[00:28] <dlemcoe> Hey hey
[00:28] <dlemcoe> Evolution is giving me this error when Launchpad tries to verify my GPG key after entering a fingerprint and receiveing the e-mail. http://pastebin.ca/1172145
[00:30] <dlemcoe> 116 people, anyone?
[00:31] <dlemcoe> ANYONE?
[00:40]  * thumper looks
[00:41] <thumper> dlemcoe: does evolution know about your gpg key?
[00:41] <thumper> dlemcoe: the message seems to indicate that it doesn't
[00:42] <thumper> dlemcoe: also, have you confirmed that launchpad has the correct public key for you?
[00:44] <dlemcoe> I;m sorry
[00:44] <dlemcoe> Evolution DOES know about it
[00:44] <dlemcoe> Launchpad has no keys, that is what i am trying to do
[00:45]  * thumper looks at his config
[00:45] <dlemcoe> hmmm how?
[00:46] <thumper> https://edge.launchpad.net/people/+me/+editpgpkeys
[00:48] <thumper> dlemcoe: the email says that it was encrypted with ELG-E key, ID 5DAC923E, does that match your public key?
[00:48] <dlemcoe> no
[00:48] <dlemcoe> wait, hold on
[00:48] <dlemcoe> no
[00:49] <thumper> did you type your GPG fingerprint or copy and paste?
[00:49] <dlemcoe> cp
[00:51] <thumper> what's your lp id?
[00:51] <dlemcoe> lp/
[00:51] <dlemcoe> ?
[00:52] <dlemcoe> 6B82861D
[00:52] <thumper> Launchpad user id
[00:52] <dlemcoe> oh rite
[00:53] <dlemcoe> WDC
[00:55] <thumper> dlemcoe: you are David Lemcoe right?
[00:55] <dlemcoe> i am
[00:55] <thumper> well the ubuntu keyserver knows who you are
[00:55] <dlemcoe> Well, how can I decrypt this e-mail message?
[00:57] <thumper> https://help.launchpad.net/YourAccount/ImportingYourPGPKey
[00:58] <thumper> dlemcoe: have you seen this page?
[00:58] <dlemcoe> yep
[00:59] <thumper> hmm
[00:59] <thumper> then it is time I asked for help :)
[00:59] <dlemcoe> I HAVE the e-mail asking me to authorize the pub key I put the fingerprint in for
[00:59] <dlemcoe> Look, how do I decrypt the ---BEGIN PGP MESSAGE--- thing?
[01:00] <dlemcoe> Sorry, i'm just fristrated, trying to sign the Ubuntu CodeofConduct to be a member, and it has taken about an hour of time to do nothing really
[01:03] <thumper> dlemcoe: a quick google suggests saving the message to a file and use "gpg -d filename"
[01:03] <dlemcoe> I type pgp
[01:03] <dlemcoe> paste the message, put in password, and it does not decrypt
[01:03] <dlemcoe> It just says what signed it, did I do it right?
[01:03] <thumper> you need to use -d to decrypt
[01:04] <dlemcoe> I just did, and it gave me no message
[01:05] <thumper> sorry, I don't know
[01:05] <dlemcoe> Well I do thank you for your time
[01:06] <Hobbsee> you typed pgp, not gpg?
[01:06] <Hobbsee> well, that's probably why it didn't work...
[05:32] <rohan> hi. can i edit my comments in launchpad? i can't find any option to do so
[05:32] <rohan> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/152286 --> in the last comment, i want to edit the "now" to "not"
[05:37] <mwhudson> nope
[12:26] <gimaker> is there some way of linking to *the latest version* of a file in loggerhead?
[12:27] <gimaker> I want to link to our NEWS file from elsewhere, but can only figure out how to get a link to the current revision
[12:29] <Peng_> Um..yes, I think.
[12:29] <lifeless> gimaker: use -1 for the rev
[12:29] <Peng_> Wait, can you change the revno in the URL to "-1"?
[12:29] <Peng_> Bah.
[12:29] <lifeless> gimaker: but you don't even need that for tip
[12:29] <lifeless> or maybe you do
[12:29] <lifeless> you shouldn't, it may still be a bug :)
[12:30] <Peng_> What?
[12:33] <lifeless> there is /files right, on a branch
[12:33] <lifeless> should have /files/FOO
[12:36] <jamesh> Peng_: try something like http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~USER/PROJECT/BRANCH/annotate/head:/FILENAME
[12:36] <jamesh> oops.  that was for gimaker
[12:38] <Peng_> Ooh, "head:". That's what I was trying to remember.
