[00:08] fine [00:08] good news ;) [00:08] one merge thing less [00:11] "People in most markets Lenovo serves, including Singapore, China and the UK, will be offered the company's new IdeaPad S10 with either Microsoft Windows XP or a Linux OS, but Australian and US computer buyers will only be offered Windows XP according to Lenovo." [00:51] asac, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306324#c5 [00:51] Mozilla bug 306324 in Build Config "Build/run Thunderbird on top of XULRunner" [Normal,New] [06:25] that's weird [06:26] I've got a whole lot of images from lhttp://www.boingboing.net/compresized/*.jpg [06:26] in my cache [06:26] that have apparently been fetches within the last minute [06:26] fetched, rather [06:27] however, I haven't look at that page in a good week (I remember it, it was a list of really old magazine computer ads) [06:27] they're showing up in about:cache?device=memory [08:42] !freenode [08:42] freenode is the IRC network that you're on! See http://freenode.net/faq.shtml [09:17] hi ! [09:19] asac: bug 136303 is this something we are willing to change in default tbird package? [09:19] Launchpad bug 136303 in mozilla-thunderbird "[Gutsy] Thunderbird doesn't open http link in firefox" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/136303 [09:20] hi [09:21] morning ;) [09:21] hi gnomefreak [09:21] that bug should work ;) [09:22] asac: you want a autologin bug on n-m? [09:23] marked bug wont fix [09:23] gnomefreak: which? [09:23] bug 155294 [09:23] Launchpad bug 155294 in network-manager "It is not possible to disable the keychain password entry dialog for accessing a WLAN when auto-login is enabled" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/155294 [09:24] asac: not sure if wee support autologin to begin with [09:24] asac, hve you seen the screenshots yesterday ? [09:27] XioNoX: the double border thing? [09:28] yes, and i've list the différent case, depending of the xbl file [09:28] with or without the element [09:29] and the location of the div [09:30] XioNoX: hmm. so unsupported doesnt work at all? [09:31] unsupported work, supported work partially (there are 2 frames) if we put the element [09:31] but only on the adobe page [09:31] on youtube for exemple it don't work for supported [09:31] XioNoX: strange thing. can you try just to "match" object? [09:31] ' [09:32] match ? [09:32] in .css [09:32] finally got to my gedit crash bug, only a month later (and it still crashes when it likes) [09:34] XioNoX: you said that flashbock? did it differently [09:34] how? [09:34] adblock plus [09:35] i don't really know, because the source is really complicated [09:36] I think too complicated to implement it on ubufox [09:37] and for something we don't know if everybody will agree [09:38] but the adblock method works well for all the flash content [09:45] XioNoX: they display a frame, right? [09:45] what ? [09:46] what do you thin about this : http://pastebin.mozilla.org/512850 ? [09:46] come from flash block [09:48] hi guys [09:48] # [09:48] object [09:48] # [09:48] # [09:48] { -moz-binding: url("chrome://flashblock/content/flashblock.xml#brokenobject") !important; } [09:48] they do this [09:48] XioNoX, asac: any help I can give you? [09:49] it works [09:49] XioNoX: so "just" object in .css works [09:49] thats good enough for us [09:49] it is better than : embed, applet, object { [09:49] -moz-binding: url('chrome://ubufox/content/alternatePlugins.xml#missingPlugin') !important; [09:49] "embed" is most likely a .xbl thing on its own which uses object [09:49] no ? [09:49] because it more targeting the content [09:49] yes [09:50] object { [09:50] 10:49 < XioNoX> -moz-binding: url('chrome://ubufox/content/alternatePlugins.xml#missingPlugin') !important; [09:50] if that works [09:50] use it ;) [09:50] ok [09:51] it works the same way, for flash or director, but i have the sames issues [09:51] so i think it come from the xbl [09:53] * gnomefreak thinks i fixed firegpg but will look later since its not 5am yet [09:56] XioNoX: can you publish your current best code in bzr please [09:56] I'd like to try [09:56] ;) [09:56] asac, http://pastebin.mozilla.org/512852 here is the xbl of flashblock, it using only JS [09:59] XioNoX: well. thats flashblock ;) [09:59] i know :D [09:59] i push the code on bzr [09:59] ok [09:59] url? [10:02] XioNoX: ? [10:02] not finish yet :D [10:02] ah [10:03] ;) [10:05] https://code.launchpad.net/~xionox/ubufox/ubufox.altplugins [10:13] XioNoX: so on what page would thta work? [10:14] http://www.adobe.com/fr/shockwave/welcome/ [10:14] here you can check 2 mimetype [10:25] re [10:25] re! [10:29] XioNoX: ok. so even with these .css rules it doesnt work anywhere except on adobe pages? [10:29] yes [10:30] i dont see any atler :/ [10:30] alert [10:32] asac: if you'll need my assistance with helping Xionox, let me know [10:33] alert works for me when we click on a frame [10:38] XioNoX: you need to add "components" to the ROOT_DIRS in config_build.sh [10:38] otherwise the pluginGlue.js is not included [10:38] in .xpi [10:41] XioNoX: according to dom inspector that style is attached to the element [10:41] ? [10:41] (on youtube) [10:41] the border appears to be not visible [10:41] not sure if that means that its hidden [10:41] or that it doesnt work [10:41] install firefox-dom-inspector package [10:42] (if you are testing with ubuntu build) [10:43] ok [10:43] so we can try with hidden=false [10:43] ? [10:44] not sure [10:45] let me play around [10:46] it si why the html:div is in red ? [10:50] Jazzva: its fixed im gonna build it for PPA to update with fixes. both branchs are fixed as well. thanks for the testing [10:53] asac: should short description end with a : ? [10:53] or long start with one? [10:54] XioNoX: i think its read because its "xbl'ed" at runtime [10:54] gnomefreak: most likely not [10:54] gnomefreak: cant`t tell without looking at case though [10:54] dpkg-checkbuilddeps: error: syntax error in debian/control at line 15: line with unknown format (not field-colon-value) [10:54] maybe shouldnt be indented [10:55] nope not it [10:57] asac: here is the control file http://pastebin.mozilla.org/512886 [10:59] i dont see anything there that looks wrong [11:01] XioNoX: so ... maybe the embed thing prevents it to be displayed [11:01] XioNoX: can you try to open the alert whenever the element is loaded please [11:01] instead of clicking? [11:02] I've try, but i don't know how to do that. Event on xbl don't allow to do it [11:03] May I ask a question : I've seen in bug 180384 that mozilla-traybiff was FTBFS [11:03] Launchpad bug 180384 in mozilla-traybiff "Please merge mozilla-traybiff 1.2.3-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/180384 [11:03] looking if I can fix that I don't clearly understand the situation of mozilla-traybiff [11:03] according LP, it is in intrepid [11:04] but I am not able to find it using apt [11:04] :( [11:04] huats: its not in INtrepid archives [11:04] gnomefreak: from my understanding of :https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozilla-traybiff it is... [11:05] that is why I am confused... [11:05] huats: most likely it need a manual merge. DAD will tell you, but i dont remmeber link to DAD, motu people would have link [11:05] I have the link... [11:05] :) [11:05] gnomefreak: thanks [11:06] huats: wait [11:06] ok [11:06] huats: that may be held back due to freeze [11:06] I know [11:06] but ask in motu what happened [11:07] In fact I was more confused by state that it seems to be in intrepid, but it is not [11:07] that was my question :) [11:07] gnomefreak: thanks! [11:07] np [11:08] huats: looks like a dependency issue [11:08] huats: look at the right of https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid/+source/mozilla-traybiff/1.2.3-4.1 [11:10] gnomefreak: yes [11:10] a pb with icedove... [11:13] gnomefreak, solved the problem with control file? [11:14] Jazzva: the above error no [11:15] i dont see a : nor did i ever remeber one being there [11:15] gnomefreak, try with this (the highlighted lines) http://pastebin.mozilla.org/512905 [11:17] the VCS line has to be broken up its more than 80 chars [11:17] XioNoX: ok [11:17] that doesn't matter for all lines, but only for those that will be presented to the user (copyright file, description...) [11:17] gnomefreak ^ [11:18] asac, xbl handler allow only key & mouse [11:18] * gnomefreak gives up on what needs to be <80 and > 80 [11:19] XioNoX: http://paste.ubuntu.com/36800/ [11:19] apply that and start fro there [11:19] Jazzva: no it didnt fix it [11:19] gnomefreak, I think just the things that will be presented to a user [11:19] hmm... strange [11:19] XioNoX: actually we can even dump the html:div [11:20] Jazzva: all you did was indent the long [11:20] the idea is to use the code [11:20] ok [11:20] like flashblock ? [11:20] to send out events about "pluginUsed" [11:20] XioNoX: apply the patch [11:20] gnomefreak, ah... the short description must be in one line [11:20] ;) [11:20] Jazzva: although now its line 14 [11:20] I'm not sure about the rule for it... [11:20] Jazzva: that doesnt meet 80 char rule [11:21] thats why its on 2 lines [11:21] and that makes sence