| asac | @time | 00:18 |
|---|---|---|
| ubottu | Current time in Etc/UTC: August 20 2008, 23:18:37 - Next meeting: Arizona LoCo IRC in 4 days | 00:18 |
| === `6og is now known as kgoetz | ||
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| === willguaraldi_ is now known as willguaraldi | ||
| [reed] | What's a way to get the current libgtk2.0 version if you don't have libgtk2.0-dev installed (and can't use pkg-config because of that)? | 08:25 |
| asac | [reed]: gtk_major_version constant? | 08:29 |
| [reed] | I want a one-liner I can give people to run on the command line | 08:29 |
| [reed] | to get their current GTK+ version | 08:29 |
| asac | [reed]: i think you need C for that ... or python if they have that installed? | 08:30 |
| asac | unless you want to depend on packaging of course | 08:31 |
| [reed] | lame | 08:31 |
| [reed] | oh well | 08:31 |
| asac | [reed]: wait a second ;) | 08:32 |
| [reed] | I'm looking for a solution that's cross-distro, too | 08:33 |
| [reed] | pkg-config would have worked, but it requires the dev package | 08:33 |
| [reed] | which is lame | 08:33 |
| [reed] | :( | 08:33 |
| gnomefreak | no ome sees me here | 08:33 |
| asac | [reed]: mozilla could provie that info in about -> dialog ;) | 08:34 |
| gnomefreak | what does this package do? libpam-runtime | 08:35 |
| gnomefreak | IIRC pam == the password dialog | 08:35 |
| asac | its a authentication framework | 08:37 |
| gnomefreak | crap | 08:37 |
| asac | allows you to plugin in new auth mechanisms | 08:37 |
| gnomefreak | its badly broken | 08:38 |
| asac | [reed]: in python you can type: | 08:40 |
| asac | import gtk | 08:40 |
| asac | gtk.gtk_version | 08:40 |
| asac | that should give you the version without the need to link or such ;) | 08:40 |
| asac | of course depends on gtk + python + pygtk | 08:41 |
| gnomefreak | ok im going back to bed itx early (3:44) | 08:45 |
| asac | gnomefreak: sleep tight | 08:45 |
| XioNoX | hi ! | 09:10 |
| fta | strings /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so* | grep 2.0 | head | 09:11 |
| fta | but using the distro pkg tool is probably better | 09:12 |
| [reed] | fta: looking for distro-agnostic method | 09:16 |
| kgoetz | [reed]: looks the most agnostic to me ;) | 09:19 |
| [reed] | yeah | 09:19 |
| [reed] | my reply was to <fta> but using the distro pkg tool is probably better | 09:19 |
| [reed] | I like fta's command | 09:19 |
| noiesmo | can i ask a question about thunderbird extensions here | 09:26 |
| fta | [reed], doesn't work with debian though :( | 09:27 |
| asac | i dont see any version with the command above ;) | 09:56 |
| asac | fta: doesnt even work here ;) | 09:57 |
| asac | but maybe thats because of my cloak ;)= | 09:59 |
| XioNoX | asac, it is more difficult that I've though :( | 10:26 |
| XioNoX | the js don't update the content of the richlistbox | 10:28 |
| asac | XioNoX: what are you on atm? | 10:41 |
| asac | implementing your own application-like dialog, right? | 10:41 |
| XioNoX | yes | 10:41 |
| XioNoX | I can show you what I've done | 10:43 |
| asac | go ahead | 10:43 |
| XioNoX | http://pastebin.mozilla.org/521817 | 10:44 |
| XioNoX | and | 10:44 |
| XioNoX | http://pastebin.mozilla.org/521818 | 10:44 |
| asac | so you need box in richlistitem? | 10:46 |
| XioNoX | the application tab have a box element | 10:48 |
| XioNoX | so i've done the same thing | 10:48 |
| asac | XioNoX: did you see that in code or DOM inspector? | 10:48 |
| XioNoX | dom | 10:48 |
| XioNoX | it is very powerfull | 10:48 |
| asac | XioNoX: yes. but what you see there is wrong ;) | 10:49 |
| XioNoX | because of xml ? | 10:49 |
| asac | well not really wrong, but it pretends to be different to what you have to code | 10:49 |
| asac | XioNoX: yes. what you see in DOM is the final dom hierarchy... this includes automatically generated elements | 10:50 |
