greg-g | oh, there were two 191115s on that page. | 00:00 |
---|---|---|
bdmurray | well, 225064 shows up in new and incomplete | 00:00 |
greg-g | i closed the first one my find command found, but there is another one in 'incomplete' | 00:00 |
* greg-g nods | 00:00 | |
bdmurray | yeah and 214101 shows up in New and Confirmed | 00:02 |
nellery | hm... | 00:06 |
nellery | I'll go through the incomplete and confirmed to make sure there are no others | 00:08 |
* greg-g is saving the page right now... just fyi | 00:08 | |
bdmurray | What's the name of the locations in the clock applet? | 00:09 |
greg-g | not sure I follow the question. | 00:09 |
bdmurray | The pkg name for the world clock in the panel. | 00:10 |
greg-g | oh | 00:11 |
greg-g | "gworldclock - Displays time and date in specified time zones" | 00:11 |
greg-g | that ^ ? | 00:11 |
greg-g | no, not that. it isn't installed on my machine. ignore. | 00:12 |
bdmurray | good, I was about to feel silly for a minute ;) | 00:12 |
greg-g | heh | 00:12 |
nellery | hm, using 'xprop | grep WM_CLASS' on the preferences window returns gnome-panel | 00:14 |
greg-g | yeah, I was just going to suggest that it is a part of gnome-panel | 00:14 |
nellery | and, I've just accidently removed it from the panel :) | 00:14 |
greg-g | heh, nice | 00:14 |
calc | what is the way people record video of bugs? is it via recordmydesktop ? | 00:26 |
bdmurray | I use istanbul | 00:26 |
calc | ok | 00:26 |
greg-g | istanbul++ | 00:28 |
greg-g | has anyone asked about bug 240770 yet? Specifically if we can close it and tell them to move the idea over to braintorm since it isn't a bug? | 01:13 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 240770 in apt "Multiple package managers hurting Linux adoption" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/240770 | 01:13 |
bdmurray | I think that makes sense since it is more than a simple feature request | 01:14 |
* greg-g nods | 01:14 | |
greg-g | I will do that, tactfully :) | 01:14 |
bdmurray | tactfully would be nice, I've just run across a new triager lacking that | 01:15 |
greg-g | bdmurray: :( | 01:16 |
bdmurray | We need an intervention process or something | 01:16 |
greg-g | have you tried contact them directly? Or just commenting on the bugs they are working on? | 01:17 |
* greg-g isn't sure which method would be best | 01:17 | |
bdmurray | I've commented on a couple, I'll monitor the situation I guess | 01:18 |
bdmurray | I've found direct e-mail to be a mixed bag | 01:19 |
bdmurray | but that is just ancedotal | 01:20 |
greg-g | yeah, I could imagine | 01:20 |
greg-g | I'm just lazy, ignore: bug 220239 | 02:07 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 220239 in apt "E: Directory '/var/log/apt/' missing" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/220239 | 02:07 |
charlie-tca | Should wishlist bug reports be marked confirmed? I'm trying to work the apt bugs for today. | 02:07 |
greg-g | charlie-tca: if you confirm that the feature is not already available. The question of whether it is a desired change is touchy sometimes, so a developer comment would be helpful for that. | 02:08 |
greg-g | it is touchy especially with someting like apt, which is a central part of the system, so any changes have to be really important/needed | 02:09 |
charlie-tca | So, we leave them incomplete until a developer confirms | 02:09 |
greg-g | bdmurray: ^ ? | 02:09 |
* greg-g defers | 02:10 | |
* greg-g could probably see a valid reason for either confirmed or not. | 02:10 | |
greg-g | charlie-tca: marking it confirmed won't hurt anything. | 02:11 |
charlie-tca | Thanks. | 02:11 |
bdmurray | confirming doesn't mean it is going to be worked on just that it just really is missing | 02:17 |
charlie-tca | That makes sense to me, Thanks | 02:18 |
* greg-g nods | 02:21 | |
greg-g | alright, 15 bugs and I'm done for today | 02:41 |
Hobbsee | nice work! | 02:41 |
Hobbsee | 20 tomorrow :) | 02:41 |
greg-g | :) we'll see | 02:41 |
greg-g | where are the encouraging graphs today? | 02:41 |
