=== nhandler is now known as nhandler_AFK === wolfger__ is now known as wolfger [00:44] I just created a new version of a package and posted it to Launchpad. How do I get it in? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/malbolge/+bug/251311 [00:44] Launchpad bug 251311 in malbolge "new upstream version available" [Undecided,Fix committed] [01:15] hell cyberix [01:15] hello* [01:16] cyberix: in to ubuntu or into a ppa on launchpad? [01:19] o_O; [01:25] anyhow, google 'ubuntu motu guide' or 'launchpad ppa quickstart' as appropriate [01:26] cyberix, https://help.launchpad.net/PPAQuickStart [01:26] https://help.launchpad.net/ contains all kinds of great help :) === nhandler_AFK is now known as nhandler [01:51] cody-somerville, are you there? [02:24] cody-somerville, ping? [02:30] hey LucidFox [02:39] anyone around who can check my copyright file? [02:42] Riddell, ping? [03:00] NCommander: What is wrong with the copyright file? === nhandler is now known as nhandler_AFK [03:49] Oh lovely. [03:49] Xubuntu is shipping half of gnome atm. :/ [03:52] cody-somerville, heh, anything that can be done? it is not only a xubuntu thing is it? [03:53] totem-gstreamer recommends gnome-control-center [03:53] I have used the xfce desktop on other distros and it is not getting any different [03:54] effie_jayx, what are you talking about? [03:54] cody-somerville, right... nevermind === tritium_ is now known as tritium === asac_ is now known as asac [04:57] persia, I had to amend it to include the LGPL, I just wanted to make sure I did it right [05:01] NCommander: URL? [05:01] Hold on [05:01] I just walked in the door ;-) [05:02] persia, http://paste.ubuntu.com/29845/ [05:04] NCommander: Firstly, you will need to specify the specific files covered by LGPL. Secondly, you'll need to include the LGPL preamble paragraph. Thirdly, you ought specify a version for the package licensing (assuming you can agree on a version with Yiannis) [05:05] persia, I'm simply going to go with the upstream GPL3 license [05:05] NCommander: As you're not the sole copyright holder, you'll want to coordinate. [05:05] I've seen the the "Additionally, most, but not all files" in other copyright files [05:06] Just because someone else cuts off their legs doesn't mean it's a good idea :) [05:06] Does anyone understand the reason for both https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdevel-symdump-perl/2.03-3/+build/427711 and https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdevel-symdump-perl/2.03-3/+build/58612 ? [05:07] persia, it rebuilt on warty O_o? [05:07] WTF [05:08] Well, the other way around. Warty and then Hardy. That doesn't make me understand though. [05:09] (I'll look at it in a tick, but is there a way to make grep only print filenames, and not actual string it found) [05:09] oh -l [05:11] persia, http://paste.ubuntu.com/29846/ - hows that look [05:13] uglier but more accurate [05:15] This is the copyright file, ugly is king here ;-) [05:15] persia, can you upload? (the package was rejected due to the old copyright file, and the archive admin also wanted uniform entries in the control file, which I added) [05:17] I can upload in the sense that dput works, but am currently having a shortage of processor capacity for test/review. [05:18] I can't shove it on a PPA due to the rather anonying fact I already uploaded a package of the same revision [05:19] (that's got to be one of the more nutty restrictions on PPAs) [05:19] This is a new upstream version? New package? [05:19] is ther ea reason why updates just now(i got them just now) installed nvidia drivers that i dont need? [05:20] persia, new package, which was sponsored and advocated, but rejected because none of us noticed that a few of the files are LGPL; the archive admin caught it and rejected [05:21] NCommander: Stuff it back on REVU with a comment about that. Should be able to go up with only a fingle review. [05:21] Yeah, I'l rebuilding it now just for good measure [05:21] (I decided to clarify why I have a lintian override in the package to disable a warning) [05:22] which warning? [05:22] script-not-executable [05:23] code blocks ships sample files for all of its lexers to allow users to test to make sure they are actually working [05:23] And why shouldn't it be executable? [05:23] Cause the sample script called