue04:04
NCommanderIt always builds if I cd into the evolution folder04:04
RAOFMaybe it's a path thing?04:05
NCommanderMaybe04:05
NCommanderI'm tweaking the rules file to figure it out04:05
RAOFBecause I found strange things happening running the compile command manually.04:05
RAOFmcs <stuff goes here> generated/*.cs dies, mcs <...> generated/Addresswhatever.cs died, cp generated/Addresswhatever.cs .; mcs <...> Addresswhatever.cs didn't segfault.04:06
NCommanderman04:06
NCommanderIt's really not happy04:06
RAOFYeah.04:06
RAOFThere's some sort of madness happening.04:07
RAOFHm. Maybe it's the length of the command line?04:07
NCommanderThe max command line on Linux is 128kb04:07
RAOFDoes mono amd64 know about that? :)04:07
NCommanderHrm04:08
NCommanderMaybe it just randomly managed to build on Debian04:08
NCommanderA random fluke04:08
RAOFI don't think so.04:09
NCommanderThe Debian version is older it seems04:09
NCommanderaccording to the changelog04:09
RAOFOh, it is.  But I'm building the new package in a sid chroot.04:09
NCommanderIf that doesn't fail04:10
RAOFIt doesn't.04:10
NCommanderTHen it's either an issue with the evolution API or our mono04:10
NCommander****04:10
NCommanderAny ideas?04:10
RAOFOooh, that's a fair point; we have a different evolution API, too.04:10
NCommanderIf it was real time code that was dying this would be easier04:11
RAOFI'm going to install some Sid mono packages in an Intrepid chroot, see if that flies.04:11
NCommanderBut this is the equivelent debugging GCC04:11
NCommanderI'm currently running --trace on mcs04:14
NCommanderSeeing if I can catch where the compiler bombs04:14
NCommanderRAOF, the bug doesn't occcur when mcs is in ttrace mode04:17
NCommanderRAOF, and the freaking trace log is 2.1GB O_O;04:19
NCommanderRAOF, ping04:20
RAOFNCommander: :(04:23
RAOFBuilds fine with sid's mcs.04:23
NCommanderd'oh04:24
NCommanderAt least we ruled out the evolution API04:24
RAOFRight.04:24
NCommanderand tells us the problem is specifically with mcs04:24
NCommanderNow we play the patch elimiation game04:24
RAOFYeah.04:24
NCommanderWant to check out my FTFBS fixes as a break, I'll work on seeing if I can figure out what patch is doing it04:25
RAOFWin.04:25
RAOFThey're in the u-u-s queue?04:25
NCommanderu-u-s?04:26
RAOFUbuntu universe sponsors04:26
NCommanderI added them to the universe queue04:26
NCommanderExpect for the one which was a main package04:26
RAOFRight.04:26
NCommandershould be04:26
NCommandermcurs, purelibc, and ngix04:26
NCommanderer04:27
NCommandernginx04:27
NCommanderRAOF, I also submitted a fix for libnet-ssleay-perl, but I don't think your a core developer04:27
RAOFTrue.04:27
NCommander(and we're in a soft freeze)04:27
NCommanderAll that experience as a debian-porter is paying off04:28
NCommander(pity its not paying off on my way to be a DD, but eh)04:28
RAOFHm.  Those fixes should really be attached to the bug as debdiffs.04:29
RAOFUnless it's also a new upstream version?04:29
NCommanderI uploaded the debdiffs O_o;04:30
RAOFYou uploaded the .diff.gz04:30
RAOFWhich isn't quite the same; a debdiff (generated by debdiff, oddly enough ;)) is generally a nice, small, reviewable patch against the existing package.04:31
NCommanderWhoops04:31
NCommanderI can fix that >.<;04:31
NCommanderI never generated those before, when someone said debdiff, I thought they meant the diff file autogenerated04:31
RAOF!debdiff04:32
ubottuSorry, I don't know anything about debdiff04:32
RAOFOooh, that's a bit of an oversight :)04:32
NCommanderyeah04:32
NCommanderWhoops04:32
=== foxbuntu is now known as fatman
NCommanderLet me generate those debdiffs04:33
NCommanderI apologize04:34
RAOFNo problem at all.04:34
NCommanderI'm getting weird output fron debdiff04:35
=== fatman is now known as foxbuntu
NCommanderoh wait04:36
NCommanderTHat's right04:36
NCommanderRAOF, I'm generating them now04:39
NCommanderRAOF, https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmucs/+bug/24776704:42
ubottuLaunchpad bug 247767 in dmucs "For for FTFBS on 64-bit architectures" [Undecided,New]04:42
NCommanderRAOF, https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/24774504:44
ubottuLaunchpad bug 247745 in nginx "Fix for FTBFS on i386/amd64 and other archs" [Undecided,New]04:44
* NCommander feels like an idiot over the debdiff thing >.<04:48
NCommanderRAOF, ?04:53
NCommanderick04:56
NCommanderI think I found the patch that broke the camels back04:57
vorianNCommander: i believe RAOF was reffering to the lack of a "debdiff" factoid in ubottu as the oversight, not what you are working on :)04:59
