[08:28] <Ziroday> Hi, our loco is trying to register a branch to basically hold all of your documents
[08:29] <Ziroday> however LP says that we need a project?
[08:30] <wgrant> LP is correct.
[08:30] <Ziroday> okay, what do we put the project under?
[08:30] <wgrant> You mean what name?
[08:31] <Ziroday> no the project, LP says teams can't have a junk branch
[08:31] <wgrant> Right, you would create a project unless you already had one for this purpose.
[08:32] <Ziroday> okay
[08:32] <Ziroday> wgrant: thanks
[11:06] <psycose> hi all
[11:09] <psycose> I would like to know if adding this knid of line on a debian/rules could break th Launchpad PPA builder system, as it work on my system but something strange happen on the PPA build log ... : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH := debian/libgnatgpr0/usr/lib:$(LD_LIBRARY_PATH)
[11:09] <psycose> any tips ? thanks
[13:44] <gour> hi, i'm planning general gui application which will have several modules which might be released separately (like bindings for C-lib, several core-libs etc.). is there way to register those 'modules' as separate projects and make them kind of sub-projects of the main app? i see there is concept of 'project group', but i'm not sure if it's possible to promote existent project into 'project group? or to just stick everything under the
[13:44] <gour> present LP project?
[13:46] <andrea-bs> gour: you have to ask for the creation of a project group on answers.launchpad.net/launchpad, then you'll be able to link your subprojects
[13:48] <gour> andrea-bs: is it possible to 'upgrade' current project to eh project group (to avoid creating a new one)?
[13:49] <andrea-bs> gour: unfortunately no: superprojects are created only from scratch
[13:50] <gour> andrea-bs: hmm, ok.
[14:00]  * gour submitted 'question'
[14:04] <gour> i see several requests to 'upgrade' project to superproject..it would be nice addition in LP
[14:05] <andrea-bs> gour: yes, I agree, it's not obvious that projects are created from scratch
[14:16] <andrea-bs> OOPS-973DEMOC1 trying to view a pool on demo.launchpad.net
[14:16] <andrea-bs> (a closed pool)
[14:32] <NCommander> Does anyone know where I can download a buildd chroot to try and reproduce a build failure?
[14:33] <NCommander> I know they're in librarian, but beyond that I haven't got a clue
[14:33] <NCommander> ^ - cprov
[14:34] <andrea-bs> NCommander: what about pbuilder?
[14:34] <NCommander> Can't reproduce locally with sbuild or pbuilder
[14:34] <NCommander> Its something in the buildd chroot thats causing it
[14:35] <NCommander> Wee, fixed netatalk :-)
[14:35] <NCommander> But the diff is UGLY
[14:35] <NCommander> Broken clean rule -_-;
[15:30] <NCommander> jdong, ping?
[15:30] <NCommander> er
[16:26] <Adri2000> why in the source package view, the uploader name is sometimes displayed, and sometimes not?
[16:27] <Adri2000> btw, is it the person in the changelog? or the signer of the upload?