[01:13] <bdrung> mwhudson: ping
[01:14] <mwhudson> bdrung: hi
[01:14] <bdrung> mwhudson: can you reenable the import of htmlvalidator?
[01:14] <mwhudson> bdrung: sure, got a link for me?
[01:15] <bdrung> https://code.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/htmlvalidator/trunk
[01:16] <mwhudson> bdrung: do you have a reason to believe the server will be more reliable now?
[01:16] <mwhudson> bdrung: perfectly happy to just give it a go, though
[01:16]  * mwhudson hits the go switch
[01:17] <bdrung> the sourceforge servers seems to be stable now
[01:18] <mwhudson> cool
[01:18] <bdrung> and they have a new hp design.
[01:20] <bdrung> we should give it a try. if murphys law strikes then we should wait another week
[01:21] <bdrung> mwhudson: thanks
[01:21] <mwhudson> bdrung: np
[01:23] <mwhudson> sigh, i really need to implement something that mails the subscribers to a branch when an import fails
[01:25] <mwhudson> oh wow, the new look for SF is ... different
[01:26] <lifeless> the orange?
[01:44] <bdrung> yes, a import failure mail would be good
[02:32] <Hobbsee> wgrant: they get the impression that launchpad is ubuntu from teh forums, i think.
[02:42] <cody-somerville> Have we stopped getting e-mail on changes we make ourselves?
[07:12] <doctormo> hmm, translations doesn't seem to work, I have a pot file in my bzr trunk branch and the lp translations ignores it. So I have translators offering to help but I end up having to send them to pot file to edit directly..
[07:13] <RAOF> doctormo: You need to import the pot file into Launchpad.  It doesn't (yet) pick up translation templates from bzr trees.
[07:14] <RAOF> Then wait for the template to be accepted, which may take some time.
[13:12] <mdke> can someone remind me how to upgrade branches on Launchpad? I recall it can be done with lftp but can't remember the precise details, and of course I don't want to break anything
[13:19] <persia> mdke: I believe you can upgrade locally and push, although some clients may complain.  I could also be wrong.
[13:23] <mdke> persia: I think you're right, but from memory when I did it last time I had to use lftp to delete the lp branch first. But I wanted to check first
[13:45] <thekorn> hi, anyone from the API team around?
[13:45] <thekorn> are there any plans to update http://people.ubuntu.com/~flacoste/launchpad-api-doc.html
[13:46] <thekorn> or can you please publish the xsl stylesheet you use to create this reference documentation?
[13:48] <leonardr> thekorn, hi
[13:48] <thekorn> leonardr, oh hi!
[13:48] <thekorn> just before you joined the channel I asked a question about the reference documentation
 are there any plans to update http://people.ubuntu.com/~flacoste/launchpad-api-doc.html
 or can you please publish the xsl stylesheet you use to create this reference documentation?
[13:51] <leonardr> thekorn, flacoste is setting or has set it up to update the doctest as part of deployment
[13:51] <leonardr> and i don't see any reason not to publish the xst stylesheet
[13:52] <thekorn> leonardr, maybe it is a good idea to publish the xsl file within the wadllib branch
[13:52] <leonardr> thekorn: that's not a bad idea, though our xsl file has some launchpad-specific assumptions
[14:14] <rick_h_> is there a method in LP to take a bug and remove it from releases it's been targetted for?
[14:14] <rick_h_> I was trying to figure out how to target a bug at a milestone and put it on a release, but now can't seem to figure out how to remove the release/tie in
[14:14] <Hobbsee> you can't.
[14:14] <Hobbsee> afaik.
[14:14] <Hobbsee> you just have to mark it as invalid.
[14:14] <Hobbsee> and ignore the bug mail.
[14:14] <rick_h_> k
[14:26] <thekorn> leonardr, ok, thanks for your information, it would be cool if you could update the reference documentation or publish the stylesheet
[14:26] <thekorn> because an outdated api-doc is not helpfull
[14:27] <leonardr> thekorn, it's likely that we have code to publish new documentation but it hasn't landed because we were doing a launchpad release last week and the queue was frozen
[14:27] <thekorn> btw, the Introspection feature is great, I really like it
[14:27] <leonardr> cool
[14:28] <thekorn> maybe you can also wrapp the content of the wadl:doc node to __doc__ of a method
[14:29] <thekorn> so people can run help(launchpad.bugs.createBug)
[14:31] <leonardr> thekorn: yeah, that's on my list
[14:31] <thekorn> cool
[15:50] <ignas> mwhudson: hi
[15:53] <swe3tdave> is there a launchpad admin i can talk to?
[15:56] <swe3tdave> i need to modify a release version number
[17:21] <Peng_> Why does Launchpad keep two copies of every branch?
[17:21] <persia> Peng: Are you sure it's not just several URLs to the same branch?
[17:23] <Peng_> persia: I've heard that http://bazaar.launchpad.net/ uses a copy of bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/'s data.
[17:23] <persia> Peng: No idea, but I suspect that if it's a copy, it's only for performance reasons.  It's fairly likely that the same resources are being accessed by two different URLs.