| asac | if you define in xbl richlistitem like: | 10:50 |
| XioNoX | but the what you see in the xul file work | 10:50 |
| asac | <box> | 10:50 |
| asac | <children/> | 10:50 |
| asac | </box> | 10:50 |
| XioNoX | only the implementation of js don't | 10:50 |
| asac | it will look in dom inspector as if <richlistitem><box><test/></box></richlistitem> is senseful xul | 10:50 |
| asac | XioNoX: right. please do what the .js file does | 10:50 |
| XioNoX | i've try it too | 10:51 |
| XioNoX | but with the same result | 10:51 |
| asac | XioNoX: in dom inspector the "red" elements are generated implicitly by xbl | 10:52 |
| XioNoX | yeah, i know that | 10:52 |
| asac | XioNoX: ok. remove everything except the header from this .xul | 10:54 |
| asac | and just copy the code from application.js | 10:54 |
| XioNoX | the full .js ? | 10:54 |
| asac | no ... the _rebuildView code? | 10:55 |
| XioNoX | ok, but this function use others functions and the XUL of the applications.xul | 11:01 |
| XioNoX | and preferences.xul | 11:01 |
| XioNoX | in the application.xul there are a richlistbox with the headder stuff | 11:04 |
| asac | XioNoX: right. you need that richtlistbox in your xul | 11:18 |
| asac | the rebuildView thing doesnt really do much | 11:18 |
| asac | copy that code... replace dynamic elements with static elements for now | 11:18 |
| asac | shouldnt be a big problem | 11:18 |
| XioNoX | var _list = document.getElementById("pluginsList"); | 11:24 |
| XioNoX | alert(_list); | 11:24 |
| XioNoX | return null | 11:24 |
| XioNoX | but I have this in my xul : <richlistbox id="pluginsList" orient="vertical" persist="lastSelectedType"> | 11:24 |
| asac | XioNoX: well .... maybe you are not in the same document? | 11:39 |
| XioNoX | I think I'am | 11:40 |
| XioNoX | it is the same xul file that I've pastbin you | 11:40 |
| asac | XioNoX: well if you run that code before it has been loaded you wont find anything | 11:41 |
| asac | you have to put that in a function that gets run when the doucment is loaded | 11:41 |
| asac | or am i wrong= | 11:41 |
| XioNoX | ok | 11:42 |
| XioNoX | We are going to lunch, i'll fix taht after | 11:42 |
| XioNoX | see you | 11:42 |
| XioNoX | asac, ok, it work :) I've just put the javascript line of the xul at the end of the xul file :) | 11:50 |
| asac | XioNoX: thats ugly | 11:51 |
| asac | use the "load" event please | 11:51 |
| XioNoX | i know i know, it was just for testing :) | 11:56 |
| asac | haha | 12:06 |
| gnomefreak | there is a new email virus out. it comes from airlines with attachment (dont open it) | 12:39 |
| Kamping_Kaiser | ... | 12:48 |
| gnomefreak | ;) | 12:54 |
| gnomefreak | anyone use liferea? | 12:56 |
| * asac lunch | 12:57 | |
| asac | gnomefreak: fta uses it | 12:57 |
| Jazzva | gnomefreak, me and fta, AFAIK | 12:57 |
| gnomefreak | its broken | 12:57 |
| gnomefreak | it frezzes up | 12:57 |
| Jazzva | gnomefreak, really? fta asked for a sponsor yesterday (or the day before) to upload new version. Are you talking about that one? | 12:58 |
| gnomefreak | it might be the updates causing it but i will find out | 12:58 |
| Jazzva | ok | 12:58 |
| gnomefreak | term is freazing up as well | 12:59 |
| * gnomefreak needs a dictionary today | 13:00 | |
| gnomefreak | i guess i go for smoke until updates are done | 13:00 |
| gnomefreak | look out for http://www.savvywallet.com/2008/07/25/bogus-virus-email-affecting-sun-country-airlines/ im looking into what it does | 13:16 |
| XioNoX | asac, how can I doo the mimetype ==> human readable conversion ? window.navigator.plugins dont seam to have mimetypes | 13:43 |
| asac | XioNoX: ill give you something .... just ignore that for now ;) | 14:16 |
| XioNoX | hu ? | 14:17 |
| asac | XioNoX: i'll try to find a solution to map a mime-type to a readable name ;) | 14:23 |
| XioNoX | I'm trying | 14:24 |
| XioNoX | and I thing I'm not far | 14:24 |
