/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/08/12/#ubuntu-bugs.txt

hggdhbdmurray, already sent it to ogasawara, did not notice he was online00:05
hggdhthanks for the follow up00:05
mrooneycan bugsquad edit descriptions/titles of bugs, or only bugcontrol?00:06
nhandlerAnyone is able to edit bug descriptions/titles mrooney00:06
bdmurraymrooney: any one00:06
mrooneyah, thanks :)00:08
* mrooney is responding to a bug control application00:08
nhandlerWho is the application for mrooney ?00:09
mrooneynot yours :)00:10
jjessewow havent checked ubuntu bug mail, holy messages from launchpad batman00:10
nhandlermrooney: I already got approved for Bug Control ;)00:11
mrooneynhandler: I figured! You had like 6 raving reviews :)00:11
mrooneyI would have added one but it seemed like overkill at that point00:11
nhandlerlol mrooney.00:12
mrooneyBut I am replying to Marcus's now00:12
=== jjesse__ is now known as jjesse
mrooneybdmurray: around by any chance?04:05
anakronHi all04:11
bdmurraymrooney: what's up? I've got a minute or two to spare04:40
mrooneybdmurray: oh hi, I just found a bug that I thought might be up your alley04:41
* mrooney searches...04:41
mrooneybdmurray: bug 25607104:41
ubottuLaunchpad bug 256071 in firefox "Can't search for ubuntu package from search box" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/25607104:41
bdmurraymrooney: hmm, I can't recreate it with intrepid04:44
bdmurrayIt might actually be firefox-launchpad-plugin not firefox04:45
bdmurraymrooney: do you have that installed?04:47
mrooneybdmurray: I don't know, this isn't the same machine I confirmed it on, I just did a sudo aptitude install firefox-2, so if it isn't depends or stock hardy, I don't think04:48
bdmurrayhrm04:48
mrooneybdmurray: so you were using firefox 2 in Intrepid?04:49
mrooneymaybe it was fixed there and the patch wasn't sent back04:49
bdmurraymrooney: okay, I'll look at it more tomorrow.  thanks!04:50
pheeroris anybody working on fixing those minor flaws in intrepid dark theme?05:13
persiapheeror: You might check with #ubuntu-artwork, but I suspect so.05:15
pheerorthe dark theme looks unbeatable with bunch of green-on-black terminals, gutsy-elephant-skin background on top of a old-fashioned thinkpad  :-)05:19
greg-gthat was an easy bug to mark as fix released.05:22
mrooneygreg-g: which one is that?05:29
greg-gmrooney: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25717805:36
ubottuLaunchpad bug 257178 in debian-edu "education-chemistry: fails to install: err 67: Custom distribution education does not exist" [High,Fix released]05:36
greg-gactually, now that I think about it, I wonder if we could backport it (or apply a patch that will make it work) for hardy05:37
persiaProbably.  Failure-to-install is often considered SRU-worthy (as it breaks upgrades)05:40
greg-gpersia: well there we go.  I've never dealt with that kind of request, what is the next (first) step?05:41
persiagreg-g: There are two interesting paths: the bugfix and the bug management.05:41
* greg-g looks for the SRU wiki page05:41
persiaTaking the latter first, you'll want to redescribe the bug in terms of test case, etc.  Also, you'll want a Hardy task to track the status in Hardy.05:42
greg-gpersia: ok05:42
* greg-g changes description to include test case05:43
persiaNext, you'll want to investigate the bugfix.  I'm guessing it's available (in part) from the debdiff between 0.825 and 0.826.  Get someone to backport that to 0.822.05:43
persiaAfter that, you just need a developer to upload, and someone to organise testing once it hits the SRU queue.05:43
greg-gpersia: awesome.  good overview, thanks.05:45
persiagreg-g: Just in case you haven't already looked there, snapshot.debian.net can be a handy way to check specific changes in Debian packages.05:48
greg-gpersia: ooo, I haven't seen that before, thanks again.05:49
greg-gfrom a quick look at the changelog, it looks like all that is needed is a change for the build depends to use cdd-dev >=4.7 from 4.405:56
greg-gbut, Hardy only has 4.405:56
greg-ghrmm05:56
persiagreg-g: Next would be to see what the change was for cdd-dev 4.705:57
greg-g  * Build-Depends: cdd-dev (>= 0.4.7)06:01
greg-g    Reason: The change in cdd to enable builds of Arch any for some CDDs leaded to the error that postinst/postrm files now contained06:01
greg-g    two copies of the same code.  This is fixed in cdd-dev 0.4.7 and thus debian-edu has to be rebuilded.06:01
greg-gthat is why, I can dig deeper and see exactly what needs to change in cdd-dev to get that fix and only that fix06:02
persiaSo the problem is really in cdd-dev: debian-edu just needs a rebuild for a fixed cdd-dev.06:02
greg-gs/that is why,/that is the why./06:02
greg-gright06:02
persiaRight.  The next step would be to identify the specific fix.  At about this level of specificity, it's a good idea to either get a developer who is going to work on it, or decide to be that developer yourself.06:03
