| crimsun | asac: RE: 245122, both libnspr4 and libnss3 have epochs, so you'll need to adjust the versioned C+R | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| === arthur__ is now known as arthur- | ||
| ScottK | We had discussed getting the patch in mozilla Bug 440840 in after mozilla had approved it. They have now. | 02:00 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 440840 in File Handling "mailcap handling may fail due to race conditions between thread waiting and system()" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440840 | 02:00 |
| ScottK | asac: ^^^ | 02:01 |
| * nxvl waves | 02:01 | |
| ogra | ScottK, what did the libflashsupport package in backports contain ? it should have only been a transitional package (if flash 10 even has it as dependency which i dont think and which shouldnt be) | 02:07 |
| ogra | (it shouldnt be installed alongside flash10 ) | 02:10 |
| crimsun | ogra: it wasn't transitional; it contains a conflicts with hardy's flashplugin-nonfree to force being removed with Flash 10 betas | 02:29 |
| asac | crimsun: indeed. how could i have missed that :( | 10:45 |
| Bubulle | hello, is that a good place to discuss the proposed-updates branch of Ubuntu? | 10:48 |
| Bubulle | A new firefox package was pushed to Hardy proposed-updates last night. Unfortunately, I discovered it removed french localized firefox3 without notice. Updates should not remove components unless it is replaced by very same fonctionnality. | 10:50 |
| laga | Bubulle: i suggest you look at the changelog of that firefox. there should be a bug report number in there for the last upload. go to that bug report and post a comment there | 10:51 |
| asac | Bubulle: you shouldn thave run dist-upgrade | 10:51 |
| asac | err, sorry. which version does your language-pack-XX have? | 10:52 |
| Bubulle | just regular update pulled it from proposed-updates. I now I did enable the proposed branch to test new versions without jumping to the ubuntu devel branch. I just like to make it know that, sometimes it can break things :) | 10:53 |
| Bubulle | language-pack-fr 1:8.04+20080527 | 10:54 |
| asac | too bad | 10:55 |
| asac | Bubulle: i thought the language pack bump was done long time ago | 10:55 |
| asac | Bubulle: get your lang pack from https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-langpack/+archive | 10:55 |
| asac | ffox obviously will have to wait for that getting uploade | 10:56 |
| Bubulle | The firefox upgrade that pulled out french localization is 3.01+build1+nobinonly-Ubuntu0.8.04.1 | 10:56 |
| asac | i am aware of that | 10:56 |
| asac | thats all ok. its just that the langpacks were forgotten to be uploaded | 10:56 |
| * wgrant would like to point out that -proposed is permitted to break things - that's the point. | 10:56 | |
| asac | right. | 10:57 |
| * Bubulle agree | 10:57 | |
| asac | well. at least temporarily ;) | 10:57 |
| asac | ArneGoetje: can you please get the langpacks updates in as soon as possible? | 10:58 |
| Bubulle | I know about the proposed-updates risks of breaking things. I know I may help with feedback on purose as well :) | 10:59 |
| asac | Bubulle: thats fine. thanks for the update | 11:04 |
| asac | if you want to get lang packs now use the langpack PPA i posted above | 11:04 |
| Bubulle | asac, just did it. As it is installed outside of repos, will it update next time? | 11:06 |
| asac | Bubulle: should work. | 11:08 |
| Bubulle | got version 20080708, and should I upgrade language-pack-xx-base to match? | 11:08 |
| asac | Bubulle: shouldnt hurt | 11:09 |
| Bubulle | Got back french locale on my Firefox. Many thanks for the tip. | 11:10 |
| emgent | heya | 12:25 |
| === LucidFox__ is now known as LucidFox | ||
| === bdrung_ is now known as bdrung | ||
| === hunger_t is now known as hunger | ||
| === ScottK2 is now known as ScottK-laptop | ||
| Rocket2DMn | question for you all, i'm triaging bug 248163 but before i go through and mark it as triaged/critical, i need to know that i'm not missing something very obvious | 18:40 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 248163 in ubuntu "Network menu item missing in Intrepid Alpha 2" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/248163 | 18:40 |
| Rocket2DMn | has this been intentionally removed? if so, what is its replacement? | 18:40 |
| * ScottK-laptop has a hard time imagining a missing menu item being critical regardless. | 18:41 | |
| Rocket2DMn | i understand, but it won't load from terminal either, running network-admin doesnt work | 18:41 |
| ScottK-laptop | Then at the very least the bug needs a better title. | 18:42 |
