=== emgent_ is now known as emgent [01:49] RAOF, are you available? === asac_ is now known as asac [04:52] brasero sucks [04:52] anyone else tried to use it to copy a cdrom to an iso file? [04:55] what for? [04:56] in all cases I can think of but one, simple file copies suffice [05:05] to upload to a virtual machine [05:06] basically im ripping an xp cd and uploading it to an esx server ;) [05:06] and brasero is choking on donkey doodle [05:06] i think it may be due to a read error though.. at least k3b was nice enough to inform me about it and complete the operation that i requested [05:07] as much as i love gnome.. i hate how kde has _some_ better applications ;) [05:15] ah well, k3b is quite nice [05:15] brasero is getting better, but theres no need to get angry when you can do what you want [05:17] I actually don't particularly care for k3b [05:17] neither do i.. i'd love to use brasero [05:17] if it didnt suck every time i tried to use it [05:18] a different bug [05:18] and k3b works like a champion [05:18] the only thing i dont like about k3b is that it seems to want to single click open [05:19] theres no good way to select things, i think it's a kde setting that i dont have by way of not installing kubuntu [05:19] the only thing i dont like about k3b, is that it depends on kde and uses qt ;) [05:19] qq [05:19] in the era of 1GB minimum vista machines, i think we can afford both qt and gtk [05:19] I don't like it's UI [05:20] what i do like about k3b.. is that its difficult to fault it, technically [05:20] ok so its interface is a bit iffy, but at least it works [05:23] brasero's UI is kinda spartan [05:23] (and expects users to read) [07:06] when confirming requests for package version upgrades in intrepid, do i just mark it as confirmed/wishlist and let the package managers find the bug report, or do i need to subscribe the MOTUs or package archive admins? [07:06] (not necessarily sync/merge requests) [07:06] don't subscribe the motu!!!! [07:06] lol ok [07:06] thats why i ask [07:06] or the package archive admins [07:07] i will personally come and stab you if you do. [07:07] haha alright, so dont assign anybody, just confirm and wishlist the reports? [07:07] down Hobbsee down! ;-) [07:07] not necessarily assign, but subscribe [07:07] every time the team 'motu' gets subscribed / assigned to a bug, *many* kittens die. [07:07] yup [07:07] we don't need any stabbings around here ;-) [07:07] yup re: dont subscribe or assign? [07:08] correct. [07:08] that makes life easy [07:08] if you were to assign, or subscribe the motu, you'd be spamming...what is it...50+ people in one hit? [07:08] i didnt think i needed to, just wanted to check, thanks [07:08] most who really don't care about the package at all [07:08] Hobbsee: more like 100 people [07:08] you may also want to file a request in the debian bugtracker, too [07:08] LaserJock: ahh. i thought my number was low [07:09] and considering we have like 10k bugs in Universe that'd be a whole lot of bugmail ;-) [07:09] Hobbsee, you mean for requests that arent for merges/syncs? [07:09] ex: bug 246822 [07:09] Launchpad bug 246822 in prism "Prism on Intrepid should be updated to new upstream version 0.9" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/246822 [07:09] Rocket2DMn: yes [07:10] do you have a link to the debian bugtracker handy? [07:10] wait [07:10] not for that particular package, it's nto in debian [07:10] or rmadison lies [07:11] bugs.debian.org, iirc. [07:11] so i *wouldn't* file that one in debian :) [07:11] Rocket2DMn: if you've got a special interest in it, poke fta on irc [07:12] who looks like the last uploader [07:12] * LaserJock stabs Fortran in the heart and watches with glee as it slowly dies a horrible death [07:13] Hobbsee, where do you see that? you looking at the changelog? [07:13] Rocket2DMn: yeah - right hand pane of that bug [07:14] uhhh is that something only on edge? [07:14] oh. scroll down [07:14] i think it moved in edge, to the top [07:14] "prism" source package in ubuntu [07:14] it's titled ^ [07:14] on the url ubottu gave [07:15] oh i didnt have that expanded [07:15] got it [07:15] i only need to ping the last uploader if i need something special right? [07:16] well, feel free to ask if they've got plans to update it [07:16] they may already know about it - people often subscribe to packages they're interested in [07:17] thats a pain to contact all the previous uploaders [07:17] (the previous for each bug that is) [07:17] if they are subscribed to it, shouldnt they get the bug report sub anyway? [07:20] Hobbsee, how did you determine if the package was available in the debian repos? did you just search for it on http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages ? [07:20] Rocket2DMn: there's a tool called rmadison in devscripts - i used that [07:21] ah i already have that package, thanks [07:22] Rocket2DMn: remember to use rmadison -u debian