/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/08/10/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

=== fta_ is now known as fta
ftare00:02
asacfta: my built got stuck because they ship flockIRDFSQLDataSource00:02
asacin rdf/ ...00:02
ftayep00:02
asaci am doing a full diff now ;)00:02
asaccurrently see no sense in having that in rdf/ directly00:03
ftafeel free to fix that00:03
* asac wonders if svn diff svn://svn-mirror.flock.com/master/flock/vendor/firefox-3.0/mozilla svn://svn-mirror.flock.com/master/flock/trunk/mozilla | tee /tmp/flock.diff00:03
asacis run on server side in svn?00:03
asacotherwise it will probably take ages00:03
asac... @fix: first i want to see what has been changed on top of that ;)00:04
asacfta: do we have a bzr mirror for that?00:04
ftano00:05
asaca launchpad project?00:05
asachmmm ... they changed nsICookieService in a wierd fashion00:07
ftahttps://edge.launchpad.net/flock00:07
asacah ok00:07
asacthey only changed internal func00:07
asacgood thing about the svn diff slowness is that one can read it while it happens ;)00:08
asacfta: how did you fix the rdf/ thing?00:09
asac(when building against system-xul)00:09
ftai don't remember00:09
ftamoving things around00:09
asacfta: did we have a tracking bug for the diffs or was that just sunbird?00:12
ftano bug for flock00:13
asacok ... no flock channel on freenode ;)00:14
asacfeel a bit reluctant to join a new server ;)00:14
ftairc.flock.com #flock-dev00:15
ftabeen there for a while now00:15
ftait's active, but they mostly ignored me00:15
asachttp://paste.ubuntu.com/36015/00:16
ftahence my reluctance to work on that project now00:16
asacfta: what attitude do they have? windowish?00:16
asacFILE_BUFFER_SIZE*5 ;)00:16
asacthats probably the perfect multiplicator00:16
asac;)00:17
ftaremember my realpath() crashes.. i used * 10 ;)00:17
asacfta: the strange thing is that redhat guy says that FORTIFY_2 works for them without modifcations00:17
ftalibxul ?00:18
asaci have the feeling that our libc has a patch that breaks ;)00:18
asacyes00:18
ftamaybe00:18
asacsince redhat is upstream, they probably have an unpatched version00:18
asacso far the diff looks managable00:19
asacstill not finished though00:19
asaccurrently in other-license/...00:19
asacif it goes in alphabetic order toolkit/ and xp*/ are still missing ;)00:19
ftado that locally00:20
asactoo late ;)00:20
asacactually i hoped that svn would do the diff on server side ;)00:20
penguin42does anyone actually have nspluginwrapper working solidly for flash on x86-64?00:32
asacme ;)00:32
asactry nspluginwrapper 1.0.0 from ~mozillateam PPA00:33
asac(but i think i am not running that)00:33
penguin42yes I have - it doesn't seem to be any better for me00:33
asacwhat issues? hardy? intrepid?00:33
penguin42it works for a few minutes and a few pages then flips out; on ff3 I just get a grey box where flash should be, on konq it does similar until I kill off nsplugin - this is Hardy00:34
penguin42this is flash00:34
penguin429.0r12400:34
asacpenguin42: do you have sound issues?00:37
asacare there npviewer processing running when you see the grey box?00:37
asachow many?00:37
penguin42sound works for me (well mostly, occasionally pulseaudio dies but that doesn't seem related)00:37
penguin42in the case of konq there normally are a few nsplugins running, not too sure about firefox00:38
asacpenguin42: so how many npviewer processes when its grey in ff?00:39
penguin42ok, so I just checked, there are currently no nspluginwrapper processes running - and going to a page with flash in ff doesn't start any00:39
penguin42(ff3 has been much worse for this than 2 was)00:39
penguin42(oh my machine is dual core - I'd assumed my problems were the old nsplugin smp bugs, but I'd thought 1.0.0 was supposed to fix those)00:40
asacpenguin42: the process is called "npviewer..."00:40