greg-g | http://people.ubuntu.com/~brian/complete-graphs/apt/ | 02:45 |
bdmurray | you could add them in ;) | 02:46 |
greg-g | just did :) | 02:47 |
bdmurray | sweet! | 02:47 |
greg-g | good work all | 02:49 |
bdmurray | This graph needs some help | 02:49 |
bdmurray | http://people.ubuntu.com/~brian/testing_graphs/nopackage.html | 02:49 |
greg-g | that it does | 02:49 |
greg-g | BugDay in a couple weeks? | 02:49 |
* greg-g has to run | 02:50 | |
greg-g | have a good night/day all | 02:50 |
* greg-g runs | 02:50 | |
IamReck | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/251690 | 04:14 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 251690 in ubuntu "Does not Focus where necessary" [Undecided,New] | 04:14 |
IamReck | Can anyone replicate this bug? | 04:14 |
charlie-tca | I can't right now, but it seems like I have seen this happen before in gutsy | 04:18 |
=== asac_ is now known as asac | ||
=== bdmurray changed the topic of #ubuntu-bugs to: Ubuntu BugSquad | http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad | Documentation: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/HelpingWithBugs | If you have been triaging bugs for a while, please apply to https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol/ | Want to report a bug? Read https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs | User support (not related to triage) is in #ubuntu | ||
mcas | hi | 06:48 |
mcas | can someone help me out with LP 251633 | 06:48 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 251633 in gnucash "Cannot install GnuCash in Intel Mac 10.5.4" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/251633 | 06:48 |
mcas | i think this bug is invalid do you think the same? | 06:48 |
RAOF | mcas: Certainly invalid for Ubuntu, but you probably want to see if you can forward that on to the _actual_ gnucash bugtracker. | 06:49 |
mcas | RAOF: ok thank you | 06:50 |
mcas | RAOF: which status gets the bug after reporting this bug upstream | 07:00 |
greg-g | mcas: invalid, as it is not an Ubuntu bug, they are using OSX | 07:04 |
mcas | ok than i will mark it invalid and add the link to the new bug report | 07:04 |
greg-g | yes, tell them that they should follow the bug at that upstream tracker. | 07:05 |
mcas | ok | 07:05 |
mcas | thanks greg-g | 07:05 |
greg-g | no problem mcas | 07:05 |
=== fdd-01 is now known as fdd | ||
LimCore | as | 10:08 |
LimCore | asac: lol... what did you ment that firefox not starting up AT ALL is not a bug =) | 10:08 |
LimCore | this bug also shows how ubuntu is NOT for human beings | 10:09 |
LimCore | normal user: "I started firefox and *nothing happened*" | 10:09 |
LimCore | powere user: "yeah, run console and there run firefox to read error messages" | 10:10 |
asac | LimCore: where? | 10:20 |
LimCore | asac: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/248493 | 10:22 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 248493 in firefox "firefox does not start after update - says "Could not find compatible GRE" (dup-of: 248362)" [Undecided,New] | 10:22 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 248362 in firefox "Firefox does not start after update" [Undecided,Fix released] | 10:22 |
asac | LimCore: its not a bug. the user runs proposed so he has to wait till the firefox package was built/rolled | 10:23 |
LimCore | well, I hit this bug on 8.04 i386 | 10:23 |
LimCore | s/my/my user | 10:24 |
asac | LimCore: now fixed? | 10:24 |
LimCore | dpkg reconfigure -a made it work | 10:24 |
asac | ok | 10:25 |
asac | thats something different then | 10:25 |
asac | most likely you forced to just upgrade firefox | 10:25 |
LimCore | I wonder if upgrade was broken | 10:25 |
asac | yes most likely | 10:25 |
LimCore | I wonder if upgrade was interrupted; but I think that rather not | 10:25 |
asac | you had a new firefox, but not a new xulrunner | 10:25 |
asac | err | 10:25 |
asac | the other way around | 10:25 |
LimCore | hmm and btw, this problem should be fixed with invisible bugs | 10:26 |
LimCore | normal users dont run apps from term | 10:26 |
