| === kiko is now known as kiko-zzz | ||
| === Ursinha-dinner is now known as Ursinha | ||
| poolie | hi | 02:55 |
|---|---|---|
| jjesse | hello | 02:55 |
| poolie | i need to take over maintainership of a project whose owner is sick/uncontactable | 02:55 |
| poolie | is there a way to do this? | 02:55 |
| poolie | hi jjesse | 02:55 |
| poolie | i guess open a ticket? | 02:55 |
| === barry-away is now known as barry | ||
| mwhudson | poolie: yes | 03:01 |
| poolie | hm | 03:01 |
| poolie | "help improve launchpad" is not so great | 03:02 |
| poolie | s//such a great label/ | 03:02 |
| poolie | what if i want help myself? | 03:02 |
| poolie | :) | 03:02 |
| lifeless | poolie: what project | 03:02 |
| poolie | bzr-usertest | 03:03 |
| lifeless | you need to take it over? its in the bazaar group already, you should be able to do most things to it as-is | 03:03 |
| poolie | hm | 03:04 |
| poolie | it is in the bazaar project group | 03:05 |
| poolie | that does not seem to give me any access though | 03:05 |
| poolie | like to change bug priority | 03:05 |
| lifeless | hmm, | 03:05 |
| lifeless | no bug supervisor set | 03:05 |
| lifeless | I thought that that inherited | 03:05 |
| lifeless | I've set the bug supervisor to bzr | 03:05 |
| poolie | ! | 03:06 |
| poolie | i will later want to change the trunk too | 03:06 |
| poolie | did you use superpowers to change that? | 03:07 |
| lifeless | yes | 03:08 |
| poolie | out of curiousity through the db or the ui? | 03:09 |
| lifeless | ui | 03:09 |
| lifeless | doing stuff in the db -> not recommended | 03:10 |
| lifeless | if you do need to take over the project, I can do that, but prefer not to - its better if you can get in contact with the current owner | 03:10 |
| lifeless | I figure the bug supervisor thing isn't contentious | 03:10 |
| lifeless | isn't likely to be, that is | 03:11 |
| IntuitiveNipple | Anyone know how to prevent a PPA build on lpia when the package architecture only specifies i386 amd64 ? | 03:46 |
| persia | IntuitiveNipple: Why would you want to specifically block a build on lpia? | 03:48 |
| persia | (and yes, it fails if the architecture only specifies i386 and amd64) | 03:48 |
| IntuitiveNipple | persia: kvm and libsmbios always fail on lpia but they're only for i386 amd64 ia64 | 03:49 |
| persia | Right. Have you tried adding lpia to the list of architectures? | 03:49 |
| persia | (admittedly most lpia HW doesn't support VMX, but I have seen at least one chip that did) | 03:50 |
| IntuitiveNipple | Hmmm... no... the idea is not to build for lpia at all :) | 03:50 |
| persia | Right, that's the idea I don't understand. Why shouldn't libsmbios work on lpia? | 03:50 |
| * persia knows about kvm, and suspects that while it's mostly useless on most real lpia HW, it should build and install) | 03:50 | |
| IntuitiveNipple | well, the original authors have specified just the three architectures I mentioned... I didn't want to mess with it :) | 03:51 |
| persia | I bet it works. The differences between lpia and i386 are less than the differences between i386 and amd64. | 03:52 |
| IntuitiveNipple | I guess I could *try* it ... at least those horrible red crosses will disappear :) | 03:52 |
| IntuitiveNipple | Well yes... I just didn't want to alter the packages more than necessary. I'm mainly building up-to-the-minute package for hardy from upstream or intrepid. | 03:53 |
| persia | IntuitiveNipple: Ah. Nice to fix that in intrepid then. I don't know what depends upon those, but they really ought to work for lpia. | 03:53 |
| IntuitiveNipple | I'll upload another version with lpia added and see what happens | 03:54 |
| lifeless | lpia is less an architecture than a profile for i386 | 03:55 |
| IntuitiveNipple | There was a nasty bug in kvm-72 that I blamed on virt-manager :) It caused all grub installer actions to fail, and stopped XP rebooting | 03:56 |
