[00:00] But i remember in the video, he said that hibernate/suspend goes under acpi... [00:06] all roads lead to matthew garrett [00:07] pwnguin: What are your thoughts about this one -- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/153665 [00:07] Launchpad bug 153665 in ubuntu "Notification sometimes "sticks" upon closing an application" [Undecided,New] [00:08] i love the "bumps" [00:08] thank you ubuntu forums, i love stupid pings [00:08] heh. [00:09] howdy everyone, what an active channel today [00:09] What package does that one belong with, or is that a 'do you still have this problem in a newer Ubuntu?' [00:09] mrooney: it's the GBJ maybe that's why. [00:09] its probably gnome-panel or somethnig else [00:09] I was thinking gnome pannel or metacity [00:10] not metacity [00:10] I would imagine gnome-panel [00:10] unless there is a more specific package for the applets, but not that I know of [00:10] or perhaps the app that closed it [00:11] maybe he just locked it to the panel. [00:12] gnome-pannel is not a source package. [00:12] oops typo [00:13] emma: I would mark it against gnome-panel and Incomplete it, asking if it still occurs and in which distribution and version of gnome-panel (apt-cache policy gnome-panel) [00:14] I would say gnome-panel indeed [00:15] Thanks! [00:16] Can you guys tell me what is it about it that tells you 'gnome-panel' ? [00:16] the notification tray is part of gnome-panel i beleive... [00:17] Is it ok to simply suggest to the reported to file upstream? or do I actually have to go do it? [00:18] s/reported/reporter [00:18] Odd-rationale: no, a reporter rarely even would know what you mean by that :) [00:18] mrooney: so i have to actually do it? [00:18] emma: right, it is a gnome-panel applet [00:19] Okay great. Thanks very much. I think helping with bugs might help me learn more deeply about Ubuntu. [00:19] emma: you definitely will, and learn about all sorts of applications and commands you never knew existed! [00:19] Odd-rationale: you don't HAVE to, you can leave it for another triager, and can suggest in the comments that it should be [00:19] That's fantastic. :) [00:20] ok. thanks [00:20] i would hate to create an account in like 5 different bug trackers.. [00:20] Odd-rationale: but it isn't, IMO, reporters responsibility to file upstream, they are using Ubuntu, and that's part of our "job" [00:20] Odd-rationale: which bug is this, specifically? [00:21] pretty much all of gnome uses the same one so it isn't really that bad. [00:21] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/230652 [00:21] Launchpad bug 230652 in ubuntu "wrong line wraps in KDE4 kate and kwrite" [Undecided,New] [00:21] it is kde [00:21] kde4 for that matter [00:21] mrooney: what should i do when upstream basically ignores launchpad? [00:21] (we can take this to PM if you don't want to spam the channel) [00:22] pwnguin: hmm, what do you mean by ignores? it isn't really an upstream projects job to worry about Ubuntu, usually [00:23] i think he has the wrong settings... [00:23] and there are quite a lot of settings for a single app in kde... [00:23] pwnguin: so you mean a bug reported upstream that the project doesn't care about fixing? in that case we can patch it on our package and give it to them, though that is less than optimal [00:24] Odd-rationale: it's OK to suggest, but then somebody else has to do the work, so it would be great if you'd actually do it [00:24] What if we find a bug report where it appears that someone has solved the problem in one of the comments? [00:24] :( [00:24] mrooney: say someone reports a wacom bug in ubuntu, and I'm pretty sure it's upstream's fault, but I can't reproduce it [00:24] Odd-rationale: it's part of the process of triaging... [00:25] ok. Thanks! [00:25] Odd-rationale: and of course, provide the appropriate cross linking [00:25] Odd-rationale: but if you don't want to get into that yet, you can just not triage those bugs to begin with. I started by just subscribing to bug reports to learn what other people did with them [00:25] mrooney: now there's a good idea. [00:25] emma: well, it depends if it was actually a bug or not. did someone come up with a workaround for it? [00:26] https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=525124&aid=2030106&group_id=69596 [00:26] Sourceforge bug 2030106 "Erratic Pen movement on x41t laptop" [Pri: 5,Closed fixed] [00:26] actually, wrong bug [00:26] mrooney: I'm also thinking, after this GBJ is over maybe I will just concentrate on a couple of packages I know more about or have an interest in. [00:26] Odd-rationale: however, I think that bug could be helped with a screenshot and maybe some settings that he has set... [00:26] https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=525124&aid=1987565&group_id=69596 [00:26] Sourceforge bug 1987565 "Can't mouse from one screen to another with Graphire" [Pri: 5,Open] [00:27] mrooney: I think it looks like it was not a bug but more of a need to know how to configure x-org. