| korpios | mwhudson: And I'm done. *Much* faster. Thanks; I need to keep that in mind in the future! | 00:01 |
|---|---|---|
| mwhudson | korpios: cool | 00:01 |
| === sm is now known as sm-food | ||
| === ursula_ is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === sm-food is now known as sm | ||
| === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn | ||
| stefanlsd | Whats the correct procedure when doing something in a PPA to test something for a specific user? I would like to rebuild a package for him to test, but I have some other guys using my PPA and i dont particulary want them to get the package. does PPA cater for this, or should i be getting him the .debs some other way? | 09:10 |
| bigjools | you need another PPA | 09:11 |
| bigjools | or "some other way" :) | 09:11 |
| wgrant | bigjools: I really think it would make more sense to allow people to customise components. | 09:13 |
| bigjools | indeed - it will happen at some point | 09:13 |
| wgrant | Oh. Last I heard it wasn't going to happen because it was wrong or similar. | 09:13 |
| bigjools | we're going to add the ability for multiple PPAs per person first probably | 09:14 |
| wgrant | Um. | 09:14 |
| wgrant | Didn't you deliberately remove that just before they hit beta? | 09:14 |
| wgrant | (I'm glad it's back on the cards) | 09:14 |
| NCommander | hey bigjools | 09:15 |
| bigjools | hey | 09:15 |
| NCommander | bigjools, how goes it | 09:15 |
| NCommander | wgrant, well, if you really want to have "fun" customizing your PPA, you can upload replacement dpkgs and such with higher versions, and during the build, it should upgrade | 09:16 |
| bigjools | NCommander: great, yourself? | 09:17 |
| NCommander | bigjools, I'm bootstrapping Ubuntu amd64-pie, and doing archive rebuilds | 09:17 |
| NCommander | Sanity is at a premium ;-) | 09:17 |
| wgrant | Is there a good reason for not showing links to pending PPA binary packages? They're there for deleted packages, and are easily accessible if one is able to add 1 to fairly large number... But links would be nice. | 09:33 |
| bigjools | wgrant: it's hard because of the way the data model works, the binaries are not even in a "pending" state until just before publishing | 09:57 |
| wgrant | bigjools: Oh. | 09:57 |
| wgrant | It seems odd that they're not at least linked to on the build page. | 09:57 |
| bigjools | just wait up to 20 minutes :) | 09:58 |
| wgrant | But it's so nice having things built just a couple of minutes after uploading. | 09:59 |
| bigjools | wgrant: we might increase the publishing frequency, watch this space | 10:01 |
| wgrant | bigjools: I was about to ask about that... | 10:01 |
| wgrant | So it doesn't scale with total published package count? | 10:01 |
| bigjools | wgrant: it depends on pending count | 10:02 |
| wgrant | Right, makes sense. | 10:02 |
| wgrant | So that's why the archive gets horribly broken sometimes... | 10:04 |
| bigjools | it does? | 10:04 |
| wgrant | Occasionally something will go insane and several checksums will be wrong. | 10:04 |
| bigjools | hmmm that's not good, do you know if it was reported? | 10:06 |
| wgrant | It was. | 10:06 |
| bigjools | ok | 10:06 |
| wgrant | IIRC the solution was to clear the apt-ftparchive cache in one instance, and reupload things in the other. | 10:06 |
| Ohaiguiz | yayz | 10:10 |
| === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch | ||
| === salgado-afk is now known as salgado | ||
| RAOF_ | Why hello there. The xserver-xgl package has been removed from the archives. Is there any easy way to close all bugs against it? | 13:55 |
| === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| thekorn | RAOF_, you can use python-launchpad-bugs or (with a bit of hacking) launchpadlib | 14:15 |
| gmb | siretart: Around? | 15:19 |
| gmb | siretart: Unping, never mind. | 15:52 |
| === salgado is now known as salgado-brb | ||
| \sh | bah...sometimes I hate python | 16:46 |
| === salgado-brb is now known as salgado | ||
| siretart | gmb: now I'm here | 18:03 |
| gmb | siretart: Thanks; all sorted now, not to worry. | 18:08 |
| gmb | (plugin-related question, but I found the answer elsewhere) | 18:08 |
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
| * gmb -> food | 18:14 | |
| === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
| eean | I'm trying to find the tags for https://code.launchpad.net/mysql-server | 19:25 |
| eean | are they not there or am I just not looking correctly? | 19:25 |
| eean | eg where should they be if they did exist :) | 19:25 |
| beuno | eean, have you tried: bzr tags lp:mysql-server | 19:26 |
| eean | nope | 19:26 |
| eean | I'll do so | 19:26 |
| beuno | wait | 19:26 |
| beuno | that doesn't work | 19:26 |
| beuno | you have to have the branch locally for that | 19:27 |
| beuno | hm | 19:27 |
| beuno | do you have the branch locally? | 19:27 |
| eean | no | 19:27 |
| eean | actually I don't have bzr yet | 19:27 |
| eean | installing now | 19:27 |
| eean | was wanting to see if the tag existed or not | 19:27 |
| beuno | you'll have to get the branch in order to do so | 19:27 |
