| Ampelbein | hi! could some member of bug-control please set bug #261598 to wishlist? thanks. | 00:17 |
|---|---|---|
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 261598 in ubuntu "[needs-packaging] seahorse-plugins" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/261598 | 00:17 |
| hggdh | Ampelbein, done | 01:58 |
| === jjesse_ is now known as jjesse | ||
| === LucidFox is now known as LucidFox_WoW | ||
| anakron | HI all | 07:08 |
| anakron | wich is the repository for 5-a-day applet in intrepid??? | 07:08 |
| anakron | cause i can found it in wiki | 07:08 |
| anakron | someone can say repositories of 5-a-day applet for intrepid or hardy? | 07:15 |
| === mcas_away is now known as mcas | ||
| === Igorots is now known as Igorot | ||
| mcas | hello | 10:44 |
| mcas | i need some help with bug263141 | 10:44 |
| mcas | i need some help with bug 263141 | 10:45 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 263141 in firefox-3.0 "Ctrl+C and Ctrl+V does not work with Caps Lock active" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/263141 | 10:45 |
| mcas | i think this is the correct behaviour | 10:45 |
| mcas | so how should i handle this bug | 10:45 |
| thekorn | mcas, hi, I agree, it is the correct behaviour | 10:47 |
| mcas | should i comment this and mark it as won't fix? | 10:47 |
| thekorn | IMO it is invalid | 10:47 |
| mcas | ah ok | 10:48 |
| mcas | thanks | 10:48 |
| thekorn | I would close it as invalid and explain that the keys are ctrl+c and ctrl+v | 10:48 |
| thekorn | and not ctrl+shift+v | 10:48 |
| mcas | ok i'll do so | 10:49 |
| thekorn | super | 10:49 |
| mcas | done | 10:53 |
| === mcas is now known as mcas_away | ||
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| === mcas_away is now known as mcas | ||
| === warp10_ is now known as warp10 | ||
| === mcas is now known as mcas_away | ||
| === Initial_2 is now known as Initial_M | ||
| === bcurtiswx1 is now known as bcurtiswx | ||
| nullack | Would someone please confirm bug 262027 for me, thanks | 22:48 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 262027 in synaptic "Synaptic Erroneously Reports Success on Fail" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/262027 | 22:48 |
| james_w | nullack: I think that the package probably didn't fail installation | 22:53 |
| nullack | james_w It did, and it resulted in X falling back to bulletproof X mode :) | 22:53 |
| james_w | nullack: I realise it failed, but it looks like it didn't fail | 22:54 |
| james_w | sorry, cryptic | 22:54 |
| james_w | it had a problem, but didn't report this with a non-zero exit code of the maintainer script | 22:54 |
| james_w | so dpkg/apt had no idea that it had a problem | 22:54 |
| nullack | james_w: If a user upgrades tselliots driver packages and it fails, and it says it fails, synaptic shoould not say the upgrade was "successful". So should I redirect the bug to tseliot on the driver? | 22:54 |
| james_w | the action is probably run as "something-that-might-fail || true" | 22:55 |
| nullack | Given hes not sending a fail code? | 22:55 |
| james_w | so that it doesn't fail the installation | 22:55 |
| james_w | I think it is a bug in the nvidia package, yes, would you reassign and modify the bug appropriately please? | 22:55 |
| nullack | Yes I will, thanks mate | 22:55 |
| james_w | thank you | 22:56 |
| nullack | Just out of interest do I assume right that devs have a coding standard about errors? Just to be sure this is being consistently done and isnt in other packages as well? | 22:56 |
| james_w | sometimes this is done intentionally | 22:56 |
| james_w | e.g. I know it is also done in flashplugin-nonfree | 22:57 |
| james_w | I don't agree with it there, but it is often a definite choice to do this | 22:57 |
| nullack | Yeah I can see isolated reasons why it would need to be done sometimes | 22:58 |
| tseliot | maybe we can report the problem to dkms | 22:58 |
| andre____ | to use bug-buddy instead of apport, i have to create /apps/bug-buddy/run_on_crash and set it to true in gconf? | 22:59 |
| nullack | Hi tseliot, is the problem with your package or dkms? | 22:59 |
| tseliot | nullack: both. I have fixed this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261816 | 23:00 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 261816 in linux-restricted-modules-envy-2.6.24 "nvidia: Multiple versions in DKMS" [Medium,In progress] | 23:00 |
| nullack | tseliot : thank you I will edit my bug then | 23:01 |
| tseliot | but there's still something left in the /var/lob/dkms/nvidia directory | 23:01 |
| nullack | tseliot : I have another matter I am in the process of raising a bug for, do you have time for a quick discuss? | 23:01 |
| tseliot | therefore there might still be directories which should have been removed | 23:01 |
| tseliot | nullack: sure | 23:01 |
| nullack | tselliot: Thanks. I did a fresh install of yesterdays ubuquity ISO | 23:02 |
| nullack | tselliot: After the glx install of 177.70 I got sent to bulletproof X | 23:02 |
| nullack | tselliot: I eventualy resolved it by getting rid of everything in xorg.conf except for the nvidia driver device section | 23:03 |
| nullack | tselliot: The default conf has items that dont need to be there like loading glx which is done anyway | 23:03 |