since it built fine before changing it [11:21] lets find out [11:22] Jazzva: space between long and short? [11:22] asac, how do y apply the diff ? [11:23] try putting it on one line :). sorry for the "80 chars rule". I try to make thing presented to user break at 80 char if I can :) [11:23] gnomefreak, space? you mean an empty line? that's not needed... [11:23] ok [11:23] oh fuck [11:23] control is fixed now rules error [11:24] Jazzva: debian/rules:21: *** missing separator. Stop [11:24] gnomefreak, please paste it [11:24] build/firegpg:: chmod a-x+X components/FireGPGCall.dll [11:25] what should be used as seperater [11:25] put "chmod ..." on a new line [11:25] http://pastebin.mozilla.org/512907 [11:25] Jazzva: it is [11:25] Jazzva: just irc put it on one line [11:26] im thinking a ; is needed but not sure [11:26] after *dll === RainCT_ is now known as RainCT [11:26] gnomefreak, the space before "chmod" should be a tab. If you copy/pasted it, it might be formed of spaces instead... [11:26] gnomefreak, so check that [11:27] and you can also put ";" at the end of the line, but it should be ok like this too... [11:27] ok give me a few need to update changelog [11:28] no i dont its all there [11:28] ha [11:28] Jazzva: thanks it worked [11:29] no problem :) [11:29] i have to update bzr but im waiting for any other errors [11:29] actually... you can change the "a-x+X" in chmod just to "a-x" [11:32] too late [11:32] XioNoX: download to file [11:32] change to ubufox dir [11:32] it really shouldnt matter at all [11:32] patch -p0 < /tmp/file.diff [11:32] (if the file is called /tmp/file.diff) [11:32] ok [11:32] i've done it manually :D [11:33] but I save that ;) [11:33] XioNoX: err [11:33] please apply directly [11:33] otherwise you might have missed something ;) [11:33] at least i wouldnt trust myself ;) [11:33] ok breakfast . bzr branches are updated and fixed and pushing to PPA atm [11:34] but well ... as long as your .css is short, and the alert pops up it should be fine [11:34] gnomefreak: please ping in bug [11:34] asac: what bug? [11:34] it should be ok :D but it is normal that my firefox is freezing on the adobe webpage ? [11:34] gnomefreak: or give me direct branch names ;) [11:34] oh [11:34] gnomefreak: i forget what you are working on ;) [11:34] firegpg [11:34] gnomefreak: if you update bug: says: "ready! [11:34] i will see it in my extension mailbox [11:34] ok [11:34] which i try to follow up on regularly [11:34] ;) [11:35] gnomefreak: full branch name would be appreciated ;) [11:35] it will have it [11:35] of your and the "release" branch [11:35] gnomefreak: sure [11:35] you want LP links or the bzr branch..... [11:35] gnomefreak: hmm ... please try to do a "merge request" [11:36] in launchpad [11:36] i'd like to test that feature [11:36] with what? [11:36] we should receive mails [11:36] i get mails for it [11:36] asac: tested a while ago [11:37] asac, i get the alert, but if i refresh the page it crash of freeze :( [11:37] asac: i would need branches to merge to [11:38] gnomefreak: ah ... ok firegpg isnt uploaded yet? [11:38] there is no RELEASE branch from what i can see [11:38] but update bug 227945 [11:38] Launchpad bug 227945 in firegpg "[needs packaging] Please package FireGPG extension for Firefox " [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/227945 [11:38] segfault [11:38] asac: no this is new [11:38] XioNoX: are you on 3.1 ? [11:38] 3.0 [11:38] asac: lso find them in my PPA if needed [11:39] XioNoX: for me it doesnt [11:39] also [11:39] XioNoX: maybe apply my patch for real ;) [11:39] ok breakfast now [11:39] asac, it seem that it is NSPlugin Wrapper who are crashing [11:40] gnomefreak: didnt base the .ubuntu branch on the .upstream branch [11:40] what did you do? [11:40] you need to start with .upstream branch [11:40] then add packaging [11:41] (which is revision 1 in your ubuntu branch, but should be revision 2) [11:41] when i did it that way it failed [11:41] no [11:41] i fixed it to have files [11:41] asac: yes it did [11:41] thats wrong [11:41] we cannot use it that way [11:41] Jazzva: informed me of it [11:41] unfortunately [11:42] the procedure is outlined on the Packaging page in wiki [11:42] oh well [11:42] you start with upstream branch [11:42] then copy debian/ directory from XPI.TEMPLATE [11:42] and adapt the files accordingly [11:42] even with your patch it is crashing [11:42] XioNoX: where? [11:42] on youtube? [11:44] on youtube it is freezing [11:44] i don't see the popup [11:44] ok http://www.t45ol.com/ we can see the alert but it crashing [11:45] XioNoX: remve the surrounding