[12:39] <Peng_> Thanks.
[12:48] <gimaker> lifeless: thanks! that worked just fine!
[12:48] <gimaker> lifeless: not so obvious though :)
[12:49] <gimaker> lifeless: any way to get just the bare file without the annotation fluff?
[12:51] <jamesh> gimaker: not without your browser asking you where you want to save it
[12:51] <gimaker> jamesh: ok, thanks.
[12:51] <jamesh> you have the choice of seeing a cooked version of your content within your browser or saving it to disk
[12:51] <jamesh> things like viewvc's /*checkout*/ URLs are a security hole.
[12:52] <jamesh> at least they are if the branch authors are untrusted
[12:53] <gimaker> don't know what /*checkout*/ refers to...
[12:53] <Peng_> gimaker: It's how ViewVC lets you see the file directly.
[12:53] <jamesh> you can get viewvc to display versions of files directly in the browser with an appropriate mime type
[12:53] <jamesh> including HTML files
[12:53] <gimaker> oh yeah, I'm definately not to be trusted ;) the annotations are not a big deal though
[12:54] <jamesh> HTML files which could contain javascript and have access to anything in the same principal
[12:54] <gimaker> jamesh: html files viewed in a browser you say? now that does sound like a serious security hole :P
[12:54] <jamesh> gimaker: think cross site scripting
[12:55] <gimaker> jamesh: web security isn't my forte - but it does seem a bit overly paranoid. If you push a link that points to .html file then that's the type of things you should expect.
[12:56] <jamesh> [this is why bug attachments are served from launchpadlibrarian.net rather than launchpad.net too]
[12:56] <Peng_> jamesh: They could set up something on launchpadlibrarian.net to view files directly.
[12:57] <jamesh> Peng_: We wanted people to be able to view librarian files directly.  But such pages won't see any launchpad.net cookies
[12:57] <jamesh> or be able to post forms on launchpad.net
[12:58] <Peng_> Right.
[12:58] <jamesh> the idea being to make the attachments as harmless as pages on other sites
[12:59] <jamesh> gimaker: imagine you have a website running a source code browser where you don't trust all the committers, and also run some other web app on the same domain that displays private information to logged in users.
[13:00] <jamesh> gimaker: as a committer, I commit an HTML file that includes some javascript that grabs some of the private data from other parts of the site and posts it back to me
[13:01] <jamesh> gimaker: if I can convince you to visit that HTML file in the source code browser, then I can steal your private data
[13:01] <jamesh> most people consider that a bad thing
[13:02] <jamesh> now, for a personal project you might trust all the developers.  For Launchpad, we'll host anyone's code
[13:03] <jamesh> While we'd do something about evil branches like that, it makes sense to limit the possible damage.
[13:15] <\sh> hmmm...is it planed to have this "retry build" action inside the ppa archive view and not anymore on the build-records page? :)
[13:27] <gimaker> jamesh: understood and agreed. thanks for the help!
[13:31] <klette> gmb: Any ETA on the move to the production env. ?
[13:32] <gmb> klette: Should happen this afternoon once our sysadmin team come online. I'll ping you as soon as its up.
[13:33] <klette> gmb: ah, ok. Thanks.
[13:33] <gmb> klette: One of the joys of working in a multi-timezone company :)
[13:33] <klette> hehe
[13:53] <persia> bigjools: Any chance the +packages preview could go back on dogfood?  I miss it already.
[13:54] <bigjools> persia: :)  sure.  BTW you know it's not up-to-date right?
[13:54] <bigjools> it will land on edge tonight / the weekend
[13:54] <persia> bigjools: That's OK.  I seems to only be about 2 months behind, and so *significantly* reduces the amount of manual searching I have to do.
[13:55] <persia> Oh, if it's going to edge, never mind.  While I'm not a beta-tester, I can get someone to proxy it next week.
[13:55] <bigjools> persia: BTW did you prefer the listing with the non-published sources too?
[13:56] <persia> Yes, very much so.  Thos indicate valid work, even though it has been superseded
[13:56] <persia> I also agree with the rest of wgrant's comments on the page :)
[13:57] <bigjools> ok - I will need you to file a new bug if you don't mind, the change that is landing does not have that in it because I didn't have time to fully regression test it before our release deadline
[13:58] <persia> bigjools: OK.  I'll wait for it to land, and file the cosmetic bugs.  It's scheduled for next week's rollout?
[13:58] <bigjools> persia: yup
[13:58] <persia> :~
[13:58] <persia> :) !
