[01:13] <Kynlem> Is there a way to search for projects on Launchpad by a programming language/category similar to how that can be done on SourceForge?
[10:36] <sistpoty> Rinchen: around? I'm here for a password reset
[10:37] <yannick> Hello, is the PPA service down?
[10:41] <wgrant> yannick: What gives you that idea?
[10:42] <yannick> wgrant, nothing is builded since hours, for me and others.
[10:43] <wgrant> Indeed, the i386 and amd64 buildds seem to be somewhat broken.
[10:43] <wgrant> I presume somebody will notice soon enough and fix them...
[10:43] <yannick> Is there the right place to report?
[10:44] <wgrant> Here is about as good as any.
[10:44] <yannick> ok
[10:58]  * gnomefreak hasnt seen an LP admin since friday but im sure they show up for a few minutes a day
[11:12] <ToyKeeper> Yeah, halfway through the weekend isn't the best time to find the admins.  :)
[11:15] <lifeless> file a question on answers.launchpad.net/launchpad, or ask in #canonical-sysadmins
[11:16] <ace> you know if some people can add some special licences on launchpad?
[11:16] <persia> ace: How do you mean?
[11:19] <acemtp> back
[11:19] <acemtp> https://help.launchpad.net/Legal/ProjectLicensing says
[11:19] <acemtp> Note: if you want to use Launchpad for a project that doesn't meet these licensing guidelines, please contact us.
[11:20] <persia> acemtp: You probably want answers.launchpad.net/launchpad then
[11:20] <acemtp> on the "contact us" page, there s a link to the chat :)
[11:20] <acemtp> so i m here :)
[11:21] <acemtp> just wonder if you know some project that doesn't follow these guidelines
[11:49] <Kamping_Kaiser> hi all. if i'd like to request a package moved from ubuntu hardy-updates to ubuntu hardy-security, do i contact LP admins, or find the ubuntu archive admins? (i'm really trying to find out what the process is so i can 'do it properly ')
[11:50] <lifeless> #ubuntu-devel or #ubuntu-motu for that; launchpad is just the hosting software, and what you're asking is an ubuntu development process question
[11:50] <Kamping_Kaiser> lifeless, cheers :)
[11:56]  * Hobbsee wonders how the buildds are dead
[11:57] <Hobbsee> oh dear.
[11:58] <damoxc> is the ppa build service broken at the moment?
[11:58] <Hobbsee> yes
[11:58] <ace> just wonder if you know some project that doesn't follow these guidelines
[12:38] <\sh> leonov 0.0.2 released
[12:40]  * persia dutifully goes to planet looking for the clicky bit to see the details...
[12:40] <\sh> persia: planet needs to catch it imho...leonov.tv is the real announcement :)
[12:42] <persia> \sh: Best practice in advertising is to ensure that the reader has an easy means to get more information :)
[12:43] <\sh> persia: I'm planning a radio ad for every leonov release ,-)
[12:43] <Hobbsee> oh dera.
[12:43] <Hobbsee> this is going to become envy-ng, all over again.
[12:43] <\sh> or I pay a little fee to get an ad in the launchpad podcast ;)
[12:44] <\sh> Hobbsee: na it will change :) I'll need to find a way to approve leonov as official launchpad project ,-) and have the leonov rss feed aggregated to planet ,->
[12:44] <persia> \sh: Well, that's good, but even an IRC announcement gets points for URLs.  Anyway, I see you've scheduled 0.0.3 for 2008-08-31: any chance I could convince you to reease on the 27th instead to make FeatureFreeze for Ubuntu?
[12:45] <\sh> persia: na...I don't care about the ubuntu freeze for leonov right now, until we have a good working version available...therefore I don't want to have packages in ubuntu at this stage
[12:46] <persia> Oh well.  Looks nifty anyway.
[12:46] <\sh> persia: plan is to have a stable version with every ubuntu release (well, before the hard freeze) those releases are really more for devs and curious people
[12:47] <persia> \sh: So target is 9.04 for default inclusion?
[12:48] <\sh> persia: right :)
[12:48] <\sh> persia: when it's time, I'll kick apachelogger to add leonov packages to our ppa...debian/ dir is already there, but we change a lot of things during the beginning...so it is irresponsible to push it now in intrepid
[12:49] <persia> \sh: Makes sense.
[12:51] <\sh> persia: when you read the future plans: switching to launchpad api, switching to storm etc. this will be fun...thekorn, our py-lp-bug master, is already playing with it...awesome guy btw ,-)
[14:15] <Rafik> hello,
[14:16] <Hobbsee> hey there
[14:17] <Rafik> I need to delete a team, I've been made owner but I don't find how to. How to proceed please ?
[14:18] <Hobbsee> file a question - link is in the /topic
[14:19] <Rafik> Hobbsee, ok, Thanks
[14:34] <mgolisch> is there something special i have to do to make my packages show up in my ppa?
[14:34] <mgolisch> dput seems to have uploaded the package but the archive is still not there
[14:34] <mgolisch> or does it just take some minutes for that to sync?
[14:36] <Hobbsee> it takes a few minutes
[14:36] <Hobbsee> you'll get an acceptance mail, if it's done right
[14:40] <yannick> mgolisch, PPA is broken atm...
[14:43] <mgolisch> ok
[14:45] <mgolisch> when will it work again?
[14:47] <Hobbsee> when someone fixes it.
[14:47] <Hobbsee> you'll have to wait till the european working monday, at least.
[14:48] <mgolisch> will packages in ppa only be build for the current dev release?
[14:49] <mgolisch> or how do i tell it which for which one to build the packages?
[14:50] <yannick> you have to tell in debian/changelog
[14:50] <mgolisch> the only reference to the realse seems to be in the changelog file, do i have to upload multiple source packages and change the relase in the changelog file to let it build for multiple releases?
[14:51] <mgolisch> or can i specify multiple?
[14:53] <yannick> i don't know
[15:07] <jelmer> mgolisch, you can only specify one
[15:08] <jelmer> you can upload multiple times though, each time for a different release
[15:08] <mgolisch> i see
[15:08] <mgolisch> its python code only anyways, i guess hardy users wont have problems using the intrepid packages
[15:08] <mgolisch> or am i wrong?
[15:10] <jelmer> depends on what your package dependencies are and whether they're available in hardy
[15:13] <mgolisch> yeah i see
[15:14] <geser> mgolisch: it's better to upload to hardy and then copy the debs into intrepid
[15:20] <mgolisch> ok
[17:03] <mdke> hello
[17:04] <mdke> on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-doc there is some bold text at the top saying "This project’s license is proprietary"
[17:04] <mdke> then there is some stuff about purchasing a subscription and so on
[17:04] <mdke> what do I need to do to get rid of that? I don't think the license is proprietary at all
[17:07] <andrea-bs> !weekend
[20:18] <soren> mwhudson: How long does it take for a new vcs import to get approved these days?
[20:39] <mwhudson> soren: depends how lucky you are :)
[20:39] <mwhudson> soren: which import are you interested in?
[20:39] <soren> mwhudson: kannel and mbuni.
[20:40] <soren> mwhudson: Well, just kannel, really. mbuni I just added for completeness.
[20:42] <mwhudson> soren: i think sf are still blocking mbuni imports
[20:42] <mwhudson> er
[20:42] <mwhudson> cvs imports
[20:42] <mwhudson> so mbuni will fail
[20:42] <soren> mwhudson: Whuh? Why?
[20:43] <mwhudson> soren: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-bazaar/+bug/244575
[20:44] <mwhudson> soren: approved, in any case
[20:44] <soren> mwhudson: Cool. Thanks very much!