| IntuitiveNipple | So I've put the fix up and wanted the builds to look all good with green ticks :p | 03:56 |
| IntuitiveNipple | The lpia build failure for kvm-72 is weird, anyone seen this before... | 04:01 |
| IntuitiveNipple | mv: cannot move `/build/buildd/kvm-72+dfsg/debian/tmp/usr/bin/' to a subdirectory of itself, `/build/buildd/kvm-72+dfsg/debian/tmp/usr/bin/kvm' | 04:01 |
| IntuitiveNipple | Looks like some serious work needed to make lpia builds of kvm work... the embedded qemu source creates build architecture-specific directories and code based on shell vars... in the case of lpia no shell var exists therefore the 'mv' source is the base-path with no extension | 04:04 |
| persia | Strange. I just built qemu for lpia yesterday. | 04:05 |
| persia | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid/+source/qemu/0.9.1-5ubuntu2 | 04:06 |
| IntuitiveNipple | It looks to be because it doesn't create a qemu-system-lpia binary | 04:06 |
| * persia suspects another forum is more appropriate: perhaps #ubuntu-virt ? | 04:07 | |
| IntuitiveNipple | indeed :p | 04:07 |
| \sh | anyone who is able to enlighten me of the new license of the new LP logo? | 07:08 |
| thumper | \sh: it is specified in https://help.launchpad.net/Legal | 07:14 |
| thumper | \sh: which is linked from the LP footer | 07:14 |
| \sh | kiko-zzz: when you are awake...I'm at my desk (somehow)from 06:00 UTC to 15:00 UTC (+/- one hour) | 07:14 |
| spiv | \sh: what do you want to know? There was an email to the launchpad-users list saying it that is licensed as CC-BY-ND, IIRC. | 07:14 |
| spiv | As thumper says, the legal page should have all the info. | 07:14 |
| \sh | spiv: yes..that's why...the leonov logo was created with the new logo before it was licensed with CC-BY-ND...I need to know if we need a new one, or at least the info where can I ask for an exception so that leonov can use the base | 07:15 |
| spiv | \sh: I'd talk to kiko | 07:16 |
| spiv | \sh: (although if there is a problem, then it was already a problem when the logo wasn't licensed at all...) | 07:16 |
| \sh | spiv: well, I want to be sure, that everything is correct...not to run into legal problems :) I'll try to catch kiko when he's awake ... | 07:17 |
| \sh | now for some daily morning meetings and some coffee...laters | 07:18 |
| wgrant | bigjools: I take it you found a reasonably easy fix for #159304, then? | 09:35 |
| bigjools | wgrant: not easy but done nonethless | 09:36 |
| viciouslime | hi, does anyone know how I can delete milestones from a branch? | 11:08 |
| kiko-zzz | viciouslime, do you mean from a series? you need to request that through answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | 11:11 |
| viciouslime | kiko-zzz: thanks :) I'll do that | 11:12 |
| kiko-zzz | you're welcome | 11:17 |
| === RainCT_ is now known as RainCT | ||
| persia | bigjools: How is "Maintained" packages calculated on dogfood? The number seems high. | 11:31 |
| bigjools | persia: it's where the user appears in the Mainainter tag on the source package | 11:33 |
| persia | bigjools: Interesting. One of your examples seems to do things differently than many of us. | 11:35 |
| persia | Also, since we're tracking uploads (which I like), maybe s/packages/uploads/ in the explanatory text? | 11:35 |
| bigjools | persia: how do you mean? | 11:35 |
| persia | bigjools: Most of use will use Ubuntu Core Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com> or Ubuntu MOTU Developers <ubuntu-motu@lsits.ubuntu.com> for ubuntu-specific uploads. Your first example doesn't do that. | 11:36 |
| bigjools | that's how it's always been on that page (even before it was broken) | 11:37 |
| wgrant | So PPA packages aren't uploaded nor maintained? | 11:37 |
| bigjools | in Ubuntu, no | 11:38 |
| wgrant | Right, but it doesn't exactly say that. | 11:38 |