| tseliot | nullack: knowing what was there before would help me diagnose the problem | 23:03 |
| nullack | tselliot: X was failing because the server layout had a keyboard entry | 23:04 |
| tseliot | nullack: did it have a serverlayout section too? | 23:04 |
| nullack | tselliot: yes | 23:04 |
| nullack | tselliot: It was all debian default, then the glx install added other stuff | 23:05 |
| tseliot | nullack: and was there an entry about the keyboard in the serverlayout section? | 23:05 |
| nullack | tselliot: Another user said he installed 177.70 from a fresh install too, and he got booted to bulletproof x on logout, but after reboot was ok | 23:05 |
| nullack | tselliot: Yes, keyboard in server layout but no keyboard device as HAL configured it | 23:06 |
| tseliot | nullack: that's a different problem. Doing a sudo rmmod nvidia && sudo modprobe nvidia would have solved the problem | 23:06 |
| nullack | tselliot: Right, has to be removed and added back with latest I understand | 23:06 |
| tseliot | yes, or simply reboot | 23:07 |
| nullack | tselliot: Anyway, it seems to me that the install is adding stuff to the xorg.conf that isnt needed and HAL is setting it all up anyway | 23:07 |
| tseliot | adding glx won't cause any problem, however you might want to file a bug report with the original xorg.conf about the problems with input devices | 23:08 |
| nullack | tselliot: I will do that thanks. Im a big fan of your work and Im grateful that you always quickly get out new nvidia drivers once they are released. Top stuff :) | 23:09 |
| tseliot | ;) | 23:09 |
| sectech | howdie | 23:29 |
| sectech | For hardy, has any of the kernel developers addressed the issue of the "suspend to ram" kernel panic being fixed for hardy? | 23:29 |
| sectech | one too many hardy's | 23:30 |
| james_w | hi sectech | 23:30 |
| sectech | I know they wanted to move forward to 2.6.27... problem is that the people running hardy now that don't follow bugs are kinda screwed up right now | 23:31 |
| james_w | is there a bug for it? | 23:31 |
| sectech | james_w, the closest that I can see is 251252 | 23:31 |
| james_w | #ubuntu-kernel is probably a better place for these questions, they will be more knowledgeable. | 23:31 |
| sectech | james_w, true... they would be... but probably were asked the question 1000 times already | 23:32 |
| sectech | 2.6.27 fixes the problem... but the hardy users arn't getting that kernel as far as I know | 23:33 |
| james_w | I doubt they will | 23:34 |
| e-jat | use intrepid main repo ... then u will get the 2.6.27-2 | 23:34 |
| james_w | if you know it fixes it you can "bisect" to find the fix, and then that can be applied in hardy. | 23:34 |
| sectech | james_w, I guess my issue is that _I_ know how to get around it... but what about the other hardy users... | 23:35 |
| james_w | that's the right instinct, and if you could point towards the fix I'm sure the developers would apply it to the hardy kernel. | 23:35 |
| sectech | james_w, imagine they would... I am still trying to find out how wide spread the bug is... I have been off for a few weeks and I just noticed this now | 23:37 |
| sectech | it was affecting my laptop for the last couple days, this is the first day I could look into it | 23:37 |
| sectech | there might be a fix out there. | 23:37 |
| nullack | Can I please get a second opinion on bug 262788 - The user has now attached required logs and Im thinking about making the package APCI rather than the Linux kernel? | 23:46 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 262788 in linux "linux 2.6.27 kernel won't boot on amd64 hp laptop" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/262788 | 23:46 |
| james_w | is there such a package? | 23:48 |
| sectech | james_w, I was getting in a panic for nothing... I had the proposed repository enabled by accident | 23:50 |
| james_w | you have the problem with -proposed, but not with -updates? | 23:50 |
| james_w | ah, there is an acpi package, I'm not sure it should be moved there though, I would still suspect the kernel. | 23:52 |
| sectech | james_w, With proposed packages arn't out of testing yet... | 23:52 |
| sectech | if an end user enabled that repository, they do so at there own risk | 23:52 |
| sectech | in my opinonj | 23:52 |
| sectech | err opinion | 23:52 |
| nullack | james_w: thanks Ill leave the package with the kernel and I guess the kernel devs can drill down from there | 23:53 |
| sectech | I tried to keep this laptop as "end user" friendly as possible... my desktop is used for testing... I guess I must have hit that by mistake | 23:53 |
| james_w | sectech: they are there for testing, if you find a regression in a package in -proposed please file a bug and state that it is a regression in -proposed package, otherwise it will be moved to -updates and more people will be exposed to it | 23:53 |
| sectech | james_w, I am looking at that part now... | 23:54 |
| james_w | thanks | 23:55 |
| sectech | that would be very bad if that hits -updates | 23:55 |
| sectech | james_w, I actually have a guy on #ubuntu-kernel (not part of the devel or any other team) trying to tell me that a kernel panic isn't important. | 23:56 |
| sectech | lol | 23:56 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!