emgentheya nxvl :)04:59
NCommanderI uploaded the actual diff.gz filees >.<;04:59
NCommanderSo Now I properly uploaded real debdiffs04:59
vorianno sweat :)04:59
NCommanderI feel like an idiot though05:00
vorianexcellent05:00
NCommanderWhy?05:00
vorianwhoa! no need to feel that way05:00
NCommanderWHat, I'm from Debian05:00
NCommanderI'm assuming the usual pose someone should take when they screw up and the sponsor attacks you :-P05:00
vorianhaha05:01
vorianyou won't get attacked here05:01
NCommanderBut I think I found the issue with evolution-sharp05:01
NCommanderSomeone commented out an entire function so mono would work on a liveCD05:01
NCommanderin one of the patchs05:01
NCommanderI think this was RAOF's plan, get me to work on evolution-sharp and he can run away in horror :-P05:02
NCommandervorian, care to check my now fixed debdiffs ;-)05:03
voriandmucs?05:03
NCommanderyeah, purelibc, nginx, and libnet-ssleay-perl (which I don't think you can check)05:04
NCommander^as well05:04
voriansure05:04
NCommanderI got busy ;-)05:04
NCommanderTHanks05:04
NCommanderIt's amazing seeing my patches go somewhere05:04
NCommanderI'm now interested in beginning the MOTU process05:05
RAOFNCommander: I'm back, and I'll pick off whatever vorian doesn't get to.05:05
NCommanderAnd I don't have to go get my key signed :-P (drove 500 miles to get it done)05:05
NCommanderRAOF, I think I found the problem05:05
voriani'm looking at dmucs05:05
=== gaurdro is now known as GPL
RAOFI'll pick up ngnix, then.05:06
NCommanderI'll keep working on evolution-sharp ;-)05:06
NCommander./build-csproj: line 180: gawk: command not found05:10
NCommanderI think I found a bug in mono's build-deps05:10
RAOFThat shouldn't be possible, but it's worth checking.  That's from your build log?05:11
NCommanderYeah05:11
NCommanderIt didn't scuttle the build though05:11
RAOFAh.  Optional build-dep?05:12
NCommanderI think the script just didn't take in account that gawk could be missing, and thus didn't return -1 to break make05:12
=== LucidFox is now known as TSLRPFox
NCommanderIt doesn't appear in other build logs, just when I build the package with dpkg-buildpackage05:14
* NCommander waits for news on his package fixes05:16
NCommanderRAOF, I isolated the patch that breaks mono on evolution-sharp05:25
RAOFNCommander: Wooo!05:25
RAOFI think I may have found a simpler solution for the ngix FTBFS, too :)05:26
NCommanderTHere are simpler ones05:26
NCommanderTHat's the right one05:26
NCommanderor a right one ;-)05:26
RAOFThe right one isn't to #include <limits.h>?05:26
NCommanderanyway, if dont_check_proc_self_exe.dpatch is removed from mono, evolution-sharp now compiles05:27
NCommanderRAOF, that didn't work05:27
NCommanderYou have to define an addition preprocessor macro to make that work.05:27
RAOFHeh.05:27
NCommanderyou actually need to include stdio05:27
RAOFRight.05:27
NCommanderwith said macro05:27
NCommander#define need_IOV_MAX or something like that05:27
NCommanderRAOF, the proc patch is incredibly nasty05:29
RAOFSome header defines that, but you're right, __USE_XOPEN needs to be defined before IOV_MAX gets pulled in.05:29
NCommanderIt disables root folder checking in mono05:29
NCommanderYeah05:29
NCommanderAnd that does a lot of other things05:29
NCommanderSo I think its simpler to properly alias it just to the value the kernel is compiled with05:29
RAOFI therefore sign off on your patch :)05:29
NCommanderTHank you05:30
NCommanderSo what should I do about this mono patch05:30
NCommanderIts required (supposidity) to allow mono to work on a livecd05:30
NCommanderBut it breaks our build, and probably other packages05:30
RAOFFile a bug against mono, saying that this patch breaks building evolution-sharp on AMD64 in some circumstances.05:30
NCommanderRAOF, how long were you working on that for?05:31
RAOFThe evolution-sharp, or the nthingy?05:32
NCommanderthe former05:32
RAOFEvolution-sharp, since yesterday pretty much.05:32
NCommanderOw05:32
RAOFNot _too_ long.05:32
NCommanderYeah05:32
NCommanderBut still05:32
NCommanderIt's C#05:32
NCommanderow05:32
NCommanderRAOF, https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mono/+bug/247782 - if you wish to add yourself05:34
ubottuLaunchpad bug 247782 in mono "Ubuntu mono patchd ont_check_proc_self_exe causes FBFTS in evolution sharp" [Undecided,New]05:34
NCommander*sigh*05:34
NCommandercheck for typos BEFORE clicking submit -_-;05:35
RAOFIt's editable :)05:35
NCommanderI'l have evolution-sharp fixed once this is taken care of ;-)05:35
NCommanderSo consider that FTBFS resolved ;-)05:35
