[10:14] <tjaalton> bryce: btw, I've prepared a couple of copypaste responses for nvidia/fglrx bugs, but can't get to them right now (they're on my home desktop)
[10:14] <bryce> ok
[10:15] <bryce> tjaalton: I trust you to make good responses :-)
[10:16] <bryce> I've got a crapload of tasks I promised people to do, so think I'm going to be swamped taking care of them for a while:
[10:16] <tjaalton> bryce: heh, well they need to be proofread first :)
[10:16] <bryce> - GEM-enabled packages for BenC
[10:16] <bryce>   (half-done)
[10:16] <tjaalton> and we probably need to tell people about the bug policy regarding fglrx/nvidia
[10:17] <bryce> - input hotplug testing (mostly done, need to test a game controller and futz with some wacom tablets)
[10:17] <tjaalton> cool
[10:17] <bryce> - failsafe-x stuff.  mdz is adamant about keeping it.  not sure what to do, but have some solid ideas.
[10:18] <bryce> - review/upload tseliot's x-kit stuff
[10:18] <bryce> - ati bug triage
[10:19] <bryce> - inkscape stuff
[10:19] <tjaalton> should keep you busy for some time :)
[10:19] <bryce> - dholbach's sponsoring todo's 
[10:20] <bryce> - goddamn spam
[10:21] <tseliot> bryce: thanks to your xorg.conf files x-kit is a lot more robust now. I'm about to upload some new improvements (in addition to what I committed yesterday). Just FYI
[10:21] <bryce> tseliot: yay!!
[10:21] <tseliot> :-)
[10:23] <tjaalton> tseliot: I guess you don't mind if we'll close nvidia bugs (those that are nvidia's fault) as wontfix in the future?-)
[10:23] <tseliot> tjaalton: of course I don't mind ;)
[10:23] <tjaalton> and ask them to use nvidia-bug-report.sh instead
[10:24] <bryce> tjaalton: yeah.  I wish I could just focus 100%, but I do kind of like that my tasks enable other people to move forward with their own stuff
[10:24] <bryce> oh, forgot
[10:24] <bryce> - test the new apport features
[10:25] <bryce> - experiment with new the LP 2.0 API
[10:25] <tjaalton> bryce: btw, wouldn't NoTrapSignals do the same as your patch?
[10:25] <bryce> would it?  I've not looked at NoTrapSignals
[10:26] <tjaalton> MrCooper asked me about it, and I couldn't answer :)
[10:26] <tjaalton> man xorg.conf would suggest that it should work
[10:26] <bryce> I didn't see any #ifdefs in the code or whatnot that would make me think NoTrapSignals would do it
[10:26] <bryce> but I could be wrong
[10:31] <jcristau> tjaalton: notrapsignals means the server doesn't get a chance to clean up
[10:31] <jcristau> (possibly your patch does, too, but i haven't checked)
[10:50] <bryce> night
[11:15] <tseliot> bryce: xkit committed
[11:15]  * tseliot > lunch
[11:48] <tjaalton> woohoo, so GEM will be in 2.6.27 :)
[11:51] <jcristau> probably not?
[11:51] <tjaalton> ah sorry, jumped the gun
[11:52] <tjaalton> just a list of commits to merge on top of -rc1 to get GEM working, bah
[22:54] <pwnguin> so what is the bug policy regarding nvidia?
[22:54] <pwnguin> (and fglrx)
[23:27] <bryce> pwnguin: how do you mean?
[23:32] <tormod> gmail is broken, I can't read my bug mail. opportunity to sleep?
[23:48] <bryce> tormod: yep
[23:48] <bryce> tormod: sorry got distracted...  need to finish one email then I'm on it