[14:55] <F1l1p3> help
[14:55] <F1l1p3> i just compiled the kernel
[14:55] <F1l1p3> and i got a black screen after the boot
[14:55] <F1l1p3> anyone??
[14:56] <alex_joni> F1l1p3: does it finish booting?
[14:59] <F1l1p3> yeah right before the login screen 
[14:59] <F1l1p3> all get black
[15:00] <F1l1p3> so i have to restart 
[15:00] <F1l1p3> i get no msg just the screen got black
[15:00] <alex_joni> F1l1p3: can you use Ctrl-Alt-F1 to get to a console?
[15:01] <visik7> hi
[15:01] <visik7> what's the command that you guys use to create the kernel package ? make-kpkg or dpkg-buildpackage ?
[15:03] <F1l1p3> no i can`t use nothing
[15:04] <F1l1p3> i got the sound that entered in the login screen
[15:04] <F1l1p3> but it`s all black
[15:07] <F1l1p3> and all it rest is me to restart the laptop
[15:27] <alex_joni> if I build a new kernel (same ABI, almost no changes), would it be possible to use the old modules?
[15:27] <visik7> alex_joni: just tring right now
[15:27] <visik7> I'll tell you
[15:28] <alex_joni> visik7: I use fakeroot debian/rules .. to build a kernel
[15:29] <alex_joni> was wondering if anyone knows what gets tested for struct_module version matching
[15:29] <visik7> I use this command
[15:29] <visik7> CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=2 AUTOBUILD=1 NOEXTRAS=1 fakeroot debian/rules binary-generic
[15:30] <visik7> alex_joni: what are you patching ?
[15:31] <alex_joni> visik7: rtai
[15:31] <alex_joni> www.rtai.org
[15:35] <visik7> I think it could broke the abi
[15:36] <visik7> didn't it ?
[15:36] <alex_joni> I already built a kernel which works, now I need to update it slightly
[15:37] <alex_joni> and I wonder if all modules built for the old one still work with the new one
[15:40] <alex_joni> vermagic from modules from both kernels look the same
[17:32] <BenC> mjg59: ping
[17:33] <BenC> alex_joni: if you have the old ABI in your build, it should check and tell you if anything changed (ABI check will fail)
[19:57] <lamont> Jul 20 12:54:12 rover3 kernel: [  351.868666] /dev/vmmon[9916]: Task_Switch: Intel VT mode is in use by some other software
[19:57] <lamont> how do I know what task I need to kill?
[20:07] <lamont> interesting.  nuking the kvm package fixed it... I guess I'll have to figure out how to switch that with less of a crowbar
[20:21] <alex_joni> BenC: it doesn't fail.. but loading an old module on the new kernel brings: [2214758.908354] rtapi: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module
[21:11] <mjg59> BenC: Hi
[21:17] <BenC> mjg59: Hey...this vt font saving patch we have, is it suitable to send upstream?
[21:24] <BenC> alex_joni: if you are passing AUTOBUILD, the check isn't done
[21:25] <BenC> alex_joni: and disagreement about struct_module means you have an ABI change, and you should use the new modules
[21:36] <alex_joni> BenC: ok, thanks
[21:37] <alex_joni> BenC: I used "DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=2 NOEXTRAS=1 fakeroot debian/rules custom-binary-foo"
[21:40] <BenC> oh, custom-binary does not get ABI checks
[21:41] <alex_joni> aha, then that's probably the issue..
[21:41] <alex_joni> there is an ABI bump, but I missed it ;)
[21:41] <alex_joni> m'kay.. thanks for clearing it up
[21:46] <BenC> mjg59: And the patch for "blank screen, only blinking cursor after console switch" patch...
[21:52] <mjg59> BenC: It's a feature enhancement, but I don't see why not
[21:53] <BenC> mjg59: on both counts?
[21:53] <mjg59> BenC: The latter is a requirement for the former
[21:53] <mjg59> BenC: Should probably be merged
[21:53] <BenC> mjg59: ok, thanks