[01:13] mwhudson: ping [01:14] bdrung: hi [01:14] mwhudson: can you reenable the import of htmlvalidator? [01:14] bdrung: sure, got a link for me? [01:15] https://code.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/htmlvalidator/trunk [01:16] bdrung: do you have a reason to believe the server will be more reliable now? [01:16] bdrung: perfectly happy to just give it a go, though [01:16] * mwhudson hits the go switch [01:17] the sourceforge servers seems to be stable now [01:18] cool [01:18] and they have a new hp design. [01:20] we should give it a try. if murphys law strikes then we should wait another week [01:21] mwhudson: thanks [01:21] bdrung: np [01:23] sigh, i really need to implement something that mails the subscribers to a branch when an import fails [01:25] oh wow, the new look for SF is ... different [01:26] the orange? [01:44] yes, a import failure mail would be good [02:32] wgrant: they get the impression that launchpad is ubuntu from teh forums, i think. [02:42] Have we stopped getting e-mail on changes we make ourselves? === stub1 is now known as stub [07:12] hmm, translations doesn't seem to work, I have a pot file in my bzr trunk branch and the lp translations ignores it. So I have translators offering to help but I end up having to send them to pot file to edit directly.. [07:13] doctormo: You need to import the pot file into Launchpad. It doesn't (yet) pick up translation templates from bzr trees. [07:14] Then wait for the template to be accepted, which may take some time. [13:12] can someone remind me how to upgrade branches on Launchpad? I recall it can be done with lftp but can't remember the precise details, and of course I don't want to break anything [13:19] mdke: I believe you can upgrade locally and push, although some clients may complain. I could also be wrong. === andreas__ is now known as ahasenack [13:23] persia: I think you're right, but from memory when I did it last time I had to use lftp to delete the lp branch first. But I wanted to check first [13:45] hi, anyone from the API team around? [13:45] are there any plans to update http://people.ubuntu.com/~flacoste/launchpad-api-doc.html [13:46] or can you please publish the xsl stylesheet you use to create this reference documentation? [13:48] thekorn, hi [13:48] leonardr, oh hi! [13:48] just before you joined the channel I asked a question about the reference documentation [13:49] are there any plans to update http://people.ubuntu.com/~flacoste/launchpad-api-doc.html [13:49] or can you please publish the xsl stylesheet you use to create this reference documentation? === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak [13:51] thekorn, flacoste is setting or has set it up to update the doctest as part of deployment [13:51] and i don't see any reason not to publish the xst stylesheet [13:52] leonardr, maybe it is a good idea to publish the xsl file within the wadllib branch [13:52] thekorn: that's not a bad idea, though our xsl file has some launchpad-specific assumptions [14:14] is there a method in LP to take a bug and remove it from releases it's been targetted for? [14:14] I was trying to figure out how to target a bug at a milestone and put it on a release, but now can't seem to figure out how to remove the release/tie in [14:14] you can't. [14:14] afaik. [14:14] you just have to mark it as invalid. [14:14] and ignore the bug mail. [14:14] k [14:26] leonardr, ok, thanks for your information, it would be cool if you could update the reference documentation or publish the stylesheet [14:26] because an outdated api-doc is not helpfull [14:27] thekorn, it's likely that we have code to publish new documentation but it hasn't landed because we were doing a launchpad release last week and the queue was frozen [14:27] btw, the Introspection feature is great, I really like it [14:27] cool [14:28] maybe you can also wrapp the content of the wadl:doc node to __doc__ of a method [14:29] so people can run help(launchpad.bugs.createBug) [14:31] thekorn: yeah, that's on my list [14:31] cool === klette is now known as klette_ === cody-somerville_ is now known as cody-somerville === DasIch_ is now known as DasIch [15:50] mwhudson: hi [15:53] is there a launchpad admin i can talk to? [15:56] i need to modify a release version number === cody-somerville_ is now known as cody-somerville === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch [17:21] Why does Launchpad keep two copies of every branch? [17:21] Peng: Are you sure it's not just several URLs to the same branch? [17:23] persia: I've heard that http://bazaar.launchpad.net/ uses a copy of bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/'s data. [17:23] Peng: No idea, but I suspect that if it's a copy, it's only for performance reasons. It's fairly likely