=== philwyett_ is now known as philwyett === asac_ is now known as asac [07:07] <_ruben> BenC: the "4g/6g" issue that i have a box with 6G in it, of which only 4G is being seen (dual 1st gen opteron running 64bits gutsy) === doko_ is now known as doko [09:52] _ruben: just out of curiosity, how many banks and CPU-slots does that machine have? what machine is it? [10:25] <_ruben> Nafallo: 2 cpu sockets, 4 dimm slots (2 banks) per cpu socket .. HP DL145 G1 .. i removed 2G (making it 'symetric' again) because after upgrading to hardy it gave me kernel panics at boot up .. im gonna try with 8G later on [10:27] hm. k. [10:29] <_ruben> 2 cpus and 2gb (2x1gb in one bank) did seem to work .. so the 'asymmetric-ness' shouldnt be a prob [10:32] * _ruben heads to the basement to temporarily steal another 2G kit from another server === ln-_ is now known as ln- [11:02] <_ruben> 8G seems to work fine .. reinstalling gutsy [11:03] <_ruben> guess its some flaky hardware thing afterall .. will see [12:29] Hi [12:30] iproute2 have a package for kernel 2.6.26? [12:35] in git irc apt_get [12:35] 01eb17a66dec4db6206fdba17b1dfed2f72f8ef3 "Update headers to 2.6.26" [12:38] hmmm [12:38] i go there [12:42] with this? git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shemminger/iproute2.git [12:44] check it out, not spoon feeding you [12:46] ok [13:14] how u get this info from git maks_? [13:17] git log === mdomsch is now known as mdomsch_YOW [15:04] no one have error when building ubuntu-hardy-lum with openvz headers ? [16:08] BenC: Er... Did I send that virtual kernel module list thing to you yet, or did I just dream that I did? Like earlier today or something? [16:08] soren: you dreamed it I believe :) [16:08] Dang. [16:10] mutt apparantly dreamed it, too. I sent it to benc@ubuntu.com rather than the kernel-team mailing list, though. [16:10] ah, heh [16:10] not sure benc@ works...it would be bcollins or ben.collins [16:10] Ah. [16:11] _ruben: If you are using a 32-bit generic kernel, you wont see past 4G [16:11] _ruben: either use 32-bit server kernel, or a 64-bit install [16:12] _ruben: I asked _ruben about that yesterday, and he said he was running the amd64 server kernel. [16:13] <_ruben> BenC: upgrading to 8GB 'fixed' it [16:13] <_ruben> must be some flakey hardware thing [16:14] sounds like fun :) [16:14] <_ruben> soren: virtual kernel module list .. ehh .. oh .. my request for the driver to be included? [16:14] <_ruben> HP DL145 G1 is ancient stuff ;) [16:14] _ruben: No, that's completely unrelated. [16:14] <_ruben> soren: doh .. for some reason i thought you addressed it to me [16:14] * _ruben goes out to buy glasses [16:15] _ruben: Two seperate, but interwoven conversations. IRC is fun :) [16:15] <_ruben> add some interwoven braincells and double the fun :) [16:15] BenC: Do you want me to resend to you or the mailing list? [16:17] <_ruben> and regarding my tulip driver request (-virtual kernel), that probably aint happen before intrepid i guess, if ever? ;) [16:18] It'll be in Intrepid, at least. [16:18] It's not out of the question to add it to Hardy in an SRU, is it? BenC? [16:19] <_ruben> soren: ic [16:19] soren: let's make it three. did you have a chance to look at my git tree? [16:20] amitk: Yes. I'm not going to use it. :) [16:20] amitk: BenC would rather go in an entirely different direction. [16:20] soren: its possible to enable tulip for the virtual flavours [16:21] rtg: ok, cool. I think we should, then. Apparantly, that's what Microsoft's virtualisation thingie emulates. [16:22] soren: for just the -virtual flavour, correct? [16:22] I thinks its already enabled for others. [16:22] <_ruben> rtg: it is, for -server atleast that i know [16:23] <_ruben> havent tested any other flavours [16:24] <_ruben> should look into which hardware hyper-v's accelerated nic uses .. its the legacy nic that uses the tulip driver [16:24] <_ruben> the accelerated one is some 10Gbps thingie [16:24] soren: and what is this other direction? I don't want to end up doing something just for lpia [16:26] amitk: He wants to take the server build and just "cherry pick" the modules from that and stitch it together to form a new .deb. [16:28] soren: hmm. That isnt useful for lpia [16:29] amitk: No, not at all. [16:29] I imagine, though, that your lpia work will be useful for all the other ports. [16:30] when do i need to submit drivers for intrepid? [16:30] er, i mean... "by when do i ..." [16:32] i ask, because i am waiting for the last moment -- i'd prefer to send in the driver AFTER the kernel janitors do their cleanups in the -rc phase [16:33] mkrufky: beta freeze is 25th Sept: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IntrepidReleaseSchedule [16:33] oh, then i have time... :-) thanks, amitk [16:33] mkrufky: there is _never_ enough time :) [16:34] ;-) [16:45] soren: bug #250857 [16:47] rtg: Oh, cool. Thanks. It's for HyperV, though, but apart from that.. [16:47] soren: oh well, no one else knows the difference :) [16:48] Heh :) [16:52] <_ruben> heheh [17:02] Ok....kernel IRC meeting... [17:02] amitk, rtg, smb_tp: You guys awake and lucid? [17:03] huh? what? [17:03] partially [17:04] I