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/152214 [00:27] Odd-rationale: and of course mark it against the right package (kdebase) [00:27] Launchpad bug 152214 in ubuntu "IBM Thinkpad T40 trackpoint (pointing stick) misconfigured" [Undecided,New] [00:27] yuriy: i would look through the settings if i had kate. But i don't use kde, much less kde4... [00:27] emma: yeah, I would recommend when you find incoming bugs (say from the RSS or #ubuntu-bugs-announce) that seem interesting to you, just subscribe to them, I do that with 2-3 every day, and you will get the emails of what happens and see it triaged and ideally eventually fixed [00:29] Odd-rationale: also, often you don't have to file anything upstream, just search [00:29] Odd-rationale: in this case, searching for "kate word wrap" at bugs.kde.org turns up dozens of reports [00:29] yuriy: oh, i didn;t think of that... [00:30] Odd-rationale: and don't forget to search launchpad for duplicates as well when you work on bugs. same idea. [00:30] yuriy: what is that about? If you find a duplicate bug what are you supposed to do with the two bugs? [00:31] report one as duplicate [00:31] you mark one as a duplicate of the other. making the one with more information the master [00:31] emma: you mark the new one as a duplicate of the other, and leave in a comment in the duplicate bug thanking them for the report, saying it has already been filed, and asking them to read the duplicate for possible workarounds, and add any new information [00:31] emma: pick the one that's a better report (clearer, more information) then mark the other one as a duplicate of it (there is a link for that) [00:31] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/MarkingDuplicate [00:31] and leave an appropriate comment [00:31] okay great. [00:31] heh, and have 4 people provide duplicate answers to the question ;) [00:31] :) [00:32] emma: also, with that report you linked, it depends on if the conf file is actually "misconfigured" [00:32] The master one is the one you type the number of? or ther other way around? [00:32] greg-g: hey, more eyes is better [00:32] pwnguin: yep [00:32] Odd-rationale: the first, you type in the master bug # [00:32] mrooney: yes, perhaps I should ask if the person's problem has been resolved and mark it as incomplete? [00:33] emma: sure, you want to find out if it previously worked, say in a previous version of Ubuntu, which would make it a regression and a bug [00:33] if it has never worked out of the box, that would be a 'wishlist' importance bug, I would say [00:34] emma: a crucial thing though, when marking things as incomplete (or making any change, I would say) is to subscribe to the bug so when the person provides more information you can change the status appropriately, otherwise it could stay in incomplete! [00:35] Odd-rationale: report fix'd [00:36] to that kate bug? [00:36] yuriy: ^ [00:37] Odd-rationale: yeah, it was already fixed, but I did all the stuff anyway (add upstream link since I'd already found it anyway, set right package, set status to fixed, set importance to wishlist, thank the reporter) [00:37] k thanks a lot! [00:37] s/wishlist/low [00:37] mrooney: Okay, I was under the impression that if something is marked as incomplete then it eventually is deleted ? [00:38] emma: well, it is "expired", after 60 days of no response [00:38] Is that for all bug reports or just ones marked incomplete? [00:38] which makes sense, if you need more information and the reporter hasn't gotten back to you in two months, those aren't useful bugs for developers/triagers to look at, there is nothing to be done with them [00:38] just Incomplete! [00:39] emma, you should look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status [00:42] Invalid: [00:42] * This status should be used when the bug report does not contain adequate information to determine whether or not it is a bug even if it is resolved for the reporter [00:42] Doesn't this constitute a criterion by which we could mark almost all of these as invalid and be done with it? :) [00:43] yes that wording does seem sub-optimal [00:43] Invalid is used when the behavior is not actually a bug, essentially [00:44] I know I was being ironic. :) [00:44] yes, it would save us some time :) [00:44] I'll just make a script to mark all incoming bugs as Invalid and we can go do other things :) [00:45] like complain