| XioNoX | yeah it is almost working | 14:24 |
| XioNoX | asac, check this please : http://pastebin.mozilla.org/521909 | 14:28 |
| XioNoX | the loop stop too early | 14:29 |
| XioNoX | and don't go througs all mimetypes | 14:29 |
| Wulfie | hey folks, a while back I asked in here and someone showed me how to change the default "zoom" behaviour in Firefox 3 back to the old behaviour (changing text size not zooming everything) . . . how do I change that back :) | 14:31 |
| Wulfie | a browser.zoom.full | 14:33 |
| Wulfie | thanks folks | 14:34 |
| XioNoX | asac, sorry, it is ok :) | 14:35 |
| asac | good | 14:38 |
| asac | let me know when we get to the next step ;) | 14:38 |
| XioNoX | nxt step ? | 14:41 |
| XioNoX | not i'm attacking the dropdown menu | 14:41 |
| XioNoX | who appear when we clic on the line | 14:42 |
| asac | yeah | 14:44 |
| asac | thats the right thing | 14:44 |
| asac | for now just display the matching plugins available | 14:44 |
| asac | and the current default | 14:44 |
| asac | which is: | 14:44 |
| asac | 1. identified by its .so path ... if there is a pref | 14:44 |
| asac | 2. or the first plugin in the list that matches | 14:44 |
| asac | (so quite simple) | 14:45 |
| asac | (though indirect) | 14:45 |
| XioNoX | . or the first plugin in the list that matches ? | 14:46 |
| gnomefreak | Jazzva: you gonna be around today? | 14:53 |
| asac | XioNoX: yes. thats correct | 14:53 |
| asac | in the plugins array == list | 14:53 |
| asac | browser.plugins | 14:53 |
| XioNoX | ok | 14:54 |
| XioNoX | now i'm trying to understand how the menu works | 14:54 |
| gnomefreak | bug 492837 | 14:55 |
| gnomefreak | !test | 14:55 |
| ubottu | sigh... again? I'm busy here, I already told you it failed. | 14:55 |
| gnomefreak | wtf is wrong with you | 14:55 |
| asac | !test | 14:56 |
| ubottu | sigh... again? I'm busy here, I already told you it failed. | 14:56 |
| asac | works ;) | 14:56 |
| gnomefreak | yeah just fixed the plugin for bugs but the person sent email with that bug in subject and its not a bug | 15:07 |
| gnomefreak | ok someone pushed diggler to Intrepid but from looking at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Extensions/List?action=show&redirect=MozillaTeam%2FFirefox3Extensions neo diggler is the one that should be pushed to archives once its worked on | 15:08 |
| gnomefreak | are they going to conflict? | 15:08 |
| gnomefreak | once i find out what is wrong with my rules file i will sttart getting info needed for neo | 15:10 |
| Jazzva | gnomefreak, pretty much, but still working on this school project | 15:10 |
| Jazzva | gnomefreak, to find out if diggler and neo-diggler (which is based on diggler) are going to conflict, look in their chrome.manifest files | 15:12 |
| gnomefreak | Jazzva: can you look at something when you get time? i will have to pull up error again but its error in rules was gonna look more into it after email but i didnt see anything wrong with it last night | 15:12 |
| gnomefreak | Jazzva: than do we drop neo-diggler? | 15:12 |
| gnomefreak | or will it superseed diggler | 15:12 |
| Jazzva | gnomefreak, and look at their chrome uri's. if they're the same (meaning the writer of neo-diggler didn't change them), they're probably gonna drop it | 15:12 |
| Jazzva | s/uri's/URIs/ | 15:12 |
| gnomefreak | 3. Accepted: diggler 0.9-16ubuntu1 (source) (Bhavani Shankar) | 15:13 |
| gnomefreak | ah ok | 15:13 |
| Jazzva | gnomefreak, I added neo-diggler because back then diggler wasn't in development anymore. If diggler is in development again, then maybe we don't need to add neo-diggler | 15:13 |
| gnomefreak | so far no info ws found other than license but i dont trust that since they didnt add any other info | 15:13 |
| Jazzva | It should be on addons.mozilla.org | 15:14 |
| gnomefreak | https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3763 | 15:14 |
| gnomefreak | that neo | 15:14 |