[17:24] <persia> It's certainly the same data, whichever protocol one uses to access it, and it tends to get updated together.
[17:26] <thumper> Peng_: LP only has two copies of hosted branches
[17:26] <thumper> Peng_: there is only one copy of a mirrored branch
[17:26] <thumper> Peng_: it has to do with trusted vs. untrusted areas
[17:26] <thumper> Peng_: in that sftp can write stuff that isn't actually a branch
[17:27] <Peng_> So I could sftp in and put arbitrary things on LP? Cool. :D
[17:27] <thumper> Peng_: not for anyone to access :)
[17:27] <thumper> Peng_: as only people with write access to a branch gets stuff from the "push" area
[17:27] <Peng_> Hmm, if someone wanted to do that, he could actually use a team branch..
[17:28] <thumper> Peng_: everyone else gets the publc (mirrored) area
[17:28] <Peng_> So the read-only copy is partially made to verify the data is valid?
[17:28] <thumper> yes
[17:28] <Peng_> OK. :)
[17:28] <thumper> to be honest, if you want to share arbitrary files...
[17:28] <thumper> just put them in a branch :)
[17:32] <Peng_> ...Err. Right.
[17:50] <radix> I just noticed bzr 1.6 final is out, does that mean stacked branches work on launchpad now?
[17:51] <Ursinha> mwhudson, ^
[18:05] <soren> Can someone explain what I need to do to bug 251480 to get it listed on https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kvm?
[18:07] <thekorn> soren, the ubuntu task is 'fix released', so not open
[18:08] <soren> thekorn: Except the hardy task, which is "confirmed".
[18:08] <soren> I can guess why it doesn't show up. that's why I asked what I need to change to make it show up :)
[18:08] <thekorn> this task is shown in https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/kvm
[18:09] <soren> That's not good enough.
[18:09] <thekorn> ...one of the strange things in launchpad
[18:09] <soren> Well, i guess I can add an intrepid task, set that to fix released, and set the "general" state to "Confirmed".
[18:57] <radix> http://rafb.net/p/5EaYcN13.html
[18:57] <radix> 'stacked-source' is a regular branch, 'SB2' is a branch stacked on it
[18:57] <radix> the strange thing is that I would not expect an *authentication* error here
[18:57] <radix> I mean, doesn't authentication happen before anything else that might be affected by whether the branch is stacked?
[19:00] <radix> (I created SB2 by "branch --stacked lp:~radix/+junk/stacked-source SB2; cd SB2; hackhackhack; bzr push --stacked lp:~radix/+junk/SB2")
[19:07] <radix> oh, hmm, I'm still on rc6
[19:07] <radix> err, rc5
[19:08] <radix> I guess the .deb package of 1.6 final isn't out yet :)
[19:20] <soren> mwhudson: qemu's upstream VCS has changed. How do I tell vcs-import this?
[19:54] <Laney> I can't see how to add tags to a bug. Can someone give me a pointer?
[19:55] <rockstar> soren, you'll want to create a new import branch.
[19:55] <LarstiQ> rockstar: that sort of sucks.
[19:55] <soren> rockstar: How do I do this?
[19:55] <soren> rockstar: Note: I'm not the owner of the project.
[19:55] <rockstar> LarstiQ, well, yes.  As you can imagine, the import system is quite complicated.
[19:56] <rockstar> soren, you can still create import branches from a project.
[19:56] <soren> rockstar: Ok... I'm looking at the project page now. What to do?
[19:57] <soren> Oh, I see it, I think.
[19:57] <rockstar> soren, go to register a branch.
[19:57] <soren> rockstar: Yes, I see it now. I can take it from here. Thanks.
[19:58] <rockstar> soren, great!  If you need anything else, I'm around.  mwhudson won't even wake up for another two hours or so.
[19:58] <soren> rockstar: YEah, I know.
[19:58] <rockstar> :)
[19:58]  * soren . o O { Slacker }
[19:58] <soren> :)
[19:59] <soren> rockstar: Can you review new code imports?
[19:59] <rockstar> soren, I can.
[19:59] <LarstiQ> rockstar: yeah, I'm aware of that, and I see the difficulties in trying to graft two possibly different histories onto eachother.
[19:59] <soren> rockstar: Please to apply your special love to https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/qemu/svntrunk :)
[20:00] <rockstar> soren, approved
[20:00] <soren> rockstar: Thanks very much :)
[20:00] <rockstar> soren, you are very welcome.
[20:04] <Laney> ...is tagging bugs a blessed task?
[20:16] <mdke> Rinchen: around?
[22:29] <muntyan> hey. i want to have my project in launchpad (hoping to get translations), but it is already registered there: https://launchpad.net/medit
[22:29] <muntyan> can i get hold of it somehow?
[22:29] <muntyan> become a maintainer or something
[22:32] <muntyan> emgent, vorian: ping. you are listed at https://launchpad.net/~motu, could you help me?
[22:32] <mdke> muntyan: I'm sure you can, you should ask a question here - https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
[22:32] <mdke> then one of the Launchpad admins will sort it out for you
[22:33] <muntyan> ok, thanks