penguin42if I quit and restart ff3 it will work for a while00:40
penguin42asac: Nope, don't have any00:40
asacpenguin42: i tink we dont have 1.0.0 for hardy yet00:41
asacit only exists forintrepid in mozillateam ppa at least00:41
penguin42asac: It's the intrepid one I have installed - it seems no worse or better than the hardy standard one00:41
asacok00:41
penguin42(and yes, I checked the version with dpkg -s and it shows 1.0.0-0ubuntu1~mt1)00:42
asacpenguin42: can i reproduce the bug by just reloading the same flash enabled page until it happens?00:42
penguin42hmm not sure; I've never managed to get it to happen on demand with ff00:42
asachmm.00:44
asaccant reproduce either ;)00:44
asacWORKSFORME ;)00:44
penguin42asac: Which flash version do you have?00:44
asac9 here on hardy00:45
asac10 on intrepid00:45
penguin42hmm; there's a flash 10? Hmm sounds worth trying - which subversion of 9?00:48
asacthe one in hardy00:50
asacwell ... 9.0.124.0ubuntu2.8.04.1~mt100:50
penguin42hmm - that's a packaged version? Where did you get that?00:50
* penguin42 has flashplugin-nonfree that has downloaded a version which seems to be 9.0.12400:52
asac~mozillateam00:55
asacppa00:56
asacthe only difference is that it also uses nspluginwrapper on x8600:56
penguin42why?00:57
asacbecause flash crashes firefox far too much ;)00:58
asacanyway. you should see npviewer processes when looking at a working flash01:00
asacfilm01:00
asaconce you find out how to find that process, please check if there are a) many npviewre processes running or b) all npviewer processes gone, when you see the grey areas01:01
asaca) means that flash has a deadlock and consumes all plugin hosts from the pool01:01
asacb) means that flash crashes and that - if you'd run it inside firefox - firefox would have crashed01:01
penguin42ok, how does ff use it though - it seems on ff once it dies it never comes back; on konq if I kill off the wrappers it recovers01:03
* penguin42 has a button on his panel that does a pkill of nsplugin01:03
asacnot sure. you couldnt see any npviewer process ... so you cant tell if its a) or b)01:04
asachere01:04
asacthe answer would be different01:04
asacanyway ... off to sleep01:06
asaccu01:06
penguin42yeh me two01:06
penguin42night01:06
crimsunasac: I can reproduce it reliably by reloading the blog of a fav band (http://www.thenewcube.blogspot.com/) with youtube.com allowed (I use noscript)01:13
crimsunasac: x86_64, hardy fully updated with both hardy's and the ppa's nspluginwrapper (the latter rebuilt, of course, for hardy)01:14
gnomefreakJazzva: you around?09:54
Jazzvagnomefreak, yep09:54
gnomefreaksweet. im looking into mozilla-bookmarksftp looking for newer version since the one we have depends on ff2 since 3 isnt supported09:55
gnomefreakim aussuming 3 isnt supported per changelog is this still true?09:55
JazzvaIn the old version no...09:57
JazzvaNot sure if there is a new version09:57
gnomefreakim looking into it debian seems to have 1.0.2-6 and i think that is ours as well but im looking09:57
gnomefreakyep same09:58
gnomefreakJazzva: im going to guess you merged it from debian?10:09
Jazzvagnomefreak, no, at least I think I didn't.10:09
gnomefreakgoogle search grings up ubuntu and debian packages in first 8 pages and i dont see it on our extension list10:09
gnomefreakand its not in firefox addons page10:10
JazzvaI think it's inside need-more-info10:10
gnomefreaki found it10:10
JazzvaI wasn't sure if it's Fx3 compatible, and I didn't know a way to test it10:11
gnomefreakthanks i was looking at the first block under needs more info10:11
gnomefreakJazzva: test == change instal.rdf and control build test. but debian bug on this already and i tried to reply to it but im not sure if im able to10:12
Jazzvachange install.rdf, build it, then test inside firefox if it actually works :)10:12
gnomefreakok we should really add upstream link in changelog10:12
