[05:22] <ScottK2> Is the bug page layout on edge right now roughly one that's intended for production or is it just an experiment?
[05:23] <Hobbsee> mpt: ^
[05:25] <Hobbsee> interesting.  unlike the bugs, the blueprints have no box to say how you want things sorted, but you have to click on the headings.
[05:26] <Hobbsee> while it makes more sense that way, at least for some options...
[05:35] <LaserJock> ScottK2: I would guess it's roughly what is intended for production if they put it on edge, with perhaps bug fixes, etc. 
[05:37] <ScottK2> I guess the kindest way I can put it is that my initial impression is that it continues the trend as I see it in Launchpad U/I.
[05:40] <lifeless> I don't know if its deliberate or not :P
[05:41] <ScottK2> Every time I complain, I'm promised I'll get used to it, but I never do.
[05:41] <ScottK2> The only thing I have going for me is that at my age eventually I forget what it used to look like.
[05:42] <LaserJock> heh, it's not just age ;-)
[05:42] <LaserJock> I have similar issues
[05:44] <ScottK2> Of course one way to not get so many "I can't find X" bugs is to stop moving stuff around.
[05:44] <LaserJock> well, I don't particularly mind the changes so much
[05:44] <LaserJock> but I'd much rather have existing bugs fixed
[05:45] <LaserJock> and yeah, a often-moving UI makes things difficult
[05:45] <ScottK2> My favorite LP view right now is on my phone with images, javascript, and CSS all turned off.  That's reasonable workable.
[05:45] <ScottK2> I need to figure out how to replicate it on the desktop.
[05:46] <ScottK2> I guess just switch to w3m.
[05:48] <LaserJock> wow, 3 levels of tabs, interesting :-)
[05:49] <LaserJock> somebody must have been at GUADEC :-)
[05:49] <Hobbsee> i almost want a simple, text only interface for LP
[05:49] <Hobbsee> but that would require subscribing to all ubuntu bugs, and searching that way.  don't think i want it that much
[05:50] <ScottK2> Hobbsee: w3m.
[05:50] <Hobbsee> ScottK2: that works?
[05:52] <ScottK2> Not yet.
[05:52] <ScottK2> It seems to think Launchpad is violating RFC 2109 4.3.2 rule 3
[05:52] <ScottK2> I am about to look up what that is.
[05:53] <LaserJock> it works for me, though I saw a warning about that
[05:55] <ScottK2> The value for the request-host does not domain-match the Domain attribute.
[05:56] <LaserJock> oh, I see, it rejects the cookie
[05:58] <ScottK2> Already reported: Bug 59510
[05:59] <ScottK2> The current state of play seems to be "Following the security guidelines in the RFC would be inconvenient."
[06:00] <LaserJock> well, invonvenient for users it seems, if I read Stuart's comment right
[06:02] <LaserJock> although I don't really see an advantage to using CLI browsers for LP
[06:02] <LaserJock> it's harder to get around
[06:02] <ScottK2> Less clutter.
[06:03] <ScottK2> I didn't find the activity log in it's new location despite much looking until I looked at the page with no images and no CSS.
[06:03] <ScottK2> It's harder to get around, but easier to find stuff.
[06:04] <LaserJock> the activity log was *easier* for  me to find in the new pages :/
[06:04] <ScottK2> I KNEW where it was before it was moved.
[06:06] <LaserJock> sure, but it seems like it's at a handier spot now
[06:06] <LaserJock> took me a first look to find where everything has moved to though
[06:08] <ScottK2> Right, let's put activity log by the one piece of activity information you don't need it for.
[06:09] <LaserJock> I think I would've put it by the title perhaps
[06:10] <LaserJock> but it's nice to have it near the top
[06:11] <ScottK2> I'm to the point that I care more about stuff not moving than I care about where any of it is (except the subscribe links being under the list where I always have to scroll down after it).
[06:13] <LaserJock> well, I'm pretty much with you on that
[07:34] <Avdhut> Hi Guyz
[11:14]  * mfm is away: Ich bin beschäftigt
[13:24]  * mfm is back (gone 02:10:33)
[15:40] <Laibsch> good morning
[15:41] <Laibsch> how long does it usually take for somebody to review an import request for translations@LP?
[15:41] <Laibsch> I am particularly interested in https://translations.launchpad.net/gnucash/+imports
[15:59] <Ursinha-afk> Laibsch, guess it depends of the project
[15:59] <Laibsch> What project?
[15:59] <Laibsch> gnucash?
[15:59] <Laibsch> I am the admin of gnucash
[15:59] <Ursinha-afk> hm
[15:59] <Laibsch> on LP
[16:00] <Ursinha-afk> it was just a guess :)
[16:00] <Laibsch> thanks anyway for guessing
[16:00] <Laibsch> Any other takers?
[16:35] <nedko> i've uploaded new version of source package to my PPA and it got "updated" somehow. It got auto-published, old version auto-deleted but repo is missing the binaries for the new version. what should i do?
[16:37] <nedko> status of old package is "superseeded", will publish of binaries happen automatically?
[16:37] <pep> I filed a question last week for the deletion of 2 projects and still got no response, must I do anything about this? https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/38202 (I know it's sunday :-) )
[17:04] <Laibsch> nedko: URL to ppa?
[17:05] <nedko> Laibsch: https://launchpad.net/~nedko/+archive
[17:05] <nedko> Laibsch: it got updated though. Still "published" state was really misleading
[17:05] <nedko> i checked the repo manually to find when it is really published
[17:06] <nedko> Laibsch: it is ok atm
[17:06] <Laibsch> nedko: looks fine to me
[17:07] <nedko> Laibsch: yes, the problem was that new package was in published state but that didnt reflect reality
[17:18] <johnnyg> I've read through the FAQs and taken the tour of Launchpad. It seems perfect for closed source business projects. Can my business pay for the Launchpad service? If not, is there any pay for hosting solution that is even close to Launchpad?
[17:21] <johnnyg> ah, here's my answer: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/30191
[18:15] <mpt> Gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooood evening Launchpadders!
[18:16] <Ursinha-afk> mpt, good evening :)
[18:18] <pep> good evening
[19:08] <nedko> is there a way i can sign launchpad PPA built binary packages?
[19:21] <siretart> nedko: this is bug #125103
[19:21] <nedko> siretart: thanks!
[23:27] <koelly> hi
[23:28] <koelly> How can i upload my packages to ppa fpr gutsy? The hardy packages are working fine, buthow to do for gutsy (or intrepid)??
[23:29] <nedko> koelly: i'm newbie and i may be wrong, but AFAIK you set version in the changelog
[23:30] <koelly> ah okay. i'll give it a try :)  Thx!
[23:30] <nedko> koelly: also once uploaded there seems to be option for copying packages to other release (i havent used it yet)
[23:30] <koelly> hmmm sounds good!
[23:33] <koelly> Yes! You were right! it's possible to copy allready built packages! Thank! saved lots of time!
[23:38] <nedko> koelly: good to know i'm not the only newbie here :]
[23:39] <koelly> hehe you'r right. I think 6 day t launchpad don't me to a pro ;-)
[23:58] <mano> hi
[23:58] <mano> anyone know about rinetd
[23:58] <mano> a port redirector