persiaOtherwise, you've just agressively triaged the bug, and with appropriate comments, it ought be easy for a developer to pick it up, approve the Hardy task, and chase the SRU team.06:03
greg-gI would love to be that developer myself.  We'll see how far I can get into figuring out the changes needed06:05
greg-gso, I guess I should change the affected package to cdd and re-tool the description.06:06
persiagreg-g: Well, no.  You'll want to add a cdd task, as there are two packages that need to be adjusted.06:10
greg-gok06:11
greg-ggood thing I was looking at the diff of cdd rather than messing with the bug06:11
greg-gthe diff is really small for cdd_0.4.4 to 0.4.706:11
persiagreg-g: Also, just as a note, when you get to the point that you know what patch you want to apply, if you're the developer, #ubuntu-motu is the place to chat about getting it applied.06:12
greg-gright right06:13
persiaThis being a good place for bug report through patch, but after that, it becomes less interesting to some people.06:13
greg-gthanks for the guidance persia06:13
persiagreg-g: Thanks for chasing and fixing the bug :)06:13
greg-g'tis what I'm here for ;)06:14
kgoetzhi all. i'm about to make a debdiff to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clearsilver/+bug/86685 and i was wondering what i'm meant to tag it after i do so. is it ubuntu-universe-sponsors still?06:18
ubottuLaunchpad bug 86685 in trac "trac BROKEN on AMD64: "neo_cgi.so: undefined symbol: Py_InitModule4"" [Undecided,Confirmed]06:18
nellerykgoetz, have a look at the tags page here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Tags06:19
kgoetznellery: cheers06:19
nelleryno problem :)06:19
kgoetz:)06:20
persiakgoetz: For a debdiff, the tags aren't so important, and #ubuntu-motu is probably a better forum.06:20
persiaSpecifically, if you seek sponsorship, you need to subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors06:20
kgoetzpersia: thanks06:21
dholbachgood morning06:43
greg-gmorning dholbach06:45
dholbachheya greg-g06:45
=== cactaur is now known as JoeKing
=== JoeKing is now known as JoeKingPfH
kgoetzpersia: thanks, i've subscribed u-u-s06:55
=== JoeKingPfH is now known as cactaur
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach
Achimhello I don't know if this is the right place but I would like to know if someone can help me with a bug report.12:25
AchimMy problem is that there is a patch and a debdiff (hardy) available and nobody seems to be interested.12:25
AchimMaybe I have done something wrong?12:25
Achimhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/25358712:25
ubottuLaunchpad bug 253587 in pulseaudio "default-server in client.conf doesn't get recognized" [Undecided,Confirmed]12:25
Achimubottu, hey nice to see someone is taking care about this report.12:26
ubottuError: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :)12:26
Achimokay12:27
techno_freakAchim, as the bug is confirmed someone will look into the patch and test it out12:29
Achimtechno_freak, I have confirmed the bug. At the moment it is more like a monologue.12:30
techno_freakAchim, it takes some time for people to respond, if not you can poke people back here after a few days12:30
techno_freak:)12:30
techno_freakAchim, and ubottu is a bot, it gives you information, especially on bugs when you specify `bug <number>` to it12:31
persiaAchim: As you've a debdiff attached, you may want to subscribe the relevant sponsors queue (only the debdiff author should do this).  In this case, it is ubuntu-main-sponsors.12:31
AchimI am the debdiff author. but I am not subscribed to the sponsors queue. Maybe I will take a look at the ubuntu-main-sponsors.12:34
persiaAchim: Rather, subscribe the bug to the sponsors queue.  You don't want to be a sponsor, you want one of the sponsors to notice your bug.12:39
persiaYou can ask more questions about getting sponsorship in #ubuntu-motu12:39
Achimthanks for your help.12:40
=== nhandler_ is now known as nhandler
=== thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak
=== apachelogger_ is now known as apachelogger
mcas_awayhellp14:14
mcas_awayhello14:14
=== mcas_away is now known as mcas
mcascan someone please look at bug 25725514:14
ubottuLaunchpad bug 257255 in dosfstools "mkdosfs manpage default -F value incorrect" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/25725514:14
mcasi think this could be set to triaged14:15
pedro_mcas: if you reproduce it and can confirm, yes it could be triaged14:16
mcasi thought that if i can confirm it it could be set to confirmed...14:18
pedro_so are you setting things to triaged without verified if that's a valid report?14:19
mcasi have no rights to set it triaged14:19
pedro_m? why not?14:20