gnomefreakJazzva: i will i just want to make sure its newest first10:13
Jazzvacool, thanks :)10:13
gnomefreaknp10:14
* gnomefreak smoke10:22
gnomefreakJazzva: thats strange10:38
gnomefreakJazzva: any hints on how to use it and where to find it?10:38
gnomefreakit built and installed with firefox 3 well firefox (>=2.0)10:40
Jazzvagnomefreak, I'm not sure how to test it, though10:40
gnomefreaki just cant find it after installing the .deb10:40
Jazzvais it present in /usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions?10:41
Jazzvahere's a topic on mozillazine forums: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=41742&start=495&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&sid=e4c7b9f1f3566d04b1d5d4689ab9548810:41
Jazzvagnomefreak, is it listed in the addons?10:42
gnomefreakJazzva: no to both not in /usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions nor in addons10:43
gnomefreakoh wait10:43
gnomefreaknope not there10:44
Jazzvagnomefreak, there should be a links file in debian/ dir. please paste it10:45
gnomefreakhttp://pastebin.mozilla.org/510945 Jazzva10:46
gnomefreakits in the right click menu10:47
gnomefreakno its not10:47
gnomefreakwtf10:47
gnomefreakthat could be a reason10:48
gnomefreakJazzva: do you have usr/share/mozilla-extensions/bookmarksftp?10:48
gnomefreakim guessing mozilla-extensions needs to be changed10:49
Jazzvathat looks more like an install file...10:50
gnomefreakits there10:50
gnomefreakgnomefreak@Development:~/mozilla-bookmarksftp/bookmarksftp-1.0.2/debian$ pastebinit dirs10:50
Jazzvasorry... dirs :).10:50
Jazzvanvm, I downloaded the source10:51
gnomefreakthere is no install file other than install.rdf10:51
gnomefreakand that is a bit longer/different10:51
JazzvaI asked for links :)10:51
Jazzvathat's where the problem is10:51
gnomefreakoh10:51
gnomefreakyou said dir10:52
gnomefreakbut i will look at links10:52
Jazzvalook in links, and replace /usr/lib/iceweasel/... with /usr/lib/firefox-addons/...10:52
gnomefreakits installed there10:53
Jazzvathat way it should be recognized inside firefox 3... not sure if it will work, but it should show up in addons dialog10:53
gnomefreakill try10:53
gnomefreakah i see only the last one had ice* still10:54
Jazzvamhm10:54
Jazzvachange that "iceweasel" to "firefox-addons"10:54
Jazzvabecause we don't use iceweasel, so we don't need that link, and we use firefox 3, so we need to link firefox-addons :)10:55
gnomefreakk10:56
gnomefreakfor all of them? inculding changing usr/share/mozilla-extensions/bookmarksftp usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/extensions10:57
gnomefreakbash: cd: /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/extensions: No such file or directory11:00
gnomefreakim gonna change it and see11:00
Jazzvagnomefreak, http://paste.ubuntu.com/36159/11:00
Jazzvatry to put this in debian/links, instead of the old content11:01
gnomefreakk11:01
gnomefreakJazzva: cant lol have to change debian/rules it seems when using yours11:05
gnomefreakmake: *** [binary-indep] Error 111:05
gnomefreakdpkg-buildpackage: failure: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit status 211:05
gnomefreakwell i see it11:06
gnomefreakJazzva: what should we use instead of extdir = $(dtmp)/usr/share/mozilla-extensions/bookmarksftp11:06
gnomefreakaddons or firefox-extensions11:06
gnomefreakno that is right11:07
Jazzvawe should have /usr/share/mozilla-extensions11:07
Jazzvathat should be ok11:07
gnomefreakwe do11:07
gnomefreakother than that line there isnt anything to suggest we dont have a link11:08
gnomefreakdh_link11:09
gnomefreakdh_link: debian/links lists a link without a destination.11:09
gnomefreakmaybe we needed the one we removed?11:10
JazzvaI don't think so... I think it was used before we switched to /usr/lib/firefox/ dir11:10
Jazzvathough I'm not sure what's wrong11:10
