/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/07/15/#ubuntu-testing.txt

=== asac_ is now known as asac
asacstgraber: davmor2: sbeattie: firefox security update bits are available for testing: http://mozilla.qa.ubuntu.com/ in case someone has questions and I am not available, please send them to #ubuntu-mozillateam10:39
davmor2asac: I'll try but I got to sod off in a sec10:40
asacdavmor2: ok. one thing. could you please paste the text i sent through QA?10:41
asaci lost the text and would like to blog about it too :/10:41
asachmm ... let me check if i received the mail as well10:41
davmor2added to #ubuntu-quality between the two should get covered :)10:43
sbeattieasac: is the firefox3 package in your ppa newer than the one in hardy-proposed?13:01
asacsbeattie: no. you can also test the ones in proposed. more important are definitly dapper (distro backports) and feisty+gutsy13:25
sbeattieokay13:25
asac(as i couldnt test them so far)13:25
davmor2asac: ping any tests left I just got back :(16:32
asacdavmor2: yes. plentry16:50
asachttp://mozilla.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/16:50
asaceverything needs morecoverage16:50
asacdavmor2: order of preference: dapper | hardy, gutsy, feisty16:54
davmor2asac: no probs I'll do a dry run after tea and upload my results.  If it's hardy proposed then I've been using it on and off16:56
asacdavmor2: yes its hardy-proposed16:56
asacmost likely well tested16:56
davmor2okay so I'll install dapper on my test machine after and run the update on that16:59
asacrock on17:12
jrdidoes anyone know when the beta for the next release is planned?18:17
davmor2asac: added 1 for dapper 15 mins existing seems fine.18:26
davmor2I can't test much more Got to go :(  But tick for hardy proposed and tick for dapper :)18:28
=== matt64- is now known as erle-
David-AAbout testing new firefox 2 patch, does it matter if I use Xubuntu 7.10 insteadof ubuntu dito?21:37
stgraberDavid-A: no problem21:55
David-Aok, i'll go to http://mozilla.qa.ubuntu.com/ and see what to do.21:59
stgrabercool, thanks for helping22:00
David-Astgraber: if i do "sudo apt-get dist-upgrade" wont I suddenly be 8.04 then?22:01
stgraberno22:02
David-Aok22:02
stgraberyou'd have to start do-upgrade to the update-manager to update to 8.0422:02
stgrabers/to/or/22:03
David-Awhat is the apt-command to upgrade modules selectively? (i dont want to upgrade "flashplugin-nonfree") ("apt-get dist-upgrade <pkg>..." still suggset all pkgs will be upgraded, and is not supported by the man page)22:41
stgraberDavid-A: apt-get install <package to upgrade>22:46
David-Aobviusly, thats who a programmer would do it, when i think about it (i'm a programmer, why didnt i see that? :-)22:49
stgraberbah, it perfectly makes sense to upgrade a package by installing it (again) no ? :)22:50
David-Aexactly22:51
David-Awell, when I upgraded the packages in synaptic it download approx 1MB in fulls22:52
David-Aspeed, then it stops22:52
David-Asame with apt-get22:52
David-Aeach time i get 1MB more of the upgraded packagse. i'll have to restart the process 20 or 40 times before im done. maybe a test report tomorrow or the day after.22:54
stgraberyou may want to try another mirror :)22:55
David-Agood idea (now it seems i get a chunk now and then if i leave apt-get working, i'll surf while waiting. i'll look in synaptics menues for other urls if and when i give up)23:00
David-Aunder the title "ffox 2 - gutsy 2.0.0.16+1nobinonly (testing)" the link "http://mozilla.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/info/1786" says "Function not implemented yet" and the link "http://mozilla.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/test/1786" just has a link to the same place. (my noscript allows this site)23:11

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!