[00:28] tacone: yep [00:28] nothing, I wrote to you on the ml, about the apache thingie. [00:29] I am not anymore sure it wasn't our fault though. [02:21] can someone help to install ubuntu server with software raid1 please [02:21] i still couldnt do it, after 6+ hours [02:22] took me a while to figure out too. [02:23] is there any tutorial/guide, im kinda linux noob too "/ [02:23] on help.ubuntu.com is the server guide [02:24] i looked but there's nothing on Raid1 [02:24] different raids use all the same steps [02:24] just you need to seelct raid1 not raid[other] at the right moment [02:26] vladdY: you can try the instructions in the develpment version of the serverguide: http://doc.ubuntu.com/~mdke/test/serverguide/C/advanced-installation.html [02:28] sommer: this is very useful link, thanks [02:29] vladdY: cool, if you have any feedback concerning the guide please let me know [02:33] sommer: did you write the kerberos section? [02:33] jmedina: yeppers [02:33] it's new for intrepid as well [02:34] sommer: you know how easy is use openldap as a database backend for MIT? [02:34] I've been working with heimdall and I think it is best documented, and afaik, samba4 works with heimdall [02:34] jmedina: I haven't actually done that yet, but it's on my todo list if there's time [02:35] jmedina: from the quick look I took at it a while back, it doesn't seem too complicated [02:35] * jmedina hates time [02:35] jmedina: add the schema file, add the kerberos attributes to the users, configure the kdc to use ldap... boom :) [02:36] sommer: pretty easy.... [02:36] :P [02:36] well in theory, heh [02:38] the instructions for heimdal http://www.h5l.org/manual/heimdal-1-2-branch/info/heimdal.html#Using-LDAP-to-store-the-database [02:38] sommer: any reason to choose mit? [02:40] jmedina: mit is in main... so for the "official" docs we try to stick to packages in main, where possible anyway [02:40] jmedina: I did some testing with heimdal, it is slightly simpler to setup and configure [02:41] ok [02:53] sommer: thanks again for that link, it helped a lot, i think i got it running [02:53] is there any easier way to test to make sure it works other than unplugging hd from motherboard :) [03:22] hm, raid1 ubuntu server won't start if i unplug one of the hard drives, computer is stuck in "verifying DMI pool data" [03:32] hm, i know im probably boring but have to ask [03:32] how can i Setup so that the other partition(disk) is bootable too using ubuntu server on raid1 [03:33] vladdY: are you running hardy? [03:33] 8.04 [03:33] i honestly dont know which version is that [03:33] vladdY: 8.04 is the latest... this howto may help: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/SoftwareRAID [03:34] vladdY: you can probably start at the "Adding GRUB to 2nd drive" section [03:35] the issue is being worked on for Intrepid, so in the future you won't have to go through the extra steps [03:37] sommer: thanks again :) [03:38] so, if I disconnect one hd, it should run from another one, correct or is there something I have to do (restore mbr or....) [03:39] vladdY: I guess, once you've installed grub on the second hard drive and added the script to the initramfs, it should work fine [03:40] vladdY: I've never actually used those instructions, so it's probably a good idea to test things before putting the machine into production [03:40] sommer: ok, thank you very much for all your help [03:41] vladdY: np [03:55] why would ports.conf in etc/apache2 be empty in pico/vi but have data/characters in the file when opened in desktop environment gedit?? [04:06] does anyone know where i can find iptables config? === afk_away is now known as folke [07:39] Do I win a prize for storing ~56k copies of ubuntu-8.04.1-server-amd64.iso in a tape library? :) [07:39] just in case it gets lost, I mean [08:13] moin [12:56] New bug: #259363 in apache2 (main) "Need to source envvars before being able to use 'apache2' binary." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/259363 [13:14] hey all, I have the strangest problem, having extremely poor network performance slowdown when copying to an NFS NAS volume, will get a peak of 20-30MBps then almost no activity for about 40 seconds then another little peak. I have tried putting in an intel pro1000 network card, cable change etc, still same problem. However if I boot off the live cd and try the same thing I get a sustained 55MBps working perfectly....any i [13:14] deas? [13:17] trentster: you boot the client that is copying the data with livecd, or the server? maybe compare nfs client versions and options? [13:18] thefish, the client I booted the livecd on. [13:19] the server is actually a dedicated NAS appliance server [13:20] i guess you mount the nfs dir and then copy? maybe the mount options are a bit different? or the client version? [13:21] naah the mount options are identical [13:21] I think the versions of nfs are the same as well, I will double check.. [13:21] I think something else on the machine is interfering with it. === mish_ is now known as thefish [13:34] trentster: what are you using for the copy? just