asac | in anyway. this was the last update where this can happen | 10:26 |
asac | LimCore: if you dont run dist-upgrade you wont see it | 10:26 |
LimCore | "omg omg *nothing happened*, just the program icon was bouncing then dissapeared" its how users see it =) | 10:26 |
asac | as you wont upgrade until xulrunner is available | 10:26 |
LimCore | ok | 10:26 |
asac | so normal users that just use update-manager shouldnt end up in that situation i hope | 10:27 |
LimCore | as a separete issue.. programs (apps) should show their errors in GUI (catch output?) if not run from console but from alt+f2 | 10:27 |
LimCore | btw another issue. one of the things that really make ubuntu annoying is lack of basic tools in default install. mc, sux, kdesudo | 10:28 |
asac | yeah. mc is certainly a tool that normal users need ;) | 10:29 |
afflux | err, well. | 10:29 |
afflux | I use mc for looking into .deb packages. What kind of normal user would use mc? | 10:30 |
asac | what i said was ironic :) | 10:30 |
LimCore | we cant afford like 10 kb to give BASIC tool any admin or any power user would use to fix system. With CD and boradband prices going wild | 10:30 |
afflux | asac: yup, noticed it right after I sent my message :) | 10:30 |
LimCore | srsly, add this to default ubuntu, and live cd | 10:30 |
asac | LimCore: i doubt that all admin users need mc | 10:30 |
asac | i guess its even just a tiny proportion that use it | 10:31 |
asac | real admins dont need that ;) | 10:31 |
LimCore | asac: yeah just use dir and ls | 10:31 |
afflux | LimCore: write to the MLs, we don't decide that kind of things here (but be aware that this kind of stuff has been discussed a lot of times before) | 10:31 |
asac | they go for posh only ;) | 10:31 |
LimCore | or better yet, WRITE ls and cd using hexedit, then run it | 10:31 |
asac | LimCore: why not | 10:31 |
asac | emacs | 10:31 |
asac | vim | 10:31 |
asac | but well. i can only say that i doubt that those will get on CD | 10:32 |
LimCore | you seriously would trace image of some silly bird instead providing essential tools? | 10:32 |
LimCore | *trade | 10:32 |
LimCore | or some stupid movie in examples/ | 10:32 |
asac | LimCore: if you find files that in your opinion are not suitable for CD let us know | 10:32 |
LimCore | well, I think this decision is really without any sense | 10:33 |
asac | we are always fighting with space problem | 10:33 |
afflux | LimCore: but not here please. | 10:33 |
asac | and every K removal helps | 10:33 |
LimCore | asac: less media, duh | 10:33 |
asac | i doubt that we have much media left on CD ... except example files | 10:33 |
LimCore | also, throw in 7zip and process less used files with it | 10:33 |
afflux | LimCore: well, that has been discussed earlier, I think there is even a blueprint for it | 10:34 |
LimCore | well, remove half the icons | 10:34 |
asac | so apps end up having a great no-icon placeholder? | 10:34 |
asac | anyway. go for mailing list | 10:34 |
LimCore | what would piss a typical power user? a) lack of mc and other tools b) lack of a nice icon | 10:34 |
asac | LimCore: apt-get install mc will take a second | 10:35 |
LimCore | or a day | 10:35 |
LimCore | if you have to buy ISP services first | 10:35 |
asac | might be. but without internet there is not much need for an admin either ;) | 10:36 |
afflux | LimCore: why don't you create a custom flavour? MCbuntu? | 10:36 |
LimCore | afflux: no comfortable way to do it with limited time | 10:36 |
afflux | ah well... You're right, this discussion is absolutly senseless here ;) | 10:37 |
asac | LimCore: ask xubuntu ;) ... they probably have plenty of space left on their CD | 10:37 |
asac | and can add that to their seed | 10:37 |
LimCore | wow | 10:39 |
LimCore | another bug! | 10:39 |
LimCore | trying to do _1_ task, during 30 minutes hit 3 bugs... awesome | 10:39 |
LimCore | can't run krusader as root (neither krusader then root mode command, nor sudo sux, then krusader) - krusader: ERROR: : couldn't create slave : Can not communicate with klauncher | 10:40 |