about how ubuntu sucks and crashes on us, and totally lost that term paper [00:46] haha yeah, everyone definitely will come across a really angry, obnoxious report every once and awhile [00:47] heh, the only one i came across was an upstream developer [00:47] I really want to keep a "best of" bug list, but I worry about offending the reporters :) [00:47] how dare we ship xournal when there's a point release avalable days after freeze [00:48] haha you should look at the X-Fi bug [00:48] i think i'll pass [00:48] an untested alpha driver came out 2 days before Hardy final and someone was pretty upset we weren't shipping it [00:49] I think this bug should have wishlist status: https://bugs.launchpad.net/wesnoth/+bug/256345 [00:49] Launchpad bug 256345 in wesnoth "recruiting impossible on some parts of a castle" [Undecided,Confirmed] [00:49] <_stink_> i'm getting a bunch of errors from the command line 5-a-day app when trying to add a bug... any advice? http://paste.ubuntu.com/36028/ [00:51] im always amused when volunteers are short on time [00:51] _stink_: did you upload your ssh keys ro launchpad? [00:51] pwnguin: i don't get it [00:51] s/ro/to [00:52] daradib: the global bug jam is on; you're short on time but participating anyways? [00:52] <_stink_> Odd-rationale: i did - they're shown at https://launchpad.net/~adamjlincoln [00:52] pwnguin: i am working regardless of jam [00:53] daradib: ok then [00:53] there is no jams close to me [00:53] are* [00:54] This person seems to have fixed their own problem -- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/154809 [00:54] Launchpad bug 154809 in ubuntu "nvidia driver does not seem to work after gutsy update" [Undecided,New] [00:55] _stink_: you have 2 keys uploaded? [00:56] <_stink_> Odd-rationale: i had one for a while that worked fine as far as I could tell. earlier today when i ran into this problem, i added the second hoping it would help. it didn't - i get the same error [00:56] <_stink_> they were generated on two different machines [00:56] <_stink_> each of which i now get the same error on [00:57] well thr first line says "Permission denied (publickey)." [00:57] so i think it has somthing to do with that... [00:57] it is ok having more than one key, I do and 5-a-day works [00:57] maybe try over again> [00:57] ? [00:57] he has ;) === max101 is now known as _max_ [00:58] <_stink_> i know, which is strange. i assumed the line after that about concurrent connections was the error assocatied with the failed connection [00:58] yeah i know more than one key is ok [00:58] <_stink_> but if no one else is getting this, then there must not be a limit problem [00:59] emma: so in that case, if they fixed it themselves and it was their own fault, a misconfigured file or something, then you can just thank them for the report and mark it Invalid, but in this case it seems like it is potentially a legitimate bug [00:59] <_stink_> maybe I'll just file a bug on it :) [00:59] _stink_: maybe you have more than one running [00:59] it is sort of disturbing that all that work took place out of launchpad [00:59] <_stink_> Odd-rationale: more than one... one what? [01:00] or more than one bzr connections running... [01:00] <_stink_> i don't have the applet going, just using the command line [01:00] mrooney: how so? [01:01] emma: well there is a lot of information in that forum thread, you could try to figure out the relevant stuff and leave it in a comment [01:01] emma: I think you are picking hard bugs :) [01:03] I'm trying to find good ones. [01:03] if you are new to triaging you probably don't want to look at old bugs since every one else passed them up already, if they were easy they are already triaged probably [01:03] True. [01:03] I'm looking at the list of ones without a package and trying to put them with the package. [01:03] I would recommend looking at incoming bug reports and subscribing to ones you want to know more about [01:03] yeah, that is a worthy effort [01:03] Okay. [01:04] Yes I'm going to do that, but I'm trying to do stuff for the GBJ today and tomorrow. [01:04] still you may want to focus your efforts on newer ones and not the ones no one else knew where to assign either :) [01:05] heh [01:05] although certainly finding old ones and asking is a great way to learn, and get attention to old bugs that maybe fell through the cracks [01:05] emma: so, I guess you can't go wrong, in conclusion :) [01:05] Could someone please mark Bug 256345 as wishlist status (or low)? [01:05] Launchpad bug 256345 in wesnoth "recruiting impossible on some parts of a castle" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/256345 [01:06] :) [01:06] heh, is that a "this game is