| wgrant | But looking much better in general. | 11:38 |
| bigjools | great | 11:39 |
| bigjools | this is pretty much what I will release for now, barring any serious issues | 11:39 |
| persia | I miss pre-Dapper package history, but that's not typically relevant for any of my non-vanity use cases. | 11:40 |
| bigjools | if there are any more things you would like to see differently, please file bugs and we can do that separately | 11:40 |
| wgrant | So it still doesn't show superseded SPRs? | 11:40 |
| persia | Right. Nvaigation needs work, but mpt was already on about that. | 11:40 |
| persia | wgrant: It shows Edgy, but not Breezy (at least for ~persia) | 11:40 |
| wgrant | 'Displaying first 30 packages out of 726 total | 11:40 |
| wgrant | That sounds a little strange. | 11:41 |
| wgrant | Is there no text in a similar position elsewhere in Launchpad? | 11:41 |
| persia | Because of the work "packages" or because of something else? | 11:41 |
| wgrant | I'm not sure. | 11:41 |
| wgrant | 'out of', maybe. | 11:41 |
| bigjools | the lists only show items that are actually published | 11:41 |
| wgrant | Right, that's probably a bad idea. | 11:42 |
| bigjools | it's something that we could add extra filtering for on the batched listings | 11:42 |
| wgrant | Why make the distinction about published/unpublished? | 11:43 |
| bigjools | I am just wary of changing something that's clearly been that way for a long time | 11:43 |
| wgrant | I don't think anybody actually likes it that way. | 11:43 |
| persia | bigjools: Is it harder to get the data for the now obsolete releases? | 11:44 |
| bigjools | no, the distroseries state does not enter the (current) query, it's purely done on whether the package is published | 11:45 |
| wgrant | Doesn't that implicitly unpublish the SPPs, though? | 11:45 |
| bigjools | no, the same package could be published in another series | 11:46 |
| bigjools | if it's not, then the package is obsoleted, yes | 11:46 |
| wgrant | Well, once all SPPs for a SPR are unpublished, the SPR will vanish from that page. That's what I meant. | 11:46 |
| bigjools | correct | 11:46 |
| bigjools | so would it be more useful to show *all* packages, regardless of state? | 11:47 |
| wgrant | I think so. | 11:47 |
| wgrant | Now it's batched there shouldn't be a problem. | 11:47 |
| bigjools | I can tweak it on dogfood right now, just a sec | 11:47 |
| wgrant | persia: What do you think? | 11:47 |
| bigjools | let's see what happens | 11:47 |
| persia | I'd be personally happy with *all* packages, regardless of state, but as I said, it's only for vanity use cases. | 11:48 |
| wgrant | At the moment, if somebody only cares about N packages, but cares about them a lot, they only get N uploads shown. | 11:49 |
| bigjools | ok, it's showing a lot more packages now | 11:50 |
| wgrant | Indeed it is. | 11:51 |
| wgrant | I must have uploaded an awful lot in Edgy. | 11:51 |
| wgrant | Or multiple times in one series, I guess. | 11:52 |
| persia | I had Edgy showing in my results before | 11:52 |
| wgrant | Maintained packages is still broken, but that might make more sense like that. | 11:52 |
| wgrant | persia: Probably because it has SPPs in other distroseries. | 11:52 |
| wgrant | persia: It will show the series in which it was originally uploaded, not where it is currently published. | 11:53 |
| persia | wgrant: Ah, quite possibly: it may have shipped also in Feisty. | 11:53 |
| persia | Hmm. I'm still only seeing one entry per source per release. Am I missing something? | 11:56 |
| emgent | Rinchen: around ? | 11:56 |
| wgrant | Ooh. | 11:56 |
| wgrant | You import Lenny on dogfood? | 11:56 |
| wgrant | I was looking for sid instead. | 11:57 |
| persia | Hmm. Finally found 1 Breezy package. | 11:57 |
| wgrant | persia: Must be published in Dapper. | 11:57 |