emerge? [05:23] Its a non-sense script for testing purposes in /usr/share/codeblocks/lexer/lexer_bash.sample [05:24] Then it should be an example? [05:24] If it's not in $PATH, it oughtn't matter. If it is in $PATH, not being executable should really be fixed. [05:24] It's not in the path [05:24] I put the override though because I was always taught if your going to ignore lintian on something, DOcument Document, Document (and override it) [05:24] Yeah, it should probably be in /usr/share/docs/codeblocks/examples and be executable. [05:25] isn't this the one that needs to be there for Codeblocks to work? [05:25] NCommander: Better to not ignore lintian unless you know either 1) it's a lintian bug or 2) there's some special reason you need to work around it for which there is no accepted solution (e.g. python modules and Zope) [05:25] because it parses it as a test or something [05:26] You never should override a lintian test if its a bug in lintian [05:26] (Debian Policy Manual) [05:26] http://paste.ubuntu.com/29849/ - please tell me why a sample script that calls emerge should be in samples and marked executable [05:26] Because it's a sample script provided by upstream? [05:26] That upstream themselves don't mark executable when its installed [05:27] Looking at the actual script, I probably wouldn't include it in the binary package at all. [05:27] they haven't read Policy then :P === RoAk is now known as RoAkSoAx [05:27] * NCommander gets rather hestiant about removing files from packages without a strong reason ebhind it [05:28] Well, if it's an example, it belongs in .../examples If it's not an example, and it's not required for package operation, it's cruft. [05:34] persia, sorry [05:34] X11 decided it wanted to commit suidice === mcasadevall_ is now known as NCommander [05:37] persia, looking at the code, the sample files are actually used it seems [05:37] I don't know for what [05:37] But I don't feel conformable moving them [05:41] persia, here's where and how they're used, given the scenario, its not meant to be an executable script [05:42] http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Creating_a_custom_lexer_for_Code::Blocks_editor#Sample_Code [05:58] NCommander: Ah. So it's not so much an actual script as an example of one of the supported data formats. Must it be loaded from a specific directory? I'm still tempted by .../examples although I've been convinced it needn't be executable. [05:59] persia, not with actually moving the lexer files themselves; (the lexers are .xml's, which specify the sample, and they don't appear to handle ../) [05:59] NCommander: You've convinced me, although I believe there is a bug in there somewhere... [06:00] The bug was plugins went in /usr/share/codeblocks/plugins [06:00] THat was a rather evil hack to move it [06:00] Upstream doesn't appear to have any intention to fix since there were a few other complaints about that on the forums, and no reply from the devs [06:07] i am trying to compile bmpanel from source . ./configure shows no dependency problem but sudo make shows a lot of problems and i am not able to install it [06:09] using hardy 32bit [06:10] please somebody help me since i really like that panel [06:10] it suits my openbox window manager [06:10] murlidhar: Not exactly on topic. Two things: (a) make shouldn't be run with root priviledes, and (b) complain to upstream :) [06:11] RAOF: hi but i really want to use it . and i tried using make too but it didn't help [06:12] RAOF: any channel where i could get help from? [06:12] #ubuntu may be able to help you; that's the correct channel. [06:12] Or finding the upstream mailing list/channel and asking there. [06:12] RAOF: in compiling stuff ? [06:13] murlidhar: Indeed. [06:14] k [08:32] does anyone know what's the command to find the version of a package you're using? I blame my late-niht eyesight for not finding it in the man pages/wiki yet [08:33] Yasumoto: dpkg -l [08:40] thanks gpocentek [09:16] If someone has some time, would you mind double checking my debdiff at https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tftp-hpa/+bug/73233 ? thanks a bunch :) [09:16] Launchpad bug 73233 in tftp-hpa "no ipv6 support (use udp4 in inetd.conf)" [Undecided,Confirmed] [09:21] Status: Confirmed => Fix Released [09:21] yay [09:27] <\sh> emgent: did