| gnomefreak | Neo Diggler is a tidy-up, bug-fix and minor re-organisation of the original Diggler | 15:15 |
| Jazzva | yeah... I think we're gonna add neo-diggler | 15:15 |
| gnomefreak | someone should ask for its removal if its gonna conflict | 15:15 |
| Jazzva | gnomefreak, diggler: Updated September 27, 2004 | 15:15 |
| gnomefreak | it was pushed on the 18th | 15:15 |
| gnomefreak | of this month | 15:16 |
| Jazzva | And it only works for Firefox up to 1.0.*. Maybe someone is updating it in Debian for recent Firefox versions | 15:16 |
| gnomefreak | anyone know the person that pushed it see ablve | 15:16 |
| asac | si there an upstreawm update? | 15:17 |
| asac | otherwise we should migrate users to it | 15:17 |
| gnomefreak | Jazzva: when you get time (doesnt hav to be today) can you look at http://pastebin.mozilla.org/521926 | 15:17 |
| Jazzva | asac, for diggler? no | 15:17 |
| asac | to neo-diggler | 15:17 |
| gnomefreak | asac: neo-diggler is not in devel anymore | 15:17 |
| asac | or isnt neo diggler similar? | 15:17 |
| gnomefreak | opps | 15:17 |
| asac | he? | 15:17 |
| gnomefreak | i mean diggler isnt | 15:17 |
| Jazzva | asac, this is the last changelog entry which is related to the source: install.rdf: Allow diggler to work with Iceweasel 2.0. | 15:17 |
| asac | ok | 15:17 |
| Jazzva | asac, in 0.9-12 | 15:17 |
| asac | how similar is the featureset of diggler vs. neo-diggler | 15:18 |
| asac | ? | 15:18 |
| asac | fta: we have one mui important feature thing to do in this cycle :( | 15:18 |
| gnomefreak | asac: not sure yet there isnt enough info on the wiki yet unless Jazzva knows | 15:18 |
| asac | fta: migrating nss/nspr back to upstream soname | 15:18 |
| Jazzva | asac, I haven't looked at both, but this is what desc for neo-diggler says "Neo Diggler is a tidy-up, bug-fix and minor re-organisation of the original Diggler" | 15:18 |
| asac | fta: so, byebye shlibs i guess and byebye debian | 15:19 |
| asac | fta: good thing is that debian wont follow (they are frozen), so they will end up with a less compatible nss | 15:19 |
| gnomefreak | shit error is http://pastebin.mozilla.org/521945 | 15:19 |
| asac | just kidding ;) ... I dont really want debian any harm | 15:19 |
| Jazzva | gnomefreak, it doesn't have a build command. I'm not sure if asac pushed med-xpi-pack which should be the default command in case where no build command is defined in debian/rules | 15:20 |
| asac | gnomefreak: what is your binary package name in control | 15:20 |
| asac | gnomefreak: and what is the source package name | 15:20 |
| asac | gnomefreak: if they dont match, you probably have the wrong name in rules | 15:20 |
| gnomefreak | both same "chatzilla" | 15:20 |
| asac | whats the build command ? | 15:20 |
| asac | that appears to be not executed | 15:20 |
| asac | have you named chatzilla in rules? | 15:20 |
| asac | paste rules might be a good idea | 15:20 |
| Jazzva | asac, http://pastebin.mozilla.org/521926 | 15:21 |
| Jazzva | rules | 15:21 |
| gnomefreak | MOZ_EXTENSION_PKG := chatzilla | 15:21 |
| asac | yeah ... there is no build command | 15:21 |
| asac | no doubt thats a likely reason | 15:21 |
| asac | for your build doing nothing | 15:21 |
| gnomefreak | could be but this xpi.template worked for firegpg | 15:21 |
| asac | gnomefreak: well. that doesnt matter | 15:22 |
| asac | you need a build command for sure | 15:22 |
| asac | unless you do other black magic ;)( | 15:22 |
| Jazzva | and back to thread synchronization. yay... *sigh* | 15:22 |
| gnomefreak | would rather keep it "official" that way when time to push it doesnt require i play 50 questions | 15:22 |
| Jazzva | see you later | 15:22 |
| asac | gnomefreak: firegpg has a build command | 15:23 |
| gnomefreak | later Jazzva and thanks | 15:23 |
| Jazzva | no problem :) | 15:23 |
| gnomefreak | and im sure maybe the CVS of this one does too but itsa old | 15:23 |
