[01:10] <wgrant> Well, that was remarkably painless.
[19:59] <tjaalton> tseliot: hi, do you have an idea why my box didn't build the nvidia module for .27-2 kernel?
[19:59] <tjaalton> on upgrade
[20:01] <tseliot> tjaalton: no, I don't. It happened to me too.
[20:02] <tjaalton> ah:)
[20:03] <tseliot> having a log would help
[20:03] <tseliot> s/would/might/
[20:03] <tjaalton> it was a "partial upgrade" so nothing in term.log
[20:04] <tseliot> usually DKMS checks the availability of the module at boot too
[20:05] <tseliot> therefore if the module hadn't been built before it should have tried to build it at boot time
[20:05] <tseliot> a bug in DKMS?
[20:05] <tseliot> I'll ask superm1
[20:07] <tjaalton> or maybe the kernel lacks something?
[20:07] <tjaalton> packaging
[20:22] <tseliot> tjaalton: all dkms needs is the headers and the compilers. Let's see if we can reproduce the problem, maybe with .27-3
[20:22]  * tseliot > bbl
[22:25] <BacuX> jajajajaja
[22:25] <BacuX> che groxy culey
[22:25] <BacuX> @roulette
[22:53] <james_w> tseliot: https://launchpad.net/bugs/262027 <- could that be the reason that nvidia didn't build the updated modules?
[22:57] <tseliot> james_w: yes, it can be that
[22:57] <james_w> I'm just talking to the user now, he's going to reassign the bug, as I don't think it's a bug in synaptic
[23:09] <tseliot> james_w: right
[23:16] <tormo1> I have a hang here, maybe with compiz. I can ssh in and there's no CPU usage. Is it normal that compiz sits in finishScreenDrawing() ?
[23:17]  * tormo1 asks in #compiz also
[23:23] <james_w> tseliot: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/260350 <- is that due to "Virtual" not being set?
[23:23] <james_w> sorry, I leave you in peace after this one.
[23:24] <tseliot> james_w: no problem ;)
[23:25] <tseliot> yes, setting the virtual resolution would be the solution
[23:25] <james_w> thanks, I'll mention that.
[23:26] <james_w> the current Intrepid packages will tell the user that?
[23:26] <james_w> and optionally do it if screen-resolution-extra is installed?
[23:27] <tseliot> james_w: no package will warn the user that he needs to set virtual to 2674x1080
[23:27] <tseliot> screen-resolution-extra will do it for him/her after warning him/her
[23:29] <james_w> great, thanks
[23:29] <tseliot> you're welcome
[23:33] <james_w> I don't really know what to say to https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260069 so if someone here has an opinion I would appreciate it if you could add something to the report.
[23:36] <tseliot> james_w: it looks like something we should mark as wishlist
[23:37] <james_w> yeah, I agree, but I had no idea if it was something that's a good idea or a bad one
[23:40] <tseliot> that might be needed in some cases and nvidia-settings does it already. It's doable and can be useful. I would like to hear bryce's opinion on this though
[23:42] <tseliot> good night
[23:42]  * tseliot > bed