afflux | well, yes. awesome. Can you please stop ranting here and just file bugs? This is a triaging channel, not support. | 10:40 |
LimCore | ok | 10:41 |
* Hobbsee wonders what mc is, and why it's useful | 11:05 | |
LimCore | Hobbsee: what do you use to administrate files in console mode? :) | 11:06 |
Hobbsee | the usual linux commands? | 11:06 |
gnomefreak | Hobbsee: mc is a replacemt for nautilus | 11:13 |
gnomefreak | eh maybe replacement is bad word | 11:13 |
gnomefreak | its a file manager | 11:13 |
gnomefreak | light weight one too | 11:13 |
* Hobbsee is fairly sure mv, ls, cat, etc, work fine too. and there is nautilus. | 11:14 | |
Hobbsee | presumably the server guys may be interested, but it's already duplicated on a desktop. | 11:15 |
gnomefreak | i enjoyed using it but it was broken in edgy and i never went back to it since i never heard of it being fixed | 11:16 |
heno | mc works fine in Hardy - incidentally it's a classic app - Midnight Commander, a clone of Norton Commander | 11:30 |
bddebian | Boo | 14:21 |
chrisccoulson | i'm looking at a couple of bug reports where the reporters are having dependency problems because they have installed packages that were uploaded to hardy-proposed, that now seem to have been removed (they have packages that are newer than those in the repository). i'm not sure whether this is a valid bug or where i can find out why the packages were removed from hardy-proposed | 15:11 |
chrisccoulson | the package in question is python2.5. it's currently at 2.5.2-2ubuntu4 in the main repository. 2.5.2-2ubuntu5 was uploaded to hardy-proposed some time ago, but is no longer there | 15:12 |
james_w | they will be removed if they cause regressions, or don't fix the bug they are supposed to | 15:12 |
chrisccoulson | shall i get them to downgrade their versions of python2.5 and then close the reports? | 15:12 |
james_w | do you have an example? I'd like to take a look. | 15:13 |
chrisccoulson | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python2.5/+bug/251748 | 15:13 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 251748 in python2.5 "apt-get dependency problem installing python2.5-dev" [Undecided,Incomplete] | 15:13 |
james_w | bug 227686 was tracking the version in -proposed if you are interested | 15:14 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 227686 in python2.5 "allow setting more build flags from the environment" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/227686 | 15:14 |
chrisccoulson | thanks for that james_w | 15:15 |
chrisccoulson | so basically, the reporters need to downgrade their versions of python in order to install the header files | 15:15 |
james_w | chrisccoulson: yeah, I don't think it's a bug really, so Invalid is probably correct, but helping them to fix it would obviously be nive | 15:16 |
james_w | yeah, I'm not sure what the easiest way to do that is. | 15:16 |
chrisccoulson | i'll have a go and tell you. i'm running the version that was pulled from hardy-proposed anyway, so i need to downgrade too really | 15:17 |
james_w | "sudo aptitude install python2.5-dev python2.5=2.5.2-2ubuntu4" may do it | 15:17 |
james_w | great, thansk | 15:19 |
chrisccoulson | that works a treat! | 15:21 |
bdmurray | 1134 | 16:30 |
bdmurray | mvo: ping | 17:19 |
mvo | bdmurray: pong | 17:19 |
bdmurray | Somebody was looking at cleaning up bugs with Edgy tasks and I was looking at bug 64615 which you had worked on a bit. Do you think the courier-authlib task is still valid? | 17:20 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 64615 in courier-authlib "apt-get broken after upgrade to edgy eft (courier-authdaemon package)" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/64615 | 17:20 |
* mvo looks | 17:20 | |
mvo | bdmurray: I think the courierlogger failure was never fixed in edgy, I can not say if that might be a problem in hardy or later or if that was just a problem with courrierlogger moving around between packages | 17:31 |
bdmurray | mvo: okay, thanks | 17:31 |
danage | why does sound playback suck so bad | 18:16 |
lukehasnoname | that's not the right question to ask | 18:16 |