RAOFnginx uploaded.  Thanks for your contribution.05:36
NCommandersweet05:36
NCommanderWhich contribution?05:36
RAOFnginx.  Also your evolution-sharp contribution, too :)05:36
NCommandersweet05:36
NCommanderMy first bug fix actually makes it into Ubuntu ^_^05:37
NCommander(I did notify upstream)05:37
RAOFExcellent.  Which particular upstream?  Debian, or nginx?05:37
NCommanderDebian05:37
RAOFExcellent.05:38
RAOFEven better.05:38
NCommanderreportbug is awesome05:38
RAOFModerately so, yes.05:38
NCommanderJust wish I could directly send mail to the debian servers05:38
NCommanderOh well05:38
NCommanderWere there any issues with the patch?05:38
RAOFWith the nginx patch?  No.05:39
NCommanderI only got to do a NMU on Debian very rarely because finding a sponsor for a NMU is near impossible05:39
RAOFRight.  I think this is where Ubuntu's "shared responsibility" model works better.05:40
* NCommander is working the debian developer process05:40
* NCommander is not holding his breath however05:40
RAOFYeah.  I hear that takes years :)05:40
NCommanderI'm a m68k port05:40
NCommander(*porter05:40
NCommander(who also does hurd and kfreebsd part time)05:40
RAOFHence building m68k gcc.05:40
NCommanderBuilding GCC on m68k takes years05:40
NCommanderrofl ;-)05:41
RAOFWoah.  hurd too?05:41
NCommanderyeah05:41
StevenKTry OpenOffice or Java05:41
NCommanderIt's also why I have a good knack for fixing packages05:41
NCommanderStevenK, those are fine05:41
NCommanderdistcc is a wonderful thing05:41
StevenKReally?05:41
StevenKYou can't distcc gcc?05:41
NCommanderI think we build openoffice in 3 days05:41
NCommanderNo05:41
NCommanderIt builds itself05:41
NCommanderIt first builds a mini-gcc05:41
NCommanderANd then does the rest of the build with that05:41
StevenKAh05:42
NCommanderTHe worst part is the GCC release team pushes patches about once a week05:42
NCommanderBut it takes ~10 days to build GCC on m68k05:42
NCommanderYou see the problem.05:42
StevenKHah. Yes. Motorola need to release a faster m68k chip. :-)05:42
warp10Hi all05:42
NCommanderStevenK, Coldfire05:42
NCommanderBut its not ABI compatiable with m68k05:42
RAOFI count only 2 m68k machines you'd need dedicated to building gcc :)05:42
NCommanderI run five m68k buildds ...05:43
NCommander>.>;05:43
NCommanderI think I have the equivelent power of an i686 at 700Mhz05:43
StevenKNCommander: So it doesn't count. :-)05:43
RAOFDedicate two to gcc, and they can stagger the builds :)05:43
NCommanderStevenK, Nope05:43
NCommanderRAOF, We usually loose three, because one handles gcj, another does gfortan, and the other does gcc proper05:43
NCommanderBut when you have 22 buildds05:44
NCommanderIt really isn't so bad05:44
RAOFMan, m68k sounds like a barrel of laughs :)05:44
NCommanderIt's faster then hurd05:44
NCommanderBuilding glibc on hurd on a dual core processor 2.16Ghz took 24 hours05:44
RAOFHurd boots? :)05:44
NCommanderBuilding glibc on m68k (with distcc) I think takes about 1805:45
NCommanderRAOF, I got it running on real hardware05:45
StevenKNCommander: You're a masochist, aren't you? :-P05:45
NCommanderand a laptop to boot05:45
* RAOF doesn't really get the point of hurd.05:45
NCommanderNow THAT'S fun.05:45
NCommanderStevenK, no. I don't run an RPM based distro ;-)05:45
StevenKHaha05:45
vorianNCommander: any interest in finding some manpages for dmucs?05:45
vorian:)05:46
* NCommander disappears faster then hurd can panic05:46
vorianit only needs 505:46
NCommander*grumbles*05:46
NCommanderIsn't it susposed to have the manpages coming from Debian?05:46
StevenKNCommander: Hurd panics?05:46
NCommanderStevenK, I got it to corrupt its own file system by just idling05:47
StevenKWhee!05:47
NCommanderIt's actually not that bad05:47
NCommanderIf you use the right hardware, its pretty stable05:47
NCommanderI've never managed to unintentionally bring mach down05:47
* RAOF tries to reconcile "not that bad" with "corrupt its own filesystem by idling"05:48
ion_raof: :-)05:48
NCommandervorian, *sigh*, got a link to a guide to writing your own manpages05:48
NCommanderRAOF, uh .... I ran linux in the 1.x days?05:49
NCommanderand freebsd 2.x?05:49
NCommanderfor an 0.3, its not bad05:49
ion_ncommander: I tend to use asciidoc to write manpages.05:49
RAOFI've used docbook2man before, that works too.05:49
NCommanderI only wanted to fix the FTBFS, not write documentation >.<;05:50
NCommander*grumble grumble*05:50
* NCommander looks up how to use the damn thing05:50
ion_Source: http://gitweb.heh.fi/?p=ion/apt-mark-sync.git;f=man/apt-mark-sync.1.txt;hb=HEAD, result: http://gitweb.heh.fi/?p=ion/apt-mark-sync.git;f=man/apt-mark-sync.1;hb=HEAD05:51