| Rocket2DMn | so there is only the applet for configuring the network | 18:42 |
| Rocket2DMn | i agree, i didnt file the bug report though | 18:42 |
| nxvl | hi | 18:42 |
| nxvl | is there any build admin here? | 18:42 |
| * ScottK-laptop is a Kubuntu user/dev so has no actual opinion on Gnome problems. | 18:42 | |
| Rocket2DMn | i guess i can mark it as High importance if you think Critical is too much. Having network control seems critical to me though, but you're the devs in here | 18:45 |
| Rocket2DMn | can somebody please help me confirm that this is actually a bug and wasn't done on purpose? it just seems a rather large problem to be an accident | 18:46 |
| ScottK-laptop | There is still a way to do it, right (via the applet)? | 18:47 |
| Rocket2DMn | nm-applet is still there | 18:49 |
| ScottK-laptop | I'd say High at most since there's still A way to do it. | 18:50 |
| Rocket2DMn | alright, Triaged/High it is | 18:50 |
| Rocket2DMn | ok thanks ScottK , it is done | 18:52 |
| === johanbr_ is now known as johanbr | ||
| hunger | Could somebody please look into getting the fix from https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/cmake/+bug/239451 into intrepid? | 19:09 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 239451 in cmake "ccmake missing?" [Unknown,Fix committed] | 19:09 |
| hunger | Thanks! | 19:09 |
| === philsf is now known as philsf_ | ||
| nxvl | pitti: around? | 19:25 |
| nxvl | pitti: we have a little doubt in pbuilder's FTBFS issue | 19:26 |
| nxvl | pitti: and you make help | 19:26 |
| nxvl | geser and i have investigated on the source of the problem | 19:26 |
| nxvl | and it's that texlive-xetex (main) depends on dvipdfmx (universe) which make it fail to build | 19:27 |
| nxvl | also i have researched | 19:27 |
| nxvl | and the why of this dependency is described here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=430373 | 19:27 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 430373 in texlive-xetex "texlive-xetex: no configuration file for xdvipdfmx (was: Accessing mathmatics symbols within XeTeX)" [Normal,Closed] | 19:27 |
| nxvl | so i think moving to recommends will be enought for fixing the issue, but also a MIR may be what it's needed | 19:28 |
| nxvl | pitti: what do you think? | 19:28 |
| ScottK-laptop | nxvl: If you move it to recommends, it still needs a MIR. | 19:29 |
| nxvl | i hate the install-recommends-by-default change | 19:30 |
| nxvl | it such a PITA | 19:30 |
| nxvl | it will need a MIR for tetex-base too | 19:35 |
| geser | isn't tetex gone? | 19:35 |
| geser | nxvl: if I looked correctly all (build-)dependencies are already in main | 19:36 |
| nxvl | geser: i'm talking about dvipdfmx dependencies | 19:37 |
| geser | nxvl: me too | 19:38 |
| jcristau | nxvl: texlive-base-bin is in main | 19:38 |
| === philsf_ is now known as philsf | ||
| * nxvl rechecks | 19:41 | |
| nxvl | mm weird, now it says it is | 19:42 |
| nxvl | ok, so we just need a MIR for dvipdfmx | 19:43 |
| * nxvl starts writing | 19:43 | |
| geser | thanks | 19:43 |
| nxvl | ScottK-laptop: where is the MIR writing doc? | 19:49 |
| nxvl | ScottK-laptop: did you have it on hand? | 19:49 |
| ScottK-laptop | Yes. | 19:49 |
| * nxvl HUGS ScottK-laptop | 19:49 | |
| nxvl | ScottK-laptop: can you give me the link please :D | 19:50 |
| ScottK-laptop | Yes. Was getting. | 19:50 |
| geser | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MainInclusionProcess | 19:50 |
| * ScottK-laptop hands nxvl https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MainInclusionProcess | 19:50 | |
| ScottK-laptop | ;-) | 19:50 |
| nxvl | :D | 19:50 |
| nxvl | geser: thank you! | 19:51 |
| nxvl | ScottK-laptop: you too! | 19:51 |
| ScottK-laptop | nxvl: After you get that one done, please do some on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ClamavSpamassassinInMain | 19:52 |
| nxvl | ScottK-laptop: yes, it's on my ToDo | 19:54 |
| nxvl | ScottK-laptop: and about to reach the top | 19:55 |
| ScottK-laptop | Great. | 19:55 |
| pitti | nxvl: dvipdfmx appears in component-mismatches; right, it just needs an MIR | 20:17 |
| * ScottK-laptop waves at pitti. | 20:19 | |
| nxvl | pitti: :D | 20:19 |
| nxvl | pitti: thank you | 20:19 |
| pitti | hey ScottK, greetings from London | 20:29 |
| stgraber | hey pitti, how's London ? | 20:31 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| pitti | stgraber: sunny, surprisingly :) | 20:44 |
| pitti | it was raining heavily in Dresden when I left | 20:44 |
| ScottK-laptop | Doesn't it always rain in Dresden? | 20:44 |
| pitti | now I'm VOIPing a bit and catch up with some mail | 20:44 |