JazzvaI'll try to build a package soon and see what's the problem11:11
gnomefreakignore thanl11:11
gnomefreaki had extra }11:11
gnomefreakwith the brace on sometimes i cant move fingers off keys fast enough11:12
Jazzva:)11:13
gnomefreaknot not compatable11:14
gnomefreaki guess we wait for upstream release11:15
Jazzvamhm11:15
gnomefreakwait a minute11:15
gnomefreakmaybe i should have used 3.0.1 in intall.rdf instead of 3.0?11:16
gnomefreaknope should work with <em:maxVersion>3.0+</em:maxVersion>11:17
gnomefreakthat should include 3.0.1 since its 3.0+11:17
Jazzvai suppose11:17
gnomefreakwhy are the ids not the same in install.rdf11:18
gnomefreak<Description about="urn:mozilla:install-manifest"> <em:id>{e133f188-27e7-401d-be2e-804643793acb}</em:id>11:18
gnomefreak<Description> <em:id>{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}</em:id>11:18
gnomefreakassuming you want about to show the right id11:19
gnomefreaks/right/same11:19
gnomefreakit shoudlnt affect the compatiablity11:20
Jazzvathat should be the id for firefox11:21
Jazzvathe first is for bookmarksftp11:21
Jazzvaand the second for firefox11:21
gnomefreakah11:28
gnomefreaki just had idea11:29
armin76bumb11:32
gnomefreaknope not it11:32
gnomefreakJazzva: we wait for upstream release or email upstream maintainer and get it done faster?11:33
Jazzvawe can try the mail... you can mail him, if you want. if not, I'll write him later :)11:34
gnomefreakJazzva: ill let you know when i check mail i can have over 1000 sincei havent checked it in a week or so11:37
Jazzvaok11:37
Jazzvathanks :)11:37
gnomefreaknp11:37
gnomefreakthis gave me an idea with firegpg ;)11:38
gnomefreakthere is not links dir in debian11:44
Jazzvait's a links file ;)11:44
gnomefreakmaybe why its not installing11:44
gnomefreakyeah file11:44
Jazzvawere you packaging firegpg with mozilla-devscripts and xpi.template?11:44
gnomefreakno just old XPI11:45
gnomefreakwhen asac made first template11:46
gnomefreakor you11:46
Jazzvaasac made it...11:46
Jazzvaif you used the template, you don't need links, install and the rest of those files...11:46
gnomefreakok11:47
gnomefreakis devscripts one different than what im using?11:47
Jazzvadevscripts just contain some script files11:48
gnomefreakoh11:48
Jazzvayou don't use them directly. your rules file call xpi.mk script, which is in mozilla-devscripts package11:48
gnomefreakstill doesnt explain why it builds doesnt install11:48
gnomefreakinclude /usr/share/mozilla-devscripts/xpi.mk11:49
gnomefreakrying again with right changelog this time11:50
gnomefreakupstream hasnt gone past 0.5 so i have newest11:51
gnomefreaknope still not showing up in addons dialog11:53
gnomefreakok smoke than ill check email im not pushing updated firegpg yet i would like to see what else i can find out11:54
gnomefreakJazzva: where does xpi.mk put the extensions?12:11
* gnomefreak thinks it should use /usr/lib/mozilla/extensons12:12
Jazzvait installs to /usr/share/mozilla-extensions/12:12
Jazzvaand then it links to whatever is set in MOZ_XPI_MOZILLA_DIRS12:12
gnomefreakhmmmmmmmm12:13
Jazzvathe default is "firefox-addons firefox", so it links /usr/lib/firefox/extensions/$EXTENSION to /usr/share/mozilla-extensions/$EXTENSION12:13
Jazzva/usr/lib/{firefox,firefox-addons}/extensions/$EXTENSION that is12:14
gnomefreaklol i dont have a MOZ_XPI_MOZILLA_DIRS in rules12:14
Jazzvait's set in xpi.mk then :)12:14
gnomefreakis there a way i can read it?12:14
Jazzvayou should only put it in rules if the extension is not compatible with fx2 and 312:14
Jazzvasure, look at /usr/share/mozilla-devscripts/xpi.mk12:15
Jazzvathere's an explanation for MOZ_XPI_MOZILLA_DIRS too12:15
gnomefreakok reading12:15
gnomefreak/usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions and the /usr/lib/firefox/extensions12:15
Jazzvahmm... that's probably a mistake in the explanation. I'm almost sure it links to the extension directory inside /usr/lib/.../extensions/12:17