you test if there is a clean upgrade path from hardy moinmoin to intrepids moinmoin? I was wondering if we can request a backport to hardy [09:30] The internet here sucks :-/ [09:32] proxy ftw. [09:41] I'm still trying to figure out how I can get my updated malbolge package into Intrepid Universe. [09:41] morning everyone [09:41] I've posted the new package at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/malbolge/+bug/251311 [09:41] Launchpad bug 251311 in malbolge "new upstream version available" [Undecided,Fix committed] [09:41] huats: morning morning [09:45] cyberix: why is the status of that bug fix commited? [09:46] "a developer has committed his/her fix to the project's codebase" [09:47] That is as close to the codebase that I can get [09:47] cyberix: The status is for update of the package. It is not for mentioning what upstream is doing. Set status to confirmed and subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors [09:49] malebolge as in the satanic programming language? [09:50] done [09:50] directhex: Yep. That on. [09:50] one [09:51] the one nobody touches with their bare hands, and writes lisp apps to do the actual writing of malbolge? [09:51] and where the docs deliberately don't reflect reality? [09:51] directhex: That's an awesome quote. Where's that ubuntu bash.org thingy... :) [09:52] bah, and as if i had to ask, there's an Intercal package in ubuntu too [09:52] and a brainfuck interpreter. but no .NET version. how disappointing [09:53] directhex: I think the original documentation and intrepreter has a few bugs, but they are probably not on purpose. [09:54] I also think L. Scheffer writes his stuff directly. [09:55] NCommander: pong [09:55] He wrote the application which copies input to output, but that one relies on an input validation bug in the original interpreter. [09:55] Which my interpreter supports as a command line option. [09:55] Because I didn't want to break backwards compatibility. [09:56] Riddell, I updated the copyright file for codeblocks (although I changed it one more time after I sent it to you; now it has the full preamble, and lists all LGPL files) [09:56] NCommander: ok, going to upload or do you need me to? [09:56] The lack of .NET only proves you have to do something simeple in order to get it in. ;- [09:56] "Users are encouraged to make their own, unique homebrew versions of Malbolge and Dis, in order to achieve the kind of portability problems normally associated with major languages" [09:56] ;-) [09:58] Riddell, I need you to upload, but I'm rebuilding the package, my lintian override isn't quite working (I made it file specific, and obviously I did it wrong >.<) [09:58] directhex: https://bugs.launchpad.net/msk/+bug/210098 [09:58] Launchpad bug 210098 in malbolge "Insufficient input sanitization leads to arbitrary code execution" [Undecided,Confirmed] [10:03] NCommander: at the end of the "Additionally, most" paragraph I'd put ", version 3 http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl-3.0.html" [10:03] bah, i can't get an app compiled with bfc to run with mono [10:03] Riddell, having the path to /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-3 isn't enough? [10:04] NCommander: well, it's important to be clear about the version these days [10:04] NCommander: and leave out from "if not" in the next paragraph, FSF addresses go out of date and the fsf URL is a substitute. [10:06] Riddell, you think its overkill to individually list every file with that is under the LGPL? [10:06] (I've never seen another package do it) [10:07] use wildcards where appropriate! [10:08] directhex, can't, since one or two files in the same folder are not LGPL >.<; [10:08] NCommander: yes, that isn't necessary [10:10] Riddell, how's this: http://paste.ubuntu.com/29900/ [10:10] er, whoops [10:10] Hold, typo [10:10] Riddell, http://paste.ubuntu.com/29901/ [10:11] NCommander: put it loke this, "all files except are under LGPL3" Then next files "following files are under " [10:12] NCommander: at both "either version 3" remove "either" [10:12] NCommander: otherwise all goo [10:12] NCommander: otherwise all good [10:13] expect [10:13] You want me to list all 127 files? [10:13] NCommander: no [10:16] Riddell, I'm sorry then I'm somewhat confused [10:17] TheMuso: hello [10:17] NCommander: what about? [10:18] Riddell, All