| pitti | ScottK-laptop: no, that was London :) | 20:45 |
| ScottK-laptop | See you later. | 20:45 |
| stgraber | pitti: also raining here so I wondered if London would then be in some kind of storm :) As they get worse weather most of the time. | 20:46 |
| hunger | pitti: Could you sync cmake from debian/unstable? The ubuntu deb is missing a rather important binary (ccmake) which is in the debian package. | 20:51 |
| hunger | pitti: See bug #239451 | 20:52 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 239451 in cmake "ccmake missing?" [Unknown,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/239451 | 20:52 |
| pitti | hunger: that cmake is in intrepid, so the bug should be fixed? | 21:07 |
| * pitti checks | 21:07 | |
| pitti | ah, it's not, pending in Debian | 21:10 |
| pitti | hunger: so we should sync when it's fixed in Debian | 21:10 |
| * pitti -> off, cu tomorrow | 21:10 | |
| hunger | pitti: Just got the debian sources from cmake 2.6.0-4 and build them: The generated deb does contain ccmake. | 21:16 |
| hunger | pitti: That is why I suggested syncing it. | 21:16 |
| hunger | pitti: It does not contain cmake-gui... but that is a different matter;-) | 21:18 |
| ScottK | hunger: The bug is still marked pending in Debian, not fixed. | 21:29 |
| * hunger checks the bugtracker. | 21:30 | |
| hunger | ScottK: I do have the deb installed and I definitely have ccmake! | 21:31 |
| ScottK | Odd. | 21:31 |
| hunger | ScottK: With "the deb" I am referring to the debian sources version 2.6.0-4. | 21:31 |
| * ScottK just checked the bug tracker. | 21:31 | |
| hunger | ScottK: Well, the debian bugtracker says that the source builds do work fine... seems to be a problem with the buildsystem? | 21:33 |
| ScottK | Note that 2.6.0-4 was uploaded to Debian before that bug was filed. | 21:33 |
| ScottK | And debian/changelog in -4 has nothging to do with it. | 21:34 |
| hunger | ScottK: Seems like the dependencies are broken... My ccmake is linked against libncurses while the build-dep is libncursesw... | 21:34 |
| hunger | I guess I just happen to have some working ncurses around when doing debuild:-) | 21:35 |
| ScottK | This is mentioned in that bug too. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=481392#15 | 21:35 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 481392 in cmake "cmake: missing ccmake" [Normal,Open] | 21:35 |
| * hunger grumbles that the debian maintainer is not moving... last entry in that bug is may 24th. | 21:36 | |
| hunger | cmake is essential for kde4 work:-( | 21:36 |
| Nafallo | meeh | 21:48 |
| Nafallo | I read coke rather than cmake :-P | 21:48 |
| * laga hands Nafallo some pepsi | 21:48 | |
| * Nafallo gives the pepsi backs to laga and asks for some coke instead | 21:48 | |
| Nafallo | :-) | 21:48 |
| cody-somerville | Nafallo, a coke or some coke? : P | 21:50 |
| laga | some coke, of course. 330ml is a common serving size here | 21:51 |
| cody-somerville | laga, odd, they measure it in grams here :P lol | 21:53 |
| Nafallo | cody-somerville: are there a difference? :-) | 21:54 |
| Nafallo | dooh | 21:54 |
| * cody-somerville fails. | 21:54 | |
| Nafallo | cody-somerville: some cans of coke ;-) | 21:54 |
| Nafallo | cody-somerville: http://www.kitti.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/failed-please-die.jpg ? ;-) | 21:54 |
| cody-somerville | lol | 21:55 |
| Nafallo | I need to print that one in A4 or something and put up on some wall somewhere :-) | 21:55 |
| cody-somerville | In other news, I think you should see this: http://youtube.com/watch?v=EwL0G9wK8j4 | 21:55 |
| johanbr | Reminds me of the time I was standing in the soft drink aisle at Safeway and my friend proudly proclaimed "I'm a coke addict." :) | 21:56 |
| * Nafallo clives | 21:56 | |
| Nafallo | lol. funny add :-P | 22:02 |
| Nafallo | ad even | 22:02 |
| cody-somerville | Nafallo, This one impressed me: http://youtube.com/watch?v=PLHjT5-XM9o | 22:13 |
| cody-somerville | Nafallo, There seems to be a number of nice linux commercials/ads on youtube. | 22:13 |
| Nafallo | I can imagine :-) | 22:14 |
| Nafallo | wow. that one is awesome. | 22:17 |
| Nafallo | I need to facebook that one. | 22:17 |
| cody-somerville | :) | 22:18 |
| === RAOF_ is now known as RAOF | ||
| __stress___ | I accidentally deleted some of my /home/"user" config files and now when I type "sudo any_command" and "tab" the command so that it can be auto-completed it does not complete....otherwise when I just type the comand and tab it, it auto-copletes...what can I do? | 22:37 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