ion_Also, http://gitweb.heh.fi/?p=ion/apt-mark-sync.git;f=man/Makefile;hb=HEAD might be handy.05:52
NCommanderargh06:11
NCommanderCan't get the name section to show up right06:11
vorianNCommander: found one06:11
NCommanderFor what?06:12
vorianhttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Howtos/PODManpage06:12
vorianeasy(er) manpage writing06:12
NCommanderTHanks06:12
NCommanderI was trying to do it with nroff06:12
vorian(for the future of course)06:12
NCommanderYour not going to make me write dmucs's manpages?06:12
vorianno06:13
NCommanderbah, I already put a good dent in it -_-;06:13
NCommanderI was trying to make the formatting look right06:13
NCommanderpod2man looks kinda weird06:19
NCommanderRAOF, if your still alive, would you like to look at my purelibc patch?06:29
=== TSLRPFox is now known as LucidFox
voriankeep up the good work NCommander06:55
* vorian sleeps06:55
NCommanderTHanks06:58
=== DrKranz is now known as DktrKranz
AnAntHello, can someone REVU this swt-gtk upload: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=swt-gtk09:59
RainCTmsg sebner uhm.. why was there a boson rebuild?12:07
* Laney throws a / at RainCT 12:08
RainCTLaney: :)12:08
DktrKranzRainCT, be careful when sending love messages with /msg, initial / is very important to keep privacy ;)12:11
sebnerDktrKranz: second package is now also in the new queue \o/12:31
DktrKranzsebner, Y. R. B.12:32
sebnerDktrKranz: HRHR12:32
devfillol12:32
voriansebner: nice work with almanah :)12:33
sebnervorian: thanks for uploading :)12:34
vorian:)12:35
DktrKranzvorian, brand new MOTU and already pushed crack from sebner? bad guy :)12:36
sebnerDktrKranz: think about the new possibilities. he could also become a SOTS12:37
vorian:o12:37
DktrKranzvorian, RUN!12:37
* vorian sprints away12:38
sebnerDktrKranz: Y. R. B :P12:39
emgentgood morning12:47
sebneremgent: \o/12:47
=== Tonio__ is now known as Tonio_
NCommandermorning world14:13
geserHi NCommander14:14
NCommanderhola geser :-)14:14
NCommanderIs there a nice list of FBFTS? (looking at the qa page I was linked to, its not updated it real-time ;.;)14:15
stgraberubuntuwire has that IIRC (or is that what you are referring as not up to date) ?14:16
NCommanderYeah14:16
geserit's updated once daily14:16
NCommanderAh14:16
nhandlerNCommander, Try harvest: http://daniel.holba.ch/harvest/sourcepackages.html14:16
stgraberLast update: 2008-07-12 02:03:41 +0000 (updated daily at 02:00 UTC)14:17
nhandlerIt has a ftbfs column14:17
geserbut you can grab the source for it and run it yourself (takes around 5 min to run)14:17
NCommanderneat14:17
* NCommander should see if I can get buildd.net's scripts to run against Ubuntu14:17
NCommanderThat page was/is my best from for dealing with autobuilders on Debain14:17
wgrantI can always run it more frequently if required.14:18
NCommanderHola wgrant :-)14:19
NCommanderwgrant, I was told to talk to you if I wanted to help with HPPA FTBFS14:19
nhandlerNCommander, the list on harvest was last updated about 5 hours ago14:20
wgrantNCommander: Really? I don't find that likely.14:21
NCommanderI think it was you, but my morning coffee still hasn't reached /dev/head, so maybe not14:22
geserdoesn't lamont care about HPPA?14:22
wgrantgeser: He was my first thought, yes.14:23
ScottK-palmnixternal: Did you see gnomefreak's comment about making sure the .so is removed (re libflashsupport)?14:23
ScottK-palmgeser: lamont's the guy for hppa.14:24
gnomefreakNicke_: libflashsupport causes most of the crashes out side of profile corruption, extensions, addons. if its flash crash removing libflashsupport.so fixes 80% (just an example i didnt measure it) of flash crashes14:25
gnomefreakack14:25
gnomefreakNicke_: not you that was fro nixternal14:25
ScottK-palmgnomefreak: Please try and catch up with crimsun or maybe TheMuso and get some expert advice.14:27
gnomefreakScottK-palm: i will most likely monday14:27
ScottK-palmIt may be we need to abandon the backport until the release gets more mature.14:28
ScottK-palmSee you later.14:28
gnomefreakScottK-palm: before that i would rather pull libflashsupport to see if it clears problems up to where its a usable plugin14:28
NCommanderDoes the 3-clause BSD license meet Debian FSG/Ubuntu's standard?14:36
hefe_biaHi all! I am about to upload a new version of my REVU packages. Should I use standards version 3.8.0.1 or 3.8.0 ?14:36
sebnerhefe_bia: it's fine when you use 3.8.014:37
hefe_biasebner: thanks14:37
NCommandersebner, does this copyrtight file look right? (I noticed it didn't include the right license)14:39