danage | i know | 18:19 |
danage | but sometimes it just spurts out | 18:19 |
* danage is killing pulseaudio once again | 18:19 | |
bdmurray | mvo: there isn't much we can do with bug 216785 is there? | 18:44 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 216785 in apt "apt-get update hangs on headers every time (gutsy)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/216785 | 18:44 |
mvo | bdmurray: hm, he claims the problem went away eventually? | 18:46 |
bdmurray | well, he worked around it via proxy server somehow | 18:46 |
bdmurray | but no logs or anything | 18:46 |
mvo | bdmurray: yeah, its a bit strnage, when tcpdump shows that nothing comes back at all | 18:51 |
=== gnomefre1k is now known as gnomefreak | ||
calc | 66.67% OOo bugs triaged, exactly 2/3 of them, heh :) | 21:30 |
greg-g | calc is on a rampage | 21:30 |
bdmurray | time for another package! | 21:31 |
bdmurray | :) | 21:31 |
calc | around 21.6% of the bugs are incomplete | 21:31 |
calc | so i would be at 88.22 if those became triaged :) | 21:32 |
calc | bdmurray: yea i need to move the bugs that are on incorrect old OOo packages onto the main one | 21:32 |
calc | there are apparently 43 of those, yuck | 21:33 |
bdmurray | I'm sure there are some openoffice.org ones hide in the nopackage bugs too | 21:33 |
calc | yea | 21:33 |
calc | how do i pull up a list of nopackage bugs? | 21:33 |
greg-g | http://ur1.ca/0n6 | 21:35 |
greg-g | new and no package assigned | 21:35 |
calc | omg 3139 | 21:35 |
calc | thats a lot | 21:35 |
bdmurray | Hey, that's down a bit! I've been working on it some | 21:35 |
calc | we should disallow filing bugs like that (or is there a reason to keep allowing it?) | 21:36 |
bdmurray | It isn't always easy to determine the package name | 21:36 |
calc | hmm true | 21:36 |
bdmurray | And not every application has launchpad integration | 21:36 |
bdmurray | calc: if you look at http://people.ubuntu.com/~brian/reports/no-package-clues.html that uses a bughelper clue file that looks for openoffice bugs | 21:37 |
bdmurray | The logic is really weak but would help pear down the potential list from 3100 to something more managable | 21:38 |
calc | ah ok | 21:38 |
bdmurray | I haven't run it in a bit but could run it now if you'd like | 21:38 |
bdmurray | Yeah, I'll do that since there is only ooo bug on there | 21:38 |
calc | ok | 21:41 |
calc | i've found several so far :) | 21:45 |
calc | making my percentage go down :-P | 21:45 |
calc | bdmurray: that looks like it would be a good candidate for a bug day just properly classifying bugs don't even really need to do anything else to be a huge help ;-) | 21:57 |
bdmurray | Right, we have them every once in a while | 21:58 |
greg-g | bdmurray: that no-package-clues page could help out on those days, no? | 21:59 |
bdmurray | greg-g: there are lots of false positives in it | 21:59 |
greg-g | yeah, saw that. I guess it would be tough to see track who has checked which ones on that list without creating a separate wiki page, which would probably just create a lot of busy work | 22:00 |
greg-g | s/see track/track | 22:00 |
=== mcas is now known as mcas_away | ||
sbeattie | bdmurray: it'd be kind of handy to have the descriptions for each bug explodable a la the sru_todo list page I made. | 22:04 |
bdmurray | sbeattie: if you look in bugHelper/format/ you can see what to patch. ;) | 22:06 |
sbeattie | bdmurray: hehe | 22:06 |
calc | looks like i gained about 5 new bugs, some of the others i asked about and put into incomplete directly | 22:17 |
calc | dropped my triaged by 1% argh ;-) | 22:17 |
JonReagan | hey folks... anyone in? | 22:41 |
sbeattie | bdmurray: wanna close bug 164728 | 22:41 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 164728 in ubuntu "Can't Boot LiveCD With Powercable Plugged In Laptop" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/164728 | 22:41 |
JonReagan | I'd like to join the bug sqad | 22:42 |
bdmurray | sbeattie: sure feel free | 22:42 |
JonReagan | I checked out the wiki page | 22:42 |
