[01:28] shouldn't libswt-mozilla-gtk depend on xulrunner? [06:04] good morning === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach [12:24] slytherin: hi, do you have a little time to review netbeans packages? persia seems to be overwhelmingly busy. Or maybe you can recommend someone I can ask? [12:25] Juli_: I don't have time right now. But I will try to do it in night. After another 6 hours or so. But I must admit that netbeans is too huge for my packaging experience. [12:26] Thanks! It would be great anyway... [12:27] there are number of little libs, they also need a review [12:28] and NetBeans is not so big:) furthermore it is update for existing package. [12:31] This are bug's I've created for new and updated packages: 253016, 252658, 252978, 253353, 253066 [12:31] I'll appreciate any help. [12:36] Juli_: will check [12:38] :) [14:19] LucidFox: howdy [14:19] hello slytherin [14:20] LucidFox: are you free these days? [14:20] What's needed? [14:22] LucidFox: I was wondering if you can find time to update fop. I saw one request on debian-java mailing list but debian maintainer doesn't have time. [14:27] Update fop? [14:27] To a new upstream version? [14:29] LucidFox: yes [14:30] 0.95 [14:59] Gosh, how big is the upstream tarball anyway? [14:59] 10 MB and still downloading [15:09] slytherin> Does fop 0.95 need a dependency on ant-optional? [15:18] LucidFox: You can run fop standalone without ant. Only the fop ant task needs library from ant-optional. [15:38] LucidFox: got to go home. see you later. [17:17] Hello, can someone look at this bug #254368 ? [17:17] Launchpad bug 254368 in openjdk "openjdk-6-jdk should depend on libxt-dev" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/254368 [17:22] I filed that bug 2 weeks ago === geser_ is now known as geser