| persia | I'm also certain that the numbers are off: e.g. dholbach had > 140 packages uploaded in Feisty, but it only shows 155 across all releases for him. | 11:58 |
| wgrant | persia: 'Displaying first 30 packages out of 779 total | 11:59 |
| wgrant | That's for dholbach. | 11:59 |
| wgrant | Is it deliberate that I'm not shown as both uploading and maintaining a package? | 12:01 |
| persia | wgrant: Hmm. I wonder how I got my result, but refreshing shows me yours. | 12:02 |
| wgrant | Interesting indeed. | 12:03 |
| bigjools | wgrant: yes that's deliberate | 12:05 |
| wgrant | bigjools: Seems a but strange, but OK. | 12:08 |
| wgrant | *bit | 12:08 |
| bigjools | I don't know why that's done like that, I just looked at the code | 12:08 |
| wgrant | Heh. | 12:09 |
| bigjools | wgrant: ah it might be to filter syncs | 12:12 |
| wgrant | Manual syncs should show up as an upload, and autosyncs are owned by katie. What do you mean? | 12:14 |
| bigjools | where the maintainer is not the uploader | 12:14 |
| bigjools | and we're interested in who uploaded it | 12:15 |
| wgrant | Right. | 12:15 |
| wgrant | But you filter things that I have uploaded but where I am the maintainer too. | 12:16 |
| bigjools | really? got an example? | 12:16 |
| wgrant | https://dogfood.launchpad.net/~wgrant/+uploaded-packages lacks soundconverter 1.2.0-0ubuntu1 | 12:18 |
| wgrant | https://dogfood.launchpad.net/~wgrant/+maintained-packages has it. | 12:18 |
| wgrant | And I'm in the Changed-By. | 12:18 |
| wgrant | There are also inconsistencies in the text when somebody has uploaded nothing. | 12:22 |
| wgrant | For the package pages, the username is used. +related-projects and everywhere else in the UI uses display name. | 12:22 |
| wgrant | 'has no maintained packages' -> 'maintains no packages' | 12:23 |
| bigjools | wgrant: right that's deliberate - the uploaded packages section only contains those where you're *only* the uploader | 12:23 |
| wgrant | 'has no uploaded packages' -> 'has uploaded no packages' | 12:23 |
| wgrant | bigjools: Seems a bit odd... | 12:23 |
| wgrant | It would make sense in Debian. | 12:23 |
| bigjools | maybe it should be renamed to "Sponsored uploads" | 12:24 |
| wgrant | Except that's not it at all. | 12:24 |
| wgrant | That's another section that we need, though. | 12:25 |
| wgrant | Well, s/we need/would be nice/ | 12:25 |
| wgrant | The intersection between that and anything else on the page would be {}, though. | 12:25 |
| persia | Not necessarily: one could sponsor an upload to a package one maintains. | 12:26 |
| wgrant | persia: GOod point. | 12:26 |
| persia | Note that for the hypothetical "Sponsored Uploads", we're not interested in cases where Changed-By: and .changes signer are the same. | 12:27 |
| persia | Actually, is there already a bug for "Sponsored Uploads"? I've a use case that might make it interesting (although not essential). | 12:28 |
| bigjools | wgrant: thanks for pointing out those other inconsistencies | 12:31 |
| wgrant | persia: I think there might be. | 12:32 |
| * persia will search later. | 12:33 | |
| wgrant | But it might be in a comment in one of the other bugs. | 12:33 |
| wgrant | bigjools: It's one of the things I do best. | 12:33 |
| bigjools | wgrant: I'll bear that in mind :) | 12:33 |
| wgrant | Is there a timeframe for Soyuz to grow full rebuild support? | 12:34 |
| bigjools | wgrant: define "full" | 12:35 |
| bigjools | we do plan on doing rebuilds this year | 12:35 |
| wgrant | Able to rebuild universe. | 12:35 |
| bigjools | but not the "scorched earth" type | 12:35 |
| wgrant | And give us results. | 12:35 |
| persia | bigjools: Does that mean complete archive rebuild on import from the previous release series, or just button-push rebuild? | 12:35 |
| wgrant | bigjools: Right, we've never expected more than that, I don't think. | 12:36 |
| bigjools | the latter for now | 12:36 |
| bigjools | but | 12:36 |
| persia | ... | 12:37 |
