[01:13] Is there a way to search for projects on Launchpad by a programming language/category similar to how that can be done on SourceForge? === Rhamphoryncus_ is now known as Rhamphoryncus === mtaylor_ is now known as mtaylor === ursula_ is now known as Ursinha [10:36] Rinchen: around? I'm here for a password reset [10:37] Hello, is the PPA service down? [10:41] yannick: What gives you that idea? [10:42] wgrant, nothing is builded since hours, for me and others. [10:43] Indeed, the i386 and amd64 buildds seem to be somewhat broken. [10:43] I presume somebody will notice soon enough and fix them... [10:43] Is there the right place to report? [10:44] Here is about as good as any. [10:44] ok [10:58] * gnomefreak hasnt seen an LP admin since friday but im sure they show up for a few minutes a day [11:12] Yeah, halfway through the weekend isn't the best time to find the admins. :) [11:15] file a question on answers.launchpad.net/launchpad, or ask in #canonical-sysadmins [11:16] you know if some people can add some special licences on launchpad? [11:16] ace: How do you mean? [11:19] back [11:19] https://help.launchpad.net/Legal/ProjectLicensing says [11:19] Note: if you want to use Launchpad for a project that doesn't meet these licensing guidelines, please contact us. [11:20] acemtp: You probably want answers.launchpad.net/launchpad then [11:20] on the "contact us" page, there s a link to the chat :) [11:20] so i m here :) [11:21] just wonder if you know some project that doesn't follow these guidelines [11:49] hi all. if i'd like to request a package moved from ubuntu hardy-updates to ubuntu hardy-security, do i contact LP admins, or find the ubuntu archive admins? (i'm really trying to find out what the process is so i can 'do it properly ') [11:50] #ubuntu-devel or #ubuntu-motu for that; launchpad is just the hosting software, and what you're asking is an ubuntu development process question [11:50] lifeless, cheers :) [11:56] * Hobbsee wonders how the buildds are dead [11:57] oh dear. [11:58] is the ppa build service broken at the moment? [11:58] yes [11:58] just wonder if you know some project that doesn't follow these guidelines === Hobbsee changed the topic of #launchpad to: Yes, PPA is broken | https://launchpad.net/ | Next meeting, all welcome: Thu 7 Aug 2008, 1800UTC #launchpad-meeting | Help: https://help.launchpad.net | Questions and spam reports: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | Code Scanner is back! [12:38] <\sh> leonov 0.0.2 released [12:40] * persia dutifully goes to planet looking for the clicky bit to see the details... [12:40] <\sh> persia: planet needs to catch it imho...leonov.tv is the real announcement :) [12:42] \sh: Best practice in advertising is to ensure that the reader has an easy means to get more information :) [12:43] <\sh> persia: I'm planning a radio ad for every leonov release ,-) [12:43] oh dera. [12:43] this is going to become envy-ng, all over again. [12:43] <\sh> or I pay a little fee to get an ad in the launchpad podcast ;) [12:44] <\sh> Hobbsee: na it will change :) I'll need to find a way to approve leonov as official launchpad project ,-) and have the leonov rss feed aggregated to planet ,-> [12:44] \sh: Well, that's good, but even an IRC announcement gets points for URLs. Anyway, I see you've scheduled 0.0.3 for 2008-08-31: any chance I could convince you to reease on the 27th instead to make FeatureFreeze for Ubuntu? [12:45] <\sh> persia: na...I don't care about the ubuntu freeze for leonov right now, until we have a good working version available...therefore I don't want to have packages in ubuntu at this stage [12:46] Oh well. Looks nifty anyway. [12:46] <\sh> persia: plan is to have a stable version with every ubuntu release (well, before the hard freeze) those releases are really more for devs and curious people [12:47] \sh: So target is 9.04 for default inclusion? [12:48] <\sh> persia: right :) [12:48] <\sh> persia: when it's time, I'll kick apachelogger to add leonov packages to our ppa...debian/ dir is already there, but we change a lot of things during the beginning...so it is irresponsible to push it now in intrepid [12:49] \sh: Makes sense. [12:51] <\sh> persia: when you read the future plans: switching to launchpad api, switching to storm etc. this will be fun...thekorn, our py-lp-bug master, is already playing with it...awesome guy btw ,-) === fta_ is now known as fta [14:15] hello, [14:16] hey there [14:17] I need to delete a team, I've been made owner but I don't find how to. How to proceed please ? [14:18] file a question - link is in the /topic [14:19] Hobbsee, ok, Thanks [14:34] is there something special i have to do to make my packages show up in my ppa? [14:34] dput seems to have uploaded the package but the archive is still not there [14:34] or does it just take some minutes for that to sync? [14:36] it takes a few minutes [14:36] you'll get an acceptance mail, if it's done right [14:40] mgolisch, PPA is broken atm... [14:43] ok [14:45] when will it work again? [14:47] when someone fixes it. [14:47] you'll have to wait till the european working monday, at least. [14:48] will packages in ppa only be build for the current dev release? [14:49] or how do i tell it which for which one to build the packages? [14:50] you have to tell in debian/changelog [14:50] the only reference to the realse seems to be in the changelog file, do i have to upload multiple source packages and change the relase in the changelog file to let it build for multiple releases? [14:51] or can i specify multiple? [14:53] i don't know === prateeksaxena is now known as prTk [15:07] mgolisch, you can only specify one [15:08] you can upload multiple times though, each time for a different release [15:08] i see [15:08] its python code only anyways, i guess hardy users wont have problems using the intrepid packages [15:08] or am i wrong? [15:10] depends on what your package dependencies are and whether they're available in hardy [15:13] yeah i see [15:14] mgolisch: it's better to upload to hardy and then copy the debs into intrepid [15:20] ok === persia_ is now known as persia === RainCT is now known as RainCT_ === Rafik_ is now known as Rafik [17:03] hello [17:04] on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-doc there is some bold text at the top saying "This project’s license is proprietary" [17:04] then there is some stuff about purchasing a subscription and so on [17:04] what do I need to do to get rid of that? I don't think the license is proprietary at all [17:07] !weekend [17:07] It's a weekend. Often on weekends, the paid developers, and a lot of the community, may not be around to answer your question. Please be patient, wait longer than you normally would, or try again during the working week. === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn [20:18] mwhudson: How long does it take for a new vcs import to get approved these days? [20:39] soren: depends how lucky you are :) [20:39] soren: which import are you interested in? [20:39] mwhudson: kannel and mbuni. [20:40] mwhudson: Well, just kannel, really. mbuni I just added for completeness. [20:42] soren: i think sf are still blocking mbuni imports [20:42] er [20:42] cvs imports [20:42] so mbuni will fail [20:42] mwhudson: Whuh? Why? [20:43] soren: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-bazaar/+bug/244575 [20:43] Launchpad bug 244575 in launchpad-bazaar "code imports from sourceforge are blocked" [High,In progress] [20:44] soren: approved, in any case [20:44] mwhudson: Cool. Thanks very much! === damoxc is now known as it1337 === it1337 is now known as damoxc === RainCT_ is now known as RainCT === ebel_ is now known as ebel