files expect , I'm not sure what you want there if you don't want each individual file [10:18] are ddebs for hardy-backports available somewhere? [10:18] NCommander: I never said anything about "All files expect" [10:19] NCommander: "either" needs to be removed and that's it [10:19] Riddell, oh, that I got [10:19] Riddell, I think what I'm lacking in is a good, hot cup of coffee [10:19] SniperBeamer: why are you asking again? [10:37] Riddell, thank you for your patience on this matter ;-) (I now have a greater apperiation for the headache being an archive admin is) [10:37] (although I don't think you use dak, you use the Launchpad souyez thing, right?) [10:38] woo, finally, it works [10:41] yes, soyuz [10:41] but reviewing packages will be the same [10:41] Riddell, of course [10:41] Riddell, still, I bet soyuz doesn't have all its commands named after women (although I think newer versions of dak finally changed that) [10:42] mercifully not :) [10:43] Riddell, I still remember fighting with britney to make a testing archive. Talk about undocumented :-P [10:48] Riddell, http://revu.tauware.de/revu1-incoming/codeblocks-0807241150/codeblocks_8.02-0ubuntu1.dsc - Updated codeblocks in need of uploading [10:48] (http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=codeblocks) [10:52] huats: What can I do for you? [10:54] NCommander: uploading [10:54] TheMuso: hello [10:54] huats: Hi. [10:54] sorry to bother but I'd like your opinion on one thing :) [10:54] huats: Go on. [10:54] Thank you Riddell, I greatly appreciate your contribution to Ubuntu [10:54] (I was looking at the bug number) [10:55] * NCommander runs for using that canned line [10:55] bug: #201123 [10:55] you mention on it that you want a clear description of the SRU [10:55] huats: What about it? [10:55] NCommander, i greatly appreciate your efforts to help destroy freedom as we know it, by helping with purely evil software like mono! [10:56] huats: Did you read my recent comment? [10:56] (which I can clearly understand, and that I haven't provided yet since I am not the one who asked for it even if I have done the packaging) [10:56] sure I did :) [10:56] * NCommander just recently recovered from the real life varient of mono [10:56] huats: So whats the problem? [10:57] and I have received an email from pedro asking me integrate his last comment ("open the application, click new") in the debdifff... [10:57] which is not what you are waiting for I guess... [10:57] huats: I don't know what you mean with the comment re Pedro. [10:58] so I just want your confirmation that you expect that I put in the changelog (and thus in the debdiff) the reason why the new deps is needed and not the test case to see if it works or breaks (which is what pedro provides) [10:58] :) [10:59] huats: Yes thats right. [10:59] TheMuso: ok :) [10:59] that was only that :) [10:59] ok [10:59] TheMuso: thanks... [11:00] np [11:00] i'll do my best to provide it today [11:17] Riddell, thanks for the upload, I see it the NEW queue, now I just need to wait for someone to reject it again ;-) */optimist* [11:24] TheMuso: still there ? [11:25] huats: Yes. [11:25] If so, is it enought for you if I change my changelog to http://paste.ubuntu.com/29916/ (regarding bug: 201123) [11:25] norsetto: !! [11:25] :) [11:25] NCommander: accepted [11:26] * NCommander dies of shock [11:26] * NCommander returns from hell [11:26] huats: thats not fair :-/ [11:26] Dang it Riddell, your going to kill someone due to shock :-P [11:26] huats: From that description, I still don't know what the SRU is supposed to address. [11:28] TheMuso: I mean, before mono 1.2.6+dfsg-1, the package libmono-i18n2.0-cil was not a package.. it was included in mono... So after that mono version every package that uses it needs to add a dependency on it [11:28] I think I don't understand your question :) [11:28] huats: WHy is this package dependency needed? What is broken in the application that this SRU fixes, in terms of usability? [11:29] the i18n packages are Recommends of the corlib packages iirc [11:29] without that dependency, you can launch the application without that but once you click "New" the application crashes, if you do not depend on that [11:30] huats: Sorry that doesn't make sense. [11:30] and the reason is that a part of the mono binary has been