| bigjools | we're working on a spec that introduces derivative archive support so you can clone an archive (in part or full) and rebuild a selection of packages | 12:37 |
| wgrant | Isn't that what a rebuild archive basically is, anyway? | 12:37 |
| bigjools | yes - we've just made it generic | 12:37 |
| bigjools | so the same code can be used for other purposes | 12:37 |
| wgrant | Good to know. | 12:37 |
| persia | bigjools: Any chance that it could be organised in such a way to allow something like a "test-rebuild-everything" feature? | 12:37 |
| wgrant | Easy enough to do with appropriate ogreing. | 12:38 |
| persia | My fear is that it would be abused to do archive-test-rebuilds on Ubuntu, and presumably you'd only want that once in a while. | 12:38 |
| persia | Having an official "test-rebuilds" feature probably avoids that, although it may not be signfiicantly different in implementation. | 12:39 |
| bigjools | persia: I guess if all packages are selected we'll be able to rebuild everything, but obviously there's issues around bootstrapping | 12:39 |
| persia | bigjools: Understood. I'm just thinking that you'll want to have an official "Ubuntu rebuild test" section so you don't end up with twelve. | 12:40 |
| bigjools | yeah this sort of thing is under discussion. The spec is here although it's a bit bare to non-Canonical people: https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/soyuz/+spec/archive-derivatives | 12:41 |
| * bigjools -> food | 12:42 | |
| wgrant | bigjools: I think we're used to that by now. | 12:45 |
| persia | bigjools: Just out of curiosity, why would you want to disallow direct uploads? | 12:48 |
| persia | I know at least the Ubuntu Desktop Japanese Remix and BlankOn would like to support that, rather than uploading to a PPA and copying the packages. | 12:48 |
| persia | (or running DAK externally as both do now) | 12:51 |
| kiko-zzz | persia, direct meaning binary? | 12:52 |
| persia | kiko-zzz: No, that would be bad. Source. | 12:54 |
| \sh | Ah..kiko is awake ;) | 12:54 |
| persia | From the blueprints page "The copy archive will never have direct uploads but will instead have packages copied to it from another archive (its parent)." | 12:54 |
| kiko-zzz | ah, ok | 12:55 |
| persia | I just don't understand why if archives are generalised, it wouldn't be appropriate to allow uploads there (presumably with configurable permissions, etc.) | 12:55 |
| persia | Also, for the rebuild-test archive-consistency use-case, would a new copy of the same source trigger a rebuild? | 12:56 |
| persia | Alternately, if these copies include binary also, what happens when they are build with e.g. different C++ ABIs, and the resulting packages don't work together (because of, say, an experimental g++ in one of the PPAs from which it is sourced) | 12:57 |
| wgrant | The world burns. | 13:00 |
| kiko-zzz | persia, I think there's some desire to maintain a level of simplicity and there's also a lot of corner-cases we avoid by not allowing direct uploads, but I'll talk it over a bit with julian | 13:03 |
| bigjools | basically correct | 13:05 |
| kiko-zzz | bigjools, right. but how do you address persia's use case (or his concern)? :) | 13:06 |
| persia | Understood, and I can imagine some of the corner cases. Is it at least a source-only copy? | 13:06 |
| * bigjools reads more scrollback | 13:06 | |
| bigjools | copies are only ever source only | 13:07 |
| wgrant | Good. | 13:08 |
| wgrant | But hmm. | 13:08 |
| persia | Good. And does a fresh copy of the same source trigger a new rebuild? | 13:08 |
| wgrant | Post-initialisation, you mean? | 13:08 |
| bigjools | wgrant: yes | 13:08 |
| wgrant | Copying only sources at initialisation seems strange unless you are rebuilding. | 13:08 |
| bigjools | right, we intend that sources are copied and then you hit the Big Red Button | 13:09 |
