[07:04] <risman> i want config uboot for i386. sc520_spunk or sc520_cdp. how do i understand?
[10:47] <bullgard4> Where can I find the associated sourcecode for /lib/modules/2.6.24-19-generic/kernel/drivers/char/nvram.ko? 
[11:34] <bullgard4> [solved]
[12:49] <Xan3> i cant run using 2.6.27-2 but all works fine with 2.6.27-1, it's normal?
[12:54] <Xan3> ??
=== asac_ is now known as asac
[14:35] <syldeb35> Une partie de messagerie musicale a été demandée. Veuillez cliquer sur l'icône MM pour l'accepter.
=== cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson
[23:35] <sectech> I am sure that this has already been discussed many times before... but the bug with kernel 2.6.24-21-generic (in generates a kernel panic when suspending to ram), how is this going to be addressed for hardy users?  2.6.27 fixes the problem, but as far as I know the general hardy user won't get that kernel
[23:37] <ln-> let me guess: it won't be addressed.
[23:39] <sectech> ln-,  it might... they obviously found the problem to fix it in 2.6.27...  
[23:39] <sectech> depending on how easy the fix was it could be applied to 2.6.24
[23:39] <ln-> so?  it doesn't mean they'd backport such a fix to an old release.
[23:39] <sectech> last time I checked hardy wasn't an old release... it's our current release.
[23:40] <ln-> even if the fix is only two lines of code.
[23:40] <sectech> ln-,  are you on the kernel team?
[23:40] <ln-> current or old, in any case not something yet-to-be-released.
[23:40] <ln-> sectech: definitely not, and not in any other team either.
[23:40] <sectech> ok.
[23:42] <sectech> My point is that it was working on a current release up until an update... then a new kernel release broke it... Although I might know how to get around it, the average ubuntu user wouldn't.
[23:42] <ln-> sectech: but the fact is that they don't fix non-critical bugs, and that one doesn't sound very critical.
[23:42] <sectech> a kernel panic doesn't sound critical?
[23:43] <sectech> ... 
[23:43] <ln-> no.
[23:43] <sectech> are you sure your in the right channel?
[23:43] <ln-> yes.
[23:43] <sectech> well that explains why your not on the kernel team then... :P
[23:44] <sectech> as for myself... I am in bug-control...   investigating this issue
[23:45] <pwnguin> is -21 out of testing?
[23:45] <sectech> yes
[23:45] <sectech> I turned off proposed....
[23:46] <pwnguin> what does apt-cache policy say?
[23:47] <sectech> hrmm.. no proposed....  I have pretty much everything else though.... just checking my settings again
[23:47] <pwnguin> all i see is -21 pushed to proposed...
[23:47] <pwnguin> but im just looking at linux-meta
[23:48] <sectech> Agh crap...   (and at the same time a sigh of relief)... yeah I have proposed on...
[23:49] <sectech> heh well....  okay... -21 shouldn't go any further then proposed until that is fixed... quite a lot of people on laptops are having the suspend to ram issue
[23:49] <sectech> I'll update a few of the bug reports I have saw....
[23:50] <sectech> well that takes care of that....
[23:54] <sectech> pwnguin,  where is -21 on the list in terms of it being released anyway?