to get the Debian versions [07:23] thanks LaserJock [07:24] OK then, so for bug 246823 - that package IS available in debian unstable [07:24] Launchpad bug 246823 in gwyddion "New upstream release of gwyddion (2.10) available" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/246823 [07:26] should i just respond with something like "Please sync version 2.10-1 from debian unstable" and confirm/wishlist ? [07:57] Does anyone know how to get debugging symbols for libc? [07:58] I have libc-dbgsym and libc6-dev-dbgsym installed [07:59] but valgrind doesn't give useful info for libc stuff === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn [09:17] anyone else finding that clicking on a link in konqueror tries to download the page and asks if you want to save or open with kate? [11:05] can anyone check Bug 232070 [11:05] Launchpad bug 232070 in linux "Rockchip ROCK MP3" device (071b:3203)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/232070 [11:14] cool: looking [11:14] Thanks, i hope i made all information available [11:16] hi afflux, I missed you 'good morning' today ;) [11:16] duh [11:17] good morning :) [11:17] hehe [11:18] thanks, this made my day [11:19] *yay* ^^ [11:19] cool: yes you did, but looking at the kernel source, hardy has 2.6.24 where the fix is included [11:20] k [11:20] I'll add that to the report [11:28] afflux, any workaround? [11:29] cool: you're on hardy right? If it does not work, the patch either wasn't correct or you're having experiencing issue. Unfortunately I'm not a kernel guy so I don't really know what's the problem [11:29] cool: you could try whether the bug Leann posted is of any help [11:29] k [11:30] * cool checks [11:39] afflux, Check my comment [11:40] cool, hm, I've no idea then, sorry [11:40] mvo: Would you care to have a glance at question 38063? It is about update-manager hanging; probably caused by an error in the local network configuration. I cannot reproduce it, in spite of having read a lot of seemingly related questions and bugs. I'm reaching the point to advise the user to reinstall ubuntu. Maybe you see the root cause and an easy solution very quickly. I don't think the user is confident to do things like editing network settings fro [11:41] afflux, no problem :) [11:43] mouz, bug 248010 is also similar [11:43] Launchpad bug 248010 in update-notifier "Update manager is extremely problematic - had to cycle power to kill it" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/248010 [11:43] cool: read it :) [11:43] cool: I mean I have been reading it :) thanks [11:44] :) [12:02] mouz: sure, let me have a look === jjesse_ is now known as jjesse === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn [15:53] Boo [15:54] yikes === LucidFox is now known as TSLRPFox === gnomefre1k is now known as gnomefreak [16:32] Would bug #248730 be classified as an invalid? [16:32] Launchpad bug 248730 in ubuntu-meta "Ubuntu is drowning in bugs" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/248730 [16:33] Hmm actually I can answer my own question.... I'll direct the reporter to the discussion groups [16:34] yeah, that's a definite invalid bug [16:34] u-d-d is probably a reasonable place for that discussion [16:35] not that it'll actually help, or anything [16:36] bug 100000 [16:36] Launchpad bug 100000 in malone "There are still too many bug reports" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/100000 [16:37] haha, yes [16:37] Mark it as a duplicate? :D [16:38] well, one relates to ubuntu, and another relates to launchpad [16:38] but either way... [17:11] hi all! who's here for Hug Day? [17:24] I'm working on a Bug #137628, which the reporter also reported to Abiword bugzilla. They are not working it, [17:24] Launchpad bug 137628 in abiword "mailmerge direct to printer is undocumented" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/137628 [17:25] and it is from 20077-09-05. Do I request information from Abiword or the reporter? [17:53] anybody working on KDE3->4 hug day, let me know if you need something tested in Intrepid [18:07] Oh, well. I confirmed the bug because upstream did accept it. [18:59] Awsoonn: please mark bugs off on the hug day page when you work on them. thanks for helping! [19:00] * Awsoonn blinks [19:00] did I work on one today? :p [19:00] I was looking at bug 66159 [19:00] Launchpad bug 66159 in kdebase "Some Hebrew-related font missing for Konqueror" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/66159 [19:02] ah, yes. Sorry about that~ === \sh is now known as LeonovShuttle === LeonovShuttle is now known as \sh [20:02] Bug 179796 was filed 2008-01-02. Moinmoin 1.7 is in intrepid. Should the status be set to Won't Fix? [20:02] Launchpad bug 179796 in moin "please package MoinMoin version 1.6" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/179796 === mcas_away is now known as mcas === emma is now known as emmy === jjesse_ is now known as jjesse