| wgrant | Right. | 13:09 |
| wgrant | (it would be a bit easier if these specs were public, of course) | 13:09 |
| === RainCT is now known as RainCT_ | ||
| bigjools | persia: it could do, we've not discussed that in complete depth. The original intention is to make copy archives cheap as chips so you can just make a new one | 13:09 |
| persia | There's enough information on the blueprints page to point at things, but yes, it would be. | 13:10 |
| persia | More interestingly, if one subscribes to a spec early enough, one can get all the wiki edits by email, even though one cannot actually see the spec. | 13:10 |
| wgrant | I can't imagine that creating a derivative archive could be cheap unless you publish in the same place. Which is bad unless it's a snapshot archive. | 13:10 |
| bigjools | wgrant: who said they need to be published? :) | 13:11 |
| wgrant | bigjools: Why do I want an unpublished non-rebuild archive? | 13:11 |
| persia | bigjools: These aren't being published? | 13:12 |
| bigjools | there will be an option to publish them or not | 13:12 |
| wgrant | (except to confuse people who are looking at dogfood and see that lenny says it has no packages. That was confusing)( | 13:12 |
| bigjools | dogfood is, erm, in a state of flux shall we say | 13:12 |
| wgrant | I note that there is a nice unpublished Lenny copy, though. | 13:13 |
| bigjools | yes, we're doing that to make syncs easier | 13:13 |
| wgrant | Yep. | 13:13 |
| wgrant | I thought gina might be dead for a while once s-i-s came along. | 13:13 |
| bigjools | gina just won't die, I think kiko put some immortality code in there | 13:14 |
| wgrant | Heh. | 13:15 |
| bigjools | we don't currently use her for anything btw, but she's going to get a new frock for Debian importing | 13:15 |
| wgrant | I thought she was used for importing from security dak. | 13:16 |
| elmo | wgrant: no, security uploads are re-uploaded to lp after going through dak (sic) | 13:17 |
| wgrant | Ah. Hm. | 13:18 |
| === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak | ||
| persia | re: sponsoring earlier: bug #155956 (for any wishing to subscribe) | 13:57 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 155956 in soyuz "+me/+packages should present different sections for sponsored uploads" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/155956 | 13:58 |
| === apachelogger_ is now known as apachelogger | ||
| raphink | hello | 15:41 |
| raphink | the Ubuntu wiki is broken for me | 15:42 |
| raphink | it seems to be linked to the kubuntu2 theme | 15:42 |
| raphink | http://pastebin.ca/1168083 | 15:42 |
| raphink | thi sis the trac | 15:42 |
| raphink | trace | 15:42 |
| * emgent need one launchpad devel | 15:49 | |
| intellectronica | emgent: still need one? | 16:24 |
| === ursula_ is now known as Ursinha-lunch | ||
| emgent | intellectronica: sure. | 16:25 |
| intellectronica | emgent: at your service, sir | 16:25 |
| emgent | intellectronica: nice :) | 16:25 |
| emgent | i need to know all people with Africa/Kigali timezone | 16:25 |
| emgent | (in launchpad) | 16:25 |
| emgent | I need it for Human project in Rwanda | 16:25 |
| emgent | intellectronica: can you grep this? | 16:26 |
| emgent | now some italian ubuntu people are in rwanda for tech ubuntu stuff (openoffice, firefox etc.) | 16:27 |
| emgent | but we should know if there is some ubuntu people in kigali for talk about possible collaboration | 16:27 |
| emgent | intellectronica: can you help me ? | 16:27 |
| intellectronica | emgent: i'm not sure what's our policy on doing something like that. the information is there (and you can google for it) but given that we don't provide a direct search function, i'm not sure it would be ok for me to run a search like that for a user | 16:28 |
| emgent | intellectronica: .... | 16:28 |
| intellectronica | emgent: i'll ask around and see what people think. in the meanwhile, would you mind filing a question? | 16:29 |