NCommanderer http://paste.ubuntu.com/26892/14:40
sebnerNCommander: sry, haven't used BSD license so far14:40
NCommanderThat's alright14:41
NCommanderSecond question, do you know how to get rid of the "Compatibility levels before 4 are deprecated." warnings?14:41
nhandlerNCommander, update the compat file14:41
NCommandernhandler, What's the current compat level?14:43
nhandlerNCommander, I don't know. I would search the Debian Policy to find out.14:44
slytherinNCommander: at least 5. Check the version of debhelper mentioned in control file14:45
NCommanderslytherin, there isn't a versioned requirement on debhelper14:48
slytherinNCommander: then 5 should be ok unless you are using anything specific to debhelper 614:48
NCommanderit builds with compat == 1 :-)14:49
bdrungvorian: ping14:59
vorianbdrung: hi14:59
bdrungvorian: bug #247725: "The only change made by Ubuntu was a rebuild. So we can safely sync."15:00
ubottuLaunchpad bug 247725 in gxmms2 "Please sync gxmms2 0.7.0-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)." [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/24772515:00
bdrungvorian: http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/universe/g/gxmms2/gxmms2_0.7.0-1build1/changelog15:00
vorianah, excellent15:01
hefe_biaREVU commenting seems broken ... :(15:03
* NCommander finally clears all the lintian warnings on this package15:07
wgranthefe_bia: Do you get an error?15:08
hefe_biawgrant: yes. A python traceback. http://paste.ubuntu.com/26899/15:09
wgranthefe_bia: Can you please try again?15:10
wgrantI touched some of the code earlier, but it seems it was the deployment that went wrong.15:10
hefe_biawgrant: still same error15:10
NCommanderAnother day, another FTBFS patch filed :-)15:17
hefe_biajust strange that it seems to be able to access the database for the other stuff... But /me doesn't know about revu code ;)15:17
sebnerNCommander: great =)15:17
NCommandersebner, care to review ;-)15:18
wgranthefe_bia: Indeed, it is very very strange.15:18
NCommanderhttps://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/transproxy/+bug/24788615:18
ubottuLaunchpad bug 247886 in transproxy "FTBFS fix on AMD64/SPARC/IA-64" [Undecided,New]15:18
NCommanderIs REVU powered by a dak installation, or is it something custom built?15:19
wgrantNCommander: It is custom built.15:19
sebnerNCommander: I'm no motu (yet) ;)15:19
NCommanderDarn, if it was dak, I have some experience with that beast ;-)15:19
NCommandermorning emgent, Tonio_15:21
NCommanderlaptop is telling me to reboot15:22
NCommanderbrb15:22
slytherinNCommander: Add your email address and descriptions to the patches. Note down the patches added in changelog.15:23
=== bliZZard1 is now known as bliZZardz
NCommanderSo I take it no sponsors in here today?15:28
slytherinNCommander: Add your email address and descriptions to the patches. Note down the patches added in changelog. And was there any need to change prefix in rules file?15:28
AnAntHello, can someone REVU swt-gtk , I just done a new upload today: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=swt-gtk15:29
NCommanderslytherin, I'm in the changelog, I don't understand wha you mean by descriptions15:29
slytherinNCommander: edit the patch you added and add description at the starting. Also note down which patch is new and why it was added in debian/changelog15:30
NCommanderThe Resolved FTBFS line isn't clear enough?15:30
slytherinNCommander: ok that is fine, but add patch name there15:31
NCommanderI did add a description to the patch15:31
slytherinAnAnt: I am not a developer but I will try to find some time to basic review.15:31
* NCommander adds his name too15:32
AnAntok15:32
NCommanderslytherin, package building now in pbuilder15:32
slytherinAnAnt: about the other package you were trying to fix, don't remember name (something starting with am), you will need to use Sun JDK for compilation.15:32
AnAntslytherin: monajat ?15:33
slytherinAnAnt: yes15:33
AnAntslytherin: you mean, it can't be built using gcj ?15:33
slytherinNCommander: And why did you change PREFIX in debian/rules?15:33
AnAntslytherin: is it because the awt lib ?15:33
slytherinAnAnt: That looks to be case from build log.15:33
AnAntslytherin: I asked the upstream to try to find out the reason15:34
NCommanderslytherin, so dh_installdirs could be used. Once the compat was set to five, it broke using tmp15:34
AnAntslytherin: I dunno why he's using awt although he's using swt15:34
slytherinNCommander: Ok.15:34
AnAntslytherin: but there is an awt package for gcj15:35