[14:01] <ignas> hi
[14:02] <ignas> is there a way to add comments to files/lines/checkins when reviewing a branch for a merge?
[17:02] <gmb> klette: http://bugs.launchpad.net/nav
[17:02] <gmb> Enjoy :)
[17:05] <klette> ohhh
[17:19] <Artemis_Fowl> how do I delete a code import from launchpad?
[18:37] <megabyte405_> I'm getting the error that my ppa upload was rejected due to missing/corrupted files despite the fact I did a dpkg-buildpackage -S -sa
[18:38] <megabyte405_> is there any other trick I might need?  The packaging is OK - I am just modifying the control, rules, and changelog to add a feature in, and uploading it to a new team ppa
[18:54] <jam> hey, I had a question about releases. When you create a new release for a series, does an announcement get made?
[19:30] <kiko> jam, no, you need to do that manually. we're going to be making the release process a lot slicker this time around
[19:30] <kiko> megabyte405_, what does the error message say?
[19:30] <jam> thanks kiko
[19:31] <jam> I couldn't remember if I did it manually for 1.5, and the announcement looks identical to the release page.
[19:31] <kiko> jam, you probably c-n-p'd it :)
[19:32] <jam> kiko: most likely. I just didn't find a "make a release announcement" in our release document, so I'm not sure how I knew to do it at the time :)
[19:32] <jam> then again, it was 4 months ago
[19:42] <doko> barry: I was asked at debconf about https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/226447
[19:43] <barry> doko: i have no word on it, but i will assign it to me and look into it
[19:45] <doko> barry: you had the misfortune of being around, couldn't find matsubara here ... ;)
[19:45] <barry> doko: no problem :)
[19:45] <barry> doko: for some reason, people always come to me with email problems
[19:45]  * doko wonders why ...
[20:28] <Ursinha> doko, you can poke me now too about issues you normally would address matsubara
[20:28] <Ursinha> :)
[21:03] <doko> Ursinha: will do in the future, just wanted to pass this issue on
[21:04] <Ursinha> doko, ok
[21:09] <therve> hello!
[21:09] <therve> just to mention that I had a weird problem with the latest bzr when pushing a branch on lp
[21:09] <therve> https://code.launchpad.net/~therve/storm/postgres-autocommit
[21:10] <therve> I was using 1.6rc2 available at http://ppa.launchpad.net/bzr/ubuntu
[21:11] <therve> I have to go now, but I'll try to open a bug with more infos later
[21:35] <Ursinha> therve, thanks for that :)
[22:01] <mwhudson> therve: the bzr on bazaar.launchpad.net doesn't support stacking yet
[22:20] <mrooney> Hello, is this the right place to ask about @ubuntu.com forwards for Ubuntu members?
[22:21] <jpds> mrooney: Probably not, what's up?
[22:22] <mrooney> jpds: okay, two people told me launchpad sets that up, but it sounded odd to me :)
[22:23] <jpds> mrooney: It uses your primary email address set on Launchpad.
[22:23] <mrooney> anyway I was accepted as an ubuntu last thursday and the membership pages say your LP id will be automatically set up as a forward to your primary launchpad address
[22:23] <mrooney> but it turns out someone already has a forward of my launchpad ID
[22:23] <mrooney> so, I am not sure what happened
[22:23] <jpds> mrooney: The script turns every two days.
[22:24] <jpds> s/turns/runs/
[22:24] <mrooney> yeah so I guess, what happens when it can't set up the forward because it is already taken?
[22:24] <jpds> mrooney: I'd try asking in #canonical-sysadmin.
[22:24] <mrooney> jpds: okay, thanks!
[23:15] <kirkland> i'm looking for some basic bzr-git magic
[23:15] <kirkland> i've branched lp:bzr-git
[23:16] <kirkland> i suppose i need to copy that and rename it into my ~/.bazaar/plugins
[23:16] <kirkland> and then run bzr <something>, but I'm having trouble figuring out those steps
[23:16] <mwhudson> generally the rule is 'bzr get lp:bzr-<foo> ~/.bazaar/plugins/<foo>'
[23:17] <mwhudson> then i would _guess_ you just run bzr branch git://whatever
[23:45] <lifeless> kirkland: there should be a README or INSTALL doc
[23:46] <kirkland> lifeless: it does, it's just not terribly informative
[23:46] <kirkland> Unable to load plugin 'git' from '/home/kirkland/.bazaar/plugins'
[23:46] <kirkland> bzr: ERROR: Unsupported protocol for url "git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mhalcrow/ecryptfs-utils.git"