| eean | (I want 5.1-rc without all the autogenerated stuff they include in the tarball) | 19:27 |
| beuno | we will show tags in Loggerhead (code view) eventually, so you can see it online | 19:28 |
| eean | ah ok | 19:28 |
| eean | was about to ask if I should make a feature request or not | 19:28 |
| beuno | sure you can | 19:28 |
| eean | um, but if its already planned? | 19:29 |
| eean | well you have launchpad in your cloak | 19:29 |
| eean | I'll take your word for it :) | 19:29 |
| beuno | haha | 19:29 |
| beuno | there's a bug for it | 19:29 |
| beuno | let me find it so you can subscribe | 19:29 |
| eean | ah | 19:30 |
| beuno | eean, https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/loggerhead/+bug/246739 | 19:30 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 246739 in loggerhead "tags are not available" [Wishlist,Confirmed] | 19:30 |
| eean | pssh I don't care aobut it personall :) | 19:30 |
| eean | suppose I shouldn't be surprised that cloning mysql is taking a long time | 19:38 |
| beuno | it's a big tree | 19:38 |
| beuno | what version of bzr are you using? | 19:39 |
| eean | long history is the problem I'd assume | 19:39 |
| eean | its not that big of a tree | 19:39 |
| beuno | yeah, very long history | 19:39 |
| eean | 1.6 | 19:39 |
| beuno | 1.6.1 has a big speed improvement for initial branching | 19:39 |
| eean | it makes the tubes faster? ;) | 19:41 |
| beuno | yes, it comes lubricated | 19:41 |
| beuno | much less friction | 19:41 |
| === dressed_in_black is now known as AndrewB | ||
| xif | Hi there. Launchpad's source hasn't been released yet, right? | 21:39 |
| LarstiQ | xif: correct. | 21:48 |
| xif | LarstiQ: but it would be released sometime in the coming year, right? | 21:49 |
| xif | it's Python, I guess? | 21:49 |
| LarstiQ | xif: that is my understanding, and yes, it's python | 21:50 |
| xif | LarstiQ: awesome. what's the advantage of Launchpad over other services, particularly Savannah? | 21:51 |
| xif | It's the only one that supports the Bazaar vcs. what else? | 21:51 |
| LarstiQ | xif: ehm, I'm not sure what you mean with "support", but that's hardly true. | 21:52 |
| LarstiQ | xif: note I don't work on Launchpad nor am I employed by Canonical. | 21:52 |
| xif | LarstiQ: you can host bzr branches on Launchpad. I don't know that you can do that on any other service. | 21:53 |
| LarstiQ | xif: anywhere you can upload files you can do that, and I'm rather sure Savannah supports bzr in at least that sense. | 21:53 |
| LarstiQ | xif: but yes, for me, Launchpad is nice with the ease of use with bzr | 21:53 |
| xif | yeah, but you can't push to it then | 21:53 |
| LarstiQ | xif: I also like the bugtracker more than sourceforget based solutions | 21:54 |
| xif | you can host read-only branches, but it's not the same. | 21:54 |
| LarstiQ | xif: eh? | 21:54 |
| xif | LarstiQ: if I can only upload files through, say, a web (browser) interface, then I can't push revisions directly to the server... | 21:54 |
| xif | (from bzr) | 21:54 |
| LarstiQ | xif: pushing works just fine if you have {a,s,}ftp/ssh/etc access | 21:54 |
| LarstiQ | xif: ah, like so. | 21:55 |
| LarstiQ | xif: right, that is _not_ what I had in mind :) | 21:55 |
| xif | :) | 21:55 |
| xif | OK, how about compared to Savannah, which is my main alternative atm? | 21:55 |
| LarstiQ | xif: I haven't used Savannah in earnest, you probably will get better answers from an lp person | 21:55 |
| LarstiQ | Rinchen: awake? | 21:56 |
| LarstiQ | xif: I can point you to some information, or I can answer specific questions I have experience with :) | 21:57 |
| LarstiQ | xif: seen https://launchpad.net/+tour ? | 21:57 |
| xif | LarstiQ: thanks, I'll take a look at that | 21:58 |
| xif | not too many specific question | 21:58 |
| xif | mostly need support for AGPL, which I guess is supported? | 21:59 |
| LarstiQ | xif: Affero GPL? yeah | 22:02 |
| LarstiQ | xif: you can play around on staging.launchpad.net if you want | 22:02 |
| xif | LarstiQ: cool, guess I will. | 22:02 |
| xif | thanks for your advice. | 22:02 |
| LarstiQ | xif: np | 22:04 |
| * LarstiQ heads to bed, ciao | 22:04 | |
| === barry is now known as barry-away | ||
| === salgado is now known as salgado-afk | ||
| LaserJock | is there any good way to "tweak" +packagebugs pages? I'd like to be able to sort for starters. For bonus points I'd like to see columns for New and Triaged | 23:56 |
| wgrant | LaserJock: Greasemonkey ftw. | 23:57 |
| LaserJock | hmm, I wonder how hard that would be | 23:57 |
| LaserJock | I guess an advanced search allows me to at least get individual bugs sorted, I'd like to get the numbers per package though :/ | 23:59 |
| mwhudson | there's a package of launchpad greasemonkey hacks somewhere isn't there? | 23:59 |
| LaserJock | yeah | 23:59 |
| wgrant | You could scrape the list of packages and use python-launchpad-bugs or launchpadlib directly to get the stats. | 23:59 |
| wgrant | mwhudson: Nothing like that, AFAIK. | 23:59 |
| wgrant | But there is a set of them around. | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!