slytherinNCommander: now once you update debdiff, suscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors15:35
NCommanderIf there is a better way to do it that takes advantage of dh_installdirs, I'd love to hear it15:35
AnAntlibgcj8-1-awt15:35
slytherinCan you point me to latest build log?15:35
NCommanderslytherin, thank you for your help ;-)15:36
AnAntslytherin: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15965071/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-i386.monajat_1.0-0ubuntu1~ppa11_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz15:37
slytherinAnAnt: sun.awt.VerticalBagLayout looks to be Sun specific API15:38
wgranthefe_bia: It's fixed now.15:39
AnAntI see15:40
slytherinAnAnt: Also java.awt.SystemTray is only available in java 6. You can try compiling the package with openjdk. But I still think sun.awt will give you trouble.15:41
AnAntslytherin: it does build with openjdk15:42
AnAntslytherin: I was trying to make it work with gcj15:42
AnAntslytherin: to put it in Debian too15:42
slytherinAnAnt: Have you tried building it with openjdk using pbuilder chroot?15:43
AnAntslytherin: yes, I build using pbuilder15:43
slytherinAnAnt: openjdk will land in Debian soon, hopefully15:43
AnAntslytherin: I heard there is a problem in openjdk & sun's jdk, that they don't work on all archs, yet gcj does15:44
AnAntsomething like that15:44
NCommanderslytherin, I look forward to that day; no more nightmare with Java packages on Debian! ;-)15:44
AnAntpeople here (& on debian mentors too IIRC) encouraged me to try make apps build using gcj15:44
slytherinAnAnt: right, as of now openjdk is known to work only on i386 and amd64. a PowerPC port is available but no idea how well it works15:46
slytherinAnAnt: Try contacting upstream and ask them not to use sun specific apis and to make systray functionality optional.15:47
AnAntslytherin: doesn't gcj support java 6 ?15:47
slytherinAnAnt: no15:48
AnAntI see15:48
AnAntwell, it is made to be a systray applet15:48
AnAntso cannot make that optional I think15:49
NCommanderslytherin, I thought openjdk worked on sparc, I mean, Sun does use the sparc architecture a lot ;-)15:50
slytherinNCommander: I think they want to have their own JDK on sparc.15:52
NCommanderI was under the impression OpenJDK -> JDK 7 when it was finished15:52
NCommanderslytherin, are you a MOTU or a core-dev?15:54
warp10Hi all!15:55
slytherinNCommander: none. :-)15:55
NCommanderslytherin, DD?15:55
NCommander(you have uncanny knowledge of how to make a patch shine ;-))15:55
slytherinNCommander: Nope.15:55
NCommanderOk then, I give. I have no idea what you are ;-)15:56
slytherinNCommander: when you encounter many packages with no patches containing no description at all or changelog without reason why a patch was added, you learn to take care of it yourself. :-)15:56
NCommanderSounds about right ;-)15:57
slytherinNCommander: I am just a java programmer by day and ubuntu enthusiast all the time. Planning to become MOTU in an year or so. :-)15:57
NCommanderslytherin, maybe you can answer me this then, at what point should I consider applying for Contributing developer. I understand you probably should ask for MOTU when people start telling you are ready15:57
NCommanderOh15:57
NCommanderd'oh15:57
hefe_biawgrant: thanks, it works now.15:57
hefe_biaNo MOTUs here today?16:00
cody-somervilleI'm here16:00
hefe_bia:) Just seemed so because of NCommanders patch discussion16:02
hefe_biacody-somerville: Care to have a look at tomboy-blogposter or gebabbel on REVU? I think I have incorporated the suggestions from yesterdays discussion.16:05
alex-weejthere's a mixture of 0.23.3 and 0.23.1 versions of empathy stuff in the archives. i suspect it's what's giving me trouble installing it.16:06
slytherinalex-weej: which repositories? hardy?16:06
alex-weejIntrepid16:06
alex-weejin synaptic, when a version is labelled as (Now), that means it's currently installed right?16:06
slytherinalex-weej: yes16:07
alex-weejfor the "empathy" package, i have 2 candidates, one of them is 0.23.3 (now) from the telepathy PPA from Hardy and the other is 0.23.1 (Intrepid)16:07
alex-weejBUT16:07
alex-weejthe package isn't installed!16:07
alex-weejand i don't even have the PPA active anymore16:07
alex-weejbut there is still, e.g. libempathy-gtk-common at 0.23.3 in the archives16:08
* slytherin has to rush for dinner16:08
AnAntHello, is the "Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 " license considered free ?16:15
slytherinAnAnt: I think so. AFAIK, only CC-BY-SA license is considered Free.16:16
AnAntthat's noncommercial16:16