gnomefreakwell its in firefox-addons/extensions12:17
gnomefreakonly other thing i can think of is building *.xpi alone and see if it works12:19
Jazzvawhat's the link to your branch?12:19
Jazzvalp:~gnomefreak/firefox-extensions/firegpg.ubuntu?12:19
gnomefreakyes12:19
JazzvaI'll take a look12:19
gnomefreakJazzva: you want me to push changes first?12:19
Jazzvaok... :)12:20
gnomefreakok let me try :)12:20
gnomefreakshit12:30
gnomefreaksomething is wrong here12:31
gnomefreakJazzva: give me a half hour or so and it will be ready12:37
Jazzvak12:37
gnomefreakJazzva: bzr branch lp:~gnomefreak/firefox-extensions/firegpg.ubuntu12:39
gnomefreakthat should be right12:39
gnomefreakwait no it might not be :(12:39
gnomefreaknope not right12:39
gnomefreakJazzva: ok if you go to https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/firefox-extensions/firegpg.ubuntu  wait for revision 4 to show up i just pushed it since something got fudged up somewhere along lines12:44
Jazzvaok12:44
gnomefreak-.edge if you dont have beta LP12:44
Jazzvahmm... you're using firefox's ID in debian/rules. but, firegpg's id is not provided withing install.rdf. that's strange12:46
JazzvaI don't know if that's the problem12:46
Jazzvaah... :)12:46
JazzvaI think this is the one12:47
Jazzvaem:id="firegpg@firegpg.team"12:47
Jazzvagnomefreak, try changing MOX_XPI_EMID in debian/rules to use "firegpg@firegpg.team"12:49
Jazzvalike this12:50
JazzvaMOZ_XPI_EMID := firegpg@firegpg.team12:50
gnomefreakok will do12:52
Jazzvait should work then...12:52
Jazzvaat least it shows up in addons, and I can change it's preferences12:53
gnomefreakok cool thanks12:53
Jazzvano problem :)12:53
gnomefreakinstalling now12:56
gnomefreakJazzva: are you able to push to archives? or should i ping asac mater this week? atleast into intrepid12:57
Jazzvai'm not able12:57
gnomefreakk12:57
Jazzva(I hope I will be soon... planning to apply on the next meeting, whenever that is)12:58
gnomefreakhmmmmm12:58
gnomefreakJazzva: did you get update dialog?12:58
gnomefreaknew version of firegpg?12:58
Jazzvayes12:58
gnomefreakshit12:58
Jazzvai think that can be disabled. see with asac if that would be smart.12:59
Jazzvasince it's a bit misleading - an ordinary user won't have the rights to upgrade...12:59
gnomefreakis there an easy way to update to 0.5 i thought i alreday have 0.5 but seems 0.4.9 was the source i had12:59
gnomefreakwell dann there is a 0.5.113:00
Jazzvagnomefreak, try downloading the new source, then replace it in your .upstream branch13:00
JazzvaI'm going with removing everything in local .upstream branch (except the .bzr dir), copying the new source over there, then "bzr add ." to add new files, and commiting that13:01
Jazzvabut I think asac mentioned that it could be done with bzr's --overwrite option13:02
gnomefreakJazzva: yeah i knew that part its the local part that bothers me13:06
Jazzvalocal part?13:07
gnomefreakJazzva: the debian dir stuff13:07
Jazzvawhat about it?13:07
gnomefreakhow to get new upstream into it13:07
gnomefreakreplace old with  new in my locale ubuntu branch13:08
Jazzvanot really13:08
gnomefreakso just start over?13:08
gnomefreakeasy enough13:08
Jazzvait should work like this: cd into .ubuntu branch, then "bzr merge path/to/upstream/branch"13:08
Jazzvai've wrote it down on wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Extensions/Packaging13:09
Jazzvaoff for a while... shower and going out to get cigarettes13:10
gnomefreakk13:10
gnomefreakfucking bzr13:18
gnomefreaki think ill push this to my PPA :)13:38
gnomefreakbug 22794513:41
ubottuLaunchpad bug 227945 in firegpg "[needs packaging] Please package FireGPG extension for Firefox " [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/22794513:41
gnomefreakok hand hurts like crap. you can find firegpg on my PPA in a few minutes please test if you are running Intrepid, i will work on Hardys version later or tomorrow13:49