| asac | gnomefreak: no | 15:23 |
| asac | BUILD_COMMAND is xpi.mk specific | 15:23 |
| asac | you need one | 15:23 |
| asac | fix that | 15:23 |
| gnomefreak | #MOZ_XPI_BUILD_COMMAND = sh build.sh | 15:24 |
| gnomefreak | thas wrong? | 15:24 |
| asac | yes | 15:25 |
| asac | what does that mean=? | 15:25 |
| * asac is testing gnomefreak ;) | 15:25 | |
| gnomefreak | dont know other than = is same | 15:26 |
| gnomefreak | well == is | 15:26 |
| gnomefreak | = mean sum/answer | 15:26 |
| asac | what does the first letter mean? | 15:26 |
| gnomefreak | s? | 15:26 |
| asac | that means that its commented | 15:26 |
| gnomefreak | yes | 15:26 |
| asac | # MOZ_XPI | 15:26 |
| gnomefreak | oh it cant be that easy | 15:26 |
| asac | -> it doesnt matter | 15:26 |
| asac | its not enabled | 15:26 |
| gnomefreak | it cant be that easy | 15:26 |
| asac | you also need to ensure that there is a build.sh that builds chatzilla | 15:26 |
| asac | remove the # | 15:27 |
| asac | if there is no build.sh ... figure what to use to build and use that instead | 15:27 |
| gnomefreak | i dont remember seeing one but ill look again | 15:28 |
| gnomefreak | let me finish what im doing first | 15:28 |
| gnomefreak | debian bug 492837 | 15:29 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 492837 in mozilla-bookmarksftp "mozilla-bookmarksftp: Please update to ff3" [Wishlist,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/492837 | 15:29 |
| gnomefreak | that why it wsant on LP | 15:29 |
| XioNoX | asac, just a little thing, I can't find the page which explain how to get things in the preferences | 15:30 |
| gnomefreak | ok be back a bit later | 15:31 |
| asac | XioNoX: ther are other places in the extensions where i get the prefs | 15:32 |
| asac | search for getCharPref | 15:32 |
| XioNoX | ok, thx | 15:33 |
| XioNoX | asac, if modules.plugins.mimetype. how do I know wich plugin is used ? | 15:54 |
| XioNoX | specially if there are many plugins installed for the same mimetype ? | 15:55 |
| asac | XioNoX: the two point above where the algorithm to fiture out which is used | 16:02 |
| asac | figure | 16:02 |
| XioNoX | 2. or the first plugin in the list that matches ? | 16:03 |
| XioNoX | so it is a kind of aleatory ? | 16:03 |
| asac | yes... but first 1. | 16:03 |
| XioNoX | yeah yeah | 16:03 |
| asac | aleatory? | 16:04 |
| asac | dont know what that means ;) | 16:04 |
| XioNoX | sorry | 16:05 |
| XioNoX | random | 16:06 |
| XioNoX | trying to make english words with french one :) | 16:06 |
| XioNoX | so it is a kind of random ? | 16:06 |
| asac | yes. thats the whole problem ... and thats why i diud that patch to select a specific plugin for a mime-type | 16:07 |
| asac | XioNoX: if 2. makes our algorithm to return wrong values, then i need to add support to query for what plugin is used in firefox core | 16:09 |
| asac | but i think we come along that way. | 16:09 |
| XioNoX | ok | 16:17 |
| XioNoX | asac, do you know how the list appear when we clic on the pluginlist ? | 17:33 |
| XioNoX | or at least how to put things on this list ? | 17:34 |
| asac | yes. the richlistbox has a onsomething listener which basically transforms the row and replaced the right hand label with a drop down | 17:34 |
| asac | look in the applicaions.xul | 17:35 |
| XioNoX | it seam to be set by the xml | 17:39 |
| XioNoX | so I have to name my functions the same | 17:40 |
| asac | james_w: do we have something like Vcs-Bzr-upstream Vcs-Bzr-release Vcs-Bzr-nextrelease ? where i can point to "upstream", "release" and "nextrelease" branch? | 17:44 |
| james_w | no, that's not defined by Debian | 17:44 |
| asac | the situation is like this: release from ~ubuntu-core-dev branch, which receives merges from ~network-manager branch | 17:45 |
| james_w | I think at least -upstream would be really useful, but they didn't think to include it | 17:45 |