AnAntthe reason I ask is because it says:16:17
AnAnt     * Noncommercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes.16:18
hefe_biauser switching killed my X session !?16:27
LucidFoxemgent, a bit late, but congratulations on your MOTUship!16:33
emgentthanks LucidFox :)16:34
=== hefe_bia_ is now known as hefe_bia
c_kornhello. I want to add a file to a package which is not automatically moved to debian/tmp/usr/bin. what do I have to change to make include this file into the package?17:18
kpircI have uploaded first attempts for packages for 'modglue' and 'cadabra' (a symbolic computer algebra system) to REVU. How do I get this reviewed?17:25
udienz-!ping #ubuntu-motu admin17:28
ubottuudienz-: Error: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :)17:28
udienz-oh...17:28
slytherinudienz-: what are you trying to do?17:28
slytherinkpirc: just wait. Someone will review it at some point of tme17:28
udienz-slytherin: i can't login into revu.ubuntuwire.com, i try to recover my password but i got messages "There is no REVU account for udienz@ubuntu.com, yet."17:29
slytherinudienz-: Are you using same email address as you used when creating package?17:31
kpircslytherin: ok, thanks.17:31
udienz-slytherin: yes17:31
slytherinudienz-: I am not developer so can;'t help you musch17:32
udienz-slytherin: nope, maybe i must waiting for a while?17:33
sebnerwarp10: around?17:38
warp10sebner: here, for a few minutes more17:38
sebnerwarp10: I saw you filed a bug for asunder in debian(wnpp) are you packaging it? if not I'd do it (I started some minutes ago with it)17:39
sebnerhi RainCT17:40
warp10sebner: I am packaging it indeed, and I have almost finished it (just waiting for an answer from the upstream developers)17:40
sebnerwarp10: ok, np17:41
warp10sebner: fortunately, there soooo many needs-pacaking tagged bug in LP :)17:42
sebnerwarp10: /me can't find them xD17:42
warp10sebner: really? I see 974 of them :)17:45
warp10sebner: BTW, whatever DktrKranz I saying to you about me: please, don't believe him! :P17:46
sebnerwarp10: maybe you have magic powers or you can use the launchpad search right xD17:46
warp10sebner: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=needs-packaging17:46
sebnerwarp10: lol, thanks for the link!17:46
warp10sebner: my pleasure!17:47
* sebner hugs warp10 17:47
* warp10 hugs back sebner17:47
DktrKranzwarp10, I'm not saying anything, I'm just writing17:47
warp10DktrKranz: mmm... fair enough :)17:48
goshawkhi, where can i find the list of package section of ubuntu?18:11
goshawksections18:12
RainCTgoshawk: file:///usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.html/ch-archive.html#s-subsections18:13
goshawkah... it's the same of debian one18:17
goshawkok18:17
slytheringoshawk: what did you expect?18:18
goshawkmaybe another one... i thought it was the same, but now i have references :)18:19
* hefe_bia got alpha2 running on vmware :D18:45
* slytherin hates arch:all packages form Debain contrib. :-(18:46
slytherins/Debain/Debian18:46
foolanohi18:48
slytherinfoolano: hi18:49
foolanowhat should i do if wanted to have a stable and unstable ppa? create two separated teams?18:49
cody-somervillefoolano, that or two packages18:50
foolanocody-somerville: thx18:51
slytherinfoolano: you can simply have two different package names.18:51
foolanobut i want user to automatically upgrade from the stable branch18:51
foolanoisnt it clearer to have separated ppas?18:53
slytherinfoolano: sure, have two teams or two persons with PPA18:53
foolanook thx a lot18:54
nijabaHello, I would need some guidance on how to fix the debian/copyright of http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=limesurvey19:02
ScottKfoolano: Are you using the installed package installed config files for Postfix with ebox or do you use your own?19:03
hefe_bianijaba: Let me have a quick look...19:06
nijabahefe_bia: thanks :)19:07
foolanoScottK: our own. For now I just made some changes from the debian sarge version to make it work with hardy and release a package which can be tested for our users. I still have to check the conf you use for intrepid to base our conf on that.19:12
ScottKfoolano: I'm working with lamont to add some helper scripts to the Postfix package to make external management easier.19:13
foolanoand I still have to nag you with some questions releated to that. I should start working on that in a week19:13
ScottKI'm about to go out now, but we should takl about what you'd need.19:13
ScottKSure.19:13
foolanoScottK: cool19:14
ScottKmain.cf can be manipulated via postconf pretty well.19:14