hard" bug? [01:06] You have a good style mrooney :) [01:06] greg-g: no, its a "this game should work" bug [01:06] what it really needs is a low and a forward to upstream [01:07] yeah, looks like it [01:07] I'll set it to low, you wanna take care of forwarding? [01:07] not really =/ [01:07] :) me neither [01:07] if it means i might meet esr, i'll pass [01:08] the wesnoth server is not working very well right now anyways... [01:08] what? esr is a dev for wesnoth? [01:08] his name appears in the credits... [01:09] ah [01:09] yes, he is [01:09] check ohloh on wesnoth [01:11] emma: thanks :) by the way, if you are focusing on bugs without a package, bdmurray has a great stock response for that [01:11] if I can find it... [01:15] What package is involved with system > shutdown ? [01:15] emma: anyway it is something like "Thanks for your bug report. This bug was filed without a package specified, which is important for getting it looked at by the right people. I have marked this as a bug against PACKAGENAME. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage for more information." [01:16] a colleciton of stock responses is at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses [01:16] s/colleciton/collection/ [01:16] hggdh: ooh, I wasn't so far off :) [01:16] emma: good question about that package [01:17] you were good, mrooney... I just thought the collection could help [01:17] hggdh: no I appreciate it, that's what I was hoping someone would provide [01:18] <_stink_> Odd-rationale: filed bug with bzr. thanks for taking a look :) [01:19] emma: one trick is to search for bugs in ubuntu that would probably be in it, and look at the package, like "gnome logout" or "gnome shutdown" or something [01:20] exit [01:20] oops [01:22] emma: gnome-session [01:24] mrooney: that's a good idea. [01:27] Does every package in Ubuntu have a bug supervisor ? [01:27] no, sadly [01:27] well, maybe supervisor means something extra special [01:29] but if every package had someone paying special attention to it, we could just take the whole unassigned queue, assign it to a random package and let them figure it out ;) [01:29] except that's what happens [01:30] the Ubuntu package and ~ubuntu-bugcontrol [01:30] well [01:30] i didnt mean one specific random package [01:30] maybe you didnt either? [01:31] Who looks at it then, the motu who packaged the package in the first place? [01:31] emma: sometimes [01:32] otherwise you have to assume~motu does [01:32] do the motus have developer skills or do they just need packagers skills? [01:32] i think bug #256491 should be set to wishlist [01:32] Launchpad bug 256491 in nautilus "Computer does not appear in "places"" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/256491 [01:32] emma: many of both [01:32] pwnguin: you theoretically could do that, but all that would happen is they would mark it invalid against their package [01:32] heh [01:32] crimsun: some of them just have packaging skills ? [01:32] emma, yes [01:32] mrooney: but some fraction of them would be right! [01:32] emma: sure, but "just" is misleading. [01:33] pwnguin: haha yeah, just keep cycling around the invalid ones until there aren't any left :) [01:33] :-) [01:39] jarosser06, I think not [01:39] jarosser06, there are two references to computer in nautilus [01:39] emma: by the way another excellent resource is https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Checklist [01:39] Okay let me read that. [01:40] one is a big buton nexto the the navigation arrows ... anything that would enable it to be more "accesible" would include neon lights with google maps directions on how to find it ;) [01:45] alright i wasnt sure how to label it im new sorry [01:47] greg-g: thanks [01:49] jarosser06, it's cool :D [01:49] jarosser06, good call on refering to brainstorm :D [01:50] Thanks i got it off the Triage tutorial lol, so just curious what would you mark something like that as b/c i totally agree with you the computer button is right there [01:51] I seem many people start their bug report with: binary package hint: why do they do that and where did they learn to do that? Is there some rubric some place that advises people how to file a report? [01:52] emma: That's part of the "Report a Problem" link in GNOME [01:52] It's under 'Help > Report a Problem' [01:52] Ahh. [01:57] jarosser06, mark it invalid, if the reported strongly feels he is right... let him reopen it [01:57] alright thanks [01:57] but once well argumented it is rarely chanllenged [02:01] so do you have any advice for someone just beginning with bugs [02:04] jarosser06, keep it coming :D [02:05] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cfv/+bug/256500 [02:05] Launchpad