don't have many topics for a meeting other than "Go fix bugs" [17:04] Me neither [17:04] BenC: ack [17:05] Anyone have anything they want announce, discuss, complain about? [17:06] amitk: wasn't the same without you and cking at the sprint last week...we'll all have to make up for it at UDS [17:07] BenC: maybe the plumber's conf instead of UDS [17:07] ah, good idea [17:08] BenC, why are you guys doing UDS so late this year? === mdomsch is now known as mdomsch_YOW [17:09] kylem: to avoid thanksgiving [17:09] kylem: when Jane says jump, we all ask "Where should I land?" [17:09] BenC, oh right, your allhands thing. [17:09] BenC: my feelings exactly... [17:10] kylem: no allhands this year...I think it was put off until May after UDS [17:10] ah. [17:10] * BenC is glad they avoided thanksgiving [17:10] would have killed attendance in the US...and since we will be in the US, that's pretty important :) [17:11] wild turkey and a bucket of kfc? [17:11] kylem: still based in Ottawa? [17:11] amitk, aye. how goes dude? [17:12] kylem: you should make UDS...call it "public relations" :) [17:12] kylem: good going. Perhaps you'll run into some of our folks at OLS this week. [17:12] BenC, maybe... escaping snow for mountain view is tempting. [17:12] amitk, yeah, tony espy is here at least. [17:13] kylem: track down Colin King and Stefan Bader and introduce yourself. [17:13] kylem: you saw him at the wireless mini-summit then? [17:13] i'm here now, yeah. [17:14] * BenC loves how this digressed into a kylem reunion :) [17:14] will be there this evening. any pub to meet. :) [17:15] sorry. ;-) [17:16] kylem: it's ok, gave us something to talk about :) [17:18] * BenC has nothing to talk about and needs lunch now [17:18] Ok, enjoy. :) [17:18] * amitk needs dinner. So long folks... [19:27] hi, should l-u-m bugs now be filed against "linux" ? I don't see any l-u-m-2.6.26 on launchpad. [19:29] tormod: yep, LUM was sucked back into the Intrepid kernel package. [19:30] so we should move all l-u-m-2.6.24 bugs to "linux" ? [19:30] all that applies in Intrepid, that is [19:31] rtg, now that I've got you here :) what about the prism2_usb/linux-wlan-ng updates? [19:31] actually, I'm surprised ogasawara hasn't already done that. [19:32] tormod: it was unclear if I needed to do more. it functions for Intrepid, correct? [19:32] rtg, the prism2/p80211 just got back into the kernel, but they are from February and needs updating. [19:32] rtg, tormod: moving lum bugs to linux is on my todo list [19:33] tormod: I deal with too many versions of the kernel. Which one are you referring to? [19:33] rtg, and the linux-wlan-ng 0.2.9 has a pending merge. [19:34] the normal intrepid kernel? [19:34] Intrepid is 2.6.26 [19:34] rtg, yes [19:35] tormod: so there are 2 issues? 1) the wireless drivers in kernel need updating, 2) user space needs an update. correct? [19:35] rtg correct! [19:36] bugs 192772 and 245026 [19:36] tormod: for the kernel drivers, please post a patch to the kernel team mailing list. kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com, and either Ben or myself will pick it up. [19:37] rtg, last time you just pulled down from upstream [19:38] * tormod just reassigned 245026 to "linux" [19:38] rtg as described in BOM [19:39] tormod: one moment. spousal interrupt. [19:40] NMI [19:41] heh [19:46] tormod: Intrepid is a little different. have the prism2/p80211 drivers been submitted during the 2.6.27 merge window? [19:47] Intrepid is different in that we are not yet backporting upstream wireless. [19:47] I am not sure if I understand. But prism2/p80211 is not part of the linux kernel. [19:49] tormod: right. I forgot that. [19:53] tormod: it looks like BenC copied the prism2/p80211 Hardy LUM drivers into the Intrepid kernel package at ubuntu/misc/wireless. It would help me out if you could submit patches against the Intrepid package that updates those drivers. [19:56] rtg, hmm I don't have a kernel tree here to diff against. [19:57] hd space issue. can I get a subtree from git? [19:57] tormod: not as far as I know [20:01] how much space does the whole git tree need? [20:03] rtg@dearborn:/usr3/ubuntu$ du -sh ubuntu-intrepid [20:03] 634M ubuntu-intrepid [20:03] seems like a lot. [20:04] can you give a tarball of the u/m/wireless tree? [20:06] it seems like BenC rearranged the directory structure quite a bit... [20:31] <_ruben> i guess a 'bug' like this (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10424), cant be easily worked around other than patching the kernel right? :/ [20:34] rtg: Does that new -proposed kernel include the hppa fix? [20:35] infinity: ought to. [20:35] _ruben: needs kernel source code change to fix SATA [20:35] rtg: Mmmkay. [20:35] infinity: has it actually built yet? [20:36] Nope, but the hppa buildds were blocked over the weekend. Let me smack it. [20:40] <_ruben> rtg: guess i'll work around it hardware wise then ;) [21:59] any solution for this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/124406 [21:59] ? [22:26] any solution for this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/124406 === smb_tp is now known as smb === smb is now known as smb_tp