that the same resources are being accessed by two different URLs. [17:24] It's certainly the same data, whichever protocol one uses to access it, and it tends to get updated together. [17:26] Peng_: LP only has two copies of hosted branches [17:26] Peng_: there is only one copy of a mirrored branch [17:26] Peng_: it has to do with trusted vs. untrusted areas [17:26] Peng_: in that sftp can write stuff that isn't actually a branch [17:27] So I could sftp in and put arbitrary things on LP? Cool. :D [17:27] Peng_: not for anyone to access :) [17:27] Peng_: as only people with write access to a branch gets stuff from the "push" area [17:27] Hmm, if someone wanted to do that, he could actually use a team branch.. [17:28] Peng_: everyone else gets the publc (mirrored) area [17:28] So the read-only copy is partially made to verify the data is valid? [17:28] yes [17:28] OK. :) [17:28] to be honest, if you want to share arbitrary files... [17:28] just put them in a branch :) [17:32] ...Err. Right. === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch [17:50] I just noticed bzr 1.6 final is out, does that mean stacked branches work on launchpad now? [17:51] mwhudson, ^ === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara [18:05] Can someone explain what I need to do to bug 251480 to get it listed on https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kvm? [18:05] Launchpad bug 251480 in kvm "X hangs in Intrepid in KVM" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/251480 [18:07] soren, the ubuntu task is 'fix released', so not open [18:08] thekorn: Except the hardy task, which is "confirmed". [18:08] I can guess why it doesn't show up. that's why I asked what I need to change to make it show up :) [18:08] this task is shown in https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/kvm [18:09] That's not good enough. [18:09] ...one of the strange things in launchpad [18:09] Well, i guess I can add an intrepid task, set that to fix released, and set the "general" state to "Confirmed". === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado [18:57] http://rafb.net/p/5EaYcN13.html [18:57] 'stacked-source' is a regular branch, 'SB2' is a branch stacked on it [18:57] the strange thing is that I would not expect an *authentication* error here [18:57] I mean, doesn't authentication happen before anything else that might be affected by whether the branch is stacked? === fta_ is now known as fta [19:00] (I created SB2 by "branch --stacked lp:~radix/+junk/stacked-source SB2; cd SB2; hackhackhack; bzr push --stacked lp:~radix/+junk/SB2") [19:07] oh, hmm, I'm still on rc6 [19:07] err, rc5 [19:08] I guess the .deb package of 1.6 final isn't out yet :) [19:20] mwhudson: qemu's upstream VCS has changed. How do I tell vcs-import this? [19:54] I can't see how to add tags to a bug. Can someone give me a pointer? [19:55] soren, you'll want to create a new import branch. [19:55] rockstar: that sort of sucks. [19:55] rockstar: How do I do this? [19:55] rockstar: Note: I'm not the owner of the project. [19:55] LarstiQ, well, yes. As you can imagine, the import system is quite complicated. [19:56] soren, you can still create import branches from a project. [19:56] rockstar: Ok... I'm looking at the project page now. What to do? [19:57] Oh, I see it, I think. [19:57] soren, go to register a branch. [19:57] rockstar: Yes, I see it now. I can take it from here. Thanks. [19:58] soren, great! If you need anything else, I'm around. mwhudson won't even wake up for another two hours or so. [19:58] rockstar: YEah, I know. [19:58] :) [19:58] * soren . o O { Slacker } [19:58] :) [19:59] rockstar: Can you review new code imports? [19:59] soren, I can. [19:59] rockstar: yeah, I'm aware of that, and I see the difficulties in trying to graft two possibly different histories onto eachother. [19:59] rockstar: Please to apply your special love to https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/qemu/svntrunk :) [20:00] soren, approved [20:00] rockstar: Thanks very much :) [20:00] soren, you are very welcome. [20:04] ...is tagging bugs a blessed task? [20:16] Rinchen: around? === salgado is now known as salgado-afk [22:29] hey. i want to have my project in launchpad (hoping to get translations), but it is already registered there: https://launchpad.net/medit [22:29] can i get hold of it somehow? [22:29] become a maintainer or something [22:32] emgent, vorian: ping. you are listed at https://launchpad.net/~motu, could you help me? [22:32] muntyan: I'm sure you can, you should ask a question here - https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad [22:32] then one of the Launchpad admins will sort it out for you [22:33] ok, thanks === salgado-afk is now known as salgado === salgado is now known as salgado-afk