bug 256500 in cfv "cfv package recommends bittorrent | bittornado, not transmission" [Undecided,New] [02:06] is it resonable to change the package to suggest transmission then? [02:06] jarosser06, read http://wiki.ubuntu.com/HelpingWithBugs [02:06] its a good start [02:06] and feel free to ask questions [02:07] i read that and How to triage [02:08] so... keep it simple. Start looking at bugs, and grab one you feel confortable with (or less unconfortable with ;-) [02:08] and then try to apply what you read [02:08] if in doubt, ask. We do not bite, most of the time [02:09] lol thanks [02:09] you are welcome, jarosser06. Thank you for helping [02:09] i think this is a wishlist item bug # 256476 [02:09] bug 256476 [02:09] Launchpad bug 256476 in empathy "Does not support file transfers" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/256476 [02:09] jarosser06: did you look at the bug checklist page I sent emma a few minutes earlier? that has some great tips [02:10] yeah that looks like Triaged/Wishlist at first glance [02:10] I will set it so [02:11] yeah i started looking at it a little i kinda wish i had a printer so i dont have to keep switching screens [02:12] jarosser06, good catch, thank you [02:12] yall are very helpful [02:12] jarosser06, this is a community effort. Community efforts only work if all work together and help each other [02:13] jarosser06, just a question: have you registered in launchpad? [02:13] yeah its great i have used Ubuntu for about 2 years and i dont think i have ever had a question or problem that i have not been helped with [02:14] i try to do the same through the mailing list and thought i might try my hand at bugs now [02:14] yes [02:14] good, then you can add your comments in [02:14] and we need all help we can get -- lots of bug reports, and not enough bug triagers [02:15] huh [02:16] a question, jarosser06: when you said ' yall' you meant 'all yall', or just ' yall' ? ;-) [02:16] all of you [02:16] ah, all yall [02:16] yeah [02:16] ill clarify next time [02:16] lol [02:16] pure old texan ;-) [02:17] yeah im actually in Huntsville right now going to Sam Houston [02:18] i think bug #256478 and bug #256477 are wishlist candidates as well [02:18] Launchpad bug 256478 in empathy "Multi-protocol contacts not supported" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/256478 [02:18] Launchpad bug 256477 in empathy "Password-protected rooms aren't supported" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/256477 [02:19] and I am in DFW [02:20] what does that stand for [02:21] Dallas Fort Worth ? [02:21] yes [02:21] gotcha [02:21] ive never been to Dallas [02:21] another way of saying dallas metroplex [02:21] Oh [02:21] bug 256478 taken care of. [02:21] Launchpad bug 256478 in empathy "Multi-protocol contacts not supported" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/256478 [02:22] bug 256477 will need a bit more of work [02:22] Launchpad bug 256477 in empathy "Password-protected rooms aren't supported" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/256477 [02:22] there is no upstream pointing to it, so we need to find if it has been reported upstream to link [02:23] how do you do that [02:24] bug #30910 should be set to Wishlist [02:24] Launchpad bug 30910 in hwtest "Hardware Database not browseable" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/30910 [02:26] empathy is a gnome application, so it should be described in gnome.org; also, it's native BTS (Bug Tracking System) is http://bugzilla.gnome.org [02:26] is patricio gonzalez here? [02:31] yoda_van, why? [02:32] jarosser06, so you can go to the gnome BTS and search in for a matching bug [02:33] it been addressed for awhile now, in brainstorm - just haven't taken action on making the db searchable/readable [02:33] (this is all part of bug triaging) [02:33] its actually broken by design, if you read through the comments [02:34] I did, and I agree. Still, ogra put it out of in progress to new [02:34] he could have put it as wishlist [02:35] ok so i should look in the gnome db after looking through launchpads if it is related to gnome [02:35] so I think we should ask him about that [02:35] k [02:36] let me check and see if ogra is on email list [02:36] jarosser06, if we could find an upstream bug, or the project plan for it, it would help. It does not really help just to set it wishlist, if upstream (the actual developers) do not get to know about it [02:37] ok that makes since [02:37] (the other two bugs you pointed out had nice upstream bugs already linked [02:37] hggdh, ogra is on email list so they will see the request - ty [02:38] welcome, yoda_van. Thank you for helping [02:38] np [02:38] this is a