| emgent | i need to know only pubblic information.. | 16:29 |
| emgent | timezone is pubblic in launchpad, but i cant check this value in launchpad search filter. | 16:29 |
| intellectronica | emgent: yeah, that's my point. the information is there, so you're welcome to search for it, but since there isn't a way to search for it directly, i'm not sure if it's ok to run such a search for you | 16:30 |
| intellectronica | emgent: however, this discussion is quite theoretical, as https://edge.launchpad.net/+search?field.text=Africa%2FKigali should give you what you want | 16:30 |
| emgent | uhm i go to check | 16:31 |
| emgent | thanks | 16:31 |
| intellectronica | emgent: looks like it's only two users, and one of them writes in his profile that he's studying in england, so maybe the tz information for him is wrong :) | 16:32 |
| emgent | yeah saw that :( | 16:32 |
| emgent | ok, thanks | 16:33 |
| === eMxyzptlk is now known as eMxyzptlk[away] | ||
| === kiko-zzz is now known as kiko-phone | ||
| TheEric | any lp admins around? | 16:53 |
| mtaylor | rosetta question... if I've added more strings to my .pot file, do I just upload the .pot and launchpad iwll run the msgmerge on the .po files it has? | 16:56 |
| bdmurray | I'm getting OOPS trying to moderate the ubuntu-bugcontrol mailing list | 16:58 |
| Rinchen | barry, ^^ | 17:09 |
| Rinchen | bdmurray, do you have an oops number for Ursinha-lunch to look up? | 17:09 |
| barry | bdmurray: that's not good | 17:09 |
| bdmurray | OOPS-955G2074 | 17:10 |
| ubottu | https://devpad.canonical.com/~jamesh/oops.cgi/955G2074 | 17:10 |
| * barry waits 10 minutes | 17:11 | |
| bdmurray | I just generated that one though | 17:11 |
| kiko-phone | TheEric, there always are, it's best to just ask your question and get the cool satisfaction of having it fixed! | 17:12 |
| === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch | ||
| barry | Rinchen, bdmurray wow. i've got the oops now. i'll submit a bug report on that | 17:28 |
| kiko-phone | barry, is it a wow oops then? :) | 17:33 |
| barry | kiko-phone: wow in the sense that it's triggering an assertion, so clearly unexpected | 17:34 |
| * barry guesses all bugs are unexpected tho ;) | 17:34 | |
| kiko-phone | heh | 17:34 |
| === kiko-phone is now known as kiko-fud | ||
| === barry is now known as barry-away | ||
| === RainCT_ is now known as RainCT | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado | ||
| Ursinha | barry-away, thanks for reporting that bug | 18:29 |
| === barry-away is now known as barry | ||
| === eMxyzptlk[away] is now known as eMxyzptlk | ||
| === kiko-fud is now known as kiko-afk | ||
| popey | uhm, how odd, i just got mails from bug 155947 and bug 51315 with the subject "Georgia: Ceasefire and Withdrawal Now" | 19:54 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 155947 in libnss-ldap "libnss-ldap: calls to initgroups() causes boot to hang when using 'bind_policy hard'" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/155947 | 19:54 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 51315 in libnss-ldap "udevd: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/51315 | 19:54 |
| mtaylor | anybody on translations? | 20:53 |
| mtaylor | I just tried to upload a .pot and now status shows "failed" | 20:53 |
| mtaylor | can't entirely say I understand how I'm supposed to update my .pot | 20:54 |
| === kiko-afk is now known as kiko | ||
| Syntux | Hi, I deleted a package from PPA and now I'm uploading a fixed version but getting that it was already accepted and I cannot upload it again although the delete was executed hours ago. | 21:26 |
| \sh | Syntux: first, why are you deleting it, when you uploading a new one anyways... | 21:27 |
| Syntux | \sh, I forgot to add 0ubuntu to the version so I had to reupload and when I tried that it said that I cannot upload older version | 21:28 |