| asac | and i have the feeling that choosing any of those is always wrong in some way | 17:45 |
| asac | e.g. using ~network-manager wont give url to get exactly this release | 17:45 |
| asac | ~ubuntu-core-dev doesnt tell the user where to develop against | 17:45 |
| asac | james_w: yes, but even if i had upstream i needed more ;) | 17:46 |
| saivann | asac : ping | 18:57 |
| gandi | asac: ping | 19:18 |
| === babu_ is now known as Siva | ||
| fta | back | 20:26 |
| fta | asac, "one mui important", "mui" ? wtfit ? | 20:27 |
| fta | asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/39500/ | 20:34 |
| asac | mui == much ;) | 20:36 |
| Siva | Hi asac, wikz tells me that you had some questions about Spicebird | 20:57 |
| Siva | I'm one of the developers for Spicebird | 20:57 |
| fta | asac, for nss, i assume it means rebuilding all deps, right ? | 21:06 |
| fta | i mean rdeps, of course | 21:07 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| asac | fta: not sure ;) | 22:52 |
| asac | maybe its "just" flipping the direction the links point to ;) | 22:53 |
| asac | and drop the soname patch | 22:53 |
| asac | gcc -x c -shared -Wl,-soname,libsoftokn3.so.0d -o debian/libnss3-0d/usr/lib/libsoftokn3.so.0d - < /dev/null | 22:55 |
| asac | fta: understand what this is ment to do? | 22:55 |
| asac | make a null lib? | 22:56 |
| fta | sure but everything linked to the .1d will need to be relinked with the .so | 22:57 |
| fta | or did i miss something ? | 22:57 |
| asac | well. current situation is that upstream builds can use our libs | 22:59 |
| asac | but the other way around isnt true | 23:00 |
| asac | so they seem to be related still ;) | 23:00 |
| asac | lets see whats happening without the soname patch ;) | 23:00 |
| asac | and a bit .links file shuffeling | 23:00 |
| fta | afaik, we provide .so links but we use the .1d, not the links | 23:01 |
| asac | right | 23:01 |
| fta | others could then use the .so or the .so.1d, we couldn't | 23:01 |
| asac | thats why i think just flipping that link direction might be enough | 23:01 |
| fta | oh, ok, i mis-read, | 23:01 |
| asac | 1. drop soname, 2. flip link direction | 23:02 |
| fta | i read drop .1d/.0d | 23:02 |
| asac | 3. take care that upgrade really fixes the links (which might be a tricky thing) | 23:02 |
| fta | could work | 23:02 |
| asac | most likely .preinst upgrade and abort required | 23:02 |
| fta | I had too much beers tonight | 23:03 |
| asac | hmm. i have to recreate the .symbols files i guess | 23:05 |
| fta | could we drop the kbsd patches then, they are a pain to keep in sync, and we don't need any of this | 23:06 |
| asac | sure | 23:06 |
| asac | fta: how do i recreate those symbols from scratch? | 23:07 |
| fta | move out the files | 23:07 |
| asac | hmm we get the full package version | 23:09 |
| asac | the debian ones were just upstream iirc | 23:10 |
| fta | grr, +300 new rss entries per day, too much to keep up with | 23:10 |
| fta | eh ? | 23:10 |
| fta | oh | 23:10 |
| asac | ah ok -v | 23:10 |
| fta | or strip manually | 23:11 |
| fta | mozilla Bug 356295 | 23:14 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 356295 in Drag and Drop "Drag and Drop (WHATWG)" [Normal,Reopened] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356295 | 23:14 |
| fta | mozilla Bug 418129 | 23:18 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 418129 in General "Need branch-based OS ignore list" [Critical,Verified: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418129 | 23:19 |
| fta | mozilla Bug 450646 | 23:29 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 450646 in Security: PSM "Firefox 3.0.2 should use NSS 3.12.1" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450646 | 23:29 |
| asac | oh dear. i hate writing those scripts for upgrade and downgrade case | 23:31 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!