mcasbecause i am not member of bug control14:20
pedro_mcas: please send an email to the bug control mailing list if you want to14:20
pedro_I've seen you working in a lot of bugs14:20
pedro_i thought you had the permissions14:21
mcasi sent the mail a few days ago and today i got an answer from mrooney14:21
mcashe wants to see some more bugs14:21
pedro_mcas: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugControl <-14:21
mcasi wrote him a new email wiht some more bugs14:21
pedro_alright i haven't looked to the list...14:22
mcasthere were problems with the list administration so i sent the new mail directly to mike14:23
mcasthe other mail was sent directly to brian14:23
mcasso pedro_ about this special bug.. i thought if i set it to triaged the bug report has all information needed and confirmed is set if i can reproduce the problem14:27
mcasplease correct me14:27
mcaspedro_: because i am not sure with this i am asking here ;-)14:27
pedro_mcas: yes, that's correct14:29
mcasi think we have all informations about this bug, but i can't reproduce it with my 128mb usb stick14:30
mcasthere i have an fat16 header14:30
pedro_well in that case i prefer to not set that to triaged and wait for someone to confirm it first14:31
pedro_it could be a non valid report14:32
mcasok14:33
bddebianBoo14:39
pedro_buu14:42
bddebian:-)14:42
tuxmaniaccan someone help with triaging this bug 123765. I think it isnt a valid bug since US keyboard settings works fine and in Brazilian KBD settings the " and ' could be mapped to some other key.14:48
ubottuLaunchpad bug 123765 in scilab "scilab keyboard " and ' input result in Â" and Â'" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/12376514:48
tuxmaniacoops missed out the "please"14:48
tuxmaniac:)14:48
=== [1]jarosser06 is now known as jarosser06
=== asac_ is now known as asac
bdmurraypedro_: bug 257347 is my gnome-terminal crash17:20
ubottuBug 257347 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/257347 is private17:20
emgentbdmurray: can you subscribe me too ?17:20
bdmurrayemgent: you should be able to see it based on being in bugcontrol17:21
pedro_bdmurray: ok, thanks17:21
emgentbdmurray: i cant.17:21
pedro_mm i'm getting a "Not allowed here"17:21
emgentNot allowed here17:21
emgentSorry, you don't have permission to access this page.17:21
emgentYou are logged in as Emanuele Gentili.17:21
bdmurrayI'm looking into it17:22
bdmurrayOh right the retracer hasn't gotten to it yet17:22
bdmurraypedro_: you are subscribed now17:24
pedro_there's no hurry we can wait ;-). btw based on your description of yesterday it could be a dup of bug 25676917:24
ubottuLaunchpad bug 256769 in vte "gnome-terminal crashed with SIGSEGV in vte_terminal_extend_selection()" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/25676917:24
pedro_bdmurray: rock will look17:24
pedro_yes it indeed looks like a dup of it, will wait for the retrace just in case of17:25
pedro_thanks bdmurray17:25
bdmurraypedro_: thanks for pointing me at the master17:26
bdmurraypedro_: for a while I've no places "run" menu item and pressing alt+f2 does nothing what package would that be?17:28
bdmurraybug 25732317:29
ubottuLaunchpad bug 257323 in ubuntu "Ubuntu 8.04 CD emits smoke from DVD drive" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/25732317:29
hggdhwow, cool17:30
bdmurraymaybe some chemicals on the CD?17:30
pedro_bdmurray: ah that's gnome-panel17:30
bdmurraypedro_: hmm, I wonder why it is missing then17:30
pedro_bdmurray: are you running intrepid? it's working for me with it17:31
hggdhperhaps, but it is doubtful... more probably the unit burnt something (a capacitor?)17:31
bdmurraypedro_: it's been like this since Hardy at least17:32
pedro_bdmurray: maybe something else is disabling the keys?17:34
pedro_ie: bug 20054017:35
bdmurraymaybe but the menu item doesn't even show up17:35
ubottuLaunchpad bug 200540 in linux "Run Application (Alt-F2) No longer works in Kernel 2.6.24.12" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/20054017:35
pedro_bdmurray: ah that's ok, the Run application menu was removed during the 2.11.X cycle IIRC17:38
chrisccoulsonnot sure how to respond to this: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/25732317:53
ubottuLaunchpad bug 257323 in ubuntu "Ubuntu 8.04 CD emits smoke from DVD drive" [Undecided,New]17:53
chrisccoulson:S17:53
hggdhchrisccoulson, the only options I can imagine are: (1) a really, really, bad CD (but it should have smoked a LOT when burning), or a faulty drive18:04
chrisccoulsonyeah, thanks for that. it's very unfortunate that it happened with his Ubuntu CD18:06
chrisccoulsonwe spoke about this bug a little while ago on here because I wasn't sure what other information to ask from the reporter: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+bug/24043718:13