| \sh | kiko: is the archive package delete cron job still running so few times ? I thought you (the admins) thought about increasing the interval | 21:29 |
| Syntux | \sh, it has already been deleted, in my PPA I have 0 packages, 0 MB binary and source. | 21:30 |
| kiko | \sh, I actually don't know the answer to that question! I need to check with the soyuz guys | 21:32 |
| \sh | Syntux: ask the soyuz people :) | 21:34 |
| Syntux | Who are they? | 21:34 |
| Syntux | Are they from the dark side? | 21:34 |
| * Syntux hides | 21:34 | |
| === ursula_ is now known as Ursinha | ||
| Romario99 | hey folks, is it possible to rename a project completely? | 21:57 |
| kiko | sure it is | 22:05 |
| kiko | what project, Romario99? | 22:06 |
| Romario99 | gscrot | 22:10 |
| Romario99 | it is not needed immediately | 22:10 |
| kiko | Romario99, and what would it be renamed to, if it was? | 22:11 |
| Romario99 | gnapshot | 22:11 |
| kiko | what a better name indeed | 22:11 |
| kiko | should I do it now? | 22:11 |
| Romario99 | hehe, i know | 22:11 |
| Romario99 | but its a frontend for scrot | 22:11 |
| kiko | I know, but scrot is a really bad name! | 22:12 |
| Romario99 | yes, am refactoring the whole app to be a standalone application | 22:12 |
| Romario99 | and gscrot is obsolete ;-) | 22:12 |
| Romario99 | i will let you know when it should be done | 22:13 |
| Romario99 | thank you, kiko | 22:13 |
| kiko | Romario99, cool, no worries | 22:13 |
| wgrant | Syntux: You can't ever upload an older version. | 22:26 |
| Syntux | wgrant, yeah that should make sense but now I have deleted the package and want to upload it to fix that mistake | 22:27 |
| wgrant | That is beside the point. | 22:27 |
| wgrant | Uploading older versions can confuse things horribly. | 22:27 |
| wgrant | It simply should not be done. | 22:27 |
| wgrant | (and Soyuz enforces this) | 22:28 |
| Syntux | wgrant, what do you recommend doing now? changing the package name? | 22:29 |
| Syntux | :-) | 22:29 |
| Syntux | increasing the version? | 22:29 |
| wgrant | The version. | 22:30 |
| wgrant | You would never change the name for something small like this... | 22:30 |
| wgrant | As that does the same thing as reducing the version. | 22:30 |
| wgrant | No upgrades. | 22:30 |
| wgrant | And it's generally bad. | 22:30 |
| Syntux | Ok | 22:32 |
| Syntux | I admit it was a horrible mistake. | 22:32 |
| Syntux | :-) | 22:32 |
| Syntux | will increase the version now, thankfully I marked it as experimental | 22:32 |
| lifeless | barry: hey, are mailman 'topics' case insensitive? | 22:35 |
| Syntux | what is Soyuz ? | 22:35 |
| barry | lifeless: the topic patterns are just regular expressions, and i believe they are case insensitive. | 22:36 |
| wgrant | Soyuz is the part of Launchpad which manages the packages in distributions and PPAs. | 22:36 |
| lifeless | we have a user saying they aren't working for her | 22:36 |
| lifeless | this is the regex: | 22:36 |
| lifeless | \[merge\] | 22:36 |
| lifeless | \[codereview\] | 22:36 |
| lifeless | note that that is two lines | 22:36 |
| lifeless | does it need a | and branches ? | 22:36 |
| lifeless | a mail got through with subject [MERGE] wordlist refactoring | 22:37 |
| lifeless | so 'what are we doing wrong' | 22:38 |
| kiko | Syntux, the part of launchpad that knows how to manage packages. | 22:39 |
| Syntux | oh I see. | 22:39 |
| Syntux | Thank you | 22:39 |
| lifeless | kiko: is it still the official name, or is it launchpad packages or something ? | 22:40 |
| kiko | lifeless, it's still the official name. | 22:40 |
| lifeless | cool | 22:40 |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-dinner | ||
| === barry is now known as barry-away | ||
| === salgado is now known as salgado-afk | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!