gnomefreakthats odd :(13:52
Jazzvagnomefreak, I'll have to test it later...13:56
JazzvaI forgot I have to go to some family lunch, so I'm off now...13:56
JazzvaSee you in the evening (UTC+2 time)13:57
Jazzvagood luck with your hand...13:57
ftahm, is svg rendering broken ?14:16
ftahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Librsvg_logo.svg vs http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/05/Librsvg_logo.svg14:16
gnomefreakok i built and uploaded firegpg to ppa hardy and intrepid14:39
ftaasac, why did you say that we need our own webkit ?14:52
asacfta: when did i say we need our own webkit?16:04
ftaAug 08 15:04:33 <fta>   i thought mike from debian was doing that16:06
ftaAug 08 15:04:56 <asac>  fta: he does that in debian. but we need to take care on our own here16:06
ftaAug 08 15:05:03 <asac>  fta: for instance debian is stuck with old gnome now16:06
ftaAug 08 15:05:08 <asac>  and they are frozen ;)16:06
ftaAug 08 15:05:11 <asac>  so we have to move ahead16:06
ftaAug 08 15:05:17 <asac>  1) webkit + 2) gnome ;)16:06
penguin42it's so hard to actually make sure you know which versions of nspluginwrapper/flash you are actually trying to run at a particular point16:06
=== asac_ is now known as asac
ftaasac, so, what about flock? did you end-up with something yesterday?16:29
asacfta: i think i have the complete diff now ;)16:47
asacnew innovation: http://www.getgnash.org/updates/Linux_x86-gcc4/gnash.xpi16:47
asac;)16:47
ftawe discussed about that with Rob in Pragues..16:49
asacyeaah16:49
asac;)16:49
asache gave me the link to test16:49
asacunfortunately i have no 32-bit atm16:49
armin76slack!17:03
ftaasac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/36228/17:05
asac17:08 < asac> fta: ok. i gave the explanation right there ;)17:12
asac17:08 < asac> fta: for instance debian is stuck with old gnome now17:12
asac17:08 < asac> e.g. it will take at least 6 month until they package the latest epiphany that only has -webkit  backend17:12
ftahm, even in unstable ?17:13
asacyes17:14
asacthey are frozen ;)17:14
asacuntil they release17:14
asacand that _can_ take ages17:14
asacin best case Nov ... otherwise I think Jan or Feb will be release17:15
asachmm17:27
asachttp://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/25/0027242&from=rss17:27
ftahttp://www.betanews.com/article/Apple_pulls_1000_App_Store_gem_after_eight_downloads/121820927417:46
asacfun17:57
ftai just bumped ff3.1 and flock in my ppa18:21
armin76bumb!18:33
=== RainCT is now known as RainCT_
ftacrimsun, i'm not able to get proper sound with firefox-3.1 (built with support for the new HTML5 <video/> tag). i just get garbage for a few secs, then nothing19:29
ftacrimsun, this with libasound19:29
fta+is19:29
ftacrimsun, if you care to have a look, everything is in my ppa19:33
armin76feature19:33
alexadranghiHi guys. Just wanted to let me know I'm using Hardy on Linux corus 2.6.24-18-generic #1 SMP 686 GNU/Linux, and just apt-get update & upgrade-ed, and for some reason Thunderbird is now crashing whenever I hit send if I enable signing with Enigmail. Where's the best place to report this problem. I can't see anything in the main log files - where are thunderbird's own log file located? Cheers.19:39
blueprinthey guys i have a problem with my thunderbird addon lightning...20:26
blueprintcan anyone help me?20:26
blueprinthey guys??20:32
=== RainCT_ is now known as RainCT
gnomefreakasac: when you show up if im not here (wrist hurts like hell) firegpg is ready for intrepid as well as hardy but would like more testing for hardy before that is decided. but intrepid is ready both are in my PPA as well as bzr branches under me .upstream and .ubuntu should be up to date without hardys changlogs22:17

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!