[01:16] <jack--> does packages.ubuntu.com work for anyone atm?
[01:17] <cvasilak> jack--, no i can't connect myself too
[01:18] <jack--> ;<
[01:18] <jack--> ok, thx
[01:18] <cvasilak> jack, :)
[01:18] <jack--> wow, now it does
[01:18] <jack--> 5 minutes later
[01:19] <jack--> no css though..something seems broken
[01:21] <jack--> now it even has its css again
[01:21] <jack--> that poor box must be under heavy load
[01:23] <jack--> what happened to seveas, btw?
[01:23] <jack--> did he switch to suse or something?
[04:22] <calc> the ooo-langpacks diff is getting big
[04:22] <calc> bzr diff| wc 7384   15488  192068
[04:22] <calc> and that is around 1/6 of the way done
[04:22]  * calc hopes it actually works once he is done patching the files
[04:42] <emgent> calc: heya :D
[04:45] <calc> special casing out all binaries from building in OOo is very tedious
[04:45] <calc> looks like i will probably have to modify 2000 makefiles to do it
[04:46] <lifeless> MEEEEEP
[04:46] <emgent> woow
[09:29] <AnAnt> is Matvey Kozhev here ?
[12:10] <Kamping_Kaiser> hi all. the recent update to xulrunner causes it to conflict with epiphany ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xulrunner-1.9/+bug/253462  ). Who should be aproached to get the updated packags copied/moved from -updates into -security ?
[12:11] <Kamping_Kaiser> this bug is a release blocker for gNewSense, as we use Epiphany as our primary browser.
[12:33] <persia> Kamping_Kaiser: You need an archive-admin to do that.
[12:34] <Kamping_Kaiser> persia, iirc theres an archive-admin list - fire them off an email?
[12:35] <persia> Kamping_Kaiser: I've always had more success finding them here in the 06:00 - 02:00 UTC range on weekdays, but you may have a different experience.
[12:36] <persia> Also note that while yelp can likely be copied, epiphany-browser has a new upstream update in -updates, so may need a specially crafted version for -security (which is both less than the one in -updates and sufficient to meet the needs for xulrunner)
[12:37] <Kamping_Kaiser> i dont think i'll try to fix this one *g*.
[12:37] <Kamping_Kaiser> not sure if i'll be able to be here in those times
[12:38] <persia> Kamping_Kaiser: It's a 20-hour range, but I understand :)
[12:39] <Kamping_Kaiser> persia, it is yes :) i'll send off an email, if i can make it here as well thats a bonus.
[15:47] <geser> Hobbsee: have you time to give-back pbuilder?
[15:47] <geser> please
[15:48] <Hobbsee> geser: given back
[16:57] <emgent> heya \sh
[20:23] <geser> soren: Hi, do you know why libipq_pic.a got dropped from iptables-dev in the last merge?
[20:24] <soren> geser: Erm.. Good question. Let me check.
[20:28] <soren> geser: Oh, right, I think I remember now. Let me find the bug reference.
[20:33] <soren> Oh.
[20:34] <soren> I found a bug about libiptc's inclusion being a mistake, and thought that was true of libipq as well..
[20:34] <soren> geser: If you throw me a patch to enable it again, I'll be happy to apply it.
[20:34] <soren> Sorry for the inconvenience.
[21:23] <bfields> I've got a bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/227837 with a patch available.  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToFix suggests that the next step is to ask here for a developer to do an upload?
[21:26] <stgraber> bfields: you should poke soren he's the one who last uploaded that package. Though it's weekend and you'll probably have more luck tomorrow.
[21:30] <bfields> stgraber: ok, thanks.  So would email to soren at ubuntu.com do the job?
[21:30] <owen1_> can u say that ubuntu development is agile? if yes, do u have any links for more info?
[21:33] <stgraber> bfields: well, the Ubuntu virtualisation team is subscribed to this bug and he's the owner of the team so he already received e-mails from Launchpad
[21:35] <owen1_> (it's for a university assignment)
[21:35] <bfields> stgraber: ok, so by "poke", you mean try to reach him by irc?  (I'm not used to irc, so a bit lost...)
[21:37] <stgraber> bfields: in my case just saying my nickname in a sentence adds it to a list of messages that I read when I'm back (/away displays them). That's the default behaviour in irssi and probably some other IRC clients
[21:41] <bfields> stgraber: ok, thanks.  So I guess I should hope the above does the job, then maybe try again during the week if nothing obvious happens.
[22:42] <greg-g> package gnome-color-chooser's description has " http://www.punk-ass-bitch.org/gnome-color-chooser/" as its homepage.  That link forwards to "http://gnomecc.sourceforge.net/"  Would it be acceptable to file a bug to request the change of that Hompage link?
[22:45] <james_w> greg-g: you mean in Debian?
[22:45] <greg-g> james_w: I guess that is where it should be filed yeah.
[22:45] <james_w> I don't see why not
[22:47] <greg-g> even if the Debian maintainer's email is @punk-ass-bitch.org ? ;)
[22:50] <james_w> greg-g: if there is a redirect then updating it seems to make sense
[22:50] <james_w> you can always ask
[22:52] <greg-g> yeah
[22:53] <pwnguin> heh
[22:53] <pwnguin> why is "fuck" censored in one description of a brainfuck package but not the rest?
[22:54] <greg-g> that doesn't make sense
[22:54] <pwnguin> its not even related to differing DD maintainers
[22:55] <pwnguin> actually, i misspoke
[22:58] <pwnguin> of course, we also dont seem to ship bitchx
[22:58] <pwnguin> seems debian stopped too
[23:06] <ion_> greg-g: Why request a change? The link works, doesn’t it? Perhaps upstream migrates away from sourceforge, and the current link will then redirect to the new location.
[23:10] <greg-g> ion_: if upstream migrates away from sourceforge the update the homepage to their new home, no?  Otherwise, we should just create a packagename.redirect.debian.org or similar for homepages, which seems redundant/not useful.
[23:11] <greg-g> s/sourceforge the update/sourceforge then update/
[23:12] <ion_> The link works right now. I don’t see the problem. :-)
[23:12] <ScottK> pwnguin: We don't ship bitchx due to it's stunningly poor security history as I understand it.
[23:13] <ScottK> greg-g: I don't see the problem either.
[23:13] <emgent> heya
[23:13] <ion_> Howdy
[23:13] <ScottK> Particularly when (given the maintainer's address) you can be pretty sure it's not left that way by accident.
[23:15] <greg-g> ScottK: well, right.  But it seems like the Homepage field should point to the homepage of the project (if there is one), not the maintainer's personal redirect page for it.  but that is just personal opinion.  We'll see what he says.
[23:16] <ScottK> greg-g: OK.  Personally I'd have better problems to spend my time on, but volunteer however suites you.
[23:16] <greg-g> ScottK: thats great, I will.
[23:16] <ScottK> :-)
[23:17] <emgent> argh packages.u.c down again.
[23:17] <jpds> emgent: Reported hours ago.
[23:18] <ion_> greg-g: The author of gnomecc seems to own the domain punk-ass-bitch.org.
[23:19] <ion_> greg-g: It seems to be the upstream’s redirect page, not just the maintainer’s.
[23:22] <greg-g> ion_: thanks for the info.