div elements [11:45] we dont need them [11:45] so content just contains children [11:45] that works for me [11:45] otherwise the alert freezes [11:45] (though i can close it using the X window closer) [11:46] still crashing [11:46] still freezing on youtube [11:47] yave you try with 3.0 ? [11:47] or do you wan't that I try with 3.1 ? [11:48] asac: just becausqe revision 1 doesnt say initial release its not usable? [11:48] no ... i am running 3.0.1 install [11:48] gnomefreak: he? [11:48] no [11:48] gnomefreak: because the .ubuntu branch is not based on .upstream branch its not usable [11:48] yes that is it since there is nothing wrong with branch it has files it should have [11:48] we wont be able to merge in future [11:48] asac: yes it is [11:49] gnomefreak: no [11:49] when i fixed it i had to redo it all today [11:49] gnomefreak: if it was the commit log of rev 1 would be identical [11:49] maybe you copied files by hand [11:49] but you surely didnt start to create the .ubuntu branch by using the real .upsream branch [11:49] asac: i did after getting upstream from branch [11:49] look at time stamps on branches [11:49] gnomefreak: you _must_ not copy by hand [11:50] gnomefreak: to create .ubuntu you do: [11:50] bzr branch lp......upstream [11:50] cd .....upstream [11:50] asac: why not since itt was already done from XPI [11:50] cp -r /tmp/XPI.TEMPALTE/debian . [11:50] asac: this was started a month or so ago [11:50] bzr commit -m "* first .ubuntu commit, which is the second commit on the brancH" [11:51] it was from XPI but had to put it aside to fix the failure to install bug [11:51] gnomefreak: you start with .upstream [11:51] yes [11:51] then copy the files from XPI.TEMPLATE by hand into it [11:51] commit that as second revision [11:51] yes [11:51] yes, but you didnt do that [11:51] look at bzr log [11:52] you started with XPI.TEMPALTE [11:52] copied .upstream files into it [11:52] (if you did that at all) [11:52] most likely you just created a directory, copied the .upstream and the XPI.TEMPALTE into it and committed that together as first revision [11:53] gnomefreak: since you did it one out ago, just redo .... follow the instructions i gave above [11:53] i have no need to commit an empty XPITEMPLATE [11:53] feel free to modifiy the files before doing the first .ubuntu commit [11:53] but start with .upstream [11:53] and commit on top of that [11:53] first revision _must_ be identical to upstream branch [11:54] wait i think i know what happened [11:54] let me guess ubuntu branch doesnt contain upstream files? [11:54] that is because i left them out when i pushed [11:55] damnit [11:55] gnomefreak: no [11:55] oh good [11:55] follow the instructions above [11:55] you have to start with .upstream [11:55] then copy the XPI.TEMPLATE files into it [11:55] modify them [11:55] commit [11:55] and bumb [11:56] (this is revision 2 then) [11:56] but the files i already had were based on it :( [11:56] cant be revision 2 [11:56] im not commiting/pushing empty XPI.TEMPLATE [11:57] so it would be revision 1 that has all files included [11:57] hence redoing it the same way i did it [11:57] gnomefreak: hey [11:57] first revision is the .upstream commit [11:57] but i will start all over and maybe have it done in a day or so [11:57] so it _is_ second revision [11:57] no [11:58] gnomefreak: thats what i am telling you [11:58] you _must_ start with .upstream branch [11:58] why .upstream is another branch [11:58] which already contains one commit [11:58] gnomefreak: yes, but .upstream is the parent branch for .ubuntu [11:58] they are not indpendent [11:58] asac: why not bumb! [11:58] gnomefreak: you did them independent, which makes them useless [11:58] as we cannot do bzr merge then [11:58] yes i know but revisions dont skip from brnch o branch [11:59] gnomefreak: try and see it yourself ;) [11:59] so 1 still wont be .upstream unless i push it beore gettingXPI [11:59] gnomefreak: just follow the instructions on wiki blindly [11:59] that will work [12:04] asac, i've find why it is freezing. The popup didn't show up but it is here, so i have juste to press space or enter [12:04] XioNoX: hehe ;) [12:04] XioNoX: maybe its hidden behind the main window? [12:05] no [12:05] we see it when we alt tab [12:05] XioNoX: ok. did you drop the html:div yet? [12:05] but a soon a we select it, he disapear [12:05] yes [12:05] but i don't know why it is crashing [12:06] XioNoX: just npviewer? [12:06] are you on hardy? [12:06] yes [12:06] 64bits if it can help [12:07] XioNoX: ok. i think there is a separate bug for nspluginwraper hanging [12:08]