ScottKIt's adding stuff to master.cf that's missing.19:14
hefe_bianijaba: I'm not sure whether it is reasonable to include the License Preamble for every of the included or derived from packages, but you'll have to at least give a pointer to the licenses in /usr/share/doc for the other licenses (GPL, LGPL, Apache...)19:14
foolanoScottK: I'll show you what changes we make to those files19:15
nijabahefe_bia: ah, ok, I see what is needed now.  Thanks a lot.19:15
ScottKfoolano: Would you email me?19:15
=== Kopfgeldjaeger2 is now known as Kopfgeldjaeger
foolanoScottK: yeah, if that's fine for you19:16
ScottKYes.19:16
ScottKI'll be back later, but have to go schlep teenagers across town.19:16
hefe_bianijaba: glad to help19:17
foolanoScottK: ok, thanks19:17
hefe_biareading emmet's comment on nijaba's packages... Are there template files for README.source for the common patch systems?19:19
nijabahefe_bia: I made one up for quilt, I could add it to a page if that could be usefull.  my seach on *.ubuntu.com or *.debian.org did not turn anything19:20
hefe_bianijaba: That would be cool as I use quilt, too and just realized my packages aren't 3.8.0 ready, too ;)19:21
nijabahefe_bia: what do you think of emmet's comment #7?  I think he understood the simlinks the wrong way aroung.  the link is from /usr/... to /etc, not the other way around19:22
nijabaso the orig file is the one in etc and is installed as conf file19:22
hefe_bianijaba: Is he referring to the postinst script? I see links made with ln -s file /etc/.../file19:26
nijabahefe_bia: aha, maybe, let me check that.  thanks again19:26
* hefe_bia has to go now. Guests are here ...19:27
nijabajust created https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/README.source if anyone cares19:32
slytherinnijaba: Please move it to other namespace if possible and include the url from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Complete.19:41
nijabaslytherin: what namespace would you suggest?19:42
slytherinnijaba: same as other urls like control, copyright are using. I think it is Howto/topic.19:42
slytherinnijaba: Edit the complete guide page and you will know.19:43
=== Ekushey- is now known as Ekushey
nijabaslytherin: ok, changed to README.sourceHowTo and update https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Lists/PatchingTips to point to it. Is this proper?19:50
slytherinnijaba: let me check19:51
slytherinnijaba: fine. I still think you should also include it from 'Complete' page19:53
nijabaslytherin: but the complete page is a collection of includes, if I am not mistaking19:53
slytherinnijaba: yes, so simply add your page to the list at appropriate place19:54
=== asac_ is now known as asac
Drk_GuyCan someone help out?20:35
Drk_GuyI'm having a weird error with dpkg-source20:35
Drk_Guydpkg-source: aviso: el directorio fuente './wine-1.1.1~winehq0~ubuntu~8.04~3DMark-1~ppa-1' no es <sourcepackage>-<upstreamversion> 'wine-1.1.1~winehq0~ubuntu~8.04-1~3DMark-1~ppa'20:36
Drk_GuyGuys...20:43
Drk_GuyThis is a lil bit uncool, can anyone help?20:43
cody-somervilleWell, I can't read spanish or I'd try to help you ;]20:43
Drk_Guycody-somerville, I can help out in that20:44
Drk_GuyIt is telling that "source dir is not <sourcepackage>-upstreamversion>20:44
cody-somervilleDreamThief, The directory name needs to match <sourcepackage>-<upstreamversion>20:46
cody-somervilleAnyhow, sorry but I gotta jet :)20:46
Drk_GuyOk20:47
Drk_GuyBut it is "wine-1.1.1~winehq0~ubuntu~8.04~3DMark-1~ppa-1" isn't it accordingly named=?20:47
cody-somervilleCheck the changelog and see :)20:48
Drk_Guychangelog's name is the same20:49
Drk_GuyI just added that 3DMark because i'm patching it20:49
cody-somervillethe upstream version, not package version20:50
cody-somervillewhat is the name of the source tarball?20:50
Drk_Guycody-somerville, wine_1.1.1~winehq0~ubuntu~8.04.orig.tar.gz20:51
Drk_GuyI used YokoZar's one20:51
Drk_GuyOfficial winehq's ubuntu mantainer20:51
YokoZarDrk_Guy: The directory needs to be the package version WITHOUT the last -foo at the end (usually -1 or -0ubuntu1 or similar)21:12
YokoZarso blah-blah-foo-2-2-1ubuntu1 would be in directory blah-blah-foo-2-221:13
Drk_GuyYokoZar, Gonna try removing the -1 out of ppa-121:14
Drk_GuyThanks YokoZar, i'm gonna be a sub-mantainer of wine21:14
Drk_GuyXD21:14
Drk_GuyYokoZar, Still, it's the same21:15
Drk_GuyYokoZar, you there?21:21
sebnernhandler: congratulations :)21:46
nhandlerThank you sebner21:46
=== Kopfgeldjaeger is now known as blub
=== blub is now known as Kopfgeldjaeger

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!