JonReagan | and I have worked with launchpad before | 22:43 |
JonReagan | are there any prereq's before I begin work? | 22:43 |
sbeattie | bdmurray: for some reason I'm unable to. | 22:43 |
bdmurray | I did a search one time for 'please close this bug' and 'please delete this bug' and found a few bugs to close | 22:43 |
bdmurray | sbeattie: really? | 22:43 |
sbeattie | bdmurray: doh. launchpad logged me out. | 22:43 |
bdmurray | hahaha | 22:43 |
bdmurray | JonReagan: yes, apparently you need to be logged in to launchpad | 22:44 |
JonReagan | k thx | 22:44 |
bdmurray | JonReagan: otherwise, a willingness to learn and a helpful attitude are all that is needed | 22:45 |
JonReagan | great! :) | 22:45 |
JonReagan | I have just one more question.... | 22:45 |
JonReagan | Is there any sort of order that I need to follow (are people taking on bugs on a single application at a time?) | 22:46 |
JonReagan | or do I need to start picking away at the new entries? | 22:46 |
greg-g | picking away at whatever interests you is a good way to start | 22:46 |
bdmurray | No, there isn't an order you need to follow. I find it best if people pick something they like and are interested in. | 22:47 |
JonReagan | ah | 22:47 |
JonReagan | ok, I can do that | 22:47 |
bdmurray | Its a good way to learn more about your favorite application or help improve it. | 22:47 |
JonReagan | awesome, thanks for the help bdmurray! | 22:48 |
bdmurray | sbeattie: I try to teach people how they could have could have closed it themselves. | 22:48 |
JonReagan | I'll sign up for the team shortly | 22:48 |
bdmurray | JonReagan: great! we are happy to have your help | 22:48 |
bdmurray | Feel free to ask any questions you might have | 22:48 |
JonReagan | I will! Thanks | 22:49 |
sbeattie | bdmurray: alas, some people are harder to teach than others. | 22:50 |
* sbeattie stabs finger at mirror accusingly. | 22:50 | |
bdmurray | sbeattie: if you are using greasemonkey you just need to add the extra words in 1 time though | 22:50 |
bdmurray | and then you can teach hunderds of people! | 22:51 |
calc | greasemonkey scripts are wonderful :-) | 22:55 |
bdmurray | I just added a new one today from thekorn | 22:55 |
bdmurray | It allows you to hide certain tags | 22:55 |
calc | ah | 22:55 |
bdmurray | s/certain/any/ | 22:55 |
* calc bbia 1hr dinner time | 22:55 | |
bdmurray | quit() | 23:16 |
bdmurray | fail! | 23:16 |
Pici | !test | 23:18 |
ubottu | Failed! | 23:18 |
bdmurray | greg-g: is this interesting? http://people.ubuntu.com/~brian/reports/most-active-triagers-2008-07.txt | 23:21 |
nellery | I see my name! | 23:23 |
nellery | But it's pretty far down :( | 23:23 |
bdmurray | It's a tough crowd | 23:23 |
bdmurray | I thought it might be a way to identify people to recruit into bug control | 23:24 |
hggdh | not a bad idea, bdmurray | 23:27 |
nellery | so how is it counted? | 23:27 |
nellery | by the amount of triaging stuff that show's up in your karma? | 23:27 |
bdmurray | This actually just checks the mailing list to see how many messages you've sent. Not including initial bug reports. | 23:28 |
nellery | ah | 23:28 |
nellery | so it counts changing/assigning packages and such? | 23:29 |
bdmurray | No, just mails | 23:29 |
bdmurray | But from there we could then query more on the specifc person to see what they have done | 23:31 |
bdmurray | A few of these people I haven't heard of | 23:32 |
bdmurray | Yeah, the logic seems sound following Sergio down he's done a lot of work and actually has applied to the team but not sent in an application yet | 23:38 |
calc | hmm not too bad i am ranked #4 | 23:57 |
bdmurray | Well, number 2 doesn't really count | 23:57 |
bdmurray | same with 7 | 23:57 |
calc | wow some community people are really high on the list :) | 23:58 |
calc | what does the number represent? | 23:58 |
calc | oh number of emails? | 23:59 |
bdmurray | number of e-mails sent to the ubuntu-bugs mailing list during the month of july | 23:59 |
calc | ah ok | 23:59 |
bdmurray | not including initial bug reports | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!