cp? [13:35] thefish, yes [13:35] just cp [13:36] trentster: sorry, not sure - i have seen it where a gui file manager eg nautilus will be really slow, and cp will be fast [13:36] no iptables or anything like that? [13:37] thefish, no iptables [13:37] its a very strange one [13:38] have you seen http://www.unix.com.ua/orelly/networking_2ndEd/nfs/ch18_01.htm [13:38] maybe some bits in there that could help [13:39] please say what fixes it ;) [13:41] thefish, thanks I will let you know......I am busy getting ready to test via FTP to see if its def NFS related only or a general problem. [13:41] fair enough [13:43] wow, its slow on ftp as well getting 6MBps [13:43] it starts off super fast 50MBPS for 3-4 secs.....then slow....allmost like a buffering problem or something. [13:46] did you check your NIC with mii-diag ? on both setups you test ? [13:47] migh be that one runs in full and the other in half duplex [13:51] thanks for the help guys, gonna reboot and try continue troubleshooting [14:32] erichammond1, so dist-upgrade = kernel upgrade? [14:57] zul: do you have time today to sponsor some init script changes? [14:57] zul: the status action stuff [14:58] kirkland: sure [14:59] kirkland: just send me the list and I will get to them today sometime [14:59] zul: okay, will do [15:01] !seen [diablo] [15:01] I have no seen command [15:01] bugger [15:32] Server team meeting in #ubuntu-meeting in 30 minutes: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/Meeting [15:32] There is still time to propose another item for discussion.... [15:34] will there be tea and coffee? [15:34] * Oliber runs away ;) [15:35] Oliber: Yes - but it will be distributed tea and coffee - just like our source control :) [15:35] The good news is the Ubuntu wiki is so slow if makes bzr feel fast in comparison. [15:35] with pockets of milk, cookies, water and other beverages that fit the local culture and timezone [15:36] ScottK-laptop: You think? Hm... It feels pretty snappy to me. [15:37] Which the wiki or bzr? [15:37] I mean the wiki. [15:37] I'm editing. [15:38] editmoin or web? [15:38] Web. [15:38] Ah. Wouldn't know about that. [15:38] * soren <3 editmoin [15:39] Well right now every time I go to the meeting page it wants me to login. [15:39] I login and it takes me to the main page. [15:39] I go to the meeting page it wants me to login. [15:39] Rinse repeat. [15:39] Which browser? [15:39] So it's faster now. [15:39] Konqueror. [15:40] * ScottK-laptop tries another one. [15:41] Works in Firefox. [16:13] nijaba: mirror? [16:13] nijaba: i added the debconf entry to mdadm, at "medium" priority. this will not popup during the installer, and will set the default to "no" [16:14] nijaba: it would be trivial to raise the priority to make it popup the question, however, that might need more of a consensus [16:14] nijaba: i would be very much in favor of that [16:14] nijaba: but i left that part of the patch for later, so as not to embargo the rest of the functionality [16:15] kirkland: my question was more whether the default Raid1 install would duplicate /boot on both disk now [16:16] nijaba: oh, the MBR ... yes, it should [16:16] kirkland: great [16:16] nijaba: the code is there, but it hasn't made it into an ISO yet, so I haven't tested it [16:16] nijaba: I tested it "by hand", but not "by ISO" :-) [16:16] kirkland: let me know when it is there, I'll give it a go as well [16:16] arakthor: Let me get you some links. [16:16] ScottK-laptop, ok === chmac7 is now known as chmac [16:18] arakthor: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ClamavSpamassassinInMain is the basic spec that lists the MIR that need to be done. [16:19] what is a MIR? [16:19] MainInclusionReport [16:19] Main Inclusion Report. [16:19] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MainInclusionProcess describes the process. [16:19] ScottK-laptop: as I've told you some time ago I'd like to do the clamav MIR is there a deadline time to do so ?? [16:19] This is how we get stuff 'promoted' to be supported. [16:20] leonel: We need it approved prior to Aug 29. [16:20] This would be a good time to work on them. [16:20] arakthor: Were you interested in Spamassassin too or just Clamav? [16:20] wow 10 days [16:20] Yes. [16:20] * ScottK-laptop notes he's been asking for help for weeks. [16:20] ehm, either or. I'm more interested in lending a hand and seeing how it goes [16:21] arakthor: OK. The Spamassassin ones are almost all Perl modules. They tend to be relatively easy. [16:21] And leonel is going to work on clamav anyway. [16:21] alright [16:21] arakthor and leonel: Please mark in the wiki what you are working on so there is no duplication of effort. [16:22] ScottK, alright. I will probably use another handle, kstewart, because I have it registered on launchpad ettc. [16:22] OK. [16:22] ScottK-laptop: ok [16:23] I need to leave in about 5 minutes, so if you have questions, please ask them now. I'll be back in a few hours. [16:23] I'm glad to review work in progress or answer questions. [16:23] ScottK-laptop: will you be online tomorrow ? [16:23] Yes. Most of the day. [16:23] ScottK-laptop: ok