split... [11:30] to create a new package... [11:30] which is libmono-i18n2.0-cil [11:31] huats: Ok. I suggest you explain it in terms of application usability. [11:31] in the changelog. [11:31] Ok [11:32] I didn't know we can do that in changelog... [11:33] huats: changelogs is where are creativity explode :-) [11:33] make it our even [11:33] :) [11:33] I will [11:33] :) [11:36] TheMuso: is it ok for you like this ? http://paste.ubuntu.com/29919/ [11:36] (just let me know) [11:37] huats: THat makes wonerful sense, thanks. [11:38] TheMuso: no problem at all :) [11:39] I just didn't understood you wanted me to put usability in the Changelog :) [11:39] and I now I know :) [11:40] huats: Right, thanks. [11:41] TheMuso: no pb... I'll put the debdiff on it in the afternoon [11:41] huats: No problem. [11:42] I can only change the changelog entry without incrementing the package version ? is it allowed (since the same packaeg with the other changelog is in intrepid ?) [11:42] can someone remind me of what it is that apps like usplash/splashy read to know what approximate percentage a system is done booting up ? I cant remember for blast [11:54] Riddell, out of curosity, what does it mean "Pending in intrepid-release" [11:55] NCommander: It means the source is uploaded, and is waiting for a publisher run, which happens at *:03 [11:56] StevenK, cool. Its kinda exciting, my first NEW ubuntu package [11:56] Heh [11:58] Could somebody take a look at my package in REVU? http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=posterazor Thanks in advance ;) [12:01] DRebellion, I'm not an MOTU, but I'll look it over [12:01] NCommander, thanks! [12:02] DRebellion, any reason the man file is PosteRazor.1 and not posterazor.1 [12:02] NCommander, PosteRazor is the default name for the binary [12:02] Ok, that makes sense === pgquiles__ is now known as pgquiles [12:03] DRebellion, I think you can loose the dirs file; those are all standard directories [12:03] NCommander, ok [12:05] DRebellion, ok, it looks good [12:05] * NCommander leaves a comment for other reviewers [12:05] yay [12:05] It's not a advocation sadly [12:06] NCommander, I will remove that dirs file, and test a build, and reupload. [12:06] DRebellion, cool, once you do that, ping me, and I'll comment on it [12:07] NCommander, will do. [12:08] wooooo, that's awesome, codeblocks is now in the archive [12:09] StevenK, can I ask you to sponsor for a backport? (it builds fine in hardy as is, I just need to correct the version number and distribution) [12:10] I thought the backport peoples had a tool for that sort of thing [12:11] StevenK, I thought it was a manual upload [12:11] Hrm [12:13] StevenK, https://edge.launchpad.net/revu - I think there is a bug in Launchpad, cause I've got more points then the entire development team combined ... [12:16] NCommander: Ask in #launchpad [12:19] hi folks [12:20] * norsetto is not a folk, is a towndweller [12:21] hola sistpoty|work [12:21] * sistpoty|work appends and towndwlellers to hi folks [12:23] * norsetto says hi to sistpoty|work and bows humbly as close as possible to the lowly ground [12:24] * NCommander steps on norsetto [12:37] hi all [12:37] someone take a look in my package? http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=umit I change rules and as far I know my package had problems with python policy. can you check if now its fixed? [12:40] NCommander, after removing the dirs file (and dh_installdirs from the install target) I get errors when copying across the files: [12:40] cp /tmp/buildd/posterazor-1.5.1/src/PosteRazor /tmp/buildd/posterazor-1.5.1/debian/posterazor/usr/bin/ [12:40] cp: cannot create regular file `/tmp/buildd/posterazor-1.5.1/debian/posterazor/usr/bin/': No such file or directory [12:41] O_o; [12:41] Why is it using /tmp? [12:41] Er wait, .... *bink* how are you building this? [12:42] NCommander, pbuilder [12:43] * NCommander takes a second look at your rules file [12:44] Your not using a make install rule, are you [12:44] d'oh [12:44] In that case, you need the dirs file [12:45] (sorry, I didn't catch that) [12:45] (I apologize, I'm a little off my game today) [12:46] NCommander, no worries. Could I just use mkdir in the rules file? [12:46] DRebellion, no, the dirs file is meant to create directories that aren't make by make install [12:46] okey [12:46] SInce your not using it, you obviously need to list them ;-) [12:47] Using mkdir causes dpkg not to know about the directories, so it can't remove the directory if it is completely empty [12:47] NCommander, ah right. [12:49] NCommander, there's no need to upload again then. [12:49] yeah [12:55] \sh: so, by your blog post, does that mean that if the discussions go to the CC, you'll quit? [13:11] <\sh> Hobbsee: I never said that, or? :) [13:12] <\sh> Hobbsee: what I said is, that I'm happy to discuss all that during a CC meeting..well, it means 3 or more hours for nothing, but why not [13:12] heh. right. [13:13] * Hobbsee just thought you'd learned to stay out of trouble now, or something. [13:13] at least you haven't made more posts about sexy ladies, and ubuntu [13:13] hey \sh [13:14] <\sh> Hobbsee: if you read the comments, it's only one guy who complained in the first place..I asked him to read the refered article and come back again...but no [13:14] <\sh> moins emgent [13:15] moin upgrade seems very hard, i talked with upstream about it (when i sent a fix for the vulnerabilities that i found) and he say to me that it`snt immediatly upgrade, need read the doc for it. [13:15] \sh: btw, i presume you know that posts like yours will tend to get stuff like planet completely obliterated from schools, with their filters. [13:17] I've uploaded a new package for Webstrict (http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=webstrict) but I don't see it [13:18] <\sh> Hobbsee: tbh, when I compare the chats on a schoolground (well sadly only here in .de, but I think in any other place on the world it will be similar nowadays) it much more worse then a *ihavetobecarfulwhatIwritenowIdontuseanyabbrevsanymoreletsseehowchildishthatwillbe* [13:19] <\sh> Hobbsee: when I watch "bad boys" in the cinema or on dvd, in the first 3 mins there are more words like this then i ever wrote the special abbrev on my blog [13:19] <\sh> Hobbsee: and I don't think anybody will complain to a director of the cinema... [13:19] i'm sure there are. but that's school filters for you, and there was no guarentee that it makes sense. [13:19] and bad boys is rated what? [13:23] \sh: You can't compare Bad Boys and your blog post. [13:23] Well, okay, you can. But it's a flawed analogy. [13:24] because one goes and explicitly sees the particular movie, and the other is mixed in with a whole bunch of stuff with various topics? [13:26] laga: in which country? [13:26] geser: it's R-rated in the US [13:33] Hobbsee: Exactly. [13:35] to be honest, getting worked up over "WTF" is a bit silly IMHO [13:36] But it isn't just "WTF" [13:37] <\sh> StevenK: the first complain was about just that [13:39] it was? WTF? [13:40] WTH is going on? [13:40] * NCommander runs for cover [13:40] NCommander, STFU! [13:41] Stop fscking swearing [13:41] (I love that one) [13:41] * NCommander fsck's this room [13:41] [13:42] <\sh> StevenK: one goes not explicitly on planet.ubuntu.com? [13:44] <\sh> anywys...I'll have to fight with ipvsadm and ldirector..that's more interesting then all this stupid discussion about the topic...CC meeting is in a few days..so there we can discuss all this crap :) [13:45] <\sh> and there is always the possibility to add a WTF STFU and whatever word we need to hide from planet in future filter to the planet software ... I mean that's the easiest solution and noone needs to worry... [13:45] BBQ [13:46] * Hobbsee wonders if it's just \sh who seems to be routinely getting these sorts of discussions about his posts. [13:46] i think i've seen one other post, that got complained about. the rest, \sh wrote. [13:46] interesting how these things pan out. [13:47] <\sh> Hobbsee: kokes post was complained too...but only because one commenter on kokes post wrote "STFU"...and this guy didn't get the difference between the article and the comment... [13:47] <\sh> Hobbsee: see diff of the /Talk page of the cc agenda [13:53] so, tha'ts one to him, one to another guy, and how many posts of yours pointed out, in hte last couple of years? [13:53] <\sh> 2 ? [13:54] * slytherin fetches some popcorns and watches the discussion silently. [13:57] at least 3, offhand. i suspect there were more :_ [13:57] <\sh> what was the 3rd? [13:58] Matthew Garrett had a good post on this topic: http://mjg59.livejournal.com/94420.html [13:58] tbh, looks like the other guy broke the CoC, certainly not \sh [13:59] igasm, sexy lady, and your recent one. add in the second post of yours which also seems to be complained about, and that's 4. [13:59] <\sh> Hobbsee: so 2 in the past...and this one.. [13:59] NCommander: Thanks for taking care of the clamav security stuff. I hope it wasn't too painful. [13:59] ScottK, oh, no, nothign like rolling the same patch three times :-P [14:00] (its all in the archive, and taken care of :-)) [14:00] It took me a year to get get Dapper/Feisty/Gutsy/Hardy on a common code base, so jdstrand is right to make sure we don't mess it up. [14:01] I didn't say it was wrong [14:01] I completely understand why [14:01] Yeah, I just hope it wasn't too frustrating for you in the process. [14:01] Nah, its fine [14:01] I've uploaded packages to Debian ;-) [14:02] <\sh> hopefully jono is not showing this video link on planet...oh wow [14:03] someone can review my package? http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=umit [14:05] <\sh> Hobbsee: but what makes it out of me now? [14:15] Linux norsetto 2.6.24-19-generic #1 SMP Fri Jul 11 21:01:46 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux [14:25] and a merry uname to you too [14:29] StevenK: Shortly after I talked to you the other day about sponsoring something my hotel wireless died, so I wanted to follow-up and see it you're still up for it. [14:29] Peoples, would somebody mind taking a look at my package in REVU? http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=posterazor People have said it is OK, but I haven't been able to get any MOTUs to take a look and advocate it. [14:29] ScottK: I was distracted. I'll make a note to look at tomorrow. [14:30] StevenK: Thanks. [14:33] hey [14:33] could someone please upload my patch for bug #237830 ? [14:33] Launchpad bug 237830 in ppracer "package planetpenguin-racer-gimp-dev None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/planetpenguin-racer-gimp-dev.list] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/gimp/2.0/palettes/PPRacer---Default.gpl', which is also in package extremetuxracer-gimp-dev" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/237830 [14:34] smarter: Did you subscribe UUS? [14:36] ScottK: nop, I'm doing it right now ;) [14:36] That will get you in line. [14:41] Hey ScottK o/ [14:41] Hell huats. [14:41] Hell/Hello [14:41] Sorry. [14:41] :) [14:41] no pb [14:41] I know you are like taht [14:41] :) [14:41] telling hell to anyone :) [14:41] ;) [14:42] Someone has to do it. [14:43] I am packaging a something that is not providing a clean rule... So I need to clean "by hand"... Is a rm -rf *.so *.o is "allowed" in the clean target of a debian/rules file ? [14:43] ScottK: sure :D [14:45] huats: You probably want "-rm ...", but yes. [14:45] huats: your clean rule should bring your package in a clean state, like it was just after unpacking [14:45] ok [14:45] thanks [14:45] :) === DktrKranz2 is now known as DktrKranz [15:07] /me feels pretty sleepy [15:08] /me feels pretty [15:09] * sistpoty|work thinks the devil himself invented dynamic memory allocation :P [15:48] I have corrected all the first series of note that I have regarding a package in REVU, so if someone (or more that one :)) want to have a look at it : http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=tktreectrl [15:55] huats: there are still files left which are not cleaned by the clean rule [15:56] norsetto: really ? [15:56] huats: no, its a joke [15:56] but there is no FTBFS [15:57] huats: of course its really ;-) [15:57] anymore [15:57] huats: You should also add a Homepage field to the control file [15:57] huats: yes, but there is still garbage left from the build rule [15:57] nHandler yeah I just realized that I haven't ... [15:57] norsetto: I'll tackle that ... [15:57] rrrgggg [15:57] :( [16:04] nHandler: done in my local package [16:04] :) [16:10] :) hauts [16:16] persia: This is what I had to say. s Java team automatically subscribed to any bugs? [16:20] norsetto: please tell me that now all the files are well cleaned ! [16:20] :) [16:20] (btw I lead 3-2 since this morning :P) [16:21] huats: thats because you cheat ;-) [16:21] no I am not :) [16:21] I was talking on the chan when you arrived :) [16:22] that do not makes me a cheater [16:22]