blast - albeit tedious [02:42] what if you dont see a bug listed in gnomes database [02:43] it is hard work... usually any hard work is tedious ;-) [02:43] yeah [02:43] and a little confusing at first [02:43] but still pretty fun [02:43] jarosser06, in this case we would have to check for the empathy project plan [02:44] the reporter stated it is in line for next**2 or next**3 gnome version [02:44] so does that mean the empathy project is already working on it [02:44] that is what the reporter stated. We need to confirm it [02:45] and we need to look in the upstream project plan not the one in launchpad correct [02:46] I dont even see empathy under gnomes project listing [02:47] nm i found it [02:48] http://live.gnome.org/Empathy [02:48] alright so i see the feature listed for future developement [02:48] now do i mark it as confirmed on launchpad [02:49] yes, you can. Add the link to the roadmap also [02:49] when i add the link is there a special way to do that or do i just add it in a comment [02:50] do they use gnome bugzilla? [02:50] ah yes [02:51] :-) [02:51] jarosser06, since it is the roadmap, just as a comment. You edit the description to add it there also [02:52] these 3 bugs, in fact, will have no immediate use... but they were opened, so we need to deal with them [02:53] jarosser06: with empathy being proposed for the desktop if would be awesome if you could help be the link between launchpad and the upstream bug tracker [02:53] bug #255019 should be marked as wishlist [02:53] Launchpad bug 255019 in syslinux "Live CD menu gives no indication of which version of Ubuntu this is" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/255019 [02:53] jcastro, good idea [02:54] yeah this is actually cooler than seeing my architectural drawings being built [02:54] lol [02:54] alright i added a comment and updated the description [02:55] so how did i do [02:55] lol [02:55] jarosser06: ah, don't people to post on brainstorm for that! [02:55] hey, can anyone confirm or deny that visiting yodlee.com with javascript enabled crashes firefox? [02:55] huh [02:56] it opened fine for me [02:56] jarosser06: you told one guy to post his bug on brainstorm, they'll just tell him to post it on launchpad. [02:56] hggdh: wow, nearly every bug is linked to upstream. [02:56] jarosser06, very good. I set it to triaged now [02:57] sweet [02:57] this makes me a happy camper [02:57] jcastro, which bugs? [02:57] empathy bugs [02:57] thanks to jarosser06, actually [02:57] all 6 of them. :) [02:57] LOL [02:57] i only delt with like one lol [02:57] if we can keep that up it would be really fantastic [02:58] jarosser06, I do not use firefox [02:58] jcastro, I agree [02:59] I'll blog about this, since I suspect more bugs will be incoming [02:59] this is inspirational. [02:59] thanks, jcastro. As you very well know, all help is appreciated. [03:00] jarosser06, you picked 3 of them up [03:00] can anyone else try yodlee.com, I disabled all extensions and still get a segfault [03:00] oh yeah but i only did the upstream stuff for one [03:00] OK, I changed two of them, but because you raised the issue [03:01] jarosser06: determining if something is upstream by bringing it up still counts! [03:01] absolutely correct [03:03] jarosser06: do you have flash installed? [03:03] would bug #256507 be considered a wishlist bug as well [03:03] Launchpad bug 256507 in brasero "Please sponsor brasero 0.8.1 (main) into Intrepid" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/256507 [03:03] yes i do [03:03] mrooney, yes i do along with java should i disable them [03:03] and try a gain [03:03] again* [03:03] nope, I just wanted to make sure you had everything enabled that I did [03:03] thanks for testing [03:03] jarosser06, no, this is a workflow bug. Bugsquad does not deal with workflow bugs. [03:04] Happy Global Bug Jam [03:04] Hi all [03:04] hi rooney [03:04] ok i am on a 64 bit Ubuntu if that makes a difference [03:04] ok [03:06] jarosser06, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage#Special%20types%20of%20bugs [03:25] Hi all [03:31] i found a bug about firefox not saving bookmarks and i found a duplicate but the duplicate states some other problems as well so is it still a duplicate [03:32] ? [03:33] hi anakron [03:33] :O [03:33] Hi hggdh... [03:33] jarosser06, it is one issue per bug [03:34] so a bug with more than one issue has to be split [03:34] by the reporter [03:34] oh well it seemed that the issue was resolved in fact the only mention of other problems was in the heading itself [03:35] so it is not really a duplicate? [03:35] i think it is they both have the same problem, the firefox bookmarks are not saved after firefox is shutdown [03:36]