I'll contact you [16:24] no questions atm, thanks. [16:25] Great. [17:04] hi everyone! [17:04] anyone here using heirloom.mailx the new "nail" to send emails from command line / cron? [17:07] i've a script that executes "nail command" with no problem via commandline but via cron the email just doesn't go to the destiny recipients, and it produces the dead.letter [17:07] anyone experienced this before? [17:08] byte_slave: any cron log? [17:09] cron log just says "Aug 19 16:55:01 elsa /USR/SBIN/CRON[4588]: (root) CMD (/root/scripts/est_disk_space_monitor.pl)" [17:09] no reference about any error or access denied or whatelse [17:09] Greetings! [17:09] hi! [17:10] I have a question I'd like to prose. I've recently upgraded from Gutsy to Hardy, and my ftp user disappeared from /etc/passwd. Why would that happen? [17:10] byte_slave, how's it going? [17:11] Fenix|work, not that good actually, nail just doesn't work sending email via cron.... [17:12] nail? or mail? [17:13] I guess they're both the same thing :) [17:13] google tells me nail is a replacement for mailx [17:14] byte_slave: and why nail instead clasic mailx? [17:16] i heard nice things about nail, and its simple to setup and supports smtp [17:16] mail doesn't as far as i know [17:17] byte_slave, what are you trying to accomplish? [17:17] well, simple... a perl script goes check disk space and if space lower than x% i receive an email [17:17] manually script runs perfectly [17:17] via cron not working [17:18] cron is running the script as root [17:18] should work i guess [17:20] are you using mail in your script? [17:20] im using NAIL [17:20] byte_slave: mail doesnt what? [17:20] support smtp? [17:20] byte_slave, I understand NAIL will alias mail and mailx when you install for backwards compatability [17:20] compatibility [17:21] no alias, NAIL is a very cool comamndline tool [17:22] jmedina, i guess not, but anyway i guess to have mail working i should have a "full MTA" working and with "NAIL solution" i found i just use NAIL + msmtp [17:23] byte_slave: that is not true [17:23] you can use mailx +ssmtp [17:23] ssmtp it has support for SMTP AUTH, so you can send mail trough a mail relay host (smarthost) [17:24] hello all, i have installed pptp vpn server, but vpn-clients use my DNS server to resolve anything instead of their server [17:24] maybe i was making confusion about "SMTP AUTH" which is actually what i need [17:25] jmedina, nail is heirloom-mailx in the package tree no? [17:25] * Abron_Gru is back (gone 18:01:01) [17:26] Fenix|work: dont know, last time I used nail was in slackware about 3 years ago [17:26] nail is now known as heirloom-mailx, thats true [17:27] used nail with gentoo, but I don't have a preference... I just install mailutils and everything works [17:27] or mail-utils, can't remember which connotation [17:27] but mailutils installs exim right?= [17:27] byte_slave, just portions of it... not the full blown exim [17:28] i'll try use mailx..... i'll remove nail and see what happens [17:35] i still cant get Raid1 to run properly, after I unplug one disk I'm unable to boot into ubuntu server [17:35] i have followed everything from https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/SoftwareRAID#Troubleshooting [17:35] any clue [17:40] vladdY: this has been discussed lately on the mailing list. Apparently, linux will not boot to a degraded RAID array. [17:40] your information is safe, but you will have to boot to a live CD and rebuild the array before you can boot back into it. [17:41] I haven't followed it too close though, as I've only used software raid to protect data drives, and never tried it for the /boot or root partitions. [17:42] I believe they are trying to get this patched in the kernel before the next Ubuntu release [17:43] Brazen: he doesnt need to rebuild the raid, only install grub in the mirror disk [17:43] well and rebuild initramfs [17:45] arakthor: I'm here briefly if you've come up with any questions. [17:45] Wouldn't grub already be installed in the mirrored partition? Like I said, I didn't follow the issue too closely. [17:46] Brazen: You only boot from one, so no. [17:47] ScottK-laptop, what6's involved in the source code review? [17:47] ScottK-laptop, also, should I start with a dependency of SA or just the SA package? [17:47] arakthor: Review it for sound security practices. If you aren't up for that, just say no. It's not a hard requirement. [17:47] Do the dependencies first. [17:48] ok, thanks. [17:48] That way when SA gets done the answer to are all the depends in Main will be yes. [17:55] New bug: #259477 in mysql-dfsg-5.0 (main) "mailx should not be Recommends" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/259477 [17:56] * ScottK-laptop runs to mark that confirmed. [18:20] do you guys have any reference to that mailing list thread on booting from degraded raid1 [18:21] also, forgot to mention, this is software raid too, running on 2 disks [18:27] Brazen: did you try those instructions? [18:27] from https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/SoftwareRAID [18:28] hi all [18:28] zul: ping? :) [18:30] ivoks: yo [18:30] wazup? :) [18:31] same old, same old... good times, heh [18:31] ivoks: yo [18:31] nice [18:31] zul: yeah... um... those bacula bugs [18:31] zul: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16211559/bacula-2.debdiff [18:31] ivoks: uploaded that this morning [18:31] zul: that's a patch for bacula in -proposed [18:32] in intrepid, right [18:32] but how about hardy? [18:33] and in hardy-proposed [18:33] that patch solves SRU problems [18:33] ok [18:33] its sitting there waiting to be accepted [18:56] New bug: #259479 in php5 (main) "php5 crashed with SIGSEGV in _Unwind_ForcedUnwind()" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/259479 [19:24] can someone please confirm that solution from https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/SoftwareRAID works [19:27] let' see [19:28] vladdY: yes [19:29] <_jmedina> vladdY: why dont you ask kirkland, I think he wrote the doc and he is working on that theme for intrepid inclusion [20:11] Is there a static version of bash and friends i can use on ubuntu server? [20:11] or at least anything not linked against libselinux [20:12] trying to apt-get remove libselinux looks really scary since it tries to pull everything out [20:12] why would you remove it? [20:13] selinux isn't enabled on ubuntu, by default [20:13] applications are compiled with support for it, if someone decides to enable it [20:13] i know, i just dont want a userspace with libselinux support for it [20:14] is there a version of ubuntu with a clean userspace? [20:14] then you'll need to recompile... everything :) [20:14] clean userspace? [20:14] what's clean? [20:15] just libc and libssl/tls, the basics [20:16] bash is clean :) [20:18] you know libc can be compiled with support for lots of things, so having only libc isn't a guaranatee that something is clean, whatever that means [20:19] or your could use gentoo ;) [20:19] whois vikram [20:19] doh.. [20:19] :) [20:20] i don't think gentoo is clean [20:20] anyway... take care... [20:39] zul, i is who i is [20:50] New bug: #259538 in samba (main) "computer reboots during winbind configuration" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/259538 [21:00] hey, [21:03] I have my main domain that I use for the server, eg: example.com and with that I have mail.example.com that is used for all email. Other domains, say 'domain.com' are hosted there and all email is sent and received via 'mail.example.com' - though the email addresses are still 'foo@domain.com'. I'm wondering if I have to set an MX record for the 'domain.com' zone that points to 'mail.example.com' [21:04] Yes. [21:04] I currently don't set this, and it works fine. The reason I use mail.example.com instead of mail.domain.com for all other domains is that I use SSL/TSL for it, and so the certificate only covers mail.example.com [21:05] In the absence of an MX record, one is supposed to try and deliver to the A. [21:05] If it's all on the same box it'll work. [21:05] ScottK, ok, so before I was basically relying on an undocumented feature/correction thingy, and I should really set the MX record for it? [21:05] I do not, however, recommend relying on the implicit MX rule. [21:06] ok, that's what I thought - I'll make sure I set it now [21:06] It's documented in RFC 821 and 2821, it's just not something I'd be so certain people get right that I rely on it. [21:06] true [21:06] <_jmedina> AlexC_ it is a good practice to use MX record for every domain, not all the MTA out there know how to act when they can't find a MX record [21:07] thanks very much ScottK _jmedina [21:08] <_jmedina> Alexc_ and your config is ok for SSL/TLS and single IP with multi domains [21:08] <_jmedina> the same when you use SPF [21:09] wont it complain that the cert is for a different domain? [21:10] <_jmedina> when? [21:10] just wanted to say that [21:10] if I used mail.domain.com instead of mail.example.com [21:10] oops [21:10] since the SSL cert is for mail.example.com [21:11] https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/SoftwareRAID does work, thank you very much for great work on ubuntu server [21:11] and for support :) [21:12] <_jmedina> vladdY: so what was the problem? [21:13] i dont know, i think i didn't wait 180 seconds :) [21:13] just did clean reinstall, switched it few times back and forth disconnecting each hd and worked everytime [21:14] _jmedina: He's right. Most MUAs will warn for that. [21:14] i was able to rebuild array and everything worked without any problems, including postgresql [21:15] <_jmedina> ScottK_ the he needs to setup MUAs with mail.example.com or whatever the cert's CN says [21:16] Right, so it's less complex if he just uses that for everything. === freaky[t] is now known as c1|freaky === c1|freaky is now known as freaky[t] [23:33] sommer: _jmedina and vladdyy are asking about a RAID document above [23:33] sommer: it's incorrectly attributed to me... I didn't write it :-) [23:34] sommer: though I've written a lot of patches on the matter lately [23:48] What is the difference between mailx and mailutils? [23:49] (In terms of functionality) [23:52] wantok: Morning