ubottuLaunchpad bug 240437 in gnome-system-tools "Users-admin fails with AMD-K6 processor" [Undecided,Incomplete]18:13
chrisccoulsonjames_w made the suggestion of monitoring dbus activity as a start, but I said I was unsuccessful with this when I tried it on my machine, and then it all went a bit quiet I think18:14
chrisccoulsoni tried contacting the developer of system-tools-backends to see if he had any suggestions, and i got no response :?18:14
chrisccoulsonand now a second person is claiming that they are seeing the same behaviour18:15
chrisccoulsonany ideas?18:15
hggdhanother one??18:15
hggdhthen chances are faulty CD disk18:15
hggdha faulty batch of them18:15
chrisccoulsoni suppose that could be a possibility18:15
chrisccoulsonit would be nice to be able to debug this though, just in case there might be something else18:16
hggdhchrisccoulson, one chance would be to verify when the CD requests were made, and try to backtrack to a CD disc batch18:16
hggdhthen get one of these CD discs, and try on18:17
chrisccoulsonah! i think we're confused now18:17
chrisccoulsoni'm talking about a different bug;)18:17
hggdhwell, I am18:17
chrisccoulsonhttps://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+bug/24043718:17
ubottuLaunchpad bug 240437 in gnome-system-tools "Users-admin fails with AMD-K6 processor" [Undecided,Incomplete]18:17
chrisccoulson^^^that one;)18:17
hggdhcompletely different...18:17
hggdhlet me see this one... blame my old age18:18
chrisccoulsonlol18:18
chrisccoulsonit was discussed on here a few weeks ago, and then it went a bit quiet18:18
chrisccoulsonand now a second person is saying that users-admin trashes their /etc/passwd file as well18:18
chrisccoulsonand it has a duplicate18:19
chrisccoulsonor it did earlier:/18:19
hggdhI do remember something about user-admin doing that, but it was not related to a specific architecture18:51
chrisccoulsonyeah, i think the architecture in the title is just a red herring18:51
hggdhah18:52
hggdhI remember now18:52
chrisccoulsoni might edit the architecture out of it actually18:52
hggdhby default -- keep in mind Gnome is all about making the user experience simpler, with less options18:52
hggdhusers-admin will *NOT* show users below 1000, and groups below 10018:52
chrisccoulsoni don't think that is the issue with this bug report though18:54
hggdhthere is a gconf2 key dealing with that, let me see if I remember it18:54
chrisccoulsonthe problem is that the reporter claims their /etc/passwd file was hosed after using users-admin18:54
chrisccoulsonyeah, there's a gconf key for toggling displaying of users below UID 100018:54
chrisccoulson/apps/gnome-system-tools/users/showall18:55
hggdhthats it18:55
hggdhnot only uid, but also gid18:55
hggdha boolean18:55
hggdhthis, in turn, seems like an issue with g-s-t, a real one (and, again, this has happened before)18:56
hggdhlook at the changelog for g-s-t18:56
chrisccoulsoni'm not sure whether bug 240437 is an issue with g-s-t or system-tools-backends though.18:56
ubottuLaunchpad bug 240437 in gnome-system-tools "Users-admin fails with AMD-K6 processor" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/24043718:56
nelleryafternoon20:34
bdmurrayhowdy20:34
AmpelbeinHi! Could some experienced user check on Bug 255826 and tell me if I done the examination in the correct way? Thank you.21:45
ubottuLaunchpad bug 255826 in xserver-xorg-video-savage "scrolling in Firefox causes Xorg-process to lag (S3 Savage driver)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/25582621:45
=== mcas is now known as mcas_away
MasterPaHey everyone, i've got a question about a bug in the ubuntu kernel. can anyone help?22:13
AmpelbeinSorry to ask again, but could some experienced user check on Bug 255826 and tell me if I done the examination in the correct way? Thank you.22:51
ubottuLaunchpad bug 255826 in xserver-xorg-video-savage "scrolling in Firefox causes Xorg-process to lag (S3 Savage driver)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/25582622:51
bdmurrayAmpelbein: you might check in #ubuntu-x as there are X specific triagers there22:52
bdmurrayThat one sounds like a duplicate to me. You might look for other xorg bugs like that22:54
AmpelbeinI already looked at other bugs, but could not find a similar one with the savage-driver.22:54
bdmurrayI don't think it is driver specific22:54
AmpelbeinI'll ask in #ubuntu-x, thanks for the hint.22:54
AmpelbeinAnd I'll go have a look on other bugs.22:55
mrooneybdmurray: is the bugcontrol list working alright for subscribers? or should I copy you?23:44
bdmurrayits only non-member postings that are problematic23:45
bdmurrayso you should be good!23:45
mrooneyalright thanks, I'll give it a shot23:48
mrooneybdmurray: did my original reply come through okay, for mcas's application?23:57
mrooneyokay, the archive appears to have it.23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!